Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 197
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Cancer ; 127(4): 609-618, 2021 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33085090

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The association of community factors and outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has not been comprehensively described. Using the County Health Rankings and Roadmaps (CHRR) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), this study evaluated the impact of community health status on allogeneic HCT outcomes. METHODS: This study included 18,544 adult allogeneic HCT recipients reported to the CIBMTR by 170 US centers in 2014-2016. Sociodemographic, environmental, and community indicators were derived from the CHRR, an aggregate community risk score was created, and scores were assigned to each patient (patient community risk score [PCS]) and transplant center (center community risk score [CCS]). Higher scores indicated less healthy communities. The impact of PCS and CCS on patient outcomes after allogeneic HCT was studied. RESULTS: The median age was 55 years (range, 18-83 years). The median PCS was -0.21 (range, -1.37 to 2.10; standard deviation [SD], 0.42), and the median CCS was -0.13 (range, -1.04 to 0.96; SD, 0.40). In multivariable analyses, a higher PCS was associated with inferior survival (hazard ratio [HR] per 1 SD increase, 1.04; 99% CI, 1.00-1.08; P = .0089). Among hematologic malignancies, a tendency toward inferior survival was observed with a higher PCS (HR, 1.04; 99% CI, 1.00-1.08; P = .0102); a higher PCS was associated with higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM; HR, 1.08; 99% CI, 1.02-1.15; P = .0004). CCS was not significantly associated with survival, relapse, or NRM. CONCLUSIONS: Patients residing in counties with a worse community health status have inferior survival as a result of an increased risk of NRM after allogeneic HCT. There was no association between the community health status of the transplant center location and allogeneic HCT outcomes.


Subject(s)
Community Health Planning , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Transplantation, Homologous/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
Blood ; 124(16): 2596-606, 2014 Oct 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25161269

ABSTRACT

We examined current outcomes of unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to determine the clinical implications of donor-recipient HLA matching. Adult and pediatric patients who had first undergone myeloablative-unrelated bone marrow or peripheral blood HCT for acute myelogenous leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome between 1999 and 2011 were included. All had high-resolution typing for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1. Of the total (n = 8003), cases were 8/8 (n = 5449), 7/8 (n = 2071), or 6/8 (n = 483) matched. HLA mismatch (6-7/8) conferred significantly increased risk for grades II to IV and III to IV acute graft vs host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and overall mortality compared with HLA-matched cases (8/8). Type (allele/antigen) and locus (HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1) of mismatch were not associated with overall mortality. Among 8/8 matched cases, HLA-DPB1 and -DQB1 mismatch resulted in increased acute GVHD, and HLA-DPB1 mismatch had decreased relapse. Nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 allele mismatch was associated with higher TRM compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch or HLA-DPB1 match and increased overall mortality compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch in 8/8 (and 10/10) matched cases. Full matching at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 is required for optimal unrelated donor HCT survival, and avoidance of nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in otherwise HLA-matched pairs is indicated.


Subject(s)
HLA-DP beta-Chains/immunology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Histocompatibility Testing , Leukemia/therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/immunology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Histocompatibility , Humans , Leukemia/mortality , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/mortality , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/mortality , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Homologous , Unrelated Donors , Young Adult
6.
Ann Hematol ; 95(6): 967-72, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26994010

ABSTRACT

In the context of discussions on the reproducibility of clinical studies, we reanalyzed a prospective randomized study on the role of splenic irradiation as adjunct to the conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Between 1986 and 1989, a total of 229 patients with CML were randomized; of these, 225 (98 %; 112 with, 113 without splenic irradiation) could be identified in the database and their survival updated. Results confirmed the early findings with no significant differences in all measured endpoints (overall survival at 25 years: 42.7 %, 32.0-52.4 % vs 52.9 %, 43.2-62.6 %; p = 0.355, log rank test). Additional splenic irradiation failed to reduce relapse incidence. It did not increase non-relapse mortality nor the risk of late secondary malignancies. Comforting are the long-term results from this predefined consecutive cohort of patients: more than 60 % were alive at plus 25 years when they were transplanted with a low European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) risk sore. This needs to be considered today when treatment options are discussed for patients who failed initial tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and have an available low risk HLA-identical donor.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/trends , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/radiotherapy , Spleen/radiation effects , Transplantation Conditioning/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Young Adult
7.
Brain ; 138(Pt 10): 2847-58, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26264513

ABSTRACT

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been proposed as treatment for mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy, a rare fatal autosomal recessive disease due to TYMP mutations that result in thymidine phosphorylase deficiency. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all known patients suffering from mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy who underwent allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation between 2005 and 2011. Twenty-four patients, 11 males and 13 females, median age 25 years (range 10-41 years) treated with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from related (n = 9) or unrelated donors (n = 15) in 15 institutions worldwide were analysed for outcome and its associated factors. Overall, 9 of 24 patients (37.5%) were alive at last follow-up with a median follow-up of these surviving patients of 1430 days. Deaths were attributed to transplant in nine (including two after a second transplant due to graft failure), and to mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy in six patients. Thymidine phosphorylase activity rose from undetectable to normal levels (median 697 nmol/h/mg protein, range 262-1285) in all survivors. Seven patients (29%) who were engrafted and living more than 2 years after transplantation, showed improvement of body mass index, gastrointestinal manifestations, and peripheral neuropathy. Univariate statistical analysis demonstrated that survival was associated with two defined pre-transplant characteristics: human leukocyte antigen match (10/10 versus <10/10) and disease characteristics (liver disease, history of gastrointestinal pseudo-obstruction or both). Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation can restore thymidine phosphorylase enzyme function in patients with mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy and improve clinical manifestations of mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy in the long term. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation should be considered for selected patients with an optimal donor.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction/surgery , Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathies/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Adolescent , Adult , Body Weight , Brain/pathology , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Muscular Dystrophy, Oculopharyngeal , Neural Conduction/physiology , Neurologic Examination , Neutrophils , Ophthalmoplegia/congenital , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Thymidine Phosphorylase/metabolism , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Young Adult
8.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 21(7): 1230-6, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25797175

ABSTRACT

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are an effective treatment for relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Leukemia resistance and secondary graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are major obstacles to success with DLI. The aim of this study was to identify pre-DLI factors associated with prolonged survival in remission without secondary GVHD. We retrospectively analyzed 500 patients treated with DLI for CML relapse (16% molecular, 30% cytogenetic, and 54% hematological) after alloSCT. The overall probabilities of failure- and secondary GVHD-free survival (FGFS) were 29% and 27% at 5 and 10 years after DLI, respectively. The type of relapse was the major factor influencing FGFS (40% for molecular and/or cytogenetic relapse and 20% for hematological relapse at 5 years, P < .001). Chronic GVHD before DLI and an interval <1 year between alloSCT and first DLI were independently associated with inferior FGFS in patients with molecular and/or cytogenetic relapse. Consequently, FGFS was 13%, 35%, to 56% at 5 years in patients with 2, 1, and 0 adverse features, respectively. In patients with hematological relapse, independent adverse prognostic factors for FGFS were initial dose of CD3(+) cells ≥ 50 × 10(6)/kg, donor-recipient sex mismatch, and chronic GVHD before DLI. FGFS was 0%, 17%, 33%, to 37% in patients with 3, 2, 1, and 0 adverse features, respectively. The probability of survival in remission without secondary GVHD was highest (>50% at 5 years) when DLI were given beyond 1 year from alloSCT for molecular and/or cytogenetic CML relapse that was not preceded by chronic GVHD.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Graft vs Leukemia Effect , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Lymphocyte Transfusion , Transplantation Conditioning , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromosome Aberrations , Chronic Disease , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/immunology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/immunology , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/mortality , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Siblings , Survival Analysis , Transplantation, Homologous , Unrelated Donors
10.
Ann Hematol ; 94 Suppl 2: S177-86, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25814084

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently recommended as 2nd or 3rd line therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in first chronic phase or as salvage for patients with very advanced disease. As a consequence, numbers of HSCT in chronic phase have dropped significantly since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), numbers of transplants in advanced disease to a lesser extent. These current recommendations consider primarily disease risk, defined as failure of TKI therapy; they might need to be adapted. We propose a more balanced appraisal of HSCT for individual patients which should include disease risk, transplant risk, and macroeconomic aspects. HSCT should be integrated into the treatment algorithms from diagnosis and be considered very early at first TKI failure for patients with high disease but low transplant risk. For patients with very advanced disease and high transplant risk in contrast, HSCT might only be recommended in a restricted research setting.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Precision Medicine , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Transfusion, Autologous/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/enzymology , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/physiopathology , Molecular Targeted Therapy/adverse effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Risk Assessment , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects
11.
N Engl J Med ; 364(11): 1027-36, 2011 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21410371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cytarabine (ara-C) is an important drug in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High-dose cytarabine (2000 to 3000 mg per square meter of body-surface area) is toxic but results in higher rates of relapse-free survival than does the conventional dose of 100 to 400 mg per square meter. Intermediate dose levels have not been thoroughly evaluated. METHODS: We compared two induction regimens in patients 18 to 60 years of age (median, 49) who had newly diagnosed AML. The intermediate-dose group, totaling 431 patients, received cytarabine at a dose of 200 mg per square meter given by continuous intravenous infusion for 24 hours during cycle 1 of induction therapy and 1000 mg per square meter by infusion for 3 hours twice daily during cycle 2 of induction therapy. The high-dose group, totaling 429 patients, received a dose-escalated regimen of 1000 mg of cytarabine per square meter every 12 hours in cycle 1 and 2000 mg per square meter twice daily in cycle 2. Patients with a complete response did not receive additional cytarabine but received consolidation therapy in a third cycle of chemotherapy (mitoxantrone-etoposide) or underwent autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Complete remission rates, survival rates, and toxic effects were assessed for each treatment group. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 5 years, no significant differences were noted between the intermediate-dose group and the high-dose group with respect to complete remission rates (80% and 82%, respectively), probability of relapse, event-free survival at 5 years (34% and 35%), or overall survival (40% and 42%). High-dose cytarabine provided no clear advantage in any prognostic subgroup. The high-dose treatment resulted in higher incidences of grade 3 and grade 4 toxic effects (in cycle 1), prolonged hospitalization, and delayed neutrophil recovery (in cycle 2) and platelet recovery (in cycles 2 and 3). CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapy with cytarabine at the lower dose already produced maximal antileukemic effects for all response end points, suggesting a plateau in the dose-response relationship above this dose level. High-dose cytarabine results in excessive toxic effects without therapeutic benefit. (Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR230.).


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Cytarabine/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Cytarabine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Remission Induction , Stem Cell Transplantation , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
12.
Haematologica ; 99(8): 1273-6, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25082784

ABSTRACT

Hematologists, specialists in cancer survivorship and patient advocates met in Bergamo, Italy (Nov 14­16, 2013) to highlight the physical, mental, psychosocial and financial challenges faced by cancer survivors and their families. Gaps in research and resources were all too apparent. This planned meeting perspective, not a formal consensus statement, reflects the key points mentioned by the participants during the discussions and the personal view of the authors. It proposes urgent action in key areas to ensure that people surviving cancer will suffer fewer long-term health problems than their predecessors and to contain costs.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Survivors , Humans , Italy , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Survival Rate/trends , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors
13.
Haematologica ; 99(5): 908-15, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24488562

ABSTRACT

Competent authorities, healthcare payers and hospitals devote increasing resources to quality management systems but scientific analyses searching for an impact of these systems on clinical outcome remain scarce. Earlier data indicated a stepwise improvement in outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with each phase of the accreditation process for the quality management system "JACIE". We therefore tested the hypothesis that working towards and achieving "JACIE" accreditation would accelerate improvement in outcome over calendar time. Overall mortality of the entire cohort of 107,904 patients who had a transplant (41,623 allogeneic, 39%; 66,281 autologous, 61%) between 1999 and 2006 decreased over the 14-year observation period by a factor of 0.63 per 10 years (hazard ratio: 0.63; 0.58-0.69). Considering "JACIE"-accredited centers as those with programs having achieved accreditation by November 2012, at the latest, this improvement was significantly faster in "JACIE"-accredited centers than in non-accredited centers (approximately 5.3% per year for 49,459 patients versus approximately 3.5% per year for 58,445 patients, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.83; 0.71-0.97). As a result, relapse-free survival (hazard ratio 0.85; 0.75-0.95) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.86; 0.76-0.98) were significantly higher at 72 months for those patients transplanted in the 162 "JACIE"-accredited centers. No significant effects were observed after autologous transplants (hazard ratio 1.06; 0.99-1.13). Hence, working towards implementation of a quality management system triggers a dynamic process associated with a steeper reduction in mortality over the years and a significantly improved survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Our data support the use of a quality management system for complex medical procedures.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Accreditation , Female , Humans , Male , Mortality , Patient Care Team/standards , Quality Control , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Total Quality Management
14.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 30(3): 253-9, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25100035

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess incidence, time frame, and outcome of "Coverage with Evidence Development" (CED) decisions in the Swiss Basic Health Insurance scheme. METHODS: Analysis of all controversial medical technologies submitted to review by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) from 1996 to 2012 with focus on decisions with constraints. Description of types of technology, type of initial decision, duration of evaluation period, final decision, and search for potential factors associated with changes over time. RESULTS: Forty-five (37.5 percent) of 120 controversial health technologies were classified as "yes, in evaluation, reimbursed" for a certain period of time and thirty-five (29.2 percent) as "no, in evaluation, not reimbursed" by the Federal Department of Home Affairs from 1996 to 2012. The rate of CED decisions ranged between zero and nine per year and was influenced by type of technology and calendar year. Forty-four of forty-five decisions were subject to further restrictions, to a "center or a specialist" (76 percent), "indications" (49 percent), "registry" (31 percent), or "other" (49 percent). The time to a final decision ranged from 1.5 to 11 years (median, 6 years). No factors associated with initial decision and final outcome could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: CED as a reality in Switzerland might have enabled patients to obtain access to promising technologies early in their life cycle. CED might have acted as a trigger to a successful implementation of a comprehensive national registry. The lack of qualitative data stresses the urgent need for evaluation of the HTA decisions and their impact on patient outcome and costs.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Technology/economics , Insurance Coverage/trends , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Decision Making, Organizational , Evidence-Based Medicine , Federal Government , Humans , Insurance, Health , Switzerland
15.
JAMA ; 311(24): 2490-8, 2014 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25058083

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have shown efficacy in systemic sclerosis in phase 1 and small phase 2 trials. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of HSCT vs 12 successive monthly intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation International Scleroderma (ASTIS) trial, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-group, clinical trial conducted in 10 countries at 29 centers with access to a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation-registered transplant facility. From March 2001 to October 2009, 156 patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis were recruited and followed up until October 31, 2013. INTERVENTIONS: HSCT vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was event-free survival, defined as time from randomization until the occurrence of death or persistent major organ failure. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were randomly assigned to receive HSCT (n = 79) or cyclophosphamide (n = 77). During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 53 events occurred: 22 in the HSCT group (19 deaths and 3 irreversible organ failures) and 31 in the control group (23 deaths and 8 irreversible organ failures). During the first year, there were more events in the HSCT group (13 events [16.5%], including 8 treatment-related deaths) than in the control group (8 events [10.4%], with no treatment-related deaths). At 2 years, 14 events (17.7%) had occurred cumulatively in the HSCT group vs 14 events (18.2%) in the control group; at 4 years, 15 events (19%) had occurred cumulatively in the HSCT group vs 20 events (26%) in the control group. Time-varying hazard ratios (modeled with treatment × time interaction) for event-free survival were 0.35 (95% CI, 0.16-0.74) at 2 years and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.16-0.74) at 4 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, HSCT was associated with increased treatment-related mortality in the first year after treatment. However, HCST conferred a significant long-term event-free survival benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN54371254.


Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Scleroderma, Diffuse/drug therapy , Adult , Autografts , Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Analysis
16.
Curr Opin Hematol ; 20(6): 485-93, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24104408

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes the current use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and aims to assess recent trends, to analyze factors associated with use and trends, and to discuss potential implications of such developments on future use. RECENT FINDINGS: The one millionth HSCT worldwide was announced in early 2013. More than 35 000 HSCT (40% allogeneic and 60% autologous) were reported in 2011 to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, with more than 60 000 worldwide. Total numbers increased in Europe over the last 10 years by 50%, with the highest increase being for allogeneic HSCT from an unrelated donor. Change in HSCT numbers was different for each indication with novel indications emerging. There were significant differences in absolute numbers and increase in transplant rates between countries concerning main indication, donor type, and stem cell source or transplant technology. Trends showed a widening gap between countries with high or low national income. The high costs of HSCT impact on its use; availability of resources, presence of a national registry, and numbers of registered donors are the most closely associated with unrelated donor transplant rates. SUMMARY: Timely and comprehensive data on HSCT activity reveal trends and provide essential information for decision making to patients, physicians, healthcare administrators, or competent authorities alike.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/trends , Humans , Transplantation, Autologous/statistics & numerical data , Transplantation, Autologous/trends , Transplantation, Homologous/statistics & numerical data , Transplantation, Homologous/trends
17.
Blood ; 117(5): 1516-21, 2011 Feb 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21106985

ABSTRACT

We present results of a phase 3 randomized trial of autografting in chronic lymphocytic leukemia versus observation for responding patients after first- or second-line treatment. The primary objective was to demonstrate that autografting improves the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) from 30% to 50%. There were 223 enrolled patients, 72% men and 28% women, 83% after first and 17% after second-line treatment. Binet stages were progressive A 13%, B 67%, C 20%; at randomization, 59% were in complete remission, and 41% in less than complete remission. Patients were randomized between autografting (n = 112) and observation (n = 111). Median EFS was 24.4 months (range, 16.7-32 months) in the observation group and 51.2 months (39.8-62.5 months) in the autografting group; the 5-year EFS was 24% and 42%, respectively (P < .001). Accordingly, the 5-year relapse incidence was 76% versus 54% (P < .001). Median time to relapse requiring therapy or death was 40 months (25-56 months) in the observation arm and 65 months (59-71 months) after autografting (P = .002). Cox modeling confirmed that autografting significantly improved EFS (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.65; P < .001). At 5 years, the probability of OS was 85.5% and 84.3% for autografting and observation, respectively (P = .77). In chronic lymphocytic leukemia, consolidating autografting reduces the risk of progression by more than 50% but has no effect on overall survival.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/therapy , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome
18.
Blood ; 118(23): 6037-42, 2011 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21951683

ABSTRACT

We report the results of a prospective, randomized phase 3 trial evaluating autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus intensive consolidation chemotherapy in newly diagnosed AML patients in complete remission (CR1). Patients with AML (16-60 years) in CR1 after 2 cycles of intensive chemotherapy and not eligible for allogeneic SCT were randomized between intensive chemotherapy with etoposide and mitoxantrone or ASCT ater high-dose cyclophosphamide and busulfan. Of patients randomized (chemotherapy, n = 259; ASCT, n = 258), more than 90% received their assigned treatment. The 2 groups were comparable with regard to prognostic factors. The ASCT group showed a markedly reduced relapse rate (58% vs 70%, P = .02) and better relapse-free survival at 5 years (38% vs 29%, P = .065, hazard ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.1) with nonrelapse mortality of 4% versus 1% in the chemotherapy arm (P = .02). Overall survival was similar (44% vs 41% at 5 years, P = .86) because of more opportunities for salvage with second-line chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation in patients relapsing on the chemotherapy arm. This large study shows a relapse advantage for ASCT as postremission therapy but similar survival because more relapsing patients on the chemotherapy arm were salvaged with a late transplantation for relapse. This trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl as #NTR230 and #NTR291.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Middle Aged , Mitoxantrone/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Remission Induction , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
19.
Haematologica ; 98(8): 1282-90, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23508009

