Health economic analysis of a cluster-randomised trial (OptiBIRTH) designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a health economic analysis of an intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean, compared with usual care. DESIGN: Economic analysis alongside the cluster-randomised OptiBIRTH trial (Optimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) through enhanced women-centred care). SETTING: Fifteen maternity units in three European countries - Germany (five), Ireland (five), and Italy (five) - with relatively low VBAC rates. POPULATION: Pregnant women with a history of one previous lower-segment caesarean section; sites were randomised (3:2) to intervention or control. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis from both societal and health-services perspectives, using a decision tree. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs and resource use per woman and infant were compared between the control and intervention group by country, from pregnancy recognition until 3 months postpartum. Based on the caesarean section rates, and maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortality, the incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated per country. RESULTS: The mean difference in costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from a societal perspective between the intervention and the control group, using a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, was: €263 (95% CI €258-268) and 0.008 QALYs (95% CI 0.008-0.009 QALYs) for Germany, €456 (95% CI €448-464) and 0.052 QALYs (95% CI 0.051-0.053 QALYs) for Ireland, and €1174 (95% CI €1170-1178) and 0.006 QALYs (95% CI 0.005-0.007 QALYs) for Italy. The incremental cost-utility ratios were €33,741/QALY for Germany, €8785/QALY for Ireland, and €214,318/QALY for Italy, with a 51% probability of being cost-effective for Germany, 92% for Ireland, and 15% for Italy. CONCLUSION: The OptiBIRTH intervention was likely to be cost-effective in Ireland and Germany. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The OptiBIRTH intervention (to increase VBAC rates) is likely to be cost-effective in Germany and Ireland.

Predictors of late initiation for prenatal care in a metropolitan region in Belgium. A cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Timely initiation of prenatal care (PNC) in the first pregnancy trimester allows prevention, identification and treatment of risk factors. However, not all women initiate PNC timely, especially women in a deprived situation. The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of late initiation, defined as initiation after 14 weeks of gestational age. Secondly the authors wanted to identify predictors for late PNC onset. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. METHODS: Pregnant women (n = 1750) were recruited in all four hospitals in Ghent (Belgium), a metropolitan region. A socio-economic deprivation ranking was measured by using a General Deprivation Index (GDI), which consists of six criteria to assess a socio-economic situation as deprived. A univariate analysis and a forward conditional multivariate logistic regression model were used analysing the association between deprivation and the likelihood to initiate PNC late. RESULTS: 1115 women were included of whom 6.1% (n = 68) initiated PNC late. A foreign maternal country of birth (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.15-3.83) and a total GDI ≥3 (OR 4.40; 95% CI 2.36-8.21) were good predictors for late initiation. More specifically, the GDI criteria education (OR 4.02; 95% CI 2.00-8.08) and unemployment (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.17-4.90) were significantly associated with higher likelihood for late initiation. CONCLUSIONS: A small group of women initiates PNC late. Vulnerable groups, at risk for late initiation can be identified through assessing their deprivation status. Priority for additional support should be given to women with low educational attainment or women in uncertain employment situations.

Technology implementation in care practices for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive decline: Perspectives of professional caregivers in Quebec and Brussels.

Objective: As worldwide population aging is accelerating, innovative technologies are being developed to support independent living among community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive decline. However, the successful implementation of these interventions is often challenging. Until now, literature on implementation issues related to the specific context of older adults with mild cognitive decline is lacking and the few studies available do not focus specifically on the perspective of professional caregivers. Yet the perspective of these caregivers is important as they can be considered a key facilitator for technology implementation among this population. Therefore, this study was the first to examine technology implementation among community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive decline from the broader perspective of professional caregivers. Methods: In this qualitative study, two focus groups consisting of a heterogeneous pool of professional caregivers were conducted: one in Quebec (Canada, n = 6) and one in Brussels (Belgium, n = 8). Braun and Clarke' method for thematic analysis, guided by a qualitative descriptive approach was applied to inductively identify themes from the data. Results: We identified factors influencing technology implementation in older adults with mild cognitive decline on three levels: an individual level (e.g., characteristics of older adults with mild cognitive decline and professional caregivers' attitude), an organizational level (e.g., lack of training among professional caregivers) and a level referring to the broader context (e.g., ethical considerations). Conclusions: This study contributes to the research gap in knowledge on the needs of professional caregivers to facilitate technology implementation among the population of older adults with cognitive decline. Future directions for research, practice, and policy are given, more specifically to improve knowledge among caregivers and on the development of decision support to retrieve safe and effective technologies that suit patient-centered care.

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in Belgium. In Flanders (Belgium), a population-based screening program with a biennial immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) in women and men aged 56-74 has been organised since 2013. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the colorectal population-based screening program in Flanders (Belgium). METHODS: A health economic model was conducted, consisting of a decision tree simulating the screening process and a Markov model, with a time horizon of 20years, simulating natural progression. Predicted mortality and incidence, total costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with and without the screening program were calculated in order to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CRC screening. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted, taking into account uncertainty of the model parameters. RESULTS: Mortality and incidence were predicted to decrease over 20years. The colorectal screening program in Flanders is found to be cost-effective with an ICER of 1681/QALY (95% CI -1317 to 6601) in males and €4,484/QALY (95% CI -3254 to 18,163). The probability of being cost-effective given a threshold of €35,000/QALY was 100% and 97.3%, respectively. The budget impact analysis showed the extra cost for the health care payer to be limited. CONCLUSION: This health economic analysis has shown that despite the possible adverse effects of screening and the extra costs for the health care payer and the patient, the population-based screening program for CRC in Flanders is cost-effective and should therefore be maintained.