ABSTRACT
Zebrafish are an outstanding model for assessing the involvement of genes in paediatric cataracts. Gene discovery for cataracts is enhanced by manipulation of the genome of zebrafish embryos and comparing the phenotypes of mutant progeny with the wildtype embryos. However, wildtype laboratory fish can also develop cataracts, potentially confounding the results. In this study, we compared the baseline cataract rate between two commonly used wildtype laboratory strains, AB and TL, and also an outbred transgenic line with mCherry reporter. We assessed a total of 805 lens images of fish at 4 days post-fertilisation for cataracts and scored each cataract observed as mild, moderate or severe. We found that the AB strain had a cataract rate of 16.2%, TL had 8.9%, and mCherry had 0.7% and these rates were significantly different. We found that TL strain had a lower rate of mild cataracts than AB fish, however, the rate of moderate and severe phenotypes in the AB and the TL strain was similar. Overall, we showed that the baseline cataract rate varies significantly between the strains housed in a single facility and conclude that baseline rates of cataracts should be assessed when planning experiments to assess the genetic causes of cataracts.