ABSTRACT
Drug-resistant (DR)-TB is the major challenge confronting the global TB control programme, necessitating treatment with second-line anti-TB drugs, often with limited therapeutic efficacy. This scenario has resulted in the inclusion of Group 5 antibiotics in various therapeutic regimens, two of which promise to impact significantly on the outcome of the therapy of DR-TB. These are the 're-purposed' riminophenazine, clofazimine, and the recently approved diarylquinoline, bedaquiline. Although they differ structurally, both of these lipophilic agents possess cationic amphiphilic properties that enable them to target and inactivate essential ion transporters in the outer membrane of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In the case of bedaquiline, the primary target is the key respiratory chain enzyme F1/F0-ATPase, whereas clofazimine is less selective, apparently inhibiting several targets, which may underpin the extremely low level of resistance to this agent. This review is focused on similarities and differences between clofazimine and bedaquiline, specifically in respect of molecular mechanisms of antimycobacterial action, targeting of quiescent and metabolically active organisms, therapeutic efficacy in the clinical setting of DR-TB, resistance mechanisms, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and adverse events.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clofazimine/pharmacology , Clofazimine/therapeutic use , Diarylquinolines/pharmacology , Diarylquinolines/therapeutic use , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Biological Transport/drug effects , Clofazimine/chemistry , Diarylquinolines/chemistry , Humans , Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Surface-Active Agents/chemistry , Surface-Active Agents/pharmacology , Surface-Active Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis/drug therapyABSTRACT
Background: Household contact investigations are effective for finding tuberculosis (TB) cases but are hindered by low referral uptake for clinic-based evaluation and testing. We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of in-home testing of household contacts (HHC) using the GeneXpert Edge platform. Methods: We conducted a 2-arm, randomized study in Eastern Cape, South Africa. HHCs were verbally assessed using the World Health Organization-recommended 4-symptom screen. Households with ≥1 eligible symptomatic contact were randomized. Intervention households received in-home GeneXpert MTB/RIF molecular testing. GeneXpert-positive HHCs were referred for clinic-based treatment. Standard-of-care households were referred for clinic-based sputum collection and testing. We defined acceptability as agreeing to in-home testing and feasibility as generation of valid Xpert MTB/RIF results. The proportion and timeliness of test results received was compared between groups. Results: Eighty-four households were randomized (n = 42 per arm). Of 100 eligible HHCs identified, 98/100 (98%) provided consent. Of 51 HHCs allocated to the intervention arm, all accepted in-home testing; of those, 24/51 (47%) were sputum productive and 23/24 (96%) received their test results. Of 47 HCCs allocated to standard-of-care, 7 (15%) presented for clinic-based TB evaluation, 6/47 (13%) were tested, and 4/6 (67%) returned for their results. The median (interquartile range) number of days from screening to receiving test results was 0 (0) and 16.5 (11-15) in the intervention and standard-of-care arms, respectively. Conclusions: In-home testing for TB was acceptable, feasible, and increased HHCs with a molecular test result. In-home testing mitigates a major limitation of household contact investigations (dependency on clinic-based referral), revealing new strategies for enhancing early case detection.
ABSTRACT
Patients who complete a standard course of anti-tuberculous treatment (ATT) for pulmonary tuberculosis and are declared cured according to the current standard of care commonly have residual metabolic activity (RMA) in their lungs on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PER/CT) imaging. RMA seen in this setting has been shown to be associated with relapse of tuberculosis. The routine clinical use of FDG PET/CT imaging for treatment response assessment in tuberculosis is hindered by cost and availability. CT is a more readily available imaging modality. We sought to determine the association between CT features suggestive of active tuberculosis and RMA on FDG PET/CT obtained in patients who completed a standard course of ATT for pulmonary tuberculosis. We prospectively recruited patients who completed a standard course of ATT and declared cured based on negative sputum culture. All patients had FDG PET/CT within 2 weeks of completing ATT. We determined the presence of RMA on FDG PET images. Among the various lung changes seen on CT, we considered the presence of lung nodule, consolidation, micronodules in tree-in-bud pattern, FDG-avid chest nodes, and pleural effusion as suggestive of active tuberculosis. We determine the association between the presence of RMA on FDG PET and the CT features of active tuberculosis. We include 75 patients with a mean age of 36.09 ± 10.49 years. Forty-one patients (54.67%) had RMA on their FDG PET/CT while 34 patients (45.33%) achieved complete metabolic response to ATT. There was a significant association between four of the five CT features of active disease, p < 0.05 in all cases. Pleural effusion (seen in two patients) was the only CT feature of active disease without a significant association with the presence of RMA. This suggests that CT may be used in lieu of FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessment of pulmonary tuberculosis.
ABSTRACT
Microbial culture is the gold standard for determining the effectiveness of tuberculosis treatment. End-of-treatment (EOT) 18F-FDG PET/CT findings are variable among patients with negative microbial culture results after completing a standard regimen of antituberculous treatment (ATT), with some patients having a complete metabolic response to treatment whereas others have residual metabolic activity (RMA). We herein determine the impact of findings on EOT 18F-FDG PET/CT on tuberculosis relapse in patients treated with a standard regimen of ATT for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis (DS-PTB). Methods: Patients who completed a standard regimen of ATT for DS-PTB and were declared cured based on a negative clinical and bacteriologic examination were prospectively recruited to undergo EOT 18F-FDG PET/CT. Images were assessed for the presence of RMA. Patients were subsequently followed up for 6 mo looking for symptoms of tuberculosis relapse. When new symptoms developed, relapse was confirmed with bacteriologic testing. Repeat 18F-FDG PET/CT was done in patients who relapsed. Results: Fifty-three patients were included (mean age, 37.81 ± 11.29 y), with 62% being male and 75% HIV-infected. RMA was demonstrated in 33 patients (RMA group), whereas 20 patients had a complete metabolic response to ATT (non-RMA group). There was a higher prevalence of lung cavitation in the RMA group (P = 0.035). The groups did not significantly differ in age, sex, presence of HIV infection, body mass index, or hemoglobin level (P > 0.05). On follow-up, no patients in the non-RMA group developed tuberculosis relapse. Three patients in the RMA group developed relapse. All patients who developed tuberculosis relapse had bilateral disease with lung cavitation. Conclusion: A negative EOT 18F-FDG PET/CT result is protective against tuberculosis relapse. Nine percent of patients with RMA after ATT may experience tuberculosis relapse within 6 mo of completing ATT. Bilateral disease with lung cavitation is prevalent among patients with tuberculosis relapse.
Subject(s)
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnostic imaging , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Prognosis , RecurrenceABSTRACT
The NIH-funded center for autophagy research named Autophagy, Inflammation, and Metabolism (AIM) Center of Biomedical Research Excellence, located at the University of New Mexico Health Science Center is now completing its second year as a working center with a mission to promote autophagy research locally, nationally, and internationally. The center has thus far supported a cadre of 6 junior faculty (mentored PIs; mPIs) at a near-R01 level of funding. Two mPIs have graduated by obtaining their independent R01 funding and 3 of the remaining 4 have won significant funding from NIH in the form of R21 and R56 awards. The first year and a half of setting up the center has been punctuated by completion of renovations and acquisition and upgrades for equipment supporting autophagy, inflammation and metabolism studies. The scientific cores usage, and the growth of new studies is promoted through pilot grants and several types of enablement initiatives. The intent to cultivate AIM as a scholarly hub for autophagy and related studies is manifested in its Vibrant Campus Initiative, and the Tuesday AIM Seminar series, as well as by hosting a major scientific event, the 2019 AIM symposium, with nearly one third of the faculty from the International Council of Affiliate Members being present and leading sessions, giving talks, and conducting workshop activities. These and other events are often videostreamed for a worldwide scientific audience, and information about events at AIM and elsewhere are disseminated on Twitter and can be followed on the AIM web site. AIM intends to invigorate research on overlapping areas between autophagy, inflammation and metabolism with a number of new initiatives to promote metabolomic research. With the turnover of mPIs as they obtain their independent funding, new junior faculty are recruited and appointed as mPIs. All these activities are in keeping with AIM's intention to enable the next generation of autophagy researchers and help anchor, disseminate, and convey the depth and excitement of the autophagy field.
Subject(s)
Autophagy/physiology , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Inflammation , Metabolism/physiology , Societies, Scientific , Biomedical Research/economics , Biomedical Research/trends , Faculty, Medical/economics , Faculty, Medical/education , Financing, Government , Financing, Organized/economics , History, 21st Century , Humans , Inflammation/etiology , Inflammation/pathology , Mentors , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economics , New Mexico , Research Personnel/economics , Research Personnel/education , Societies, Scientific/economics , Societies, Scientific/organization & administration , Societies, Scientific/standards , Societies, Scientific/trends , United StatesABSTRACT
Recently, NIH has funded a center for autophagy research named the Autophagy, Inflammation, and Metabolism (AIM) Center of Biomedical Research Excellence, located at the University of New Mexico Health Science Center (UNM HSC), with aspirations to promote autophagy research locally, nationally, and internationally. The center has 3 major missions: (i) to support junior faculty in their endeavors to develop investigations in this area and obtain independent funding; (ii) to develop and provide technological platforms to advance autophagy research with emphasis on cellular approaches for high quality reproducible research; and (iii) to foster international collaborations through the formation of an International Council of Affiliate Members and through hosting national and international workshops and symposia. Scientifically, the AIM center is focused on autophagy and its intersections with other processes, with emphasis on both fundamental discoveries and applied translational research.
Subject(s)
Autophagy , Biomedical Research , Inflammation/pathology , International Cooperation , Research Personnel , Congresses as Topic , Information DisseminationABSTRACT
Mycobacteria form lipid-rich biofilms that restrict the efficacy of antimicrobial chemotherapy, possibly necessitating the use of lipophilic antibiotics. In the current study, the activity of one such agent, clofazimine, against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis planktonic cells and biofilms was investigated. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of clofazimine were determined for planktonic cultures, whilst minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were determined for planktonic, biofilm-producing and biofilm-encased organisms using standard bacteriological procedures. The effects of clofazimine on biofilm formation and the stability of pre-formed biofilm were measured using a crystal violet-based spectrophotometric procedure. In the case of M. smegmatis, clofazimine was found to be active against planktonic phase (MICs and MBCs of 2.5mg/L and >20mg/L, respectively) and biofilm-producing organisms (MBC of 2.5mg/L); clofazimine demonstrated greater activity against M. tuberculosis, corresponding values of 0.06, 5 and 0.3mg/L. Although clofazimine inhibited biofilm production both by M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis (P<0.05 at ≥0.07mg/L and ≥0.3mg/L, respectively) and appeared to reduce the pre-formed M. tuberculosis biofilm, addition of antimicrobial agent to pre-existing biofilm matrices failed to kill biofilm-encased organisms. In conclusion, clofazimine is more effective against M. tuberculosis than against M. smegmatis, exhibiting bactericidal activity both for actively growing and slowly replicating bacilli but not for non-replicating organisms of both species.
ABSTRACT
Short-course chemotherapy is highly efficacious in treating tuberculosis (TB). However, the length (>/=6 months) and complexity (three or four different drugs) of the treatment makes adherence difficult. Erratic treatment not only fails to cure patients but also creates chronically contagious cases, who may excrete drug-resistant TB bacteria. The Directly Observed Treatment Short-course (DOTS) strategy recommended by WHO provides a comprehensive organisational and infrastructural framework for the rational use of diagnosis, drug supply, as well as case and programme management services, in TB control. WHO and other organisations recommend fixed-dose combination formulations (FDCs) as a further step to facilitate the optimal drug treatment of TB. Using FDCs in TB control will simplify the doctor's prescription and patient's drug intake, as well as the drug supply management of the programme. By preventing monotherapy and facilitating the ingestion of adequate doses of the constituent anti-TB drugs, FDCs are expected to help prevent the emergence of drug resistance. This article presents the international recommendations for the use of FDCs in TB programmes. The fundamental issue is to obtain drug supplies of good quality. A laboratory network for quality testing, including bioavailability testing of FDCs exists, and the recently established Global TB Drug Facility (GDF) supplies quality TB drugs, including 4-drug FDCs, to countries requesting assistance. This articles deals with the requirements for a successful transition to FDC-based treatment. It emphasises the need for appropriately revised programme documentation (programme manual, training modules, treatment guidelines and forms), training of staff at all levels, carefully calculated drug needs, and a plan for the exhaustion of existing stocks of loose tablets and the phasing-in of FDCs at all levels of the programme at the same time. Loose drugs for individualised treatment of patients with adverse effects should be kept at district or central health institutions.