Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 48(1): 4-12, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24180688

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate if preoperative left ventricular (LV) function assessed by exercise echocardiography could predict late postoperative LV function in aortic regurgitation (AR) patients and to evaluate how LV long-axis function is affected late after aortic valve surgery. DESIGN: A total of 21 male chronic AR patients, aged 49 ( 12 ) years, accepted for surgery were examined preoperatively, 6 months-, and 4 years postoperatively, at rest and during exercise. Besides conventional echocardiographic parameters, the atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD) by M-mode and peak systolic velocity (s') in the basal LV by color tissue Doppler were measured. RESULTS: Preoperatively EF rest and EF exercise, were 55( 7 )% and 54( 9 )%, respectively, and ∆EF 0( 8 )%. LV dimensions and volumes indexed to BSA had decreased at the 6-month follow-up and were stable at late follow-up. s'rest, s'exercise, AVPD rest, and AVPD exercise were unchanged at both the postoperative examinations (all P ≥ 0.05). Preoperative EF exercise and AVPD exercise showed inverse correlation to late postoperative indexed LV enddiastolic volume (r = -0.68, p < 0.004 and r = -0.86, P < 0.001) and indexed LV endsystolic volume (r = -0.68, P = 0.004 and r = -0.81, P < 0.001), while there was no correlation to preoperative EF rest and AVPD rest (all r < 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative exercise echocardiography can detect AR patients with suboptimal LV remodeling late postoperatively.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Echocardiography, Doppler, Color , Echocardiography, Stress , Exercise Test , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Function, Left , Ventricular Remodeling , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/complications , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Chronic Disease , Hemodynamics , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 82(6): 1004-14, 2013 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23554145

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate longitudinal left and right ventricular function (LVF and RVF) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and LVF and RVF after TAVI by the transfemoral (TF) or transapical (TA) approach. BACKGROUND: Knowledge about differences in recovery of LVF and RVF after TAVI and SAVR is scarce. METHODS: Sixty patients (age 81 ± 7 years, logistic EuroSCORE 16 ± 10%), undergoing TAVI (TF: n = 35 and TA: n = 25), were examined by echocardiography including atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD) and peak systolic velocities (PSV) by tissue Doppler at basal RV free wall, LV lateral wall and septum preprocedurally, 7 weeks and 6 months postprocedurally. Twenty-seven SAVR patients were matched to 27 TAVI patients by age, gender and LVF. RESULTS: Early postintervention, TAVI patients had improved longitudinal LVF. However, when analyzed separately, only TF, but not TA patients, had improved LV lateral and septal AVPD and PSV (all P ≤ 0.01). All TAVI patients, as well as the TF and TA group had unchanged longitudinal LVF between the early and late follow-ups (all P > 0.05). The SAVR group had higher septal LVF than the matched TAVI group preprocedurally, while postoperatively this difference was diminished. Longitudinal RVF was better in the TF group than in the TA group pre- and postprocedurally. Although the SAVR group had superior longitudinal RVF preoperatively, this was inferior to TAVI postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Postprocedural longitudinal LVF and RVF in patients undergoing TF-TAVI, TA-TAVI, or SAVR differ considerably. Preservation of longitudinal RVF after TAVI might influence the selection of aortic valve intervention in the future.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Echocardiography, Doppler , Femoral Artery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Ventricular Function, Left , Ventricular Function, Right , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Stroke Volume , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur J Echocardiogr ; 12(8): 603-11, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21705353

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Knowledge of longitudinal left and right ventricular (LV and RV) function after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is scarce. We hypothesized that the longitudinal systolic biventricular function in aortic stenosis (AS) patients is affected differently by TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-three AS patients (all-TAVI group, age 81 ± 9 years, 18 female), with EuroSCORE 18 ± 9%, were accepted for TAVI. Seventeen of these patients were matched (by gender, age, and LV function) to 17 patients undergoing SAVR. Conventional echocardiographic parameters, systolic atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD) at standard sites and peak systolic velocity (PSV) by pulsed tissue Doppler at basal RV free wall, LV lateral wall, and septum were studied before and 8 weeks after the procedure. Procedural success was 100%, and 30-day mortality 9%. In all TAVI patients, AVPD(lateral), PSV(lateral), AVPD(septal), and PSV(septal) increased (P< 0.001, 0.003, 0.006 and 0.002). When studying the matched patients postoperatively, both the SAVR and TAVI patients had increased PSV(lateral) and AVPD(lateral) (SAVR: P=0.03 and P=0.04, TAVI: P=0.04 and P=0.01). The PSV(RV) increased in the all-TAVI group (P=0.007), while the AVPD(RV) was unchanged. SAVR patients had decreased AVPD(RV) (P=0.001) and PSV(RV) (P=0.004), while the matched TAVI patients had unchanged RV function parameters. CONCLUSION: An improvement in regional longitudinal LV function in the septal and lateral wall could be seen after TAVI. Among the matched patients, both the TAVI and SAVR patients seemed to improve LV function in the lateral wall. RV systolic function increased in TAVI patients, but was impaired in the matched SAVR group at the 8-week follow-up.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/pathology , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Ventricular Function, Right/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/pathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Diastole , Echocardiography, Doppler/instrumentation , Echocardiography, Doppler/methods , Female , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL