ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological findings regarding the association of particulate matter ≤2.5 µm (PM2.5) exposure with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) are inconsistent; evidence for HDP risk related to PM2.5 components, mixture effects, and windows of susceptibility is limited. We aimed to investigate the relationships between HDP and exposure to PM2.5 during pregnancy. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A large retrospective cohort study was conducted among mothers with singleton pregnancies in Kaiser Permanente Southern California from 2008 to 2017. HDP were defined by International Classification of Diseases-9/10 (ICD-9/10) diagnostic codes and were classified into 2 subcategories based on the severity of HDP: gestational hypertension (GH) and preeclampsia and eclampsia (PE-E). Monthly averages of PM2.5 total mass and its constituents (i.e., sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, organic matter, and black carbon) were estimated using outputs from a fine-resolution geoscience-derived model. Multilevel Cox proportional hazard models were used to fit single-pollutant models; quantile g-computation approach was applied to estimate the joint effect of PM2.5 constituents. The distributed lag model was applied to estimate the association between monthly PM2.5 exposure and HDP risk. This study included 386,361 participants (30.3 ± 6.1 years) with 4.8% (17,977/373,905) GH and 5.0% (19,381/386,361) PE-E cases, respectively. In single-pollutant models, we observed increased relative risks for PE-E associated with exposures to PM2.5 total mass [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) per interquartile range: 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.04, 1.10] p < 0.001], black carbon [HR = 1.12 (95% CI [1.08, 1.16] p < 0.001)] and organic matter [HR = 1.06 (95% CI [1.03, 1.09] p < 0.001)], but not for GH. The population attributable fraction for PE-E corresponding to the standards of the US Environmental Protection Agency (9 µg/m3) was 6.37%. In multi-pollutant models, the PM2.5 mixture was associated with an increased relative risk of PE-E ([HR = 1.05 (95% CI [1.03, 1.07] p < 0.001)], simultaneous increase in PM2.5 constituents of interest by a quartile) and PM2.5 black carbon gave the greatest contribution of the overall mixture effects (71%) among all individual constituents. The susceptible window is the late first trimester and second trimester. Furthermore, the risks of PE-E associated with PM2.5 exposure were significantly higher among Hispanic and African American mothers and mothers who live in low- to middle-income neighborhoods (p < 0.05 for Cochran's Q test). Study limitations include potential exposure misclassification solely based on residential outdoor air pollution, misclassification of disease status defined by ICD codes, the date of diagnosis not reflecting the actual time of onset, and lack of information on potential covariates and unmeasured factors for HDP. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings add to the literature on associations between air pollution exposure and HDP. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting that specific air pollution components, mixture effects, and susceptible windows of PM2.5 may affect GH and PE-E differently.
Subject(s)
Air Pollution , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Particulate Matter , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/analysis , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/etiology , Adult , Air Pollution/adverse effects , California/epidemiology , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/analysis , Young Adult , Maternal Exposure/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Environmental Exposure/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis rates among children aged 5-17 years over the past decade (2010-2021) and to investigate whether there have been differences in temporal changes based on race and ethnicity, sex, or income. STUDY DESIGN: Childhood ADHD diagnosis was ascertained from electronic health records using International Classification of Diseases ninth revision (314.xx) and International Classification of Diseases tenth revision (F90.x) codes. Data were stratified by child's sex, race and ethnicity, and household income, and rates of ADHD were estimated before and after adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: The overall ADHD diagnosis rates increased from 3.5% in 2010 to 4.0% in 2021. ADHD diagnosis was most prevalent among White children (6.1%), then Black (4.6%), Other/multiple (3.7%), Hispanic (3.1%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (PI) (1.7%). ADHD was also highly prevalent among boys (73.3%) or family income≥$70,000 (50.0%). ADHD diagnosis increased among Black (4.2% to 5.1%), Hispanic (2.8% to 3.6%), and Asian/PI children (1.5% to 2.0%) but remained stable for White (6.2% to 6.1%) and Other/multiple race/ethnic children (3.7% to 3.7%). Increases in the prevalence among girls were also observed. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of ADHD in children has risen with the largest increases observed for Black, Hispanic, and Asian/PI children. Rates among less affluent families and girls have also been increasing, narrowing the gaps in diagnosis rates previously observed. These increases may reflect improvements in screening and provision of care among demographics where ADHD has been historically underdiagnosed.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Child , Male , Female , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , California/epidemiology , PrevalenceABSTRACT
AIM: To estimate the incidence of abruption in first births and recurrence in the subsequent birth in patients of a large US-based integrated health care system. METHODS: Retrospective population-based cohort study of patients with first two consecutive singleton births using data from the Kaiser-Permanente South California health care system who delivered over a period of 30 years (1991-2021), using longitudinally linked electronic health records. ICD-9/ICD-10 codes "641.20" and "O45.x" identified placental abruption. We calculated the incidence and rates of abruption in first and second pregnancies. We used logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for abruption in second pregnancies in patients with and without abruptions in their first pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 126 264 patients with first two consecutive singleton births over the period, 805 had abruptions in their first births, and 861 in their second births. Rates of abruption in first and second births were 0.63% and 0.68%, respectively. Twenty-seven patients had abruptions in both first and second births. Rates of abruption in the second birth among individuals with and without previous placental abruption were 3.35% and 0.66%, respectively, giving an approximately five-fold increased odds of abruption in a second pregnancy in individuals who had abruption in their first birth when compared with those who did not have placental abruption in their first birth (aOR: 4.95, 95% confidence interval: 3.35-7.31, p < 0.00001). Interpregnancy interval had no statistically significant association with recurrence. CONCLUSION: Abruption in a first birth is associated with an approximately five-fold increased odds of abruption in a second birth.
Subject(s)
Abruptio Placentae , Recurrence , Humans , Female , Abruptio Placentae/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Adult , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , California/epidemiology , Young Adult , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Fetal fibronectin (fFN) testing and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) are diagnostic tools used to predict impending spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) among women presenting with preterm labor (PTL). We evaluated the association between fFN testing or TVUS cervical length (CL) measurement in predicting sPTB, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and sPTB-related costs. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health system (January 1, 2009-December 31, 2020) using diagnostic and procedure codes, along with a natural language processing algorithm to identify pregnancies with PTL evaluations. PTL evaluation was defined as having fFN and/or TVUS assessment. Outcomes were ascertained using diagnostic, procedural, and diagnosis-related group codes. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between fFN and/or TVUS results and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with those without PTL evaluations, those with positive fFN tests had higher adjusted odds ratio (adj.OR) for sPTB (2.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.64, 3.29), RDS (2.34, 95% CI: 2.03, 2.69), and NICU admission (2.24, 95% CI: 2.01, 2.50). In contrast, those who tested negative had lower odds for sPTB (adj.OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.79), RDS (adj.OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.73), and NICU admission (adj.OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.79). Among those with positive fFN results, the odds of sPTB was inversely associated with CL. Health care costs for mothers and neonates were lowest for those with fFN testing only. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that positive fFN results were associated with an increased odds of sPTB, RDS, and NICU admission and the association with sPTB was inversely proportional to CL. Additionally, negative fFN results were associated with decreased odds of sPTB, RDS, and NICU admissions. fFN testing may predict these and other sPTB-related adverse outcomes hence its utility should be explored further. Moreover, fFN testing has some cost savings over TVUS. KEY POINTS: · Patients with positive fFN tests had higher odds of sPTB, RDS, and NICU admission.. · Inverse relationship between sPTB and CL among those with positive fFN tests was observed.. · Health care costs for mothers and neonates were lowest for those with fFN testing only..
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have reported associations between severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes but the extent to which these associations vary by race/ethnicity remains uncertain. Therefore, we examined how the association between prenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse perinatal outcomes may be modified by race/ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data on 67,986 pregnant women extracted from the Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health records between April 6, 2020, and December 31, 2021. Upon admission to labor and delivery, all women were routinely tested for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were used to estimate associations. RESULTS: During the study period, COVID-19 was diagnosed in 4,960 (7%) of singleton pregnancies, with the highest rates observed among Hispanics (9.4%) and non-Hispanic Blacks (6.2%). Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics (aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.21) with SARS-CoV-2 infection had the highest odds of a pregnancy associated with nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing. Neonates of all races/ethnicities, except for non-Hispanic Blacks, showed significantly increased odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with the highest risk observed among Asians/Pacific Islanders (aOR: 10.88, 95% CI: 1.33, 89.04). Non-Hispanic White mothers who tested positive were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) at a higher rate at delivery and within 7 days of delivery (aOR: 34.77, 95% CI: 11.3, 107.04; aOR: 26.48, 95% CI: 9.55, 73.46, respectively). Hispanics were also at a significantly higher odds of admission to ICU (aOR: 4.62, 95% CI: 2.69, 7.94; aOR: 4.42, 95% CI: 2.58, 7.56, respectively). Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander mothers who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 prenatally, were at increased risk for preeclampsia/eclampsia, and preterm birth as compared to non-Hispanic White mothers. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight racial/ethnic disparities in the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse perinatal outcomes. The risk of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection was highest for Asian/Pacific Islanders. We also observed a remarkably high risk of ICU admission for non-Hispanic White mothers infected with SARS-CoV-2. KEY POINTS: · Race/ethnicity influences perinatal outcomes in pregnancies impacted by SARS-CoV-2.. · The risk of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection was highest for Asian/Pacific Islanders.. · White mothers had a notably high risk of ICU admission at delivery following SARS-CoV-2 infection..
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Disruption in school and the workplace are health concerns for transgender people. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate transgender individuals' thoughts and comfort with how others perceive their gender identity (social affirmation) and its association with outness in the workplace and mistreatment at work or school. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Survey respondents older than age 18 yr from the Study of Transition, Outcomes & Gender cohort (N = 696; n = 350 assigned male at birth, n = 346 assigned female at birth [AFAB]). OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ever "out" to employer and treated unfairly at work or school or fired from job. Predictors were high social affirmation and comfort with how others perceive own gender identity. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used for analyses. RESULTS: Individuals reporting high social affirmation were less likely to experience mistreatment at work or school than those with low social affirmation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.38, 0.86]). Individuals AFAB who felt comfortable with how others perceived their gender identity were less likely to be out to their employers than individuals AFAB who did not (OR = 0.45; 95% CI [0.20, 0.97]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Individuals with high social affirmation were less likely to experience work or school mistreatment, and feeling comfortable with how others perceive their gender identity did not signify the need to be out. Plain-Language Summary: Occupational therapy practitioners can play a pivotal role when working with transgender individuals by assisting in creating new routines for self-presentation at work or school, navigating social environments, and providing guidance in self-advocacy skills. Individuals assigned male at birth may be in greater need because they report lower levels of social affirmation and acceptance at school and work than individuals assigned female at birth.
Subject(s)
Transgender Persons , Infant, Newborn , Female , Male , Humans , Adolescent , Gender Identity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , SchoolsABSTRACT
In the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), we previously reported no association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in early pregnancy and spontaneous abortion (SAB). The present study aims to understand how time since vaccine rollout or other methodological factors could affect results. Using a case-control design and generalized estimating equations, we estimated the odds ratios (ORs) of COVID-19 vaccination in the 28 days before a SAB or last date of the surveillance period (index date) in ongoing pregnancies and occurrence of SAB, across cumulative 4-week periods from December 2020 through June 2021. Using data from a single site, we evaluated alternative methodological approaches: increasing the exposure window to 42 days, modifying the index date from the last day to the midpoint of the surveillance period, and constructing a cohort design with a time-dependent exposure model. A protective effect (OR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.69, 0.89), observed with 3-cumulative periods ending March 8, 2021, was attenuated when surveillance extended to June 28, 2021 (OR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.96, 1.08). We observed a lower OR for a 42-day window compared with a 28-day window. The time-dependent model showed no association. Timing of the surveillance appears to be an important factor affecting the observed vaccine-SAB association.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , COVID-19 Vaccines , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Abortion, Spontaneous/chemically induced , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Reports of perforation risk related to intrauterine devices (IUDs) inserted immediately post partum and among non-post-partum individuals are scarce, and previous studies with only 12-month follow-ups underestimate the risk. Breastfeeding at IUD insertion and insertion within 36 weeks post partum have been associated with increased risk of uterine perforation. The aim of these analyses was to compare the incidence and risks of IUD-related uterine perforations by non-post-partum and post-partum intervals at IUD insertion, and among post-partum individuals, to assess the impact of breastfeeding on these outcomes. METHODS: We did a multisite cohort study in the USA, using electronic health records (EHR). Study sites were three health-care systems and a site that used data from a health-care information exchange. The study population included individuals who were aged 50 years or younger and had an IUD insertion between Jan 1, 2001, and April 30, 2018. Individuals were excluded if they had not been in the health-care system for at least 12 months before IUD insertion. The primary outcome for this analysis was any IUD-related uterine perforation diagnosis for the first IUD insertion in this time period. Both complete and partial IUD-related perforations were identified. Chart abstraction was done to validate EHR-based algorithms or confirm perforations. The crude rate and cumulative incidence of uterine perforation were evaluated by non-post-partum and post-partum intervals at IUD insertion in the full cohort, and by breastfeeding status in a subcohort of post-partum individuals. Cox models estimated crude and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). FINDINGS: Data from 326â658 individuals in the full cohort and 94â817 individuals in the post-partum subcohort were analysed. In the full cohort, we identified 1008 uterine perforations (51·2% complete), with the 5-year cumulative incidence being the lowest in the non-post-partum group (0·29%, 95% CI 0·26-0·34). The aHR for the post-partum interval relative to non-post partum ranged from 2·73 (95% CI 1·33-5·63; 0 to 3 days post partum) to 6·71 (4·80-9·38; 4 days to ≤6 weeks post partum). The post-partum subcohort of individuals with breastfeeding information had 673 uterine perforations (62% complete), with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 1·37% (95% CI 1·24-1·52) and an increased risk with breastfeeding (aHR 1·37, 95% CI 1·12-1·66). INTERPRETATION: Although the risk for uterine perforation with IUD insertion 4 days to 6 weeks or less post partum is nearly seven times that of insertion non-post partum, perforation remains an incredibly rare event for all clinical time points. Despite a slight increased risk of perforation with breastfeeding at IUD insertion, the benefits of breastfeeding and effective contraception generally outweigh risks and should have little clinical impact. Therefore, IUD insertion timing should be based on individual desire for IUD contraception and patient convenience to assure an IUD insertion can occur. Careful follow-up of individuals at higher risk of uterine perforation is warranted. FUNDING: Bayer AG.
Subject(s)
Intrauterine Devices , Uterine Perforation , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Intrauterine Devices/adverse effects , Postpartum Period , Uterine Perforation/epidemiology , Uterine Perforation/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors are at an elevated risk of financial hardship. However, financial hardship among LGBTQ+ AYAs has not been widely explored. Thus, we used qualitative and quantitative survey data from the Horizon Study cohort to assess financial hardship of AYAs by LGBTQ+ status. METHODS: Multivariable logit models, predicted probabilities, average marginal effects or differences in predicted probabilities (AME) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the association of LGBTQ+ status and two components of financial hardship: material and psychological. Qualitative content analysis of an open-ended survey question about financial sacrifices was used to describe the third component of financial hardship, behavioral. RESULTS: Among 1,635 participants, 4.3% self-identified as LGBTQ+. Multivariable logit models controlling for demographic factors revealed that LGBTQ+ AYAs had an 18-percentage point higher probability of experiencing material financial hardship (95%CI 6-30%) and a 14-percentage point higher probability of experiencing psychological financial hardship (95%CI 2-26%) than non-LGBTQ+ AYAs. Controlling for economic factors attenuated the association of LGBTQ+ status with psychological financial hardship (AME = 11%; 95%CI - 1-23%), while the material financial hardship association remained statistically significant (AME = 14%; 95%CI 3-25%). In the qualitative analysis, LGBTQ+ AYAs frequently reported educational changes and costs (e.g., quitting school), unpaid bills and debt (e.g., medical debt, taking on credit card debt), as well as changes in housing and poor housing conditions (e.g., moving into less expensive house). CONCLUSIONS: LGBTQ + targeted and tailored interventions are needed to move toward equity for LGBTQ+ AYAs-an overlooked minority population.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Neoplasms , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Financial Stress , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the association between discontinuing predischarge car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) with 30-day postdischarge adverse outcomes in infants born preterm. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study involving all infants born preterm from 2010 through 2021 who survived to discharge to home in a 14-hospital integrated health care system. The exposure was discontinuation of CSTS. The primary outcome was a composite rate of death, 911 call-triggered transports, or readmissions associated with diagnostic codes of respiratory disorders, apnea, apparent life-threatening event, or brief resolved unexplained events within 30 days of discharge. Outcomes of infants born in the periods of CSTS and after discontinuation were compared. RESULTS: Twelve of 14 hospitals initially utilized CSTS and contributed patients to the CSTS period; 71.4% of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients and 26.9% of non-NICU infants were screened. All hospitals participated in the discontinuation period; 0.1% was screened. Rates of the unadjusted primary outcome were 1.02% in infants in the CSTS period (n = 21â122) and 1.06% after discontinuation (n = 20â142) (P = .76). The aOR (95% CI) was 0.95 (0.75, 1.19). Statistically insignificant differences between periods were observed in components of the primary outcome, gestational age strata, NICU admission status groups, and other secondary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of CSTS in a large integrated health care network was not associated with a change in 30-day postdischarge adverse outcomes. CSTS's value as a standard predischarge assessment deserves further evaluation.
Subject(s)
Child Restraint Systems , Infant, Premature , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Infant , Child Restraint Systems/adverse effects , Patient Discharge , Retrospective Studies , Aftercare , Intensive Care Units, NeonatalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For the past several decades, epidemiological studies originating from the United States have consistently reported increasing rates of preterm birth (PTB). Despite the implementation of several clinical and public health interventions to reduce PTB rates, it remains the leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality in the United States and around the world. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine recent trends in preterm birth and its clinical subtypes by maternal race and ethnicity among singleton births. STUDY DESIGN: Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health records for all singleton births between 2009 and 2020 (n=427,698) were used to examine preterm birth trends and their subtypes (spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm births). Data on preterm labor triage extracted from electronic health records using natural language processing were used to define preterm birth subtypes. Maternal race and ethnicity are categorized as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander. Multiple logistic regression was used to quantify the linear trend for preterm birth and its subtypes. Racial and ethnic trends were further examined by considering statistical interactions and stratifications. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2020, the overall preterm birth rate decreased by 9.12% (from 8.04% to 7.31%; P<.001). The rates decreased by 19.29% among non-Hispanic Whites (from 7.23% to 5.83%; P<.001), 6.15% among Hispanics (from 7.82% to 7.34%; P=.036), and 12.60% among non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islanders (from 8.90% to 7.78%; P<.001), whereas a nonsignificantly increased preterm birth rate (8.45%) was observed among non-Hispanic Blacks (from 9.91% to 10.75%; P=.103). Between 2009 and 2020, overall spontaneous preterm birth rates decreased by 28.85% (from 5.75% to 4.09%; P<.001). However, overall iatrogenic preterm birth rates increased by 40.45% (from 2.29% to 3.22%; p<.001). Spontaneous preterm birth rates decreased by 34.73% among non-Hispanic Whites (from 5.44% to 3.55%; P<.001), 19.75% among non-Hispanic Blacks (from 6.82% to 5.47%; P<.001), 22.96% among Hispanics (from 5.55% to 4.28%; P<.001), and 28.19% among non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islanders (from 6.50% to 4.67%; P<.001). Iatrogenic preterm birth rates increased by 52.42% among non-Hispanic Whites (from 1.88% to 2.61%; P<.001), 107.89% among non-Hispanic Blacks (from 3.18% to 6.13%; P<.001), 46.88% among Hispanics (from 2.29% to 3.26%; P<.001), and 42.21% among non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islanders (from 2.45% to 3.44%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: The overall preterm birth rate decreased over time and was driven by a decrease in the spontaneous preterm birth rate. There is racial and ethnic variability in the rates of spontaneous preterm birth and iatrogenic preterm birth. The observed increase in iatrogenic preterm birth among all racial and ethnic groups, especially non-Hispanic Blacks, is disconcerting and needs further investigation.
Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Premature Birth , Female , Infant, Newborn , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Premature Birth/etiology , Black or African American , Managed Care Programs , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , WhiteABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many transgender persons seek hormone therapy to reduce gender dysphoria and improve quality of life, but little is known about patient satisfaction with current gender-affirming hormone therapy. AIM: To examine patient satisfaction with current gender-affirming hormone therapy and patients' goals of additional hormone therapy. METHODS: Transgender adults in the validated multicenter STRONG cohort (Study of Transition, Outcomes, and Gender) were asked to complete a cross-sectional survey about current and planned hormone therapy and the effects that they experienced or hoped to gain. The proportion of respondents reporting overall satisfaction with hormone therapy were compared with χ2 or Fisher exact test. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis was used to compare the covariates of interest while controlling for age at the time of survey completion. OUTCOMES: Patient satisfaction across hormone therapies, each measured with a 5-point scale, was averaged and dichotomized. RESULTS: Out of 2136 eligible transgender adults, 696 (33%) completed the survey: 350 transfeminine (TF) and 346 transmasculine (TM) respondents. Most participants (80%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their current hormone therapies. TF participants and older participants were less likely to report being satisfied with their current hormone therapies than TM participants and younger participants, respectively. However, TM and TF categories were not associated with patient satisfaction after controlling for age at the time of survey completion. More TF persons planned to take additional treatment. The most frequent goals for additional hormone therapy for TF persons included breast size growth, feminine body fat distribution, and facial feature softening; for TM persons, goals included diminishing dysphoria, greater muscle mass, and masculine body fat distribution. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Multidisciplinary care beyond provision of hormone therapy-such as involvement of surgical, dermatologic, reproductive health, mental health, and/or gender expression care-may be important to help achieve unmet gender-affirming care goals. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study had a modest response rate and included only respondents with private insurance, limiting generalizability. CONCLUSION: Understanding patient satisfaction and goals of care will assist shared decision making and counseling in patient-centered gender-affirming therapy.
Subject(s)
Transgender Persons , Humans , Adult , Transgender Persons/psychology , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Goals , Hormones , Personal SatisfactionABSTRACT
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major pregnancy complication affecting approximately 14.0% of pregnancies around the world. Air pollution exposure, particularly exposure to PM2.5, has become a major environmental issue affecting health, especially for vulnerable pregnant women. Associations between PM2.5 exposure and adverse birth outcomes are generally assumed to be the same throughout a large geographical area. However, the effects of air pollution on health can very spatially in subpopulations. Such spatially varying effects are likely due to a wide range of contextual neighborhood and individual factors that are spatially correlated, including SES, demographics, exposure to housing characteristics and due to different composition of particulate matter from different emission sources. This combination of elevated environmental hazards in conjunction with socioeconomic-based disparities forms what has been described as a "double jeopardy" for marginalized sub-populations. In this manuscript our analysis combines both an examination of spatially varying effects of a) unit-changes in exposure and examines effects of b) changes from current exposure levels down to a fixed compliance level, where compliance levels correspond to the Air Quality Standards (AQS) set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and World Health Organization (WHO) air quality guideline values. Results suggest that exposure reduction policies should target certain "hotspot" areas where size and effects of potential reductions will reap the greatest rewards in terms of health benefits, such as areas of southeast Los Angeles County which experiences high levels of PM2.5 exposures and consist of individuals who may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of air pollution on the risk of GDM.
Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution , Diabetes, Gestational , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Diabetes, Gestational/chemically induced , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Air Pollutants/analysis , Electronic Health Records , Particulate Matter/analysis , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollution/analysis , California/epidemiology , Environmental Exposure/analysisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to examine the association between neonatal sepsis and autism risk among children and whether the risk varied with the timing of exposure, child's sex, and race/ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records (EHR) extracted from Kaiser Permanente Southern California Health Care System. Mother-child dyads were constructed by linking records of children born to member mothers and continuing to receive care through the system during the follow-up period with those of their biological mothers (n = 469,789). Clinical health records were used to define neonatal sepsis. Diagnosis of autism was made by medical specialists. Potential confounders included maternal sociodemographic factors, obstetrical history, child's age, sex, race/ethnicity, and maternal and child medical history. Incident rates and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were used to estimate the associations. RESULTS: Compared with children without the diagnosis of autism, children with the condition were more likely to be from Asian/Pacific Islander descent and male sex. Exposed children showed higher rates of autism as compared with unexposed children (3.43 vs. 1.73 per 1,000 person-years, aHR: 1.67-95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.00). Both preterm (aHR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.09-1.98) and term (aHR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.29-2.06) births were associated with increased risk for autism. Although the magnitude of the HRs and incidence ratios for neonatal sepsis to increase autism risk varied between race ethnicities, neonatal sepsis was associated with significantly increased likelihood of autism diagnosis for all race-ethic groups except for Asian/Pacific Islanders. Although neonatal sepsis was associated with significantly increased autism risk for both boys and girls, incident rates and HR point estimates suggested that the effect may be stronger in girls. CONCLUSION: Neonatal sepsis is associated with increased risk of autism diagnosis in preterm- and term-born children. The association was significant for both girls and boys and all race ethnicities except for Asian-Pacific Islanders. KEY POINTS: · Neonatal sepsis is associated with increased risk of autism diagnosis.. · The association was significant in preterm- and term-born children.. · The association was significant for all race/ethnicities except for Asian-Pacific Islanders..
Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder , Neonatal Sepsis , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Male , Autistic Disorder/diagnosis , Autistic Disorder/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Neonatal Sepsis/diagnosis , Neonatal Sepsis/epidemiology , Racial Groups , EthnicityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As prenatal vaccinations continue to be given more frequently, it is important to assess long-term safety events. We investigated the association between prenatal influenza vaccination or infection and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in offspring. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of mother-child pairs with deliveries between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2014 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California was performed. Children aged >1 year were followed through 31 December 2018. Maternal influenza vaccination or infection during pregnancy was obtained from electronic health records. ASD was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification, codes after age 1 year. Cox proportional hazard models estimated the crude and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) hazard ratios (HR) for the association between maternal influenza vaccination or infection and ASD. RESULTS: There were 84 739 mother-child pairs included in the final analytic sample. Of the 46 257 women vaccinated, 32.4% were vaccinated during the first trimester, 41.8% during the second trimester, and 25.8% during the third trimester. ASD was diagnosed in 1930 (2.3%) children. The IPTW analyses showed no association between prenatal influenza vaccination or infection and ASD in offspring (HR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], .95-1.13; HR, 1.12; 95% CI, .66-1.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal influenza vaccination or infection was not associated with ASD risk in offspring. The findings support recommendations to vaccinate pregnant women to protect themselves and their infants, both of whom are vulnerable to severe morbidity following infection.
Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Influenza, Human , Autism Spectrum Disorder/epidemiology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/etiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Data collected from a validation substudy permit calculation of a bias-adjusted estimate of effect that is expected to equal the estimate that would have been observed had the gold standard measurement been available for the entire study population. In this paper, we develop and apply a framework for adaptive validation to determine when sufficient validation data have been collected to yield a bias-adjusted effect estimate with a prespecified level of precision. Prespecified levels of precision are decided a priori by the investigator, based on the precision of the conventional estimate and allowing for wider confidence intervals that would still be substantively meaningful. We further present an applied example of the use of this method to address exposure misclassification in a study of transmasculine/transfeminine youth and self-harm. Our method provides a novel approach to effective and efficient estimation of classification parameters as validation data accrue, with emphasis on the precision of the bias-adjusted estimate. This method can be applied within the context of any parent epidemiologic study design in which validation data will be collected and modified to meet alternative criteria given specific study or validation study objectives.
Subject(s)
Research Design , Adolescent , Bias , Data Collection , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Probabilistic bias and Bayesian analyses are important tools for bias correction, particularly when required parameters are nonidentifiable. Negative controls are another tool; they can be used to detect and correct for confounding. Our goals are to present conditions that assure identifiability of certain causal effects and to describe and illustrate a probabilistic bias analysis and related Bayesian analysis that use a negative control exposure. METHODS: Using potential-outcome models, we characterized assumptions needed for identification of causal effects using a dichotomous, negative control exposure when residual confounding exists. We defined bias parameters, characterized their relationships with the negative control and with specified causal effects, and described the corresponding probabilistic-bias and Bayesian analyses. We present analytic examples using data on hormone therapy and suicide attempts among transgender people. To address possible confounding by healthcare utilization, we used prior tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (TdaP) vaccination as a negative control exposure. RESULTS: Hormone therapy was weakly associated with risk (risk ratio [RR] = 0.9). The negative control exposure was associated with risk (RR = 1.7), suggesting confounding. Based on an assumed prior distribution for the bias parameter, the 95% simulation interval for the distribution of confounding-adjusted RR was (0.17, 1.6), with median 0.5; the 95% credibility interval was similar. CONCLUSIONS: We used dichotomous negative control exposure to identify causal effects when a confounder was unmeasured under strong assumptions. It may be possible to relax assumptions and the negative control exposure could prove helpful for probabilistic bias analyses and Bayesian analyses.
Subject(s)
Hormones , Bayes Theorem , Bias , Causality , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is a widely used treatment option for obesity that often provides long-term weight control and health benefits. Although a growing number of women are becoming pregnant after bariatric surgery, only a few population-based studies have assessed the impact thereof on perinatal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between bariatric surgery and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women and to examine whether the risk for adverse perinatal outcomes is modified by the postsurgery weight, gestational weight gain, type of bariatric surgery, timing of pregnancy after bariatric surgery, and maternal comorbidities. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed with the use of the Bariatric Surgery Registry and hospital inpatient and outpatient physician encounter records. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision codes from hospitalizations during pregnancy and infant birth records were used to ascertain the outcomes of interest. Women eligible for BS who delivered at ≥20 weeks of gestation (n=20,213) at Kaiser Permanente Southern California hospitals (January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2018) were included in the study. Adjusted odds ratios were derived from logistic regression models with inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for confounding using propensity scores. RESULTS: Bariatric surgery was associated with a reduction in the risks for gestational diabetes (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.69; P<.001), preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.61; P<.001), chorioamnionitis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.63; P<.001), cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.72; P<.001), large for gestational age neonate (adjusted odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.29; P<.001), macrosomia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.30; P<.001), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.81; P<.001). However, bariatric surgery was also associated with a significantly increased risk for small for gestational age neonates (adjusted odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.16-2.79; P<.001). The risk for the adverse outcomes is independent of the time interval between the surgery and subsequent pregnancy. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that there are many pregnancy outcome benefits for women with severe obesity who undergo bariatric surgery; however, women who have undergone bariatric surgery before pregnancy should be monitored closely to reduce the risk for small for gestational age neonates and postpartum hemorrhage.
Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intrauterine devices, including levonorgestrel-releasing and copper devices, are highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptives. The potential risks associated with intrauterine devices are low and include uterine perforation and device expulsion. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of perforation and expulsion associated with levonorgestrel-releasing devices vs copper devices in clinical practice in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: The Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study was a retrospective cohort study of women aged ≤50 years with an intrauterine device insertion during 2001 to 2018 and information on intrauterine device type and patient and medical characteristics. Of note, 4 research sites with access to electronic health records contributed data for the study: 3 Kaiser Permanente-integrated healthcare systems (Northern California, Southern California, and Washington) and 1 healthcare system using data from a healthcare information exchange in Indiana (Regenstrief Institute). Perforation was classified as any extension of the device into or through the myometrium. Expulsion was classified as complete (not visible in the uterus or abdomen or patient reported) or partial (any portion in the cervix or malpositioned). We estimated the crude incidence rates and crude cumulative incidence by intrauterine device type. The risks of perforation and expulsion associated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices vs copper intrauterine devices were estimated using Cox proportional-hazards regression with propensity score overlap weighting to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Among 322,898 women included in this analysis, the incidence rates of perforation per 1000 person-years were 1.64 (95% confidence interval, 1.53-1.76) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.48) for copper intrauterine devices; 1-year and 5-year crude cumulative incidence was 0.22% (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.24) and 0.63% (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.68) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and 0.16% (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.20) and 0.55% (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.68) for copper intrauterine devices, respectively. The incidence rates of expulsion per 1000 person-years were 13.95 (95% confidence interval, 13.63-14.28) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and 14.08 (95% confidence interval, 13.44-14.75) for copper intrauterine devices; 1-year and 5-year crude cumulative incidence was 2.30% (95% confidence interval, 2.24-2.36) and 4.52% (95% confidence interval, 4.40-4.65) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and 2.30% (95% confidence interval, 2.18-2.44) and 4.82 (95% confidence interval, 4.56-5.10) for copper intrauterine devices, respectively. Comparing levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices with copper intrauterine devices, the adjusted hazard ratios were 1.49 (95% confidence intervals, 1.25-1.78) for perforation and 0.69 (95% confidence intervals, 0.65-0.73) for expulsion. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for potential confounders, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices were associated with an increased risk of uterine perforation and a decreased risk of expulsion relative to copper intrauterine devices. Given that the absolute numbers of these events are low in both groups, these differences may not be clinically meaningful.
Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents, Female , Intrauterine Devices, Copper , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated , Intrauterine Devices , Uterine Perforation , Female , Humans , Intrauterine Device Expulsion , Intrauterine Devices, Copper/adverse effects , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated/adverse effects , Levonorgestrel , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Perforation/epidemiology , Uterine Perforation/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intrauterine devices are effective instruments for contraception, and 1 levonorgestrel-releasing device is also indicated for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia). OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of intrauterine device expulsion and uterine perforation in women with and without a diagnosis of menorrhagia within the first 12 months before device insertion STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in 3 integrated healthcare systems (Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Southern California, and Washington) and a healthcare information exchange (Regenstrief Institute) in the United States using electronic health records. Nonpostpartum women aged ≤50 years with intrauterine device (eg, levonorgestrel or copper) insertions from 2001 to 2018 and without a delivery in the previous 12 months were studied in this analysis. Recent menorrhagia diagnosis (ie, recorded ≤12 months before insertion) was ascertained from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The study outcomes, viz, device expulsion and device-related uterine perforation (complete or partial), were ascertained from electronic medical records and validated in the data sources. The cumulative incidence and crude incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the crude and adjusted hazard ratios using propensity score overlap weighting (13-16 variables) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Among 228,834 nonpostpartum women, the mean age was 33.1 years, 44.4% of them were White, and 31,600 (13.8%) had a recent menorrhagia diagnosis. Most women had a levonorgestrel-releasing device (96.4% of those with and 78.2% of those without a menorrhagia diagnosis). Women with a menorrhagia diagnosis were likely to be older, obese, and have dysmenorrhea or fibroids. Women with a menorrhagia diagnosis had a higher intrauterine device-expulsion rate (40.01 vs 10.92 per 1000 person-years) than those without, especially evident in the first few months after insertion. Women with a menorrhagia diagnosis had a higher cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) of expulsion (7.00% [6.70-7.32] at 1 year and 12.03% [11.52-12.55] at 5 years) vs those without (1.77% [1.70-1.84] at 1 year and 3.69% [3.56-3.83] at 5 years). The risk of expulsion was increased for women with a menorrhagia diagnosis vs for those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.84 [95% confidence interval, 2.66-3.03]). The perforation rate was low overall (<1/1000 person-years) but higher in women with a diagnosis of menorrhagia vs in those without (0.98 vs 0.63 per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) of uterine perforation was slightly higher for women with a menorrhagia diagnosis (0.09% [0.06-0.14] at 1 year and 0.39% [0.29-0.53] at 5 years) than those without it (0.07% [0.06-0.08] at 1 year and 0.28% [0.24-0.33] at 5 years). The risk of perforation was slightly increased in women with a menorrhagia diagnosis vs in those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.13). CONCLUSION: The risk of expulsion is significantly higher in women with a recent diagnosis of menorrhagia. Patient education and counseling regarding the potential expulsion risk is recommended at insertion. The absolute risk of perforation for women with a recent diagnosis of menorrhagia is very low. The increased expulsion and perforation rates observed are likely because of causal factors of menorrhagia.