Isonatric Dialysis Biofeedback in Hemodiafiltration with Online Regeneration of Ultrafiltrate in Hypertensive Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.

UNLABELLED: Dialysis biofeedback in hemodiafiltration with online regeneration of ultrafiltrate (HFR) could help to improve arterial hypertension. We evaluated the impact of isonatric HFR (HFR-iso) on hypertension control compared to conventional HFR. Forty-seven hemodialysis patients were included and randomized (ratio 2/1) HFR-iso versus HFR during 24 dialysis sessions. In the HFR-iso group (32 patients, 768 dialysis sessions), the predialytic systolic blood pressure (BP) decreased from S1 to S24 of 9 ± 20 mm Hg and increased of 5 ± 24 mm Hg in the HFR group (15 patients, 360 dialysis sessions), variation that differed between the 2 groups (x0394;S1-S24, p = 0.035; interaction group*time, p = 0.012). The diastolic BP (HFR-iso -3 ± 14 mm Hg vs. HFR 5 ± 13 mm Hg; p = 0.088), the DDD of antihypertensive treatment and the dry weight did not vary significantly during the study. Number of sessions complicated by symptomatic hypotension was similar in the 2 groups. HFR-iso improved BP control without increasing dialysis hypotension episodes. SHORT SUMMARY: In this multicenter, open-label, controlled, randomized study, we evaluated the impact of dialysis biofeedback in HFR on arterial hypertension compared to conventional HFR. We observed that HFR-iso improved arterial BP control without increasing dialysis hypotension episodes.

Effect of a plasma sodium biofeedback system applied to HFR on the intradialytic cardiovascular stability. Results from a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is still a major clinical problem for haemodialysis (HD) patients. Haemodiafiltration (HDF) has been shown to be able to reduce the incidence of IDH. METHODS: Fifty patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, crossover international study focussed on a variant of traditional HDF, haemofiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR). After a 1-month run-in period on HFR, the patients were randomized to two treatments of 2 months duration: HFR (Period A) or HFR-Aequilibrium (Period B), followed by a 1-month HFR wash-out period and then switched to the other treatment. HFR-Aequilibrium (HFR-Aeq) is an evolution of the haemofiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) dialysis therapy, with dialysate sodium concentration and ultrafiltration rate profiles elaborated by an automated procedure. The primary end point was the frequency of IDH. RESULTS: Symptomatic hypotension episodes were significantly lower on HFR-Aeq versus HFR (23 ± 3 versus 31 ± 4% of sessions, respectively, P l= l0.03), as was the per cent of clinical interventions (17 ± 3% of sessions with almost one intervention on HFR-Aeq versus 22 ± 2% on HFR, P <0.01). In a post-hoc analysis, the effect of HFR-Aeq was greater on more unstable patients (35 ± 3% of sessions with hypotension on HFR-Aeq versus 71 ± 3% on HFR, P <0.001). No clinical or biochemical signs of Na/water overload were registered during the treatment with HFR-Aeq. CONCLUSIONS: HFR-Aeq, a profiled dialysis supported by the Natrium sensor for the pre-dialysis Na(+) measure, can significantly reduce the burden of IDH. This could have an important impact in every day dialysis practice.

[Out-of-center blood pressure measurements in dialysis patients: Feasibility and comparison of methods]. / Mesures hors centre de la pression artérielle chez les hémodialysés chroniques : faisabilité et comparaison des méthodes.