ABSTRACT

Fifty-five years after publication of the first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation this technique has become an accepted treatment option for defined hematologic and non-hematologic disorders. There is considerable interest in understanding differences in its use and trends on a global level and the macro-economic factors associated with these differences. Data on the numbers of hematopoietic stem cell transplants performed in the 3-year period 2006-2008 were obtained from Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation member registries and from transplant centers in countries without registries. Population and macro-economic data were collected from the World Bank and from the International Monetary Fund. Transplant rates were analyzed by indication, donor type, country, and World Health Organization regional offices areas and related to selected health care indicators using single and multiple linear regression analyses. Data from a total of 146,808 patients were reported by 1,411 teams from 72 countries over five continents. The annual number of transplants increased worldwide with the highest relative increase in the Asia Pacific region. Transplant rates increased preferentially in high income countries (P=0.02), not in low or medium income countries. Allogeneic transplants increased for myelodysplasia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute leukemias, and non-malignant diseases but decreased for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Autologous transplants increased for autoimmune and lymphoproliferative diseases but decreased for leukemias and solid tumors. Transplant rates (P<0.01), donor type (P<0.01) aand disease indications (P<0.01) differed significantly between countries and regions. Transplant rates were associated with Gross National Income/capita (P<0.01) but showed a wide variation of explanatory content by donor type, disease indication and World Health Organization region. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity is increasing worldwide. The preferential increase in high income countries, the widening gap between low and high income countries and the significant regional differences suggest that different strategies are required in individual countries to foster hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as an efficient and cost-effective treatment modality.


Subject(s)
Global Health/economics , Global Health/trends , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/trends , Global Health/standards , Gross Domestic Product/trends , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Humans , Registries/standards , Retrospective Studies , World Health Organization/economics
20.
Transfusion ; 53(8): 1788-97, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23176347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trials of transfusions of platelets (PLTs) treated with amotosalen-based pathogen reduction (PR) showed lower corrected count increments (CCIs) compared to conventional PLT components (PCs). However, PR-PLTs and conventional PCs often differed in various factors besides PR. We compared transfusion efficacy of single-donor apheresis PCs treated with PR or gamma irradiation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Hematologic patients were assigned to receive PR-PLTs or gamma-irradiated conventional PCs, both prepared in PLT additive solution (PAS). One-hour CCI (primary endpoint), 24-hour CCI, time to next PLT transfusion, and transfusion requirement of red blood cells and plasma were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-four patients assigned to PR-PLTs received 220 PR-PLTs and 136 conventional PCs; 72 controls received 517 conventional PCs. No differences between patient groups were observed for mean (±standard deviation [SD]) 1-hour CCI (11.4 [±4.9] for PR-PLT vs. 11.0 [±4.9] for controls), mean (±SD) 24-hour CCI (6.1 [±4.4] for PR-PLTs vs. 6.2 [±4.8] for controls), and for the other evaluated outcomes. No differences between PC types were observed for mean (±SD) 1-hour CCI (10.6 [±6.7] for PR-PLTs vs. 9.9 [±6.2] for conventional PCs) and mean 24 hour-CCI (3.3 [±3.9] for PR-PLTs vs. 4.2 [±5] for conventional PCs). Thirty-five percent of PR-PLTs and 38% of conventional PCs (p = 0.63) were associated with 1-hour CCIs of less than 7.5. Inadequate 24-hour CCIs were observed for 72% of PR-PLTs and 64% of conventional PCs (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion efficacy of single-donor apheresis PCs in PAS treated with amotosalen PR versus gamma irradiation is comparable.


Subject(s)
Blood Safety/methods , Furocoumarins/adverse effects , Gamma Rays/adverse effects , Photosensitizing Agents/adverse effects , Platelet Transfusion , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Platelets/drug effects , Blood Platelets/radiation effects , Blood Safety/adverse effects , Erythrocyte Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Plasma , Platelet Count , Platelet Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL