Parasitological and clinical efficacy of standard treatment regimens against Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax and P. malariae in Papua New Guinea.

Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) and P. vivax (Pv) to standard antimalarials is widespread in Papua New Guinea (PNG). The objective of the study was to assess the rate of clinical treatment failure (TF) and parasite resistance to amodiaquine (AQ), chloroquine (CQ) and quinine+sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (Q+SP) for malaria in a rural health centre of the East Sepik Province. 179 patients presenting with symptoms and signs of malaria and with Pf (144 patients), Pv (18 patients), P. malariae (Pm) (7 patients) or mixed infection (10 patients) were included. 86 were treated with AQ, 88 with CQ and 5 with Q+SP. 21/179 patients (12%) were not cured or had a recrudescence of symptoms associated with parasitaemia in the 28 days following treatment, 14% after AQ, 10% after CQ and 0% after Q+SP. The proportion of TF was higher (17%) when the analysis population included only the 108 subjects who had a complete follow-up, especially for failure with Pf following AQ treatment (26%). During the 28 days of follow-up, RII or RIII level of resistance in Pf was detected in 55% of the subjects treated with amodiaquine, 30% of those treated with chloroquine and 0% of those treated with quinine+SP. Of the Pv or Pm parasites only one Pv was found to be RII resistant to CQ in the 28-day test. In vitro resistance of Pf to CQ was higher than to AQ (50% versus 27% of 36 parasite samples that grew successfully). The level of TF and parasitological resistance to standard antimalarial drugs was lower in this area than in urban settings, where drugs are more easily available. AQ performed less well than CQ but the difference is likely to be due to the age of the users, ie, their level of immunity, AQ being the first-line drug for young children. These results provided support for the recent change in the policy for the standard treatment of uncomplicated malaria in PNG from AQ or CQ to the combination of AQ+SP or CQ+SP, a recommendation aimed at slowing down the spread of multidrug resistance.

Molecular analysis of Plasmodium falciparum from drug treatment failure patients in Papua New Guinea.

A study was conducted in Papua New Guinea to analyze Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance polymorphisms in patients presenting with resistant malaria. One hundred ninety-nine P. falciparum-positive patients were recruited at two sites, Madang and Maprik. Exposure to the 4-aminoquinolines chloroquine and amodiaquine was uniformly high, at 84% overall. However, 59% of these were taken in various combinations of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine and/or primaquine and/or quinine. Two markers for 4-aminoquinoline resistance, P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter 76T and P. falciparum multidrug resistance 1, were fixed in the population and two markers for pyrimethamine resistance, dihydrofolate reductase (dhps) 59R and 108N, were found at moderate to high levels, overall 60% and 75%, respectively. No polymorphisms in dhps associated with sulfadoxine resistance were present. Differences between the two sites are analyzed. The study period encompasses a change in standard malaria treatment policy. These findings stress the need for regular monitoring of the effects of standard drug treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Papua New Guinea.

The sensitivity of the OptiMAL rapid diagnostic test to the presence of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes compromises its ability to monitor treatment outcomes in an area of Papua New Guinea in which malaria is endemic.

Using in vivo samples from treatment failure malaria cases, we demonstrate the high sensitivity of the parasite lactase dehydrogenase (pLDH)-based OptiMAL rapid diagnostic test in the detection of P. falciparum gametocytes. This high sensitivity limits the use of pLDH-based tests in the monitoring of treatment outcomes in circumstances where gametocytemia is common.

Rifampicin/Cotrimoxazole/Isoniazid versus mefloquine or quinine + sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine for malaria: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies of a fixed combination including cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, and isoniazid (Cotrifazid) showed efficacy against resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum in animal models and in small-scale human studies. We conducted a multicentric noninferiority trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Cotrifazid against drug-resistant malaria in Papua New Guinea. DESIGN: The trial design was open-label, block-randomised, comparative, and multicentric. SETTING: The trial was conducted in four primary care health facilities, two in urban and two in rural areas of Madang and East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea. PARTICIPANTS: Patients of all ages with recurrent uncomplicated malaria were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive Cotrifazid, mefloquine, or the standard treatment of quinine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events and rate of clinical and/or parasitological failure at day 14 were recorded. RESULTS: The safety analysis population included 123 patients assigned to Cotrifazid, 123 to mefloquine, and 123 to quinine + SP. The Cotrifazid group experienced lower overall incidence of adverse events than the other groups. Among the efficacy analysis population (72 Cotrifazid, 71 mefloquine, and 75 quinine + SP), clinical failure rate (symptoms and parasite load) on day 14 was equivalent for the three groups (0% for Cotrifazid and mefloquine; 1% for quinine + SP), but parasitological failure rate (P. falciparum asexual blood-stage) was higher for Cotrifazid than for mefloquine or quinine + SP (9% [PCR corrected 8%] versus 0% and 3%, respectively [p = 0.02]). CONCLUSION: Despite what appears to be short-term clinical equivalence, the notable parasitological failure at day 14 in both P. falciparum and P. vivax makes Cotrifazid in its current formulation and regimen a poor alternative combination therapy for malaria.