Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Retina ; 36(9): 1751-7, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26977742

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether classical indocyanine green angiography lesions in patients with birdshot chorioretinitis can be used to monitor disease activity. METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed on 26 eyes in 26 consecutive patients with birdshot chorioretinitis who had at least one indocyanine green angiography performed during disease activity and another during disease quiescence. Using Photoshop, the mean number, area, and area per spot on indocyanine green angiography were compared between disease activity and quiescence using a paired ratio test. RESULTS: The mean total lesion number, area, and area per spot during disease activity were 75.27 spots, 24,525 pixels, and 364 pixels/spots, respectively. The mean total lesion number, area, and area per spot size during disease quiescence were 28.35 spots (P < 0.01), 7,411 pixels (P < 0.01), and 279 pixels/spot (P = 0.12), respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean total area and number of lesions between the time of disease activity and disease quiescence (P < 0.01). Our results suggest that indocyanine green angiography has a role not only in diagnosis but also in monitoring treatment effectiveness; lesions can be reversible with treatment and their reappearance may be an indicator of disease relapse.


Subject(s)
Chorioretinitis/diagnosis , Coloring Agents/administration & dosage , Fluorescein Angiography , Indocyanine Green/administration & dosage , Adult , Birdshot Chorioretinopathy , Chorioretinitis/drug therapy , Chorioretinitis/physiopathology , Electroretinography , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Retina/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Visual Fields/physiology
2.
F1000Prime Rep ; 6: 41, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24991418

ABSTRACT

Pediatric uveitis is a topic of special interest not only because of the unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges but also because of the lifetime burden of vision loss if the problem is not adequately treated, as well as the economic and psychological toll on the family. Often, uveitis in children is discovered as part of a routine eye exam; this silent, insidious inflammation can be difficult to treat and can lead to further complications if not handled skillfully. Corticosteroids have long been the mainstay of therapy; however, the significant associated side effects mandate a corticosteroid-sparing therapeutic regimen in pursuit of remission. In this review, we cover the therapeutic options for pediatric uveitis, specifically focusing on the most common non-infectious varieties, juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis and pars planitis.

3.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 14(11): 1651-66, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25226284

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of adult, noninfectious uveitis remains a major challenge for ophthalmologists around the world, especially in regard to recalcitrant cases. It is reported to comprise approximately 10% of preventable blindness in the USA. The cause of uveitis can be idiopathic or associated with infectious and systemic disorders. The era of biologic medical therapies provides new options for patients with otherwise treatment-resistant inflammatory eye disease. AREAS COVERED: This two-part review gives a comprehensive overview of the existing medical treatment options for patients with adult, noninfectious uveitis, as well as important advances for the treatment ocular inflammation. Part I covers classic immunomodulation and latest information on corticosteroid therapy. In part II, emerging therapies are discussed, including biologic response modifiers, experimental treatments and ongoing clinical studies for uveitis. EXPERT OPINION: The hazard of chronic corticosteroid use in the treatment of adult, noninfectious uveitis is well documented. Corticosteroid-sparing therapies, which offer a very favorable risk-benefit profile when administered properly, should be substituted. Although nothing is currently approved for on-label use in this indication, many therapies, through either translation or novel basic science research, have the potential to fill the currently exposed gaps.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Biological Products/administration & dosage , Uveitis/drug therapy , Administration, Ophthalmic , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Biological Products/immunology , Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Communicable Diseases/immunology , Humans , Immunomodulation/drug effects , Immunomodulation/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/immunology , Treatment Outcome , Uveitis/diagnosis , Uveitis/immunology
4.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 15(15): 2141-54, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25226529

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of adult, noninfectious uveitis remains a challenge for ophthalmologists around the world. The disease accounts for almost 10% of preventable blindness in the US and can be idiopathic or associated with infectious and systemic disorders. Strong evidence is still emerging to indicate that pharmacologic strategies presently used in rheumatologic or autoimmune disease may be translated to the treatment of intraocular inflammation. Corticosteroid monotherapy is widely regarded as wholly inappropriate, due to the unfavorable risk/benefit profile and poor long-term outcomes. Treatment plans have shifted away from low-dose, chronic corticosteroid therapy for maintenance, towards medium- to high-dose therapy for acute inflammation, followed immediately by initiation of immunomodulatory therapy. These therapies follow the 'stepladder approach', whereby least to more aggressive therapies are trialed to induce remission of inflammation, eventually without corticosteroids of any form (topical, local and systemic). AREAS COVERED: This two-part review gives a comprehensive overview of the existing medical treatment options for patients with adult, noninfectious uveitis, as well as important advances for the treatment of ocular inflammation. Part I covers classic immunomodulation and latest information on corticosteroid therapy. EXPERT OPINION: The hazard of chronic corticosteroid use for the treatment of adult, noninfectious uveitis is well-documented. Corticosteroid-sparing therapies, which offer a very favorable risk-benefit profile when administered properly, should be substituted.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Uveitis/drug therapy , Adult , Alkylating Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antimetabolites/therapeutic use , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL