The incidence of and risk factors for developing atypical femoral fractures in Japan.

The long-term treatment with anti-resorptive drugs for osteoporotic patients is suggested to be associated with an increase in atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). However, their incidence, patient characteristics, and risk factors have not been fully elucidated especially in Asian countries. This retrospective observational cohort study found fourteen AFFs in ten patients (four bilateral fractures) among 2,238 hip and femoral shaft fractures treated in our associated hospitals between 2005 and 2010; this incidence (0.63%) was similar to Caucasians. Of the ten patients with AFFs, nine (90%) and six (60%) were using bisphosphonates (BPs) and glucocorticoids (GCs), respectively, compared to 14.3 and 8.6% for patients with typical femoral fractures who were using these agents. As comorbid conditions, five patients had collagen disease (CD) and two had diabetes. A fracture location-, age- and gender-matched (1:3) case-control study revealed that administration of BPs, GCs, and suffering from collagen disease (CD) were significant risk factors for developing AFFs [odds ratios 36.0 (95% confidence intervals 3.8-342.2), 13.0 (2.3-74.1) and 9.0 (1.6-50.3), respectively]. Interestingly, all of the patients with atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures, defined as those within 5 cm of the lesser trochanter, were taking GCs due to CD, and the age of these patients (average of 54.8 years) was significantly younger than those with atypical diaphyseal femoral fractures (average of 77.2 years, p < 0.05). In conclusion, the incidence of AFFs in the Japanese population was similar to that of Caucasians, and taking BPs and GCs and suffering from CD were risk factors for developing AFFs.

Analysis of Temporal Changes in Dural Sac Morphology After XLIF Indirect Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate temporal changes in dural sac morphology after extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) indirect decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis and to study the factors influencing the changes. METHODS: The morphology of the dural sac was categorized into 4 grades (A, minor; B, moderate; C, severe; and D, extreme) by partially modifying Schizas classification (m-Schizas). The study involved 38 patients and 47 intervertebral spaces treated with indirect decompression (grade C or D). We evaluated m-Schizas before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at final follow-up. We performed a statistical analysis on the risk factors of grade C or D stenosis (poor morphological improvement) at final follow-up. The factors evaluated were preoperative dural sac cross-section area (CSA), diagnosis, cage size, location of cage insertion, locked facets, bony lateral recess stenosis, end plate injury, and changes in the posterior disc height (PDH) and disc angle (DA). RESULTS: On morphological evaluation, improvement to grade A or B was seen in 10 intervertebral spaces (21.2%) immediately after the surgery, and improvement was achieved in 38 intervertebral spaces (80.8%) at final follow-up. The risk factor of poor morphological improvement was found to be small preoperative dural sac CSA (odds ratio 1.32, P < .002). CONCLUSIONS: After XLIF indirect decompression, the morphological improvement of the dural sac was remodeled with time and further expansion was seen in many patients. However, the study suggested that sufficient morphological improvement may not be achieved in spinal stenosis whose preoperative state is severe.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results of Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: In this study, we compared the postoperative outcomes of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) indirect decompression with that of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There are very few reports examining postoperative results of XLIF and minimally invasive TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, and no reports comparing XLIF and mini-open TLIF. METHODS: Forty patients who underwent 1-level spinal fusion, either by XLIF indirect decompression (X group, 20 patients) or by mini-open TLIF (T group, 20 patients), for treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis were included in this study. Invasiveness of surgery was evaluated on the basis of surgery time, blood loss, hospitalization period, and perioperative complications. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), disc angle (DA), disc height (DH), and slipping length (SL) were evaluated before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at 12 months after surgery. Cross-sectional spinal canal area (CSA) was also measured before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of surgery time or hospitalization period; however, X group showed a significant decrease in blood loss (p<0.001). Serious complications were not observed in either group. In clinical assessment, no significant differences were observed between the groups with regard to the JOABPEQ results. The change in DH at 12 months after surgery increased significantly in the X group (p<0.05), and the changes in DA and SL were not significantly different between the two groups. The change in CSA was significantly greater in the T group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative clinical results were equally favorable for both procedures; however, in comparison with mini-open TLIF, less blood loss and greater correction of DH were observed in XLIF.

The fracture sites of atypical femoral fractures are associated with the weight-bearing lower limb alignment.

PURPOSE: Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are stress-related fractures that are speculated to associate with long-term treatment with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. A history of AFF is a high risk factor for the development of a subsequent AFF in the same location of the contralateral femur, suggesting that a patient's individual anatomical factor(s) are related to the fracture site of AFFs. In this study, we investigated the radiographs of fourteen AFFs (four bilateral fractures among ten patients) treated at six hospitals associated with our university between 2005 and 2010. The fracture site and standing femorotibial angle (FTA), which reflects the mechanical axis of the lower limb, were measured on weight-bearing lower limb radiographs. The fracture site and FTA of patients with typical femoral fractures (TFF) were compared to those of patients with AFFs. The correlations were examined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. The fracture locations in the femora were almost the same in the patients with bilateral AFFs. There was a positive correlation between the fracture site and the standing FTA in the patients with AFFs (r=0.82, 95% confidence interval; 0.49 to 0.94), indicating that the larger the standing FTA (varus alignment), the more distal the site of the fracture in the femur. The FTA of the patients with atypical diaphyseal femoral fracture were significantly larger compared to that of those with not only atypical subtrochanteric fractures but also TFFs. In conclusion, the fracture sites of AFFs are associated with the standing lower limb alignment, while those of TFFs are not.