The effect of ankle and hindfoot malalignment on foot mechanics in patients suffering from post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Ankle and hindfoot malalignment is a common finding in patients suffering from post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis. However, no studies have addressed the effect of concomitant foot deformities on intrinsic foot kinematics and kinetics. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of ankle and hindfoot malalignment on the kinematics and kinetics of multiple joints in the foot and ankle complex in patients suffering from post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis. METHODS: Twenty-nine subjects with post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis participated in this study. Standardized weight-bearing radiographs were obtained preoperatively to categorize patients as having cavus, planus or neutral ankle and hindfoot alignment, based on 4 X-ray measurements. All patients underwent standard gait assessment. A 4-segment foot model was used to estimate intrinsic foot joint kinematics and kinetics during gait. Statistical parametric mapping was used to compare foot kinematics and kinetics between groups. FINDINGS: There were 3 key findings regarding overall foot function in the 3 groups of post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis: (i) altered frontal and transverse plane inter-segmental angles and moments of the Shank-Calcaneus and Calcaneus-Midfoot joints in the cavus compared to the planus group; (ii) in cavus OA group, Midfoot-Metatarsus joint abduction sought to compensate the varus inclination of the ankle joint; (iii) there were no significant differences in inter-segmental angles and moments between the planus and neutral OA groups. INTERPRETATION: Future studies should integrate assessment of concomitant foot and ankle deformities in post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis, to provide additional insight into associated mechanical deficits and compensation mechanisms during gait.

The wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb (WHAT) test: a more specific and sensitive test to diagnose de Quervain tenosynovitis than the Eichhoff's Test.

De Quervain's disease has different clinical features. Different tests have been described in the past, the most popular test being the Eichhoff's test, often wrongly named as the Finkelstein's test. Over the years, a misinterpretation has occurred between these two tests, the latter being confused with the first. To compare the Eichhoff's test with a new test, the wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb test, we set up a prospective study over a period of three years for a cohort of 100 patients (88 women, 12 men) presenting spontaneous pain over the radial side of the styloid of the radius (de Quervain tendinopathy). The purpose of the study was to compare the accuracy of the Eichhoff's test and wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb test to diagnose correctly de Quervain's disease by comparing clinical findings using those tests with the results on ultrasound. The wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb test revealed greater sensitivity (0.99) and an improved specificity (0.29) together with a slightly better positive predictive value (0.95) and an improved negative predictive value (0.67). Moreover, the study showed us that the wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb test is very valuable in diagnosing dynamic instability after successful decompression of the first extensor compartment. Our results support that the wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb test is a more precise tool for the diagnosis of de Quervain's disease than the Eichhoff's test and thus could be adopted to guide clinical diagnosis in the early stages of de Quervain's tendinopathy.