ABSTRACT
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) instruction is required for physician assistant (PA) students. As a follow-up to an initial didactic year survey, this study seeks to understand which attributes of EBM resources clinical PA students find most and least useful, their self-efficacy utilizing medical literature, and their usage of EBM tools in the clinic. Results indicate that students preferred UpToDate and PubMed. PA students valued ease of use, which can inform instructors and librarians. Respondents utilized EBM tools daily or a few days a week, underscoring the importance of EBM tools in real-world scenarios. After their clinical year, students felt moderately confident utilizing the medical literature, emphasizing EBM training.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Physician Assistants , Physician Assistants/education , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Evidence-Based Medicine/education , Female , Male , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Students, Health Occupations/psychology , Young Adult , Self EfficacyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: (1) Identify the proportion of primary care visits in which American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) men receive a prostate-specific antigen test (PSAT)and/or a digital rectal exam (DRE), (2) describe characteristics of primary care visits in which AI/AN receive PSA and/or DRE, and (3) identify whether AI/AN receive PSA and/or DRE less often than non-Hispanic White (nHW) men. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) during 2013-2016 and 2018 and the NAMCS Community Health Center (CHC) datasets from 2012-2015. Weighted bivariate and multivariable tests analyzed the data to account for the complex survey design. RESULTS: For AI/AN men, 1.67 per 100 visits (95% CI = 0-4.24) included a PSATs (or PSAT) and 0 visits included a DRE between 2013-2016 and 2018. The rate of PSA for non-AI/AN men was 9.35 per 100 visits (95% CI = 7.78-10.91) and 2.52 per 100 visits (95% CI = 1.61-3.42) for DRE. AI/AN men were significantly less likely to receive a PSA than nHW men (aOR = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01-0.83). In CHCs, AI/AN men experienced 4.26 PSAT per 100 visits (95% CI = 0.96-7.57) compared to 5.00 PSAT per 100 visits (95% CI = 4.40-5.68) for non-AI/AN men. DRE rates for AI/AN men was 0.63 per 100 visits (95% CI = 0-1.61) compared to 1.05 per 100 (95% CI = 0.74-1.37) for non-AI/AN men. There was not a statistically significant disparity in the CHC data regarding PSA (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.42-1.98) or DRE (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.15-3.74), compared to nHW men. CONCLUSION: Efforts are needed to better understand why providers may not use PSA and DRE with AI/AN men compared to nHW men.
Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Physical Examination , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , American Indian or Alaska Native , Physical Examination/methods , Primary Health Care , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/ethnology , Rectum , WhiteABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Latinx children face psychosocial, linguistic, and economic challenges that put them at an increased risk of developing mental health conditions. Primary care providers should be equipped to recognize the complex mental health needs of this growing population. This article explores some of the barriers to mental health screenings in Latinx children and presents culturally sensitive, validated screening tools for primary care providers.
Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Child , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The primary method of drug delivery to treat asthma is through pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI). Asthma guidelines recommend that providers prescribe a spacer for all patients using pMDI. The objective of this study was to examine whether microbial contamination of spacer devices is associated with poor asthma outcomes. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, single-center case series of seven pediatric patients with persistent asthma who had previously been prescribed a spacer. Spacers were swabbed with sterile cotton and samples assessed for bacterial/fungal growth. Parents completed a questionnaire including Asthma Control Test (ACT) and asthma control was assessed by an Allergist/Immunologist physician. RESULTS: Two (n = 2) children's parent-completed ACT score indicated poorly controlled asthma and three (n = 3) patients were noted to be poorly controlled by the physician. All but one caregiver reported cleaning the spacer with most reporting (n = 5) that they cleaned their child's spacer monthly and one (n = 1) reporting cleaning it every two weeks. One spacer had detected Candida albicans. There was not a statistically significant association between ACT score and microbial growth (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Most spacers in a pediatric sample were not contaminated, despite lack of consistent cleaning, as recommended by spacer manufacturers. Providers and pharmacists should discuss proper cleaning of spacers with caregivers of pediatric patients.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Administration, Inhalation , Asthma/drug therapy , Caregivers , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Metered Dose Inhalers , Nebulizers and VaporizersABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Both the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) asthma practice guidelines recommend that providers routinely check inhaler technique and correct any mistakes that patients may make when using these devices. Providers, however, rarely check inhaler technique during asthma visits. The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe the development of an instrument to measure self-efficacy and outcome expectations regarding inhaler technique patient education, (2) evaluate the internal consistency reliability of the new scales, and (3) provide preliminary evidence of construct validity. Methods: First- and second-year physician assistant (PA) students at two institutions completed an anonymous and voluntary survey evaluating two new instruments, the Teaching Inhalers to Patients: Self-efficacy (TIP-SE) and the Teaching Inhalers to Patients: Outcome Expectations (TIP-OE) scales and sociodemographic characteristics. The data were analyzed using Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Cronbach's α, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: We had usable responses from 146 PA students (71.9% participation rate). The PCA identified one factor for the TIP-SE and TIP-OE, respectively. The internal consistency of the TIP-SE and TIP-OE was α = 0.96 and α = 0.92, respectively. The logistic regression found that second-year PA students who had higher mean TIP-SE scores were significantly more likely to report teaching patients to use inhalers during rotations (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1, 2.9). There was not a statistically significant relationship between reporting teaching patients to use inhalers during rotations and mean TIP-OE scores. Conclusion: The TIP-SE and TIP-OE show preliminary evidence of reliability and validity.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2021.2008428 .
Subject(s)
Asthma , Administration, Inhalation , Asthma/drug therapy , Humans , Metered Dose Inhalers , Motivation , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Self EfficacyABSTRACT
Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) instruction is required for physician Assistant (PA) students. This pilot study surveyed didactic PA students at three geographically diverse PA programs at the end of their didactic EBM course to understand which attributes of EBM resources they find most and least useful, and their self-efficacy in searching and appraising medical literature. Thematic analysis identified the most important student-reported attributes of a resource. PA students in this sample preferred UpToDate and PubMed as their top EBM tools based on attribute ratings. However, each database included in this pilot study received positive feedback, despite a low usage rate across institutions. The most important attributes were ease of use/search, information presentation, and conclusion/critical appraisal skill. After one EBM course, on average, students rated their self-efficacy searching the literature and appraising the literature as "moderately confident." This suggests that instructors and librarians have an opportunity to expose students to more tools as well as encourage "the right tool for the right job."
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Physician Assistants , Humans , Pilot Projects , Evidence-Based Medicine/education , Surveys and Questionnaires , Physician Assistants/education , StudentsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the relative importance of job-, community-, and individual-related factors that contribute to job choice among physicians, physician assistants (PAs), and NPs, to inform policy options to recruit clinicians to rural areas. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of PA preceptors from three institutions in two states. Participants were asked to rate the importance of 16 job-, community-, and individual-related factors when choosing a job. RESULTS: We received responses from 45 physicians, 74 PAs, and 15 NPs (24.2% response rate), who rated most job-, community-, and individual-related factors as important; ratings were similar across clinicians. PAs rated loan repayment programs and work hours higher than physicians, though the magnitude of the difference was small. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians similarly rated many factors as important. A better understanding of the tradeoffs clinicians are willing to make between these factors when making a job choice is critical to increase the attractiveness of rural positions.
Subject(s)
Nurse Practitioners , Physician Assistants , Physicians , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Job Satisfaction , United StatesABSTRACT
To evaluate major bleeding in cirrhosis with use of traditional anticoagulation or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), using a standardized definition. Anticoagulation in patients with cirrhosis is often a clinical conundrum for providers as the necessary balance between thrombotic and bleeding risk is complicated by end organ damage. Recent meta-analyses have sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with liver disease. These recent analyses are limited by various bleeding definitions, broad inclusion criteria, and few indications for anticoagulation. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis using a validated definition for major bleeding and compare rates between traditional anticoagulation and DOACs in patients with cirrhosis. Articles were eligible for inclusion if the international society on thrombosis and hemostasis (ISTH) definition of a major bleed was the primary safety outcome. Additionally, only articles including patients with cirrhosis and receiving treatment with anticoagulation for an indication for stroke prevention or venous thromboembolism were eligible. Eligible articles needed a DOAC comparator group against traditional anticoagulant medication. Seven studies met inclusion criteria and compiled data for 683 patients in the meta-analysis. Pooled trial analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of ISTH major bleeding (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.28-1.07, I2 0%). Individual secondary outcomes of all bleeding, intracerebral hemorrhage, or gastrointestinal bleeding also demonstrated no significant difference between DOACs and traditional anticoagulation. Use of DOACs in patients with mild to moderate cirrhosis carries similar risk to use of traditional anticoagulation.
Subject(s)
Liver Cirrhosis , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Currently, 13 U.S. jurisdictions allow for pharmacist-prescribed contraception; however, pharmacists' intention to use and ultimate uptake of this patient care opportunity have been variable. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to (1) identify student pharmacists' attitudes toward pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception (HC), (2) identify student pharmacist perceived barriers regarding pharmacist-prescribed HC, and (3) explore what factors affect student pharmacists' viewpoints. METHODS: An anonymous survey was administered using Qualtrics among third-year student pharmacists in a public health course. The survey was developed using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and previously published literature. TPB was developed to predict an individuals' intention to engage in a behavior at a specific time and place. All responses were anonymous. Survey responses were summarized using descriptive statistics, and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test was used to compare differences based on student pharmacist gender and religion. RESULTS: A total of 67 student pharmacists participated in the survey (response rate 80.7%). Most agreed-strongly agreed (n = 59, 88.1%) that pharmacists are capable of appropriately assessing and selecting HC therapies and believe it should be within a pharmacist's scope of practice (n = 53, 79.1%). Similarly, most agreed-strongly agreed that it is a professional responsibility for pharmacists to provide this service (n = 56, 83.6%). Potential barriers identified included limited access to patient medical records (n = 55, 82.1%), interruption to workflow (n = 51, 76.1%), and concerns for a decrease in well-women examinations (n = 51, 76.1%). Most identified with the Christian faith (n = 45, 67.2%) but said this did not influence their opinions (n = 40, 59.7%). Gender, age, and religion were not found to be associated with student pharmacists' attitudes. However, an increasing number of barriers were negatively associated with their attitudes. CONCLUSION: Student pharmacists believe it is within a pharmacist's scope of practice and a professional responsibly to prescribe HC. Student pharmacists were less supportive of pharmacist-prescribed HC if they reported a greater number of barriers.
Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents , Pharmacists , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Perception , Professional Role , StudentsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Suicide is an increasing public health problem for adolescents and young adults. The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency of physician assistants' (PAs') self-reported adolescent suicide risk assessments and to elicit salient beliefs regarding behavioral attitudes, norm referents, control factors, and intention to conduct suicide risk assessment with adolescents. METHODS: A convenience sample of PAs completed an anonymous cross-sectional questionnaire. Relationships were assessed using bivariate analyses and qualitative theme analysis. RESULTS: Forty-three PAs completed the questionnaire. Many PAs supported suicide risk assessment screening as a strategy to identify adolescents who are suicidal at an earlier stage of their illness; lack of time during the visit and problematic parental involvement were identified as barriers. CONCLUSIONS: PAs recognized that screening adolescents for suicide ideation may help prevent suicides. Their practice behaviors, however, did not correspond to this belief.
Subject(s)
Suicidal Ideation , Suicide, Attempted , Adolescent , Attitude , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Risk Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine patient and prescriber perceptions of depression screening within the community pharmacy setting and to assess the best strategies for patient engagement and care coordination. DESIGN: Qualitative semistructured key informant interviews using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as a theoretical framework. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A community pharmacy in the metropolitan Piedmont region of North Carolina from February 2019 to May 2019. Prescriber and patient interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by 2 investigators. A qualitative analysis was completed, with a selection of supporting quotations for each theme. OUTCOME MEASURES: Qualitative analysis of prescriber and patient perceptions of depression screening provided in community pharmacies, strategies for patient engagement, and coordination of care for depression screenings. RESULTS: Twelve patients and 4 prescribers participated in the study. The patient perceptions were categorized into 3 key themes: (1) private and confidential screenings; (2) disparate views regarding the potential interventions that pharmacists could offer; and (3) mental health stigma concerns. The prescriber perceptions were categorized into 3 key themes: (1) support for expanded access to depression screenings provided in community pharmacies; (2) necessity of referral algorithms for transitions of care; and (3) communication of full screening results for positive and negative screens. A mutual theme was identified among patients and prescribers: the view that mental health care provided at a community pharmacy was influenced by an established relationship with a community pharmacist. CONCLUSION: This study describes patient and provider perceptions of depression screening within the community pharmacy setting. Prescribers were supportive of community pharmacists' ability to close the gaps in access to care for patients with mental health conditions, whereas patients had mixed feelings that may have been influenced by concerns of privacy, confidentiality, and stigma. This deeper understanding of prescriber and patient perceptions of how community pharmacies could expand access to depression screening may provide a roadmap for offering these interventions in community pharmacies.
Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services , Pharmacies , Attitude of Health Personnel , Depression/diagnosis , Humans , North Carolina , Perception , PharmacistsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this research was to identify if an educational intervention increased the knowledge of high school adolescents on the social and health risks associated with vaping. The secondary objectives included measuring the prevalence of vaping habits and the attitudes of adolescents on the safety of vaping. METHODS: This research was conducted with adolescents at a single high school. An evidence-based educational intervention was provided on the health risks associated with vaping PRODUCTS: Data were collected using a pre- and postsurvey tool. The material presented was targeted on the basis of age and making the information relevant and easy to understand. RESULTS: A total of 235 participants showed a 14% increase in scores from the pre- to postsurvey, indicating an increase in knowledge (P < 0.001). Gender was not a predictor for vaping behavior, but grade level was. A significantly higher proportion of participants who vaped reported vaping being safer than smoking than those who did not vape (χ2 = 13.31, P = 0.001). The most common reason for vaping was stress reduction. For the participants who reported vaping, the most common reason indicated that would motivate them to stop the use of vaping products was concern regarding the negative impact on personal or family health (n = 43). CONCLUSION: An educational intervention was successful in improving high school students' knowledge on the risks associated with vaping. Knowledge on health risk was the most common reported reason for which students would stop vaping.
Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Health Education , Vaping , Adolescent , Humans , Schools , Smoking , Students , Vaping/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to (a) qualitatively examine caregiver and child feedback about a gold standard written asthma action plan (WAAP), and (b) determine whether having an asthma action plan was associated with child and caregiver self-efficacy in managing an exacerbation. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of structured interviews with 22 children with persistent asthma that collected feedback about the WAAP as well as self-efficacy. An analysis of interviews used the constant comparative method to identify themes of child and caregiver statements. Caregivers completed a questionnaire that measured asthma management self-efficacy, barriers to managing asthma, and belief in the treatment efficacy using validated scales. RESULTS: Approximately 36% of the caregivers reported having a WAAP for their child from their child's pediatrician. Most caregivers stated that having pictures would improve the WAAP, while most children stated that the layout needed to be improved by adding more space between the sections. Caregivers who reported knowing what the asthma action plan was had greater self-efficacy than caregivers who did not (z = -1.99, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Re-designing the current WAAP layout and including pictures of inhalers may promote patient understanding. Future research needs to examine if a re-designed WAAP improves asthma management of children with asthma and their caregivers.
Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Asthma/drug therapy , Caregivers/psychology , Patient Education as Topic , Self Care/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma/psychology , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Qualitative Research , Self Efficacy , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To 1) identify barriers to medication adherence and 2) examine the relationship between the Indian Health Service (IHS) 3 prime questions and medication adherence in patients with diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia before and 6 months after intervention. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study evaluated the effectiveness of an adherence program at an independent community pharmacy. Patients who met inclusion criteria were telephoned monthly to answer questions related to their medications. Patients served as their own controls to show comparison between pre- and postintervention adherence rates calculated according to proportion of days covered over the previous 6 months. Mean medication adherences before and after intervention were assessed via paired t test. Linear regression was used to analyze predictors of average medication adherence. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to measure the impact of comorbid conditions on medication adherence. RESULTS: Fifty-six of 354 patients met inclusion criteria, consented, and completed the study. The percentage of patients achieving an adherence rate of 80% or more increased from 9% initially to 59% at study completion. Each medication class showed improvement in adherence rates: diabetes from 66.24% to 80.06% (P = 0.0153), hypertension from 72.33% to 81.34% (P = 0.0192), and hyperlipidemia from 64.45% to 74.66% (P = 0.0103). Overall, average medication adherence increased by 11% (P < 0.0001). The top patient-reported barrier to adherence was convenience/forgetfulness (46.43%). CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-led counseling sessions with the use of the 3 prime questions showed short-term improvement in adherence rates among patients participating in a medication adherence program. Future studies should assess if improved adherence is sustained long-term following active intervention.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Hyperlipidemias/drug therapy , Hypertension/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Pharmaceutical Services/statistics & numerical data , United States Indian Health Service/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Medication Therapy Management/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND This study sought to quantify utilization and costs associated with opioid prescribing by emergency providers for Medicare Part D beneficiaries in North Carolina and the United States from 2013 to 2014.METHODS This was a retrospective examination of the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Part D Prescriber datasets from 2013-2014. The main variables of interest were total number of prescription claims and total Medicare Part D medication costs for opioid analgesic medications. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the data.RESULTS Excluding North Carolina, there were 2,030,108 (678.49 per 100,000) opioid claims in the United States in 2013, costing more than $28.3 million. In 2014, also excluding North Carolina, there were 2,061,992 (689.15 per 100,000) claims for opioids, costing almost $35.8 million. In North Carolina, there were 67,570 (708.62 per 100,000) opioid claims from emergency providers in 2013 and 72,881 (764.31 per 100,000) opioid claims in 2014 for Part D beneficiaries. Total Part D drug costs associated with opioids from North Carolina increased from $545,574 to $764,016, more than a 40% increase. In North Carolina, there was a statistically significant increase in costs (P < .001), but not a significant increase in numbers of claims (P = .051).LIMITATIONS This study did not examine patient-level data and could not examine diagnoses leading to opioid prescriptions, or opioid misuse or overdoses.CONCLUSION Almost 1 out of every 4 Part D prescriptions from emergency department providers in North Carolina was for an opioid medication. Given the recent focus on controlling opioid prescribing, future research should examine if the new opioid-prescribing guidelines reduced opioid prescription by these providers.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Emergency Medicine , Medicare Part D , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Analgesics, Opioid/economics , Drug Costs , Humans , North Carolina , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether provider, caregiver and child communication predicted peak flow meter (PFM) use one month later. METHODS: Five practices, 35 providers and 296 children with persistent asthma and their caregivers comprised the study sample. Audio-recorded provider-caregiver-child communication during the baseline medical visit captured discussion of the PFM; and child and caregiver baseline interviews after the medical visit collected factors associated with PFM use. Child- and caregiver-reported PFM availability and use, and observed child use of PFM were collected one-month later in the family's home. RESULTS: During the medical visit, provider communication about PFM use was infrequent (10% maximum) and child- or caregiver-initiated communication was nearly absent (0%-2%). Despite this, children demonstrated good use of the PFM one month later. Children were significantly more likely to perform at least six PFM steps correctly one month later when there was more communication about PFM during the medical visit. Few other factors predicted availability and use. CONCLUSIONS: Few providers discussed use of a PFM; observed performance was predicted by having talked about it with the child's provider. Provider communication should be targeted in future interventions to improve asthma management skills.
Subject(s)
Asthma/physiopathology , Peak Expiratory Flow Rate , Respiratory Function Tests/instrumentation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Caregivers , Child , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physician-Patient Relations , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the content of discussions between general pediatric providers and children and their caregivers about the benefits of asthma-control medication; describe the extent to which these discussions occur; and examine factors that are associated with medication benefit discussions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional secondary analysis of audiotaped medical visits. SETTING: Five primary care pediatric clinics in North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: 35 pediatric providers and 248 children with persistent asthma and their caregivers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of discussion about benefits associated with asthma-control medications. RESULTS: Providers discussed benefits associated with asthma-control medications during 56% of medical visits. Benefits were more likely to be discussed when the child was younger and when medication adherence was discussed during the visit. When providers discussed benefits of asthma-control medications, they were most likely to ask questions and make statements regarding symptom control/prevention. CONCLUSION: General pediatric medical providers often do not discuss the benefits of asthma-control medications. Pharmacists could fill this information gap by counseling both children and their caregivers about benefits that a child with asthma can expect as a result of treatment.
Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Caregivers , Communication , Health Personnel , Health Services , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , North Carolina , Pediatrics/methodsABSTRACT
Stroke incidence is higher and stroke outcomes are poorer in Black patients compared to White patients. Poststroke pain, however, is not a well understood stroke outcome. Using the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program database, we hypothesized that the dataset would demonstrate proportionately higher relative risk of poststroke pain in the Black poststroke patient population compared to the White poststroke patient population. However, our analysis showed that Black stroke patients were diagnosed with poststroke pain at a similar rate as White stroke patients. As our results are not consistent with other poststroke outcomes in the literature, this study identifies a potentially underdiagnosed patient population, highlighting the need for further research.
Subject(s)
Population Health , Stroke , Humans , Black or African American , Pain , Stroke/complications , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , United States , WhiteABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Current physician assistant (PA) learners have a clear preference for interactive learning that is vibrantly present in new media technologies. At present, there is a paucity of research regarding use or acceptability of gamification in PA education. The purpose of this study was to examine PA students' experience with, attitudes toward, and outcomes of a gamified cardiac auscultation curriculum. METHODS: Faculty at one institution designed an interactive Mobile App Cardiac Auscultation Curriculum (MACAC). The MACAC incorporates independent and group learning using the Littmann Learning mobile app. Author-created surveys as well as knowledge and auscultation assessment tools were delivered to all students. RESULTS: Most of the students recommended the use of the app for future cohorts and reported confidence to accurately identify normal and abnormal heart sounds. Knowledge and auscultation assessment scores demonstrated proficiency in identification of normal and abnormal heart sounds. DISCUSSION: Gamification research is important because blended learning that incorporates new media technologies with traditional approaches can help overcome the limitations of passive learning environments. This study provides evidence that the use of a mobile app can be an effective and innovative method to teach cardiac auscultation to the 21st century PA learners.