ABSTRACT
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.
Subject(s)
Medical Oncology , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Societies, Medical , Spain , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Molecular BiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the clinical landscape of ovarian carcinoma (OC) over time. DESIGN: Register-based prospectively collected data. SETTING: South East Scotland. SAMPLE: A total of 2805 OC patients diagnosed in 1981-2015. METHODS: Survival times were visualised using the Kaplan-Meier method; median survival, 5-year survival probabilities and associated restricted mean survival time analyses were used to quantify survival differences. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease-specific survival. RESULTS: A significant increase in disease-specific survival (DSS) from 1981-1985 to 2011-2015 was observed (median 1.73 versus 4.23 years, P < 0.0001). Corresponding increase in progression-free survival (PFS) was not statistically significant (median 1.22 versus 1.58 years, P = 0.2568). An increase in the proportion of cases with low residual disease volume (RD) (<2 cm RD) following debulking was observed (54.0% versus 87.7%, P < 0.0001). The proportion of high grade serous (HGS) cases increased (P < 0.0001), whereas endometrioid and mucinous cases decreased (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.0002). Increases in stage IV HGS OC incidence (P = 0.0009) and stage IV HGS OC DSS (P = 0.0122) were observed. Increasing median age at diagnosis correlated with increasing Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) over time (r = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: OC DSS has improved over the last 35 years. PFS has not significantly increased, highlighting that improvement in outcome has been limited to extending post-relapse survival. Distribution of stage at diagnosis, histological subtype and RD following debulking has changed over time, reflecting evolution in tumour classification, staging and optimal debulking definitions (from low RD to minimal or zero RD). Histology, stage, RD and ECOG PS remain reliable outcome predictors. Increasing median age at diagnosis and ECOG PS indicates demographic shifts in the clinical population. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Significant improvement in ovarian carcinoma survival has been seen over time. Most of this improvement is due to an extension of survival following disease relapse.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Age of Onset , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Progression-Free Survival , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Scotland/epidemiologyABSTRACT
This article was originally published under a CC BY NC SA License, but has now been made available under a CC BY 4.0 License.
ABSTRACT
Background: The purpose of this multistage, adaptively, designed randomized phase II study was to evaluate the role of intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and optimal debulking surgery in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and methods: We carried out a multicenter, two-stage, phase II trial. Eligible patients with stage IIB-IVA EOC treated with platinum-based intravenous (i.v.) NACT followed by optimal (<1 cm) debulking surgery were randomized to one of the three treatment arms: (i) i.v. carboplatin/paclitaxel, (ii) i.p. cisplatin plus i.v./i.p. paclitaxel, or (iii) i.p. carboplatin plus i.v./i.p. paclitaxel. The primary end point was 9-month progressive disease rate (PD9). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). Results: Between 2009 and 2015, 275 patients were randomized; i.p. cisplatin containing arm did not progress beyond the first stage of the study after failing to meet the pre-set superiority rule. The final analysis compared i.v. carboplatin/paclitaxel (n = 101) with i.p. carboplatin, i.v./i.p. paclitaxel (n = 102). The intention to treat PD9 was lower in the i.p. carboplatin arm compared with the i.v. carboplatin arm: 24.5% (95% CI 16.2% to 32.9%) versus 38.6% (95% CI 29.1% to 48.1%) P = 0.065. The study was underpowered to detect differences in PFS: HR PFS 0.82 (95% CI 0.57-1.17); P = 0.27 and OS HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.47-1.35) P = 0.40. The i.p. carboplatin-based regimen was well tolerated with no reduction in QOL or increase in toxicity compared with i.v. administration alone. Conclusion: In women with stage IIIC or IVA EOC treated with NACT and optimal debulking surgery, i.p. carboplatin-based chemotherapy is well tolerated and associated with an improved PD9 compared with i.v. carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Clinical trial number: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01622543.