The European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA)/European Society of Hypertension (ESH) recommends out-of-center blood pressure measurements, self-blood pressure measurement or ambulatory blood pressure measurement in dialysis patients. However, the feasibility of out-of-center blood pressure measurements in routine care is not known. The objective of our study was to quantify it as "a priori" i.e. the percentage of hemodialysis to whom out-of-center blood pressure measurements can be proposed and who accept it, as "a posteriori", i.e. the percentage of out-of-center blood pressure measurements made and valid. A systematic out-of-center blood pressure measurements program was implemented from April to October 2019 in our chronic hemodialysis structures. It was proposed to each dialysis patient to carry out after education, an self-blood pressure measurement (Omron M3®), from 2 measurements, to 1 to 2minutes interval, mornings and evenings of 6days without dialysis (validity: 15 measures). Apart from arrhythmic patients, to all patients "not eligible" for self-blood pressure measurement (visually impaired, hemiplegic, neuropsychological disorders, language barrier), a 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (Microlife WatchBP 03®) was proposed separating 2 hemodialysis sessions; measures every 15minutes from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 30minutes from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. (validity: 40 measurements/day and 14/night). This is a study evaluating practices recommended for routine care in 18-year-old hemodialysis, having given their consent to the collection and analysis of the data. One hundred twenty nine patients were treated with chronic hemodialysis in our structures during the out-of-center blood pressure measurements campaign. Out-of-center blood pressure measurements could not be done in 21 patients (4 deceased, 2 transplanted and 4 absent before evaluation; 7 arrhythmics; 3 refusals and 1 multiple-disabled). Of these 108 patients (sex ratio 1.25; 69.3±13.5 years), 23 were ineligible for self-blood pressure measurement (visually impaired, neuro- and/or psychological disorders, language barrier). Due to 4 self-blood pressure measurement failures, the feasibility of the self-blood pressure measurement (n=81/129) is 62.8 % (CI95% 54.2-70.7). Of the 24 ambulatory blood pressure measurements performed (23 among those not eligible for self-blood pressure measurement and 1 failure of self-blood pressure measurement), 19 were valid. The "a posteriori" feasibility of out-of-center blood pressure measurements (n=100/129) is 77.5 % (CI95% 69.6-83.4). The feasibility of out-of-center blood pressure measurements in hemodialysis patients is good, making the application of the recommendations possible.

COVID-19 in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Prevalence and Asymptomatic Screening During a Period of High Community Prevalence in a Large Paris Center.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Due to extensive comorbid conditions, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a poor prognosis in people receiving maintenance hemodialysis. In this article, we describe our experience with 200 maintenance hemodialysis patients in a hemodialysis center that used universal reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing, including 38 COVID-19-positive patients. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive observational cohort, including the time line of patient diagnoses along with contextual events including precautions, testing, screening algorithms, clinical diagnostics and therapy, and the clinical course of COVID-19-infected patients and their final outcomes. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 200 patients within a single hemodialysis center with 2 dialysis clinics in Paris. RESULTS: Among 200 maintenance hemodialysis patients, 38 (19%) had COVID-19 diagnosed; of these, 15 (39.5%) were admitted to the hospital, including 4 who required intensive care unit (ICU) care. There were 8 (21%) deaths. The most common symptom was fever, followed by dry cough, fatigue, and dyspnea. All COVID-19-infected patients had lymphopenia and an increase in C-reactive protein levels. Median time from the onset of respiratory symptoms to ICU admission was 1 to 2 days. Durations of non-ICU hospitalizations and ICU stays were 7 and 13 days, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study, single hemodialysis center. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis patients are a highly susceptible population and hemodialysis centers are a high-risk area in a COVID-19 epidemic. "Unexplained" lymphopenia and/or an increase in C-reactive protein level should lead physicians to the diagnosis of COVID-19 and should, when possible, be followed by diagnostic testing with universal reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, as well as the reinforcement of contamination barrier measures.

