Immunogenicity of High-Dose Versus MF59-Adjuvanted Versus Standard Influenza Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: The Swiss/Spanish Trial in Solid Organ Transplantation on Prevention of Influenza (STOP-FLU Trial).

BACKGROUND: The immunogenicity of the standard influenza vaccine is reduced in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients, so new vaccination strategies are needed in this population. METHODS: Adult SOT recipients from 9 transplant clinics in Switzerland and Spain were enrolled if they were >3 months after transplantation. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to a MF59-adjuvanted or a high-dose vaccine (intervention), or a standard vaccine (control), with stratification by organ and time from transplant. The primary outcome was vaccine response rate, defined as a ≥4-fold increase of hemagglutination-inhibition titers to at least 1 vaccine strain at 28 days postvaccination. Secondary outcomes included polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza and vaccine reactogenicity. RESULTS: A total of 619 patients were randomized, 616 received the assigned vaccines, and 598 had serum available for analysis of the primary endpoint (standard, n = 198; MF59-adjuvanted, n = 205; high-dose, n = 195 patients). Vaccine response rates were 42% (84/198) in the standard vaccine group, 60% (122/205) in the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine group, and 66% (129/195) in the high-dose vaccine group (difference in intervention vaccines vs standard vaccine, 0.20; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], .12-1); P < .001; difference in high-dose vs standard vaccine, 0.24 [95% CI, .16-1]; P < .001; difference in MF59-adjuvanted vs standard vaccine, 0.17 [97.5% CI, .08-1]; P < .001). Influenza occurred in 6% of the standard, 5% in the MF59-adjuvanted, and 7% in the high-dose vaccine groups. Vaccine-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the intervention vaccine groups, but most of the events were mild. CONCLUSIONS: In SOT recipients, use of an MF59-adjuvanted or a high-dose influenza vaccine was safe and resulted in a higher vaccine response rate. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03699839.

Immune Monitoring-Guided Versus Fixed Duration of Antiviral Prophylaxis Against Cytomegalovirus in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of assays detecting cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cell-mediated immunity may individualize the duration of antiviral prophylaxis after transplantation. METHODS: In this randomized trial, kidney and liver transplant recipients from 6 centers in Switzerland were enrolled if they were CMV-seronegative with seropositive donors or CMV-seropositive receiving antithymocyte globulins. Patients were randomized to a duration of antiviral prophylaxis based on immune monitoring (intervention) or a fixed duration (control). Patients in the control group were planned to receive 180 days (CMV-seronegative) or 90 days (CMV-seropositive) of valganciclovir. Patients were assessed monthly with a CMV ELISpot assay (T-Track CMV); prophylaxis in the intervention group was stopped if the assay was positive. The co-primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with clinically significant CMV infection and reduction in days of prophylaxis. Between-group differences were adjusted for CMV serostatus. RESULTS: Overall, 193 patients were randomized (92 in the immune-monitoring group and 101 in the control group), of whom 185 had evaluation of the primary outcome (87 and 98 patients). CMV infection occurred in 26 of 87 (adjusted percentage, 30.9%) in the immune-monitoring group and in 32 of 98 (adjusted percentage, 31.1%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, -0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.0% to 12.7%; P = .064). The duration of prophylaxis was shorter in the immune-monitoring group (adjusted difference, -26.0 days; 95%, CI, -41.1 to -10.8 days; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Immune monitoring resulted in a significant reduction of antiviral prophylaxis, but we were unable to establish noninferiority of this approach on the co-primary outcome of CMV infection. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02538172.

Targeting the Complement Pathway in Kidney Transplantation.

