The RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitin ligase cascade facilitates class switch recombination.

An effective immune response requires B cells to produce several classes of antibodies through the process of class switch recombination (CSR). Activation-induced cytidine deaminase initiates CSR by deaminating deoxycytidines at switch regions within the Ig locus. This activity leads to double-stranded DNA break formation at the donor and recipient switch regions that are subsequently synapsed and ligated in a 53BP1-dependent process that remains poorly understood. The DNA damage response E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168 were recently shown to facilitate recruitment of 53BP1 to sites of DNA damage. Here we show that the ubiquitination pathway mediated by RNF8 and RNF168 plays an integral part in CSR. Using the CH12F3-2 mouse B cell line that undergoes CSR to IgA at high rates, we demonstrate that knockdown of RNF8, RNF168, and 53BP1 leads to a significant decrease in CSR. We also show that 53BP1-deficient CH12F3-2 cells are protected from apoptosis mediated by the MDM2 inhibitor Nutlin-3. In contrast, deficiency in either E3 ubiquitin ligase does not protect cells from Nutlin-3-mediated apoptosis, indicating that RNF8 and RNF168 do not regulate all functions of 53BP1.

Lack of MSH2 involvement differentiates V(D)J recombination from other non-homologous end joining events.

V(D)J recombination and class switch recombination are the two DNA rearrangement events used to diversify the mouse and human antibody repertoires. While their double strand breaks (DSBs) are initiated by different mechanisms, both processes use non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in the repair phase. DNA mismatch repair elements (MSH2/MSH6) have been implicated in the repair of class switch junctions as well as other DNA DSBs that proceed through NHEJ. MSH2 has also been implicated in the regulation of factors such as ATM and the MRN (Mre11, Rad50, Nbs1) complex, which are involved in V(D)J recombination. These findings led us to examine the role of MSH2 in V(D)J repair. Using MSH2-/- and MSH2+/+ mice and cell lines, we show here that all pathways involving MSH2 are dispensable for the generation of an intact pre-immune repertoire by V(D)J recombination. In contrast to switch junctions and other DSBs, the usage of terminal homology in V(D)J junctions is not influenced by MSH2. Thus, whether the repair complex for V(D)J recombination is of a canonical NHEJ type or a separate microhomology-mediated-end joining (MMEJ) type, it does not involve MSH2. This highlights a distinction between the repair of V(D)J recombination and other NHEJ reactions.

Antibody diversification: mutational mechanisms and oncogenesis.

Antibody diversification processes play a major role in protecting humans from pathogens. Somatic hypermutation and gene conversion increase the affinity of pathogen-specific antibodies by changing the sequence within antibody variable genes, while the class switch recombination (CSR) process changes the antibody's effector function by replacing the constant region of the antibody gene with a different constant region. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates each of these three processes by deaminating cytidines within antibody genes, while a host of other DNA transacting factors are involved in either creating new mutations or repairing DNA lesions introduced during these processes. This review will discuss the main features of antibody diversification and their role in lymphomagenesis, highlight outstanding issues and questions that remain in the field, and discuss our contributions to this field.

Methylation protects cytidines from AID-mediated deamination.

Somatic hypermutation (SHM), class switch recombination (CSR), and gene conversion of immunoglobulin genes require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID). AID initiates these events by deaminating cytidines within antibody variable and switch regions. The mechanism that restricts mutation to antibody genes is not known. Although genes other than antibody genes have been found to mutate, not all highly transcribed genes mutate. Thus, somatic hypermutation does not target all genes and suggests a mechanism that either recruits AID to genes for mutation, and/or one that protects genes from promiscuous AID activity. Recent evidence suggests that AID deaminates methyl cytidines inefficiently. Methylation of cytidines could thus represent a means to protect the genome from potentially harmful AID activity that occurs outside of the immunoglobulin loci. To test this premise, we examined whether AID could deaminate methylated-CpG motifs in different sequence contexts. In agreement with a report that suggests that AID has processive-like properties in vitro, we found that AID could completely deaminate single-stranded DNA tracks in plasmid substrates that were greater than 300 nucleotides in length. In addition, methylated-CpG motifs, but not their unmethylated counterparts, were protected from AID-mediated deamination. However, methylation did not protect cytidines that neighbored CpG motifs indicating that methylation per se does not provide a more global safeguard against AID-mediated activity. These data also suggest that AID, and possibly other related cytidine deaminases, might represent a more rapid alternative to bisulfite sequencing for identifying methylated-CpG motifs.

The concerted action of Msh2 and UNG stimulates somatic hypermutation at A . T base pairs.

Mismatch repair plays an essential role in reducing the cellular mutation load. Paradoxically, proteins in this pathway produce A . T mutations during the somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes. Although recent evidence implicates the translesional DNA polymerase eta in producing these mutations, it is unknown how this or other translesional polymerases are recruited to immunoglobulin genes, since these enzymes are not normally utilized in conventional mismatch repair. In this report, we demonstrate that A . T mutations were closely associated with transversion mutations at a deoxycytidine. Furthermore, deficiency in uracil-N-glycolase (UNG) or mismatch repair reduced this association. These data reveal a previously unknown interaction between the base excision and mismatch repair pathways and indicate that an abasic site generated by UNG within the mismatch repair tract recruits an error-prone polymerase, which then introduces A . T mutations. Our analysis further indicates that repair tracts typically are approximately 200 nucleotides long and that polymerase eta makes approximately 1 error per 300 T nucleotides. The concerted action of Msh2 and UNG in stimulating A . T mutations also may have implications for mutagenesis at sites of spontaneous cytidine deamination.

The mutation spectrum of purified AID is similar to the mutability index in Ramos cells and in ung(-/-)msh2(-/-) mice.

Somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination are initiated by the enzyme activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID). Although other models exist for AID function, one model suggests that AID initiates these processes by deaminating cytidines within DNA, thereby initiating mutagenic repair pathways that involve either UNG or Msh2. Recent work shows that GST-hAID prefers to mutate WRC motifs, a motif frequently mutated in vivo. Because this is a strong argument in favor of the DNA deamination model, we sought to extend this analysis by examining the activity of purified AID with a small polyhistidine tag (His-hAID) on all 16 trinucleotide combinations (i.e., NNC). Here we show that purified His-hAID preferentially mutated cytidines within WRC (i.e., A/T, A/G, C) motifs, but poorly mutated cytidines within GYC (G, C/T, C) motifs. We next compared this mutability preference with those in hypermutating Ramos cells and in msh2(-/-)ung(-/-) mice, since both are reduced or deficient in UNG- and/or Msh2-induced mutations and are thus likely to reflect the sequence specificity of the mutator in vivo. Indeed, the mutation spectrums of purified His-hAID and GST-hAID matched the trinucleotide mutability indexes in Ramos cells and in msh2(-/-)ung(-/-) mice. Thus, the activity of AID on single-stranded DNA produces the same mutation pattern as double-stranded DNA in hypermutating cells. These data lend support to the DNA deamination model and indicate that AID does not require co-factors for its WRC specificity.