What is a disease? What is the disease clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)?

INTRODUCTION: Though clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease worldwide, there is still much confusion in the literature and the many clinical guidelines as to its definition. Often the disease is associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and managed according to only symptoms. This leads to undertreatment in some patients with severe bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) with no symptoms, and overtreatment in patients with LUTS but no clinical BPH. DEFINITION OF A DISEASE: Fundamentally, a disease can be defined as an abnormal structure or function or a condition which may cause harm to the organism. DEFINITION OF CLINICAL BPH: Thus, clinical BPH can be defined as prostate adenoma/adenomata, causing a varying degree of BOO, which may eventually cause harm to the patients. With this definition, we are then able to differentiate the disease clinical BPH from the many other less common causes of LUTS, and then treat it according to its severity. DIAGNOSING CLINICAL BPH: Clinical BPH can be diagnosed with non-invasive ultrasound in the clinic, grading it according to the shape (intravesical prostatic protrusion) and size of the prostate. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Treatment can then be planned according to the disease severity using our staging system that classifies severity according to the presence or absence of significant obstruction and bothersomeness of symptoms. CONCLUSION: This would lead to better individualised and cost-effective management of the disease clinical BPH.

A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Transabdominal Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion Assessment in Determining Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Unsuccessful Trial Without Catheter.

CONTEXT: Urodynamic study (UDS) provides the most objective assessment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) but is impractical to be recommended routinely in outpatient services. Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) had been described to obstruct urinary flow by creating an anatomical ball-valve effect, but there remains a lack of pooled evidence that can objectively correlate with BOO in benign prostatic hyperplasia. OBJECTIVE: To update the current evidence on the predictive role of IPP in determining BOO and unsuccessful trial without catheter (TWOC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies that evaluated IPP in diagnosing UDS-determined BOO and TWOC. The search included the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to January 2021. An updated systemic review and meta-analysis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 18 studies with 4128 patients were examined. Eleven studies with 1478 patients examined the role of IPP in UDS-determined BOO. The pooled area under the curve (AUC) was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.86), and at a cut-off of >10 mm, the sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.61-0.78) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68-0.84), respectively. The probability-modifying plot revealed positive and negative likelihood ratios of 3.34 (95% CI: 2.56-4.36) and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.26-0.45), respectively. Seven studies with 2650 patients examined IPP in predicting unsuccessful TWOC, with a pooled AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84), with Sn of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.43-0.60) and Sp of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84) at an IPP cut-off of >10 mm. Five studies compared prostate volume (PV) and IPP and revealed a lower AUC of PV at 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67-0.75), which was an inferior parameter in diagnosing BOO (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This systemic review provided evidence that IPP is a reliable clinical parameter that correlates strongly with underlying BOO and unsuccessful TWOC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this review, we comprehensively reviewed all the literature to date on evaluating the clinical utility of intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP). We have demonstrated that IPP correlates strongly with urodynamic study (UDS)-determined bladder outlet obstruction and failure of trial without catheter (TWOC). Outpatient IPP measurement is a quick, inexpensive, and reproducible clinical parameter that can determine the severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The clinical role of IPP in predicting failure of TWOC selects patients who are best treated with aggressive surgical approaches rather than conservative medical therapies. More importantly, IPP can facilitate the discriminatory use of invasive UDS, reserved for patients with a strong suspicion of concomitant detrusor abnormalities.

Decision making in the management of benign prostatic enlargement and the role of transabdominal ultrasound.

Benign prostate enlargement (BPE) is a common disease affecting elderly men. It can present clinically in many ways including, but not exclusively, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and acute urinary retention (AUR). Therefore, in managing men with BPE, a correct diagnosis in the outpatient setting is important. Diagnosis of BPE in the clinic can be aided by simple, non-invasive, transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS). In our practice, a normal prostate is generally defined as less than 20 mL, and shows no intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) to distort the normal funneling bladder neck on TAUS, with a maximum flow rate of more than 15 mL/s. The degree of IPP can be measured non-invasively in the midsagittal plane, and can be graded accordingly. Studies have shown that the grade of IPP correlates well with the degree of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). In addition, TAUS can also be used to measure prostate volume (PV) and post-void residual urine (PVR). There is a good correlation between IPP and PV, but IPP is a better predictor for BOO. Patients with low-grade IPP, no significant PVR (<100 mL) and no bothersome symptoms (low stage) can generally be watched; whereas those with high-grade IPP, significant PVR (>100 mL) and bothersome symptoms (higher stage) will need more aggressive management. The final decision for management can then be tailored and individualized to achieve cost-effectiveness.

Intravesical prostatic protrusion predicts clinical progression of benign prostatic enlargement in patients receiving medical treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To assess intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) as a novel predictor of clinical progression in patients with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). METHODS: All patients attending the outpatient clinic at our institution who were being treated for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPE between January 1997 and December 2003 were recruited into the study. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) scores, uroflowmetry parameters, post-void residual urine volume (PVR), IPP and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were collected. IPP was classified into Grade 1, 2 or 3. Patients were stratified to different treatment options including watchful waiting, alpha blockers or 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Those who developed high post-void residual urine volume (>100 mL), acute urinary retention or a deterioration of at least 4 points in IPSS score were considered to have disease progression. Using the Grade 1 IPP group as a reference, the odds ratio for clinical progression of Grade 2 and Grade 3 IPP were calculated by using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients with a mean age of 63 years (range 50-90 years) and mean follow-up time of 32 months were available for analysis. Fifty-two patients were found to have clinical progression. Odds ratio for progression of a Grade 2 IPP was 5.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-16.2) and that of a Grade 3 IPP was 10.4 (95% CI 3.3-33.4). CONCLUSION: A higher IPP grade is associated with a higher risk of clinical progression in BPE. IPP is a useful non-invasive predictor for clinical progression in BPE.

Pathophysiology of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia.

A disease can be defined as an abnormal anatomy (pathology) and/or function (physiology) that may cause harm to the body. In clinical benign prostatic hyperplasis (BPH), the abnormal anatomy is prostate adenoma/adenomata, resulting in a varying degree of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) that may cause harm to the bladder or kidneys. Thus clinical BPH can be defined as such and be differentiated from other less common causes of male lower urinary tract symptoms. Diagnosis of the prostate adenoma/adenomata (PA) can be made by measuring the intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) and prostate volume (PV) with non-invasive transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) in the clinic. The PA can then be graded (phenotyped) according to IPP and PV. Multiple studies have shown a good correlation between IPP/PV and BPO, and therefore progression of the disease. The severity of the disease clinical BPH can be classified into stages from stage I to IV for further management. The classification is based on the effect of BPO on bladder functions, namely that of emptying, normal if post-void residual urine (PVRU) < 100 mL; and bladder storage, normal if maximum voided volume (MVV) > 100 mL. The effect of BPO on quality of life (QoL) can be assessed by the QoL index, with a score ≥3 considered bothersome. Patients with no significant obstruction and no bothersome symptoms would be stage I; those with no significant obstruction but has bothersome symptoms (QoL ≥ 3) would be stage II; those with significant obstruction (PVRU > 100 mL; or MVV < 100 mL), irrespective of symptoms would be stage III; those with complications of the disease clinical BPH such as retention of urine, bladder stones, recurrent bleeding or infections would be stage IV. After assessment, further management can then be individualised. A low grade and stage disease can generally be watched (active surveillance) while a high grade and stage disease would need more invasive management with an option for surgery. The final decision making would take into account the patient's age, co-morbidity, social economic background and his preferences/values. Proper understanding of pathophysiology of clinical BPH would lead to better selection of patients for individualised and personalised care and more cost effective management.

Can men with prostates sized 80 mL or larger be managed conservatively?

PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term clinical outcomes of men with large prostate sizes of 80 mL and greater who were managed conservatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed men with prostate sizes of 80 mL and greater from our electronic hospital database. Clinical parameters such as age, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) scoring, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), uroflowmetry variables, and transabdominal ultrasound findings were evaluated. These parameters were compared at entry to our study and at the patient's latest follow-up visit. RESULTS: For the 50 men included in our analysis, mean age was 68 years, median PSA was 9.9 ng/mL, and median prostate volume was 94 mL. Seven men underwent upfront prostate surgery, whereas the other 43 were managed conservatively, predominantly with pharmacotherapy (98%). Only serum PSA, QoL scores, and postvoid residual urine demonstrated a significant reduction at the end of a median follow-up period of 62 months. Fourteen men (33%) were considered to have progressed clinically, with 8 experiencing retention of urine and 6 having symptomatic deterioration. Of the 35 men who were still receiving conservative treatment at the end of the follow-up period, 24 men (69%) had a peak flow rate of 10 mL/s or greater, a QoL score of 3 or less, and mild to moderate (IPSS, 0-19) symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of clinical progression in men with prostate sizes of 80 mL and greater is high, there is still a role for conservative management with pharmacotherapy.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia and male lower urinary symptoms: A guide for family physicians.