The complement system is paramount in the clearance of pathogens and cell debris, yet is increasingly recognized as a key component in several pathways leading to allograft injury. There is thus a growing interest in new biomarkers to assess complement activation and guide tailored therapies after kidney transplantation (KTx). C5 blockade has revolutionized post-transplant management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, a paradigm of complement-driven disease. Similarly, new drugs targeting the complement amplification loop hold much promise in the treatment and prevention of recurrence of C3 glomerulopathy. Although unduly activation of the complement pathway has been described after brain death and ischemia reperfusion, any clinical attempts to mitigate the ensuing renal insults have so far provided mixed results. However, the intervention timing, strategy, and type of complement blocker need to be optimized in these settings. Furthermore, the fast-moving field of ex vivo organ perfusion technology opens new avenues to deliver complement-targeted drugs to kidney allografts with limited iatrogenic risks. Complement plays also a key role in the pathogenesis of donor-specific ABO- and HLA-targeted alloantibodies. However, C5 blockade failed overall to improve outcomes in highly sensitized patients and prevent the progression to chronic antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Similarly, well-conducted studies with C1 inhibitors in sensitized recipients yielded disappointing results so far, in part, because of subtherapeutic dosage used in clinical studies. The emergence of new complement blockers raises hope to significantly reduce the negative effect of ischemia reperfusion, ABMR, and nephropathy recurrence on outcomes after KTx.

Surgical site infections after kidney transplantation are independently associated with graft loss.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common health care-associated infections. SSIs after kidney transplantation (K-Tx) can endanger patient and allograft survival. Multicenter studies on this early posttransplant complication are scarce. We analyzed consecutive adult K-Tx recipients enrolled in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study who received a K-Tx between May 2008 and September 2020. All data were prospectively collected with the exception of the categorization of SSI which was performed retrospectively according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. A total of 58 out of 3059 (1.9%) K-Tx recipients were affected by SSIs. Deep incisional (15, 25.9%) and organ/space infections (34, 58.6%) predominated. In the majority of SSIs (52, 89.6%), bacteria were detected, most frequently Escherichia coli (15, 28.9%), Enterococcus spp. (14, 26.9%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (13, 25.0%). A BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (multivariable OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.07-4.34, P = .023) and delayed graft function (multivariable OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.56-5.34, P = .001) were independent risk factors for SSI. In Cox proportional hazard models, SSI was independently associated with graft loss (multivariable HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.35-10.38, P = .011). In conclusion, SSI was a rare complication after K-Tx. BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and delayed graft function were independent risk factors. SSIs were independently associated with graft loss.

Impact of different urinary tract infection phenotypes within the first year post-transplant on renal allograft outcomes.

In this study, we investigated the clinical impact of different urinary tract infection (UTI) phenotypes occurring within the first year after renal transplantation. The population included 2368 transplantations having 2363 UTI events. Patients were categorized into four groups based on their compiled UTI events observed within the first year after transplantation: (i) no colonization or UTI (n = 1404; 59%), (ii) colonization only (n = 353; 15%), (iii) occasional UTI with 1-2 episodes (n = 456; 19%), and (iv) recurrent UTI with ≥3 episodes (n = 155; 7%). One-year mortality and graft loss rate were not different among the four groups, but patients with recurrent UTI had a 7-10 ml/min lower eGFR at year one (44 ml/min vs. 54, 53, and 51 ml/min; p < .001). UTI phenotypes had no impact on long-term patient survival (p = .33). However, patients with recurrent UTI demonstrated a 10% lower long-term death-censored allograft survival (p < .001). Furthermore, recurrent UTI was a strong and independent risk factor for reduced death-censored allograft survival in a multivariable analysis (HR 4.41, 95% CI 2.53-7.68, p < .001). We conclude that colonization and occasional UTI have no impact on pertinent outcomes, but recurrent UTI are associated with lower one-year eGFR and lower long-term death-censored allograft survival. Better strategies to prevent and treat recurrent UTI are needed.

Outcome of COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients Through the SARS-CoV-2 Variants Eras: Role of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at increased risk for COVID-19-associated complications. We aimed to describe the evolving epidemiology and outcome of PCR-documented SARS-CoV-2 infection in KTR followed at our institution from March 2020 to May 2022. The primary endpoint was hospitalization for COVID-19-related symptoms or death within 28 days from diagnosis. Overall, 243 cases were included of which 68 (28%) developed the primary outcome. A significant decrease in the incidence of the primary outcome was observed (p < 0.001, r -0.342) during the study period. Anti-Spike monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were administered as early treatment (within 5-7 days of onset of symptoms) in 101 patients (14 with casirivimab/imdevimab and 87 with sotrovimab). Among 145 patients who had received at least one vaccination dose before infection, 109 patients were considered as adequately vaccinated. Multivariate analysis revealed that the Charlson Comorbidity Index (P 0.001; OR 1.28, CI 1.11-1.48) was associated with the primary outcome, while early administration of mAbs (P 0.032; OR 0.39, CI 0.16-0.92) was associated with a better outcome, but not infection during the period of the omicron variant predominance or adequate vaccination.

