ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are crucial in the identification and accessibility to treatment for people with substance use disorders. AIM: Objective of this literature review is to assess health professionals' attitudes towards patients with substance use disorders and to examine the consequences of these attitudes on healthcare delivery for these patients. METHOD: PubMed, Psycinfo and Embase were systematically searched for articles published between 2000-2011. Reviews, commentaries and letters were excluded, as were studies originating from non-Western countries. The search process yielded 1562 citations. After selection and quality assessment 28 studies were included. RESULTS: Health professionals generally have negative attitudes towards patients with substance use disorders. They perceive violence, manipulation, and poor motivation as impeding factors in the healthcare delivery for these patients. Health professionals also lack adequate education, training and support structures in working with this patient group. Negative attitudes of health professionals diminish patients' feelings of empowerment and subsequently treatment outcomes. Health professionals have a more task-oriented approach (e.g. less personal engagement and diminished empathy) in the delivery of healthcare for these patients. CONCLUSION: This review indicates that negative attitudes of health professionals towards patients with substance use disorders are common and contribute to suboptimal health care for these patients. However, few studies have evaluated the consequences of health professionals' negative attitudes towards patients with substance use disorders.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/psychology , Social Stigma , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , HumansABSTRACT
AIMS: To examine whether Dutch and Norwegian adults differ in their opinion on policy measures that may prevent young people from problematic drinking. METHODS: Data were derived from a web-based cross-sectional study. In this study, only Dutch and Norwegian adults (aged ≥24 years) were included (n(NL) = 5023, n(NO) = 1916). Opinions on policy items concerning restrictive and educational measures were examined together with alcohol consumption. RESULTS: Differences between the opinions of the Dutch and Norwegians concerning the restrictive and educational measures were small. In both countries, the support for restrictive measures was predicted by female gender, higher age and less own alcohol consumption. For the educational measures, the explained variance in the Norwegian and Dutch sample was relatively low; this indicates that opinion was more strongly predicted by other factors. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that, despite the differences between the Dutch and Norwegian alcohol policy, differences in opinion are small between Dutch and Norwegian respondents, especially regarding restrictive measures that may prevent young people from drinking.
Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy , Public Opinion , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Norway , Principal Component AnalysisABSTRACT
Assertive community treatment (ACT) is described as a team treatment model designed to provide assertive, outreaching, comprehensive, community-based, rehabilitation-oriented and supportive psychiatric services for people with severe mental illness as reported by Drake et al. (Psychiatr Serv 52: 179-182, 2001) and Teague et al. (Psychiatr Serv 68: 216-232, 1998). This study explores variations in the way the original components of ACT are implemented for the target group of clients with a first-episode psychosis, and establishes whether these variations lead the treatment model to a higher, more valuable, outcome level. The study also describes how to achieve this optimally effective application of target group-specific treatment services.
Subject(s)
Community Psychiatry/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Models, Organizational , Netherlands , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the development of alcohol consumption and 'binge drinking' in The Netherlands over the period 1997-2005. METHODS: Data from three national population surveys commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Health were compared. RESULTS: Decreases in binge drinking have appeared, especially for youngsters, which are not explained by changes in the composition of the population according to religious orientation, and for which no other explanation can be given at present. CONCLUSION: Trends in binge drinking in The Netherlands can vary over relatively short spaces of time.
Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Health Behavior , Adolescent , Adult , Catchment Area, Health , Demography , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Religion , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Pre-existing conditions have been postulated as possible causes of the J-shaped relationship between alcohol intake and cardiovascular disease. Two research questions have been addressed in this paper. First, whether never drinkers and former drinkers differ from moderate drinkers in terms of health, and if so, which health problems contribute to this difference. Second, whether the U-shaped relationship between current alcohol intake and cardiovascular disease or all-cause mortality could in part be explained by difference in pre-existing disease burden. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective case-cohort, the Lifestyle and Health Study, consisting of 16,210 men and women aged between 45 and 70 years. Alcohol intake and risk factors were assessed at baseline with a self-administered questionnaire. Medical information was obtained from general practitioners. Cardiovascular events and mortality were followed for a period of 5 years (1996-2001). MAIN RESULTS: Never drinkers and former drinkers were less healthy than moderate drinkers. They rated their health more often as poor, and often had more diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and also alcohol-related diseases. The difference in disease burden did not change the observed relationship between alcohol intake and cardiovascular events, and only partially changed the U-shaped relationship between alcohol intake and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The found difference in health between never drinkers and former drinkers compared with moderate drinkers appeared to be only a partial explanation of the observed relationships between alcohol intake and cardiovascular disease, and between alcohol intake and all-cause mortality.
Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Health Status , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cause of Death , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , TemperanceABSTRACT
Communalization of health care refers to the increasing responsibility of citizens to look after their ill or handicapped fellow members of society and to provide care to them. Governments in Western Europe more and more develop health care policies directed at communalization of health care. The article discusses the care responsibilities of individuals based on the views of the philosophers Buber, Levinas, and Ricoeur and on the views of the family therapist Nagy. The care responsibilities of states are discussed in terms of the views of the political philosophers Rawls and Daniels and these are linked to right liberal, left liberal, and Christian-democrat views on care responsibilities of states. Thereupon, four criteria for a proper communalization of health care are proposed and different forms of health care policies with respect to communalization of care are assessed. In the last section, we look closely at several measures in the just reformed Dutch health care system and discuss how far these measures meet our criteria for a proper communalization. We focus in this section on the effects of these measures on family care because more and more family care plays an important role in good functioning of the health care system.
Subject(s)
Philosophy, Medical , Public Health Administration , Sociology, Medical , Humans , NetherlandsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is an evidence-based treatment model, which has been frequently discussed and investigated and which has been used mainly with patients suffering from 'severe mental illness'. It is a pro-active type of treatment involving a multidisciplinary team who provide outreaching and intensive care (treatment, rehabilitation and support). Increasingly, the act model is being used with other target groups such as patients with a first episode psychosis. Frequently act is not being implemented strictly in accordance with the original model. As a result, various combinations of elements of act are being presented. AIM: Primarily to find out whether the original components of act can be varied in such a way that it combines the best possible treatment procedures for the target group of patients suffering from a first episode psychosis. METHOD: Model fidelity was measured and patients and their carers were asked to state to what extent the care provided met their care requirements. The results were used for adaptations of the original model. However, it was assumed from the outset that any variations on the essential elements of the act model could undermine the fundamental principles of act and affect its efficacy. We therefore adhered to the original model as strictly as possible, looking particularly at the care requirements of patients and carers and examining which elements of the model could be used to improve the care of patients with a first episode psychosis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Results show that it is possible to implement the original act model successfully and that patients and caregivers are satisfied with the model. There is strong evidence that the implementation of elements of the act in specific combinations can increase the efficacy of the act when it is applied to special groups of patients, such as those with a first episode psychosis. However, considerable care and caution are called for when act is being adapted in this way for use with special groups of patients.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/methods , Ambulatory Care/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Humans , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to assess the association between response behavior and health status at baseline, and survival in a 5-year follow-up period. A secondary aim was to assess whether reasons for nonresponse were associated with health status at baseline. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Data came from a prospective study cohort consisting of 31,349 men and women aged 45-70 years. Objective retrospective and prospective health information derived from general practitioner registries was available for both respondents and nonrespondents. RESULTS: Results show that among respondents coronary heart disease was more prevalent. Compared with respondents, noncontacts had a higher mortality risk during follow-up. Refusals had hypercholesterolemia more often than did noncontacts, and coronary heart disease or diabetes mellitus less often. CONCLUSION: The paradoxical results that respondents are less healthy at baseline but prospectively have a lower mortality risk may point to a selection effect indicating that the 'worried ill' are more inclined to participate. This effect could imply that observed relationships between risk factors or behaviors and outcomes in cohort studies may be attenuated.
Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Patient Selection , Refusal to Participate , Age Distribution , Aged , Epidemiologic Methods , Family Practice , Female , Health Status , Heart Diseases/mortality , Heart Diseases/psychology , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Selection BiasABSTRACT
AIM OF STUDY: To explore the validity of self-reported substance use among emergency room populations and the processes of sample selection bias, to establish their influence on the prevalence rates found. METHODS: Self-reported alcohol and illicit drug use of patients in the emergency room is compared with results from an alcohol breath analyser and urine toxicology. RESULTS: Variations in reported substance use occur when comparing self-report measures with alcohol breath analyser results and urine toxicology. Self-reported alcohol use was found among 7.5% of the patients compared with 4.7% based on alcohol breath analysers. Illicit drug use was reported by 9.0% of the patients whereas urine toxicology resulted in 30% patients positive for illicit drug use. Patients that voluntarily participate in the study differ from those that do not participate. Patients who refuse an alcohol breath analyser report slightly more alcohol use prior to the injury (difference not significant), and patients who provide a urine sample report more illicit drug use prior to the injury compared to those that refuse. DISCUSSION: Differences in prevalence rates can be explained partly by the measurements used and partly by sample selection bias. Self-reported alcohol use and self-reported illicit drug use are preferable to the "gold standard" when used among emergency room patients, because both measures provide more accurate information on the actual use. Sample selection bias also influences the prevalence rates.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Self Disclosure , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol Drinking , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Biomarkers/urine , Breath Tests , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Wounds and Injuries/etiologyABSTRACT
Local and regional policymakers, care providers and prevention workers involved in addiction and addiction care need timely and reliable information. As few data on substance use are available at a local or regional level, an integrated local or regional monitoring system for alcohol and drugs (MAD) was developed. The MAD consists of four modules: a local social and information map, analyses of registration data of (addiction) care organisations, a local/regional survey among the general population and a community-based drug monitoring system aimed at collecting data on hard drug users. Both quantitative and qualitative research methods are used. This paper presents an overview of the MAD results with respect to alcohol and illicit drug use. Both quantitative and qualitative results show a substantial variation between regions, even in a country as small as the Netherlands. The study shows that a monitoring system can be an important source of information for local addiction policy, care and prevention.
Subject(s)
Alcoholism/epidemiology , Illicit Drugs , Population Surveillance , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , NetherlandsABSTRACT
In most European countries we are witnessing a shift from supply-driven to demand-driven approaches in health care. According to these approaches, health care should contribute to the fulfillment of health-care-related needs of individuals and, therefore, to their perceived quality of life. The purpose of this study is to develop a conceptual framework for research in this new view of health care. The authors conclude that the 'felt need' should be the foundation of demand-driven care. The second part of the study is based on a widely used behavioral model resulting in a conceptual framework for research, policy and practice. This study makes a start at providing information about fundamental concepts that are at the heart of the demand-driven approach. In order to contribute to quality of life, health care providers should explore the underlying needs while developing services in order to fit the demand-driven approach.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Services Needs and Demand , Patient Satisfaction , Europe , HumansABSTRACT
The present study aimed to develop a short, easily administered, psychometrically sound, and valid instrument to assess the severity of compulsive Internet use. A set of criteria was determined based on the addiction literature. Next, the internal consistency and convergent validity were determined, and the set was tested as a one-factor solution in two representative samples of heavy Internet users (n = 447 and n = 229) and in one large convenience sample of regular Internet users (n = 16,925). In these three studies, respondents were asked about their online behavior and about problems related to Internet use. In the first study, the Online Cognition Scale (OCS) was included to determine concurrent validity. The newly developed Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) contains 14 items ratable on a 5-point Likert scale. The instrument showed good factorial stability across time and across different samples and subsamples. The internal consistency is high, and high correlations with concurrent and criterion variables demonstrate good validity.
Subject(s)
Attitude to Computers , Compulsive Behavior/diagnosis , Internet , Mental Disorders/classification , Psychological Tests , Psychometrics/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Behavior, Addictive/classification , Behavior, Addictive/diagnosis , Behavior, Addictive/psychology , Child , Compulsive Behavior/classification , Compulsive Behavior/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , User-Computer Interface , Young AdultABSTRACT
Prior epidemiologic research revealing cardioprotective effects of alcohol intake has systematically neglected lifetime exposure to alcohol, which may cause serious bias in conclusions regarding drinking and heart disease risk. Departing from use of an earlier interview schedule, the authors of the present 1996-2001 cohort study developed a self-administered Lifetime Drinking History questionnaire (LDH-q). A total of 16,211 Dutch men and women older than age 45 years participated by completing the baseline questionnaire. A random sample of 3,255 men and women was used to determine the reliability and validity of the LDH-q. Test-retest reliability was assessed by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient and kappa scores. Correlations between lifetime and current intake scores were used to assess discriminant and convergent validity. Both reliability and validity appeared to be reasonably high compared with results obtained by using interview formats to measure lifetime alcohol intake. Reliability of the LDH-q was higher for men than for women, probably because of the more frequent and regular drinking of men. Indices of validity were similar for men (0.75) and women (0.70). Results show that the LDH-q can be a useful instrument in large-scale cohort studies.