Prognostic value of cardiac markers in ESRD: Chronic Hemodialysis and New Cardiac Markers Evaluation (CHANCE) study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac disease is the main cause of mortality in long-term hemodialysis patients. Cardiac troponins (cTn) have been proposed to be markers of cardiac damage, but their value is still debated in hemodialysis patients. The aim of this prospective study is to assess the prognostic value of biochemical cardiac markers in long-term hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We measured serum levels of cTn I (cTnI), cTn T (cTnT), and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) in 258 asymptomatic patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years; 150 men) before the dialysis treatment. All causes of death and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina) were recorded at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify factors predictive of mortality. RESULTS: On inclusion, 48 patients (18.6%) had cTnT levels greater than 0.1 ng/mL, 46 patients (17.8%) had cTnI levels greater than 0.15 ng/mL, and 18 patients (7.0%) had CK-MB levels greater than 3 ng/mL. Of 246 patients followed up at 2 years, 64 patients (26%) had died, including 29 patients (11.8%) of cardiac disease, and 49 patients (19.9%) experienced at least 1 MACE. MACEs were significantly greater for patients with elevated predialysis serum cTnT and CK-MB levels (>0.1 ng/mL and 3 ng/mL, respectively) than for patients with normal levels of these cardiac markers (31.9% versus 17.1%; P = 0.01; 38.9% versus 18.4%; P = 0.02, respectively). No differences were found for cTnI levels. In multivariate analysis, age (relative risk [RR], 1.04; P = 0.002), previous ischemic heart disease (RR, 2.5; P = 0.0001), and serum cTnT levels greater than 0.1 ng/mL (RR, 1.9; P = 0.04) were independent significant factors for MACEs. CONCLUSION: Increased predialysis serum levels of cTnT and CK-MB, but not cTnI, were predictive of a high risk for overall mortality and MACEs at 2 years in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients.

L-carnitine treatment in incident hemodialysis patients: the multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled CARNIDIAL trial.

BACKGROUND: L-carnitine levels decrease rapidly and steadily with duration of hemodialysis, and carnitine depletion can impair response to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). The study hypothesis was that L-carnitine supplementation during the first year of hemodialysis would improve this response. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: From October 2006 through March 2010, this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded study assigned 92 incident hemodialysis patients to receive placebo or 1 g of intravenous L-carnitine after each dialysis session for 1 year. The primary outcome measure compared the groups for rHuEPO resistance index (EPO-RI), defined as weekly rHuEPO doses (IU/kg body weight divided by hemoglobin level) (g/dl). RESULTS: In the L-carnitine group, carnitine concentration increased from a mean ± SD of 79 ± 51 µmol/L to 258 ± 137 µmol/L; in the placebo group, it declined from 68 ± 25 µmol/L to 53 ± 24 µmol/L (interaction group × time, P<0.001). Carnitine deficiency affected about 30% of the patients in the placebo group during the study period. EPO-RI varied from 15.8 ± 11.3 to 9.5 ± 5.8 IU/kg per g/dl in the placebo group and from 20.6 ± 12.8 to 15.6 ± 15.9 IU/kg per g/dl in the L-carnitine group, for a mean variation of -3.94 ± 12.5 IU/kg per g/dl and -2.98 ± 15.5 IU/kg per g/dl, respectively (P=0.7). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the EPO-RI course was similar in each group (difference between groups, P=0.10; interaction group × time, P=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Carnitine levels decrease by about 11% ± 33% during the first year of hemodialysis. Treatment of incident hemodialysis patients with L-carnitine does not improve their response to rHuEPO.

Presentation and outcome of patients with systemic amyloidosis undergoing dialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Light chain (AL) and secondary (AA) amyloidosis usually present as a systemic disease frequently involving the kidney and leading to ESRD. Data regarding patients with AA or AL amyloidosis undergoing dialysis remain scarce. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We retrospectively studied patients with AA or AL amyloidosis who started dialysis in five French centers between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2005. RESULTS: We identified 19 patients with AL and 20 patients with AA amyloidosis undergoing dialysis. Patients with AL amyloidosis had shorter time from diagnosis to dialysis (25.2 versus 69.3 mo, P < 0.05) and more extrarenal amyloidosis, especially cardiac (63.2 versus 5%, P < 0.0001). Mean duration of follow-up was 37.4 and 31.8 mo for patients with AL and AA amyloidosis, respectively. Fifteen patients (78.9%) with AL and three patients (15%) with AA amyloidosis died on dialysis. Median survival was shorter in patients with AL (26 mo) than AA amyloidosis [not definable (ND)] (P < 0.02). Sepsis and cardiac deaths were the main causes of mortality. Prognosis factors for death at 1 yr were AL type (P < 0.01), cardiac amyloidosis [odds ratio (OR) = 18, P < 0.01], heart failure (OR = 8, P < 0.04), and shorter time from diagnosis to dialysis (6.1 versus 56 mo, P < 0.03). Multivariate analysis indicated that AL type (P = 0.02), but not cardiac amyloidosis was independently associated with global mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with amyloidosis undergoing dialysis, especially AL type, is probably better than previously reported. However, mortality is higher in AL than AA type, especially in the setting of cardiac involvement.

Effects of oral vitamin C supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a proteomic assessment.

Evidence indicates that oxidative stress is present in dialysis patients, and is associated with vitamin C deficiency. Limited data are available regarding the effects of vitamin C supplementation on oxidative stress and inflammation markers in these patients. Moreover, there are no data available on plasma polypeptide fingerprints by proteome analysis before and after vitamin C supplementation. Therefore, we analyzed plasma samples from a prospective, randomized, open-labeled trial to assess the effects of oral vitamin C supplementation (250 mg three times per week), to define the plasma polypeptide pattern in hemodialysis patients. Our results reveal that more than 30 polypeptides show significant changes in the dialysis patients in comparison to controls with normal renal function, and that several polypeptides are affected/normalized by oral vitamin C supplementation. These results underline the remarkable potential for proteomics to recognize specific peptide profiles in different pathological situations, which might not be detected by classical methods.

Effects of oral vitamin C supplementation on oxidative stress and inflammation status in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence for the presence of oxidative stress and vitamin C deficiency in dialysis patients. Limited data, however, are available regarding the effects of vitamin C supplementation on oxidative stress and inflammation markers in such patients. METHODS: We ran a prospective, randomized, open-label trial to assess the effects of oral vitamin C supplementation (250 mg three times per week) for 2 months on well-defined oxidative and inflammatory markers in 33 chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients. RESULTS: Normalization of plasma total vitamin C and ascorbate levels by oral vitamin C supplementation did not modify plasma levels of carbonyls, C-reactive protein and albumin, or erythrocyte concentrations of reduced and oxidized glutathione. CONCLUSION: Short-term oral vitamin C supplementation did not modify well-defined oxidative/antioxidative stress and inflammation markers in HD patients. Whether a higher oral dose or the intravenous route can modify these markers remains to be determined.

Increased pasma S-nitrosothiol concentrations predict cardiovascular outcomes among patients with end-stage renal disease: a prospective study.

The plasma concentrations of S-nitrosothiols, which are circulating nitric oxide metabolites with potential biologic activity, are increased among patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD). However, the ability of S-nitrosothiols to release nitric oxide at physiologically relevant sites may be reduced among HD patients, because of impaired availability and/or activity of factors involved in S-nitrosothiol breakdown. The resultant lack of S-nitrosothiol bioavailability could contribute to the high cardiovascular risk for such patients. A possible relationship between plasma S-nitrosothiol levels and cardiac outcomes, as well as all-cause mortality rates, was investigated in a cohort of 250 chronic HD patients and who were undergoing regular dialysis three times per week were monitored for 1 yr. During that follow-up period, major cardiac events and all-cause deaths were prospectively recorded. At baseline, high plasma S-nitrosothiol levels (>2 micro M, corresponding to the top quartile of all measured values) were independently associated with pulse pressure in an adjusted multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.05; P = 0.007). During the follow-up period, 36 patients died (16 as a result of cardiac causes) and 33 patients experienced major adverse cardiac events. In an adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model, high plasma S-nitrosothiol concentrations (i.e., the top quartile versus the three other quartiles) were an independent predictor of cardiac events (hazard ratio, 3.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.61 to 6.76; P = 0.001) but not of all-cause death. Therefore, among chronic HD patients, markedly elevated plasma S-nitrosothiol levels are associated with pulse pressure and predict cardiovascular outcomes. These findings support the hypothesis that impaired S-nitrosothiol bioavailability in uremia is an important factor for the excessive cardiovascular risk among HD patients.