Male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are increasingly seen by family physicians worldwide due to ageing demographics. A systematic way to stratify patients who can be managed in the community and those who need to be referred to the urologist is thus very useful. Good history taking, physical examination, targeted blood or urine tests, and knowing the red flags for referral are the mainstay of stratifying these patients. Case selection is always key in clinical practice and in the setting of the family physician. The best patient to manage is one above 40 years of age, symptomatic with nocturia, slower stream and sensation of incomplete voiding, has a normal prostate-specific antigen level, no palpable bladder, and no haematuria or pyuria on the labstix. The roles of α blockers, 5-α reductase inhibitors, and antibiotics in a primary care setting to manage this condition are also discussed.

Patients with small prostates and low-grade intravesical prostatic protrusion - A urodynamic evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Despite high-grade intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) being closely related to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), up to 21% of patients with low IPP remain obstructed. This study evaluates the characteristics and urodynamic findings of men with small prostates and low IPP. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen men aged >50 years old with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were assessed with symptoms, uroflowmetry, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), transabdominal ultrasound measurement of prostate volume (PV), IPP and post-void residual urine (PVRU). All patients underwent pressure flow studies. Patients with PV < 30 mL and IPP ≤ 10 mm were examined for parameters correlating with BOO or impaired detrusor contractility. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients had PV < 30 mL and IPP <10 mm. Nine patients (25.0%) had urodynamic BOO, all with normal bladder contractility. Fourteen patients (38.9%) had poor detrusor contractility and all had no BOO. PV, PVRU and IPP were significantly associated with BOO, with IPP showing greatest positive correlation. Both Qmax and IPP were significantly associated with detrusor contractility. At 5-year follow-up, most patients responded to medical therapy. Only three out of nine patients (33.3%) with BOO eventually underwent surgery, and all had a high bladder neck seen on the resectoscope. Only one patient (7.1%) with poor detrusor contractility eventually required surgery after repeat pressure flow study revealed BOO. CONCLUSION: In men with small prostates and low IPP, the presence of BOO is associated with higher PV, PVRU and IPP, and most respond well to medical management. BOO can possibly be explained by elevation of the bladder neck by a small subcervical adenoma.

Early outcome of transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent prostate adenoma is a long-term complication following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate (TUERP) is more appealing, since the nodular adenoma can be completely removed through endoscopy. TUERP is also hypothesised to result in a lower frequency of recurrent adenoma. This study aimed to compare the early outcomes of TUERP and TURP, and assess the feasibility and safety of TUERP. METHODS: We compared the outcome of 81 patients who underwent TUERP with that of 85 patients who underwent TURP. International prostate symptom score, quality of life score, prostate volume, degree of intravesical prostatic protrusion, maximum flow rate, post-void residual volume and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Complications (e.g. transfusion rate, incontinence, infection and urethral stricture) were analysed. RESULTS: Operative time was significantly longer in the TUERP group compared to the TURP group (85.3 minutes vs. 51.6 minutes). After TUERP, the maximum flow rate was significantly higher (21.1 mL/s vs. 17.1 mL/s) and PSA level was significantly lower (1.2 ng/mL vs. 1.9 ng/mL) than after TURP. The rates of infection, transfusion and urethral stricture were similar for both groups, but the TUERP group had a higher rate of temporary incontinence (13.6% vs. 4.7%). CONCLUSION: The lower PSA level and better maximum flow rate achieved following TUERP suggest that prostate adenoma removal was more complete with TUERP. Long-term follow-up is required to establish whether TUERP results in fewer resections for recurrent adenoma.

Can intravesical prostatic protrusion predict bladder outlet obstruction even in men with good flow?

OBJECTIVE: Men with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) with good urinary flow may still have bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) has been shown to be able to predict BOO. We aim to investigate the use of IPP to predict BOO in men with good urinary flow. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen consecutive men (>50 years old) presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of BPH were recruited in 2001 and 2002. They were evaluated with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), uroflowmetry and transabdominal ultrasound measurement of IPP and prostate volume (PV). Pressure-flow urodynamic studies were performed on all men and BOO was defined by BOO index > 40. Men with Qmax ≥ 12.0 mL/s were considered to have good flow. RESULTS: Among the 114 men, 61 patients had good urinary flow. Their median age, PV and Qmax were 66 years, 32.9 mm3 and 14.5 mL/s respectively. 14/61 (23.0%) patients had BOO and their distribution of IPP were as follows: Grade 1 - 0/20 (0%) obstructed, Grade 2 - 6/22 (27.3%) and Grade 3 - 8/19 (42.1%). Sensitivity of Grade 2/3 IPP for BOO was 100% while specificity of Grade 3 IPP was 76.6%. The area-under-curve (AUC) for IPP was greater than that for PV (0.757 vs. 0.696). CONCLUSION: Even in men with good flow, high grades of IPP were more likely to have BOO and hence, may be a useful adjunct to predict BOO.

Relationships between Prostatic Volume and Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion on Transabdominal Ultrasound and Benign Prostatic Obstruction in Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to determine the relationships between prostatic volume (PV) and intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 408 males (aged 50 years and above) who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were recruited. All had International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) index, uroflowmetry (Qmax) and postvoid residual urine (PVR) measured by transabdominal ultrasonography (TAUS). The PV and the degree of IPP were also measured by TAUS in the transverse and sagittal planes respectively. The PV is classified as Grade a, (20 ml or less), Grade b, (more than 20 ml to 40 ml) and Grade c, (more than 40 ml), while the IPP is graded as Grade 1 (5 mm or less), Grade 2 (more than 5 mm to 10 mm) and Grade 3 (more than 10 mm). RESULTS: There was a fair positive correlation between the PV and IPP (Spearman, r(s) = 0.62, P <0.001) with important clinical exceptions. There was negative correlation between the PV and Qmax (rs = -0.20, P = 0.022), IPP and Qmax (r(s) = -0.30, P <0.001). PV and IPP were good predictors of BPO. However, IPP was slightly better (r(s) of -0.30 vs -0.20) than PV. CONCLUSION: PV is related to IPP with important clinical exceptions. IPP is a better predictor of BPO than PV.

Diagnosis of prostate adenoma and the relationship between the site of prostate adenoma and bladder outlet obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of using intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) as a parameter for the diagnosis of prostate adenoma (PA), as well as to determine the relationship between the site of PA and bladder outlet obstruction. IPP was determined with the use of transabdominal ultrasonography (TAUS). METHODS: A total of 77 consecutive adult men aged 30-85 years with haematuria or undergoing checkup for bladder tumour were enrolled. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and the results of uroflowmetry, TAUS and cystourethroscopy were assessed. All cases of IPP were classified into grades 0 (no IPP), 1 (1-5 mm), 2 (6-10 mm) or 3 (> 10 mm). PA diagnosis was confirmed using flexible cystourethroscopy. The sites of PA were classified as U0 (no adenoma), U1 (lateral lobes), U2 (middle lobe) or U3 (lateral and middle lobes). RESULTS: Of the 77 patients, 11 (14.3%) had no IPP. PA was confirmed using cystourethroscopy for all patients with IPP and for 7 of the 11 patients without IPP. Of the 37 patients with prostate volume < 20 g, 29 (78.4%) had IPP. Sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values for diagnosing PA using only IPP were 90.4%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 36.4%, respectively. Higher sensitivity (95.9%) and negative predictive value (50.0%) were obtained when PA was used together with peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) < 20.0 mL/s. The mean Qmax of patients classified as U1 (n = 39) was 16.0 mL/s, while the mean Qmax in those classified as U2 (n = 12) and U3 (n = 22) was 11.9 mL/s and 8.9 mL/s, respectively. CONCLUSION: All patients with IPP had PA, and PA in the middle lobe was more obstructive than those in lateral lobes. Patients without IPP may still have PA.

6th College of Surgeons lecture: the philosophy of balance: the art of healing.

With the rise of high tech medicine, and emphasis on the scientific aspects of medicine, there is danger that we may lose the balanced approach to healing, and lose the benefit of the traditional medical wisdom and emotional support, to improve the care of our patients. Allopathic or the mainstream medicine (Western medicine) is not the only way. With over-emphasis on the anatomy and pathology, the biochemistry and the molecular biology, we tend to treat the disease, and somehow neglect the patient. That is one of the reasons why many patients still turn to alternative medicine to relieve their ailments.We need to remember that the patient is a person, consisting of not just the body, but also the mind and the spirit. We therefore need to treat not just the body but also the mind and to heal the spirit. That would be the balanced approach in the management of patients. To treat our patients optimally, we need to understand the natural history of diseases, and not make our treatment worse than the disease itself, carefully balancing the risks and benefits in our treatment for that individual patient. The mind has more influence over the body in health and diseases than we used to think. We need to be optimistic and give patients hope through counseling, and help to minimise the harmful effects of stress and anxiety on the body. It is as important to improve the immunity of the body to diseases (infection as well as cancer) as to get rid of every bacteria or cancer cell. It may not be possible to get rid of all the cancer cells in the body, but it may be possible to keep them under control. The most important factor in improving the immunity is for the patient to have a relaxed mind. He would need emotional support from family and friends. Exercise, proper diet with plenty of fresh fruits and vegetables would help to improve immunity and speed up the healing process. The art of healing is the art of balancing the Science and the Art of Medicine, treating the disease and the patient as a whole, incorporating the best in allopathic (Western) medicine as well as complementary medical practices. With this, we hope to provide the best care to our patients.