Recurrence of IgA nephropathy after kidney transplantation: experience from the Swiss transplant cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) after kidney transplantation occurs in about 30% of patients. The relevance of recurrence for the long-term graft survival is expected to increase, since graft survival continues to improve. METHODS: In a nested study within the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study the incidence of IgAN recurrence, predictive factors, graft function and graft and patient survival were evaluated. Serum concentration of total IgA, total IgG, Gd-IgA1 and IgA-IgG immune complex were measured using ELISA-based immunologic assays. RESULTS: Between May 2008 and December 2016, 28 women and 133 men received their kidney allograft for end-stage kidney disease due to IgAN in Switzerland. Over a median follow-up time of 7 years after transplantation, 43 out of 161 patients (26.7%) developed an IgAN recurrence, of which six (13.9%) had an allograft failure afterwards and further four patients (9.3%) died. During the same follow-up period, 6 out of 118 patients (5%) each experienced allograft failure or died without prior IgAN recurrence. After 11 years the risk for IgAN recurrence was 27.7% (95%-CI: 20.6-35.3%). Renal function was similar in patients with and without recurrence up to 7 years after transplantation, but worsened thereafter in patients with recurrence (eGFR median (interquartile range) at 8 years: 49 ml/min/1.73m2 (29-68) vs. 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (38-78)). Serum concentration of total IgA, total IgG, Gd-IgA1 and IgA-IgG immune complex within the first year posttransplant showed no significant effect on the recurrence of IgAN. Younger recipients and women had a higher risk of recurrence, but the latter only in the short term. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a recurrence risk of 28% at 11 years after transplantation, which is consistent with previous literature. However, the predictive value of known biomarkers, such as serum Gd-IgA1 and IgA-IgG IC, for IgAN recurrence could not be confirmed.

Pre-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies and risk for poor first-year renal transplant outcomes: results from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study.

The aim of this study was to analyze first year renal outcomes in a nationwide prospective multicenter cohort comprising 2215 renal transplants, with a special emphasis on the presence of pre-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). All transplants had a complete virtual crossmatch and DSA were detected in 19% (411/2215). The investigated composite endpoint was a poor first-year outcome defined as (i) allograft failure or (ii) death or (iii) poor allograft function (eGFR ≤25 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) at one year. Two hundred and twenty-one (221/2215; 10%) transplants showed a poor first-year outcome. Rejection (24/70; 34%) was the most common reason for graft failure. First-year patient's death was rare (48/2215; 2%). There were no statistically significant differences between DSA-positive and DSA-negative transplants regarding composite and each individual endpoint, as well as reasons for graft failure and death. DSA-positive transplants experienced more frequently rejection episodes, mainly antibody-mediated rejection (both P < 0.0001). The combination of DSA and any first year rejection was associated with the overall poorest death-censored allograft survival (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, presence of pre-transplant DSA per se does not affect first year outcomes. However, DSA-positive transplants experiencing first year rejection are a high-risk population for poor allograft survival and may benefit from intense clinical surveillance.

[Hypertension after kidney transplantation]. / Hypertension après transplantation rénale.

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. While graft survival has considerably improved with current immunosuppressive strategies, long-term prognosis is dependent on cardiovascular complications. There is a high prevalence of arterial hypertension after kidney transplantation. Hypertension can be associated with traditional risk factors or directly linked with the anatomy and the function of the kidney allograft, as well as with the immunosuppressive treatment. Current blood pressure targets are <130/80 mmHg, but there is a lack of evidence regarding the impact on cardiovascular and graft outcomes. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, the causes as well as the management of hypertension after kidney transplantation.

La transplantation rénale est le traitement de choix de l'insuffisance rénale terminale. Si la survie des greffons s'est considérablement améliorée avec les traitements immunosuppresseurs actuels, le pronostic à long terme dépend en grande partie des complications cardiovasculaires. L'hypertention artérielle (HTA) est très fréquente après une transplantation rénale. Elle peut être associée aux facteurs de risque traditionnels ou être plus spécifiquement en lien avec l'anatomie et la fonction du greffon ainsi qu'avec les médicaments antirejet. Les cibles tensionnelles recommandées sont des valeurs < 130/80 mmHg, mais les évidences manquent concernant l'impact sur les complications cardiovasculaires et la survie du greffon. Dans cet article, nous discutons l'épidémiologie, les causes et la prise en charge de l'HTA après transplantation rénale.

Real-life food-safety behavior and incidence of foodborne infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

Food-safety measures are recommended in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, the actual adherence of patients in a real-life setting and the impact on the incidence of foodborne infections remain largely unexplored. We performed a survey among SOT recipients followed at our institution, aiming to evaluate their food-safety behavior. We assessed the incidence of microbiologically proven foodborne infections by chart review. One hundred ninety-seven SOT recipients (kidney = 117, lung = 35, liver = 29, and heart = 16) participated in the survey. Overall, 17.7% of the participants observed all food-safety recommendations (22.0% avoided food at risk of contamination while 67.9% applied hygiene recommendations). Patients within the first year after transplantation (odds ratio [OR] 5.42; P = .001) and females (OR 4.67; P = .001) followed food-safety recommendations more closely. Although the majority of SOT recipients felt concerned and actively sought information on food safety (68%-70%), only 27% were able to recognize all risks of foodborne infection in hypothetical scenarios. Incidence of proven foodborne infections was 17.9% (95% confidence interval 9.9%-30.9%) 5 years after transplantation. Importantly, foodborne infections occurred exclusively among patients not following food-safety recommendations. In summary, most SOT recipients eat foods that make them at risk of foodborne infections. Our results indicate that there is room for improvement in patient education, particularly later after transplantation, and reinforce current food-safety recommendations.

Dialysis after graft loss: a Swiss experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients returning to dialysis after graft loss have high early morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We used data from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study to describe the current practice and outcomes in Switzerland. All patients who received a renal allograft between May 2008 and December 2014 were included. The patients with graft loss were divided into two groups depending on whether the graft loss occurred within 1 year after transplantation (early graft loss group) or later (late graft loss group). Patients with primary non-function who never gained graft function were excluded. RESULTS: Seventy-seven out of 1502 patients lost their graft during follow-up, 40 within 1 year after transplantation. Eleven patients died within 30 days after allograft loss. Patient survival was 86, 81 and 74% at 30, 90 and 365 days after graft loss, respectively. About 92% started haemodialysis, 62% with definitive vascular access, which was associated with decreased mortality (hazard ratio = 0.28). At the time of graft loss, most patients were on triple immunosuppressive therapy with significant reduction after nephrectomy. One year after graft loss, 77.5% (31 of 40) of patients in the early and 43.2% (16 out of 37) in the late-loss group had undergone nephrectomy. Three years after graft loss, 36% of the patients with early and 12% with late graft loss received another allograft. CONCLUSION: In summary, our data illustrate high mortality, and a high number of allograft nephrectomies and re-transplantations. Patients commencing haemodialysis with a catheter had significantly higher mortality than patients with definitive access. The role of immunosuppression reduction and allograft nephrectomy as interdependent factors for mortality and re-transplantation needs further evaluation.

Upfront use of eculizumab to treat early acute antibody-mediated rejection after kidney allotransplantation and relevance for xenotransplantation.

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) early after transplant remains a challenge, both in allotransplantation and in xenotransplantation. We report the case of an early and severe acute AMR episode in a kidney transplant recipient that was successfully treated with upfront eculizumab. A 58-year-old woman had been on dialysis since 2014. She underwent a first kidney transplant in 2018 with primary non-function and received several blood transfusions. Postoperatively, she developed anti-HLA antibodies. One year later, she received a second allograft from a deceased donor. At day 0, there was only one preformed low-level donor-specific antibody (DSA) anti-DQ7. After initial excellent allograft function, serum creatinine increased on days 7-9, and this was associated with oligo-anuria. On day 7, there was an increase in her DSA anti-DQ7 and 4 de novo DSA had developed at high MFI values. Allograft biopsy showed severe active AMR with diffuse C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. The early acute AMR episode was treated with upfront eculizumab administration (2 doses) with efficient CH50 blockade (< 10% CH50). Rituximab was also administered on day 12, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was given over the following days. There was an excellent clinical response to eculizumab administration. Eculizumab administration rapidly reversed the acute AMR episode without the need for plasmapheresis. Rituximab and IVIG were also used as B-cell immunomodulators to decrease DSA. Blocking efficiently the terminal complement pathway may become a useful strategy to treat acute AMR in sensitized recipients of allografts, and possibly in recipients of discordant xenografts.

[SARS-CoV-2 infection and solid organ transplantation]. / Infection à SARS-CoV-2 et transplantation d'organes solides.

Transplantation has become a valid therapeutic option for an increasing number of patients with end-stage organ disease. The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection and associated disease (COVID-19) has alarmed the transplant community, since recommendations for adequate follow-up of organ transplant recipients during the acute phase of a pandemic are limited. Furthermore, treatment options against COVID-19 disease and adequate adjustment of immunosuppression in at risk patients remain a concern. This review summarizes current knowledge on the incidence and clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with solid organ transplantation. It also discusses therapeutic strategies and provides general recommendations on how to proceed with transplantation programs in a time when health care resources may become scarce.

La transplantation d'organes permet de prolonger et d'améliorer la qualité de vie d'un nombre croissant de patients. Dans le contexte de la pandémie actuelle de l'infection au coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 et de la maladie qui en découle (COVID-19), la communauté de transplantation s'interroge sur le risque encouru par les patients greffés, sur la manière d'assurer un suivi adéquat d'une population à risque, et sur le schéma thérapeutique à adopter en cas de maladie avérée. Dans cet article nous décrivons les connaissances actuelles quant à l'incidence et à l'évolution de l'infection SARS-CoV-2 chez des patients greffés. En accord avec les sociétés de discipline, nous proposons des recommandations de prise en charge thérapeutique, et amenons quelques éléments de réflexion en tenant compte d'une possible limitation des ressources et d'une situation pandémique évolutive.

[Post-transplantation diabetes in kidney transplant: from the diabetologist point of view]. / Diabète post-transplantation rénale: le point de vue du diabétologue.

Post-transplantation diabetes (PTDM) exposes to increased morbidity (cardiovascular or infectious complications, early graft dysfunction) and to a risk of premature death. Recognition of risk factors is essential for early and individualized care. The management of a PTDM requires the use of oral antidiabetic treatments (metformin or DPP4 inhibitors) or GLP1 receptor agonists for their favorable effects on weight and kidney that seem ideal in this context. Corticosteroid-induced diabetes or the rare occurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis require insulin therapy. In the long term, the main objective remains to integrate PTDM treatment in a more comprehensive management, targeting the reduction of cardiovascular risk of vulnerable transplant patients.

Le diabète post-transplantation (PTDM) expose le patient à une morbidité accrue (cardiovasculaire, infectieuse ou dysfonction précoce du greffon), ainsi qu'à un risque de décès prématuré. La reconnaissance des facteurs de risque est primordiale pour une prise en charge précoce et individualisée. La prise en charge d'un PTDM d'apparition progressive recourt à l'utilisation d'antidiabétiques oraux (metformine ou inhibiteurs de la dipeptidyl peptidase 4) ou aux agonistes du récepteur du glucagon-like peptide-1 dont l'effet pondéral et néphroprotecteur semble idéal dans ce contexte. Un diabète cortico-induit ou, plus rare, une acidocétose aiguë seront traités par une insulinothérapie précoce. À long terme, l'objectif reste d'intégrer le traitement du PTDM dans une prise en charge plus globale ciblant la réduction du risque cardiovasculaire de ces patients transplantés fragiles.

Genetic immune and inflammatory markers associated with diabetes in solid organ transplant recipients.

New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) is a complication following solid organ transplantation (SOT) and may be related to immune or inflammatory responses. We investigated whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 158 immune- or inflammation-related genes contribute to NODAT in SOT recipients. The association between 263 SNPs and NODAT was investigated in a discovery sample of SOT recipients from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS, n1  = 696). Positive results were tested in a first STCS replication sample (n2  = 489) and SNPs remaining significant after multiple test corrections were tested in a second SOT replication sample (n3  = 156). Associations with diabetic traits were further tested in several large general population-based samples (n > 480 000). Only SP110 rs2114592C>T remained associated with NODAT in the STCS replication sample. Carriers of rs2114592-TT had 9.9 times (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.22-30.5, P = .00006) higher risk for NODAT in the combined STCS samples (n = 1184). rs2114592C>T was further associated with NODAT in the second SOT sample (odds ratio: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.55-14.6, P = .006). On the other hand, SP110 rs2114592C>T was not associated with diabetic traits in population-based samples, suggesting a specific gene-environment interaction, possibly due to the use of specific medications (ie, immunosuppressants) in transplant patients and/or to the illness that may unmask the gene effect.

Targeted γ-secretase inhibition of Notch signaling activation in acute renal injury.

The Notch pathway has been reported to control tissue damage in acute kidney diseases. To investigate potential beneficial nephroprotective effects of targeting Notch, we developed chemically functionalized γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) targeting γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (γ-GT) and/or γ-glutamylcyclotransferase (γ-GCT), two enzymes overexpressed in the injured kidney, and evaluated them in in vivo murine models of acute tubular and glomerular damage. Exposure of the animals to disease-inducing drugs together with the functionalized GSIs improved proteinuria and, to some extent, kidney dysfunction. The expression of genes involved in the Notch pathway, acute inflammatory stress responses, and the renin-angiotensin system was enhanced in injured kidneys, which could be downregulated upon administration of functionalized GSIs. Immunohistochemistry staining and Western blots demonstrated enhanced activation of Notch1 as detected by its cleaved active intracellular domain during acute kidney injury, and this was downregulated by concomitant treatment with the functionalized GSIs. Thus targeted γ-secretase-based prodrugs developed as substrates for γ-GT/γ-GCT have the potential to selectively control Notch activation in kidney diseases with subsequent regulation of the inflammatory stress response and the renin-angiotensin pathways.

Malt1 protease inactivation efficiently dampens immune responses but causes spontaneous autoimmunity.

The protease activity of the paracaspase Malt1 has recently gained interest as a drug target for immunomodulation and the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. To address the consequences of Malt1 protease inactivation on the immune response in vivo, we generated knock-in mice expressing a catalytically inactive C472A mutant of Malt1 that conserves its scaffold function. Like Malt1-deficient mice, knock-in mice had strong defects in the activation of lymphocytes, NK and dendritic cells, and the development of B1 and marginal zone B cells and were completely protected against the induction of autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Malt1 inactivation also protected the mice from experimental induction of colitis. However, Malt1 knock-in mice but not Malt1-deficient mice spontaneously developed signs of autoimmune gastritis that correlated with an absence of Treg cells, an accumulation of T cells with an activated phenotype and high serum levels of IgE and IgG1. Thus, removal of the enzymatic activity of Malt1 efficiently dampens the immune response, but favors autoimmunity through impaired Treg development, which could be relevant for therapeutic Malt1-targeting strategies.

[Return to dialysis after kidney transplantation: a retrospective study in the Canton de Vaud]. / Retour en dialyse après transplantation rénale : une étude rétrospective dans le canton de Vaud.

Renal transplantation is the first-line therapy for eligible patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, approximately 20 % of cadaveric graft recipients need to start dialysis at 5 years. The transition period between transplantation and dialysis is at high risk of complications, but data exploring this issue are scarce. In this retrospective study from dialysis centres of the Canton de Vaud, we analysed the clinical data and management of these patients at the beginning of dialysis after graft loss, and up to one year after dialysis start. Our data show that such patients suffer from a high rate of complications, such as urgent start of dialysis, hospitalizations, severe hypertension and depression. We suggest that clinical management in this period should be revisited.

La transplantation rénale est le traitement de choix de l'insuffisance rénale terminale chez les patients éligibles à cet effet. Malheureusement, environ 20 % des receveurs d'une greffe rénale cadavérique doivent (re)débuter la dialyse 5 ans après la greffe. La transition de la greffe rénale à la dialyse est une période à haut risque de complications, mais les données relatives à ce sujet sont parcimonieuses. Cette étude rétrospective, provenant des centres de dialyse du canton de Vaud, a analysé les données cliniques des patients transplantés rénaux et leur prise en charge au moment du retour en dialyse, et dans l'année qui a suivi. Nos résultats montrent un taux élevé de complications, comme un début de dialyse en urgence, de multiples hospitalisations, une hypertension sévère et une dépression. Nous suggérons que la prise en charge de ces patients dans cette période soit revisitée.