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Infusions, Parenteral , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Progression-Free SurvivalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Scottish patients with ovarian cancer, before and after a change in testing policy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Four cancer/genetics centres in Scotland. POPULATION: Patients with ovarian cancer undergoing germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2) sequencing before 2013 (under the 'old criteria', with selection based solely on family history), after 2013 (under the 'new criteria', with sequencing offered to newly presenting patients with non-mucinous ovarian cancer), and in the 'prevalent population' (who presented before 2013, but were not eligible for sequencing under the old criteria but were sequenced under the new criteria). METHODS: Clinicopathological and sequence data were collected before and for 18 months after this change in selection criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of germline BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, and RAD51D mutations. RESULTS: Of 599 patients sequenced, 205, 236, and 158 were in the 'old criteria', 'new criteria', and 'prevalent' populations, respectively. The frequency of gBRCA1/2 mutations was 30.7, 13.1, and 12.7%, respectively. The annual rate of gBRCA1/2 mutation detection was 4.2 before and 20.7 after the policy change. A total of 48% (15/31) 'new criteria' patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations had a Manchester score of <15 and would not have been offered sequencing based on family history criteria. In addition, 20 patients with gBRCA1/2 were identified in the prevalent population. The prevalence of gBRCA1/2 mutations in patients aged >70 years was 8.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Sequencing all patients with non-mucinous ovarian cancer gives a much higher annual gBRCA1/2 mutation detection rate, with the frequency of positive tests still exceeding the 10% threshold upon which many family history-based models operate. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: BRCA sequencing all non-mucinous cancer patients increases mutation detection five fold.
Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Carcinoma/genetics , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma/epidemiology , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/epidemiology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Testing/standards , Germ-Line Mutation , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Scotland/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Investigating tumour evolution and acquired chemotherapy resistance requires analysis of sequential tumour material. We describe the feasibility of obtaining research biopsies in women with relapsed ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS: Women with relapsed ovarian HGSC underwent either image-guided biopsy or intra-operative biopsy during secondary debulking, and samples were fixed in methanol-based fixative. Tagged-amplicon sequencing was performed on biopsy DNA. RESULTS: We screened 519 patients in order to enrol 220. Two hundred and two patients underwent successful biopsy, 118 of which were image-guided. There were 22 study-related adverse events (AE) in the image-guided biopsies, all grades 1 and 2; pain was the commonest AE. There were pre-specified significant AE in 3/118 biopsies (2.5%). 87% biopsies were fit-for-purpose for genomic analyses. Median DNA yield was 2.87 µg, and was higher in biopsies utilising 14 G or 16 G needles compared to 18 G. TP53 mutations were identified in 94.4% patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining tumour biopsies for research in relapsed HGSC is safe and feasible. Adverse events are rare. The large majority of biopsies yield sufficient DNA for genomic analyses-we recommend use of larger gauge needles and methanol fixation for such biopsies, as DNA yields are higher but with no increase in AEs.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma/genetics , Carcinoma/secondary , DNA, Neoplasm/analysis , Image-Guided Biopsy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases , DNA Mutational Analysis , DNA, Neoplasm/isolation & purification , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/adverse effects , Image-Guided Biopsy/instrumentation , Liver/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Omentum/pathology , PTEN Phosphohydrolase/genetics , Pain/etiology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Peritoneum/pathology , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/geneticsABSTRACT
The consensus statements regarding first-line therapies in women with ovarian cancer, reached at the Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference held in Tokyo, Japan, in November 2015 are reported. Three topics were reviewed and the following statements are recommended: (i) Surgery: the subgroups that should be considered in first-line ovarian cancer clinical trials should be (a) patients undergoing primary debulking surgery and (b) patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. The amount of residual disease following surgery should further stratify patients into those with absent gross residual disease and others. (ii) Control arms for chemotherapy: for advanced stage ovarian cancer the standard is intravenous 3-weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. Acceptable alternatives, which should be stratified variables in trials when more than one regimen is offered, include weekly paclitaxel plus 3-weekly carboplatin, the addition of bevacizumab to 3-weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel, and intraperitoneal therapy. (iii) Trial Endpoints: overall survival is the preferred primary endpoint for first-line clinical trials with or without a maintenance component. Progression-free survival (PFS) is an alternative primary endpoint, but if PFS is chosen overall survival must be measured as a secondary endpoint and PFS must be supported by additional endpoints, including predefined patient reported outcomes and time to first or second subsequent therapy. For neoadjuvant therapy, additional 'window of opportunity' endpoints should be included.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Research Design , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Female , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Steroid receptor coactivator 3 (SRC3) is an important coactivator of a number of transcription factors and is associated with a poor outcome in numerous tumours. Steroid receptor coactivator 3 is amplified in 25% of epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) and its expression is higher in EOCs compared with non-malignant tissue. No data is currently available with regard to the expression of SRC-3 in EOC and its influence on outcome or the efficacy of treatment. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed for SRC3, oestrogen receptor-α, HER2, PAX2 and PAR6, and protein expression was quantified using automated quantitative immunofluorescence (AQUA) in 471 EOCs treated between 1991 and 2006 with cytoreductive surgery followed by first-line treatment platinum-based therapy, with or without a taxane. RESULTS: Steroid receptor coactivator 3 expression was significantly associated with advanced stage and was an independent prognostic marker. High expression of SRC3 identified patients who have a significantly poorer survival with single-agent carboplatin chemotherapy, while with carboplatin/paclitaxel treatment such a difference was not seen. CONCLUSION: Steroid receptor coactivator 3 is a poor prognostic factor in EOCs and appears to identify a population of patients who would benefit from the addition of taxanes to their chemotherapy regimen, due to intrinsic resistance to platinum therapy.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Pharmacological , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 3/physiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Platinum Compounds/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Pharmacological/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/physiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Cohort Studies , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/physiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/metabolism , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/mortality , Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 3/metabolism , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Platinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Taxoids/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Most patients presenting with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) eventually relapse. Symptom palliation, maintenance of quality of life (QoL) and prolongation of life are primary therapeutic goals. METHODS: Sixty-six U.K. oncologists completed an online survey about AOC management. Two hundred and two patients were interviewed about care, treatment experiences and expectations. RESULTS: Prior to diagnosis, 34% (69 out of 202) of women had > or =3 symptoms associated with AOC. Twenty-one per cent (43 out of 202) thought poor symptom recognition by general practitioners (GPs) delayed diagnosis. Amelioration of side effects experienced was variable, for example, only 54% (68 out of 127) distressed by alopecia had received sufficient information about it. Clinicians were asked 'What minimum gain in progression-free survival (PFS) would make you feel it worthwhile to offer maintenance therapy?'; 48% (24 out of 50) indicated 5-6 months, but 52% (26 out of 50) believed patients would find PFS of 3-4 months acceptable. When patients were presented with hypothetical scenarios, 33% (52 out of 160) would require 1-2 months extra life, 6% (10 out of 160) 3-4 months, 31% (49 out of 160) 5-6 months, and 31% (49 out of 160) > or =7 months. However, 86% (173 out of 202) would accept treatment that improved QoL without prolongation of life. When asked what was most important, 33% (67 out of 201) said QoL, 9% (19 out of 201) length of life and 57% (115 out of 201) said both were equally important. CONCLUSION: Clinicians' and patients' experiences, expectations and priorities about OC management may differ.
Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Rate , United KingdomABSTRACT
Ovarian cancer presents at advanced stage in around 75% of women, and despite improvements in treatments such as chemotherapy, the 5-year survival from the disease in women diagnosed between 1996 and 1999 in England and Wales was only 36%. Over 80% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer will relapse and despite a good chance of remission from further chemotherapy, they will usually die from their disease. Sequential treatment strategies are employed to maximise quality and length of life but patients eventually become resistant to cytotoxic agents. The expansion in understanding of the molecular biology that characterises cancer cells has led to the rapid development of new agents to target important pathways but the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer biology means that there is no predominant defect. This review attempts to discuss progress to date in tackling a more general target applicable to ovary cancer-angiogenesis.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood supply , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Angiopoietins/antagonists & inhibitors , Angiostatins/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab , Bibenzyls/therapeutic use , Female , Fibroblast Growth Factors/antagonists & inhibitors , Flavonoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Thrombospondins/biosynthesis , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Prolonged exercise may compromise immunity through a reduction of salivary antimicrobial proteins (AMPs). Salivary IgA (IgA) has been extensively studied, but little is known about the effect of acute, prolonged exercise on AMPs including lysozyme (Lys) and lactoferrin (Lac). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a 50-km trail race on salivary cortisol (Cort), IgA, Lys, and Lac. METHODS: 14 subjects: (6 females, 8 males) completed a 50km ultramarathon. Saliva was collected pre, immediately after (post) and 1.5 hrs post race (+1.5). RESULTS: Lac concentration was higher at +1.5 hrs post race compared to post exercise (p < 0.05). Lys was unaffected by the race (p > 0.05). IgA concentration, secretion rate, and IgA/Osm were lower +1.5 hrs post compared to pre race (p < 0.05). Cort concentration was higher at post compared to +1.5 (p < 0.05), but was unaltered from pre race levels. Subjects finished in 7.81±1.2 hrs. Saliva flow rate did not differ between time points. Saliva Osm increased at post (p < 0.05) compared to pre race. CONCLUSIONS: The intensity could have been too low to alter Lys and Lac secretion rates and thus, may not be as sensitive as IgA to changes in response to prolonged running. Results expand our understanding of the mucosal immune system and may have implications for predicting illness after prolonged running.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To determine (a) the cause of an improvement in survival from oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in South East Scotland and (b) whether this improvement was human papillomavirus (HPV) and p16 subtype-dependent. METHODS: Clinicopathological characteristics and outcome data for patients referred with OSCC from 1999 to 2001 (Cohort-1) and 2003 to 2005 (Cohort-2) were obtained. Molecular HPV detection and immunohistochemistry for p16 were performed from paraffin blocks. RESULTS: Cohort-1 and Cohort-2 contained 118 and 136 patients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly improved survival in Cohort-2 (P<0.0001). Sub-classification according to HPV and p16 status revealed no improvement in survival in Class-I (HPV-ve/p16-ve; 47 patients) or Class-III (HPV+ve/p16+ve; 77 patients). However in Class-II (HPV+ve/p16-ve; 56 patients) an increase in 5-year cause-specific survival from 36% in Cohort-1 to 73% in Cohort-2 was detected (P=0.0001).Proportional hazards analysis of 217 patients treated radically demonstrated that significant variables were p16 (P<0.0001), N stage (P=0.0006) and cohort (P=0.0024). Removing cohort from the variables offered to the model showed that, whereas p16 (P<0.0001) and N stage (P=0.0016) remain significant, chemotherapy (P=0.0163) and T stage (P=0.0139) are now significant. This suggests that much of the cohort effect is due to the higher use of chemotherapy in the second cohort. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that HPV+ve/p16-ve patients constitute a separate subclass of OSCC who may particularly benefit from chemotherapy. They imply that p16 status cannot be considered a surrogate for HPV status, and those trials to de-escalate treatment in HPV+ve OSCC should take p16 status into account.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , DNA, Viral/analysis , Genes, p16 , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/genetics , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Recurrence , Smoking , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is frequently advanced at presentation when treatment is rarely curative. Response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy significantly influences survival, but clinical response is unpredictable and is frequently limited by the development of drug-resistant disease. METHODS: We used qRT-PCR analysis to assess intertumour differences in the expression of fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) and additional candidate genes in human ovarian tumours (n=187), and correlated individuality in gene expression with tumour histology, chemotherapy response and survival. We used MTT assays to assess platinum chemosensitivity in drug-sensitive and drug-resistant ovarian cell lines. RESULTS: Marked intertumour differences in gene expression were observed, with each tumour having a unique gene expression profile. Nine genes, including FGF1 (P=1.7 × 10(-5)) and FGFR2 (P=0.003), were differentially expressed in serous and nonserous tumours. MDM2 (P=0.032) and ERBB2 (P=0.064) expression was increased in platinum-sensitive patients, and FGF1 (adjusted log-rank test P=0.006), FGFR2 (P=0.04) and PDRFRB expression (P=0.037) significantly inversely influenced progression-free survival. Stable FGF1 gene knockdown in platinum-resistant A2780DPP cells re-sensitised cells to both cisplatin and carboplatin. CONCLUSION: We show for the first time that FGF1 is differentially expressed in high-grade serous ovarian tumours, and that individuality in FGF1 expression significantly influences progression-free survival and response to platinum-based chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Fibroblast Growth Factor 1/genetics , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Cell Line, Tumor , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Gene Expression , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapySubject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Bevacizumab , Humans , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/pharmacology , Female , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Mutation , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/geneticsABSTRACT
A proportion of breast cancers are attributable to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Technological advances has meant that mutation testing in newly diagnosed cancer patients can be used to inform treatment plans. Although oncologists increasingly deliver treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT) as part of mainstream ovarian cancer care, we know little about non-genetics specialists' views about offering genetic testing to newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. This study sought to determine genetics and non-genetics specialists' views of a proposal to mainstream BRCA1 and 2 testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Qualitative interview study. Nineteen healthcare professionals currently responsible for offering TFGT in a standard (triage + referral) pathway (breast surgeons + clinical genetics team) and oncologists preparing to offer TFGT to breast cancer patients in a mainstreamed pathway participated in in-depth interviews. Genetics and non-genetics professionals' perceptions of mainstreaming are influenced by their views of: their clinical roles and responsibilities, the impact of TFGT on their workload and the patient pathway and the perceived relevance of genetic testing for patient care in the short-term. Perceived barriers to mainstreaming may be overcome by: more effective communication between specialities, clearer guidelines/patient pathways and the recruitment of mainstreaming champions.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Testing , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Genetics, Medical , Humans , Mutation , Oncologists , Physician's Role , Qualitative Research , Referral and Consultation , Surgeons , TriageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Olaparib is poorly soluble, requiring advanced drug delivery technologies for adequate bioavailability. Sixteen capsules/day are required for the approved 400 mg twice-daily dose; a tablet formulation was developed to reduce pill burden. This clinical trial evaluated the optimal dose and administration schedule of the tablet formulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two stages of sequentially enrolled cohorts: stage 1, pharmacokinetic properties of tablet and capsule formulations were compared in patients with advanced solid tumours; stage 2, tablet dose escalation with expansion cohorts at doses/schedules of interest in patients with solid tumours and BRCAm breast/ovarian cancers. RESULTS: Olaparib 200 mg tablets displayed similar Cmax,ss, but lower AUCss and Cmin,ss than 400 mg capsules. Following multiple dosing, steady-state exposure with tablets ≥300 mg matched or exceeded that of 400 mg capsules. After dose escalation, while 400 mg twice daily was the tablet maximum tolerated dose based on haematological toxicity, 65 % of patients in the randomized expansion phase eventually required dose reduction to 300 mg. Intermittent tablet administration did not significantly improve tolerability. Tumour shrinkage was similar for 300 and 400 mg tablet and 400 mg capsule cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended monotherapy dose of olaparib tablet for Phase III trials was 300 mg twice daily, simplifying drug administration from 16 capsules to four tablets per day. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00777582 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Phthalazines/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Phthalazines/administration & dosage , Phthalazines/pharmacology , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Piperazines/pharmacology , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/pharmacologyABSTRACT
WWOX is a candidate tumour suppressor gene that exhibits LOH or homozygous deletion in several tumour types. As well as the predominant full-length transcript (variant 1) there also exist alternatively spliced transcripts found previously only in malignant tissue. It has been suggested that proteins encoded by these variants may interfere with normal WWOX function in a dominant negative fashion. The most prevalent alternate transcript demonstrated in ovarian cancer is variant 4, which lacks exons 6-8. Here, we report the first comparison of the mRNA expression of WWOX variants 1 and 4 in human ovarian tumours and normal ovaries, and correlate expression with clinical data. We demonstrate significantly lower WWOX variant 1 expression in tumours than in normal ovaries. This reduction was not associated with any specific clinical subgroup. Variant 4 was expressed at low levels, and significantly associated with high grade and advanced stage ovarian cancer. Furthermore, tumours co-expressing variant 4 and relatively high levels of variant 1 showed significantly worse survival than tumours expressing variant 1 alone. However, variant 4 was also frequently identified in non-malignant ovarian tissue. These results support the role of WWOX variant 1 as a suppressor of ovarian tumourigenesis, but the role of variant 4 remains speculative.