Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 200(1): 74-83, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23255744

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of computer-aided detection (CAD) on the identification of subsolid and solid lung nodules on thin- and thick-section CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 46 chest CT examinations with ground-glass opacity (GGO) nodules, CAD marks computed using thin data were evaluated in two phases. First, four chest radiologists reviewed thin sections (reader(thin)) for nodules and subsequently CAD marks (reader(thin) + CAD(thin)). After 4 months, the same cases were reviewed on thick sections (reader(thick)) and subsequently with CAD marks (reader(thick) + CAD(thick)). Sensitivities were evaluated. Additionally, reader(thick) sensitivity with assessment of CAD marks on thin sections was estimated (reader(thick) + CAD(thin)). RESULTS: For 155 nodules (mean, 5.5 mm; range, 4.0-27.5 mm)-74 solid nodules, 22 part-solid (part-solid nodules), and 59 GGO nodules-CAD stand-alone sensitivity was 80%, 95%, and 71%, respectively, with three false-positives on average (0-12) per CT study. Reader(thin) + CAD(thin) sensitivities were higher than reader(thin) for solid nodules (82% vs 57%, p < 0.001), part-solid nodules (97% vs 81%, p = 0.0027), and GGO nodules (82% vs 69%, p < 0.001) for all readers (p < 0.001). Respective sensitivities for reader(thick), reader(thick) + CAD(thick), reader(thick) + CAD(thin) were 40%, 58% (p < 0.001), and 77% (p < 0.001) for solid nodules; 72%, 73% (p = 0.322), and 94% (p < 0.001) for part-solid nodules; and 53%, 58% (p = 0.008), and 79% (p < 0.001) for GGO nodules. For reader(thin), false-positives increased from 0.64 per case to 0.90 with CAD(thin) (p < 0.001) but not for reader(thick); false-positive rates were 1.17, 1.19, and 1.26 per case for reader(thick), reader(thick) + CAD(thick), and reader(thick) + CAD(thin), respectively. CONCLUSION: Detection of GGO nodules and solid nodules is significantly improved with CAD. When interpretation is performed on thick sections, the benefit is greater when CAD marks are reviewed on thin rather than thick sections.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/pathology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/pathology
2.
J Digit Imaging ; 25(6): 771-81, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22710985

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to assess the impact on nodule detection and efficiency using a computer-aided detection (CAD) device seamlessly integrated into a commercially available picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Forty-eight consecutive low-dose thoracic computed tomography studies were retrospectively included from an ongoing multi-institutional screening study. CAD results were sent to PACS as a separate image series for each study. Five fellowship-trained thoracic radiologists interpreted each case first on contiguous 5 mm sections, then evaluated the CAD output series (with CAD marks on corresponding axial sections). The standard of reference was based on three-reader agreement with expert adjudication. The time to interpret CAD marking was automatically recorded. A total of 134 true-positive nodules, measuring 3 mm and larger were included in our study; with 85 ≥ 4 and 50 ≥ 5 mm in size. Readers detection improved significantly in each size category when using CAD, respectively, from 44 to 57 % for ≥3 mm, 48 to 61 % for ≥4 mm, and 44 to 60 % for ≥5 mm. CAD stand-alone sensitivity was 65, 68, and 66 % for nodules ≥3, ≥4, and ≥5 mm, respectively, with CAD significantly increasing the false positives for two readers only. The average time to interpret and annotate a CAD mark was 15.1 s, after localizing it in the original image series. The integration of CAD into PACS increases reader sensitivity with minimal impact on interpretation time and supports such implementation into daily clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiology Information Systems , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Algorithms , Humans , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Systems Integration
3.
Eur Radiol ; 21(6): 1214-23, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21225269

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm on the performance of novice readers for detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) at CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included CTPA examinations of 79 patients (50 female, 52 ± 18 years). Studies were evaluated by two independent inexperienced readers who marked all vessels containing PE. After 3 months all studies were reevaluated by the same two readers, this time aided by CAD prototype. A consensus read by three expert radiologists served as the reference standard. Statistical analysis used χ(2) and McNemar testing. RESULTS: Expert consensus revealed 119 PEs in 32 studies. For PE detection, the sensitivity of CAD alone was 78%. Inexperienced readers' initial interpretations had an average per-PE sensitivity of 50%, which improved to 71% (p < 0.001) with CAD as a second reader. False positives increased from 0.18 to 0.25 per study (p = 0.03). Per-study, the readers initially detected 27/32 positive studies (84%); with CAD this number increased to 29.5 studies (92%; p = 0.125). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that CAD significantly improves the sensitivity of PE detection for inexperienced readers with a small but appreciable increase in the rate of false positives.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Angiography/methods , Professional Competence , Pulmonary Artery/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Artificial Intelligence , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , South Carolina
4.
Inf Process Med Imaging ; 20: 38-49, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17633687

ABSTRACT

Volume segmentation is a relatively slow process and, in certain circumstances, the enormous amount of prior knowledge available is underused. Model-based liver segmentation suffers from the large shape variability of this organ, and from structures of similar appearance that juxtapose the liver. The technique presented in this paper is devoted to combine a statistical analysis of the data with a reconstruction model from sparse information: only the most reliable information in the image is used, and the rest of the liver's shape is inferred from the model and the sparse observation. The resulting process is more efficient than standard segmentation since most of the workload is concentrated on the critical points, but also more robust, since the interpolated volume is consistent with the prior knowledge statistics. The experimental results on liver datasets prove the sparse information model has the same potential as PCA, if not better, to represent the shape of the liver. Furthermore, the performance assessment from measurement statistics on the liver's volume, distance between reconstructed surfaces and ground truth, and inter-observer variability demonstrates the liver is efficiently segmented using sparse information.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Models, Biological , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Artificial Intelligence , Computer Simulation , Databases, Factual , Humans , Information Storage and Retrieval/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16685852

ABSTRACT

In this paper we propose a Particle Filter-based approach for the segmentation of coronary arteries. To this end, successive planes of the vessel are modeled as unknown states of a sequential process. Such states consist of the orientation, position, shape model and appearance (in statistical terms) of the vessel that are recovered in an incremental fashion, using a sequential Bayesian filter (Particle Filter). In order to account for bifurcations and branchings, we consider a Monte Carlo sampling rule that propagates in parallel multiple hypotheses. Promising results on the segmentation of coronary arteries demonstrate the potential of the proposed approach.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Algorithms , Artificial Intelligence , Computer Simulation , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Models, Biological , Models, Statistical , Monte Carlo Method , Particle Size , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL