Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 121
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol ; 34(4): 280-288, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34219518

ABSTRACT

Mood disorders and anxiety significantly impact the prognosis and disease course of Parkinson's disease. Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease such as apathy, anhedonia, and fatigue overlap with diagnostic criteria for anxiety and depression, thus making accurate diagnosis of mood disorders in Parkinson's disease patients difficult. Furthermore, treatment options for mood disorders can produce motor complications leading to poor adherence and impaired quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients. This review aims to clarify the current state of diagnostic and treatment options pertaining to anxiety and mood disorders in Parkinson's disease. It explores both the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment modalities for various mood disorders in comorbid Parkinson's disease with a brief discussion of the future outlook of the field given the current state of the literature.


Subject(s)
Mood Disorders , Parkinson Disease , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Humans , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Mood Disorders/therapy , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Quality of Life
2.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol ; 34(4): 274-279, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34219522

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease seen in older adults after Alzheimer's disease, with increasing prevalence worldwide. Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) is a common, non-motor feature of PD, which increases caregiver stress and is a risk-factor for nursing home placement. In this paper we review PDP epidemiology, features, diagnosis, and treatment. PDP most often presents with sequential development of minor and then increasingly complex visual hallucinations mediated by dopaminergic-serotonergic interactions activating the mesolimbic pathway, with contributions from other structures and neurotransmitters. Appropriate evaluation of differential diagnoses for psychosis is vital before diagnosing PDP. Initial treatment should involve non-pharmacologic approaches. If these are unsuccessful and PDP symptoms significantly impact the patient's and or their caregivers' quality of life and functions, then pharmacotherapy is indicated. Pimavanserin is a recently FDA-approved pharmacologic treatment for PDP with a better profile of balanced effectiveness and safety compared to previous use of atypical antipsychotics. Early diagnosis and safer, more effective treatments for PDP should help reduce caregiver burden and enable caregivers to continue to provide care at home versus institutionalization.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Parkinson Disease , Psychotic Disorders , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Caregivers , Humans , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Quality of Life
3.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 33(1): 58-66, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33125455

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The management of major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD), formerly known as dementia, is of increasing concern as the elderly population continues to grow. Doll therapy (DT) is a controversial method observed in clinical practice that has both promising benefits and potential ethical concerns. To date, little research has been done on this therapy. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed using the keywords "dementia," "elderly," "dolls," "doll therapy," and "Alzheimer's disease." A list of pertinent articles was assembled, with irrelevant articles excluded. References from these articles were also reviewed and additional articles were included in the final list. RESULTS: Research on the utility of DT for patients with MNCD is limited. Current literature suggests that DT may be beneficial in decreasing the use of pharmacologic interventions and alleviating symptoms such as agitation and anxiety. However, most studies consisted of small, unrepresentative sample populations. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary studies favor DT as an effective management strategy for behavioral symptoms of MNCD. However, the few existing randomized controlled trials are limited in size and demographics. Further research involving larger, more diverse study samples with more male patients is needed. Additionally, the exact parameters to guide this therapy have not been established and require investigative study.


Subject(s)
Behavioral Symptoms/therapy , Dementia/psychology , Object Attachment , Play and Playthings , Anxiety/psychology , Humans , Respect
4.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 28(4): 383-400, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31708380

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brexpiprazole in patients with agitation in Alzheimer's dementia (AAD). DESIGN: Two 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm studies (NCT01862640; NCT01922258). SETTING: Study 1: 81 sites in 7 countries. Study 2: 62 sites in 9 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with AAD (Study 1: 433 randomized; Study 2: 270 randomized) in a care facility or community-based setting. Stable Alzheimer disease medications were permitted. INTERVENTION: Study 1 (fixed dose): brexpiprazole 2 mg/day, brexpiprazole 1 mg/day, or placebo (1:1:1) for 12 weeks. Study 2 (flexible dose): brexpiprazole 0.5-2 mg/day or placebo (1:1) for 12 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) (Total score range: 29-203; higher scores indicate more frequent agitated behaviors), and Clinical Global Impression - Severity of illness (CGI-S) as related to agitation. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: In Study 1, brexpiprazole 2 mg/day demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement in CMAI Total score from baseline to Week 12 than placebo (adjusted mean difference, -3.77; confidence limits, -7.38, -0.17; t(316) = -2.06; p = 0.040; MMRM). Brexpiprazole 1 mg/day did not show meaningful separation from placebo (0.23; -3.40, 3.86; t(314) = 0.12; p = 0.90; MMRM). In Study 2, brexpiprazole 0.5-2 mg/day did not achieve statistical superiority over placebo (-2.34; -5.49, 0.82; t(230) = -1.46; p = 0.15; MMRM). However, a benefit was observed in post hoc analyses among patients titrated to the maximum brexpiprazole dose of 2 mg/day compared with similarly titrated placebo patients (-5.06; -8.99, -1.13; t(144) = -2.54; p = 0.012; MMRM). On the CGI-S, a greater numerical improvement than placebo was demonstrated for brexpiprazole 2 mg/day in Study 1 (-0.16; -0.39, 0.06; t(337) = -1.42; nominal p = 0.16; MMRM), and a greater improvement for brexpiprazole 0.5-2 mg/day in Study 2 (-0.31; -0.55, -0.06; t(222) = -2.42; nominal p = 0.016; MMRM). In Study 1, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with incidence ≥5% among patients receiving brexpiprazole 2 mg/day were headache (9.3% versus 8.1% with placebo), insomnia (5.7% versus 4.4%), dizziness (5.7% versus 3.0%), and urinary tract infection (5.0% versus 1.5%). In Study 2, TEAEs with incidence ≥5% among patients receiving brexpiprazole 0.5-2 mg/day were headache (7.6% versus 12.4% with placebo) and somnolence (6.1% versus 3.6%). In both studies, the majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Brexpiprazole 2 mg/day has the potential to be efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of AAD.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Quinolones/administration & dosage , Thiophenes/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Female , Headache/etiology , Humans , Internationality , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychomotor Agitation/diagnosis , Quinolones/adverse effects , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/etiology , Thiophenes/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 28(12): 1256-1269, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32958332

ABSTRACT

Psychosis is common among individuals with neurocognitive disorders, is difficult to manage, and causes considerable burden and stress to patients and caregivers. Developing effective treatments is a substantial unmet medical need but research has been slowed by the need for updated consensus diagnostic criteria. To address this need, the International Psychogeriatrics Association initiated a process to develop criteria for clinical use, research, and treatment development efforts. The process included clinical, regulatory, and industry stakeholders as well as input from a global network of experts in geriatric psychiatry responding to two surveys (N = 336). Results from the consensus process confirmed that clinicians wanted elaboration of aspects of the definition proposed by Jeste and Finkel in 2000 to ensure that the criteria are applied appropriately. Based on discussions, the survey, and emerging research, criteria were revised to apply to psychosis occurring with all major and mild neurocognitive disorders. Other important changes include providing examples of hallucinations and delusions and clarifying time course, impact, and exclusionary criteria. This definition of psychosis in major and mild neurocognitive disorders can be used to advance many types of research including development of much needed pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for psychosis in patients with neurocognitive disorders.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Psychotic Disorders , Aged , Cognitive Dysfunction/complications , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , Consensus , Geriatric Psychiatry , Hallucinations , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/complications , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology
6.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 31(2): 144-152, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy, defined as being prescribed 5 or more medications, has been shown to be associated with a decline in mental and physical functioning in elderly patients. Despite this, elderly patients are currently being prescribed a median of 7 medications, which often causes more harm than benefit, and emphasizes the importance of deprescribing. METHODS: Five classes of potentially inappropriate medications for the elderly population, especially for the aging brain, are discussed, including anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, opioids, and proton pump inhibitors. Recommendations regarding these medications were collected from the 2015 Beer's Criteria, the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria, the Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment (START) criteria, and the Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) list. The PubMed database was also searched for the most recent evidence regarding prescription patterns, adverse effects, and recommendations regarding discontinuation of these medications in older adults. RESULTS: Anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and opioids were all found to have significant adverse effects in the elderly population. All of the discussed medication classes have been shown to be successfully deprescribable. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy increases the risk of adverse drug reactions and hospitalizations in geriatric patients. Rational deprescribing of anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, opioids, and proton pump inhibitors in selected patients may be a good first step to reducing this risk.


Subject(s)
Deprescriptions , Polypharmacy , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Aged , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans
7.
Brain ; 141(7): 1917-1933, 2018 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29850777

ABSTRACT

Cholinergic synapses are ubiquitous in the human central nervous system. Their high density in the thalamus, striatum, limbic system, and neocortex suggest that cholinergic transmission is likely to be critically important for memory, learning, attention and other higher brain functions. Several lines of research suggest additional roles for cholinergic systems in overall brain homeostasis and plasticity. As such, the brain's cholinergic system occupies a central role in ongoing research related to normal cognition and age-related cognitive decline, including dementias such as Alzheimer's disease. The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease centres on the progressive loss of limbic and neocortical cholinergic innervation. Neurofibrillary degeneration in the basal forebrain is believed to be the primary cause for the dysfunction and death of forebrain cholinergic neurons, giving rise to a widespread presynaptic cholinergic denervation. Cholinesterase inhibitors increase the availability of acetylcholine at synapses in the brain and are one of the few drug therapies that have been proven clinically useful in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease dementia, thus validating the cholinergic system as an important therapeutic target in the disease. This review includes an overview of the role of the cholinergic system in cognition and an updated understanding of how cholinergic deficits in Alzheimer's disease interact with other aspects of disease pathophysiology, including plaques composed of amyloid-ß proteins. This review also documents the benefits of cholinergic therapies at various stages of Alzheimer's disease and during long-term follow-up as visualized in novel imaging studies. The weight of the evidence supports the continued value of cholinergic drugs as a standard, cornerstone pharmacological approach in Alzheimer's disease, particularly as we look ahead to future combination therapies that address symptoms as well as disease progression.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Cholinergic Neurons/physiology , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Cholinergic Agents/metabolism , Cholinergic Agents/therapeutic use , Cholinergic Neurons/metabolism , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/metabolism , Cognition/physiology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Humans , Neurofibrillary Tangles/metabolism
8.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 32(3): 173-178, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29771687

ABSTRACT

Memantine extended release (ER) significantly outperformed placebo on co-primary endpoints of Clinician's Interview-based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) and baseline to endpoint changes on the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) in a 24-week, randomized trial (NCT00322153) in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease taking a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI). A post hoc analysis compared patients receiving memantine ER/ChEI to placebo/ChEI for time to onset of response and if the response was maintained (achieving improvement at weeks 8, 12, or 18 and maintaining through endpoint/week 24) on the SIB, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), CIBIC-Plus, and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) using Fisher exact test. A second post hoc analysis compared percentages of patients for all possible combinations of 2 to 4 assessments with either no decline or clinically notable response using Wald χ. Significantly greater percentages of memantine ER/ChEI patients achieved an early response that was maintained on SIB, NPI, and CIBIC-Plus (P<0.05) versus placebo/ChEI. Significantly greater percentages of memantine ER/ChEI-treated patients achieved and maintained a clinically notable response on ADL/NPI, SIB/ADL/NPI, and SIB/ADL/CIBIC-Plus, compared with placebo/ChEI (P<0.05). Memantine ER results in early, maintained improvement in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease concurrently taking ChEIs, compared with cholinesterase treatment alone.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Dopamine Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Memantine/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Single-Blind Method
9.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 30(3): 220-232, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30028897

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Empathy can be broadly defined as the ability to understand what others feel (cognitive empathy) and feel what others feel (affective empathy). The capacity to empathize may be impaired in certain major neurocognitive disorders (MNCDs), affecting not only the patient, but also the caregivers. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies investigating empathy changes, using an objective scale, in patients with MNCDs. RESULTS: The Interpersonal Reactivity Index was most commonly used to evaluate empathy in this population. Impairments in cognitive but not affective empathy were found in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and may be attributable to overall cognitive decline. Patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have demonstrated severe deficits in empathy, correlating with greater caregiver burden. Empathy changes in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies, vascular dementia, and Parkinson's disease dementia have not yet been studied. Intranasal oxytocin has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for empathy loss, but it has not been explored yet in patients with MNCDs. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers need to be educated about empathy loss, which is an important part of the disease process in AD and FTD. Future research should further assess empathy changes in other MNCDs, as well as explore novel treatment options in this field.


Subject(s)
Empathy/physiology , Neurocognitive Disorders/physiopathology , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs ; 22(1): 101-105, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28253832

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major neuropsychiatric disorder affecting more than 5 million Americans over age 65. By the year 2050, AD is expected to affect over 30 million. Characterized by neuronal cell death accompanied by the accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques, AD results in devastating clinical symptomatology with a lasting psychosocial and financial impact. Studies have shown that the current treatments for AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI's) and NMDA receptor antagonists, have limited efficacy. The 5-HT-6 receptor antagonists Idalopirdine and Intepirdine have shown the most progress in current clinical trials and warrant consideration as emerging treatments for AD. Areas covered: This review discusses 5-HT6 antagonists currently in clinical trials as potential treatments for AD symptomatology and how 5-HT6 physiology may play a positive role in alleviating AD symptom pathophysiology. A literature search using PubMed was conducted using the terms Idalopirdine, Intepirdine, 5-HT-6 antagonist, and AD as keywords. Clinicaltrials.gov and Alzforum were also used to obtain information on clinical trials. Expert opinion: If current Phase-3 trials are positive, 5-HT6 antagonists such as Idalopirdine and Intepirdine may be considered as supplementary treatments to ChEI's and NMDA receptor antagonists for the symptomatic treatment of AD.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Receptors, Serotonin/drug effects , Serotonin Antagonists/therapeutic use , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Animals , Benzylamines/pharmacology , Benzylamines/therapeutic use , Drug Design , Humans , Indoles/pharmacology , Indoles/therapeutic use , Quinolines/pharmacology , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Receptors, Serotonin/metabolism , Serotonin Antagonists/pharmacology , Sulfones/pharmacology , Sulfones/therapeutic use
11.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 29(4): 283-290, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29069113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lithium is a first-line treatment for bipolar disorder in geriatric patients; however, it has long been associated with potentially significant renal consequences, including chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We reviewed the available evidence to characterize the effects of lithium on renal function, provide a consensus on periodic monitoring, and propose criteria for transitioning an older patient with bipolar disorder and renal issues to an alternate medication. RESULTS: Although the evidence on lithium use, duration, and dosage on progression of CKD and end-stage renal disease in geriatric patients is mixed, there is solid evidence that patients receiving lithium generally have a reduced glomerular filtration rate compared with controls. The current guidelines for monitoring lithium use in geriatric patients are nearly sufficient, but adherence in clinical practice frequently falls short. Alternative medications for bipolar disorder in geriatric patients are generally considered safe and effective, but do not have the strength of evidence that exists in the general adult population. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is no compelling evidence that lithium should be avoided in geriatric patients; however, prudent monitoring strategies are recommended, with a strong consideration of transitioning geriatric patients with poor tolerance to an alternative medication.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Lithium Compounds/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/chemically induced , Aged , Humans
12.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 28(4): 255-262, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27901517

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ideomotor apraxia (IMA) is known to affect individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Combined with impaired cognitive function, IMA can support evidence of probable AD. However, apraxia is a condition that is difficult to diagnose. The Postural Knowledge Test (PKT), developed by Mozaz et al, was designed to easily identify limb apraxia in multiple sclerosis yet demonstrated potential utility for AD. ILIAD is a pilot study to investigate correlation between the PKT and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). METHODS: Participants with mild, moderate, and severe AD were administered the MMSE by 1 examiner, followed by the PKT by a second blinded examiner. RESULTS: Seventy-seven participants with mild (25), moderate (26), and severe AD (26) met study criteria. Correlation was demonstrated between the MMSE and PKT at 0.835 among all AD groups. Correlation between MMSE and PKT-1 (transitive) and PKT-2 (intransitive) separately was 0.819 and 0.793. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant correlation between the MMSE (memory loss) and PKT (IMA). This suggests the PKT may be used in conjunction with the MMSE to aid in staging AD and to monitor disease severity. Correlation between the MMSE and separate PKT tests suggests that administration of only 1 test may be necessary clinically, saving valuable time.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/complications , Apraxias/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Extremities , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Posture , Severity of Illness Index
14.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 23(8): 780-3, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25500118

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Combining five commonly observed symptoms of late-life depression to develop a short depression screening tool with similar sensitivity and specificity as the conventional, more time-consuming tools. METHODS: We developed the St. Louis University AM SAD (Appetite, Mood, Sleep, Activity, and thoughts of Death) questionnaire. The frequency of each symptom in the prior 2 weeks is quantified as 0, 1, or 2. Patients 65 years or older from our clinics were administered the AM SAD, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the St. Louis University Mental Status Exam (SLUMS). RESULTS: 100 patients were selected. AM SAD correlation with GDS was 0.72 and MADRS 0.80. AM SAD yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 62% against diagnosis of depression; of 88% and 62% with GDS-15; and 92% and 71% with MADRS. CONCLUSIONS: The AM SAD can be reliably used as a short depression screening tool in patients with a SLUMS score of 20 or higher.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Mass Screening/instrumentation , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 29(2): 110-6, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25437301

ABSTRACT

The long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of high-dose 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch in severe Alzheimer disease was evaluated in a 24-week, open-label extension to the double-blind ACTION study. Safety and tolerability, and efficacy on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale-Severe Impairment Version (ADCS-ADL-SIV), Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), and ADCS-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) were assessed. Overall, 197 patients continued on 13.3 mg/24 h patch; 199 uptitrated from 4.6 mg/24 h to 13.3 mg/24 h patch. The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs was similar in patients who continued on, and patients who uptitrated to, 13.3 mg/24 h patch (AEs: 57.9% and 59.8%; serious AEs: 16.2% and 16.1%; discontinuations: 11.2% and 12.1%, respectively). Larger mean changes from double-blind baseline were observed in patients uptitrated on the ADCS-ADL-SIV (-4.6; SD=8.7) and SIB (-7.0; SD=16.6), than those who continued on 13.3 mg/24 h patch (-3.9; SD=8.0 and -4.7; SD=16.8, respectively). ADCS-CGIC scores were comparable. There were no clinically relevant between-group differences in safety and tolerability. Greater decline was observed in patients with delayed uptitration to high-dose 13.3 mg/24 h patch than patients who continued on high-dose patch.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Rivastigmine/administration & dosage , Accidental Falls , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Prospective Studies , Rivastigmine/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Transdermal Patch , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Tract Infections/chemically induced , Weight Loss
16.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 26(1): 19-32, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24501728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, there has been a surge of new clinical trials studying the impact of exogenous testosterone on mood. The results of these studies have been inconsistent. METHODS: Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials using common depression rating scales was performed. RESULTS: Sixteen trials with a total of 944 subjects met selection criteria. Meta-analysis of data showed a significant positive impact of testosterone on mood (z=4.592; P<.0001). Subgroup analysis showed a significant effect size of 5.279 (P<.0001) in the trials with a mean age of <60 years. However, the effect size was not statistically significant in those trials with a mean age of >60 years. The effect size in hypogonadal men was 4.192 (P<.0001), whereas the result was not statistically significant in eugonadal men. In addition, the effect size was larger in subthreshold depression compared with major depression. Oral testosterone compared with oral dehydroepiandrosterone, testosterone gel, and intramuscular testosterone did not show a significant result. Larger CONCLUSIONS: Testosterone may be used as a monotherapy in dysthymia and minor depression or as an augmentation therapy in major depression in middle-aged hypogonadal men.


Subject(s)
Depression/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Testosterone/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
17.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 24(5): 433-441, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566584

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In July 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted full approval to lecanemab for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild AD dementia. Considering the limited treatment options for AD, the approval of lecanemab offers hope and opens the door for other disease-modifying therapies in the pipeline. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors summarize the FDA treatment guidelines, other anti-amyloid agents, and drug information relevant to prescribers, such as pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. Relevant clinical trial outcomes are discussed along with their significance and controversies. EXPERT OPINION: While questions remain about the magnitude of lecanemab's clinical impact, its approval signifies major progress in addressing the underlying pathology of AD. The authors have confidence in lecanemab as a promising treatment option and foresee exciting advancements on the 5-year horizon. Yet, further research is needed regarding trials beyond 18 months, post-marketing surveillance, and lecanameb in combination with existing treatments and lifestyle interventions.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , United States , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Amyloid beta-Peptides
18.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 20(6): 411-417, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758223

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Donanemab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that significantly reduces cerebral amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). It can delay disease progression and cognitive decline, making it one of the most promising disease-modifying treatments in the current treatment landscape. AREAS COVERED: This paper covers the current literature available on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of donanemab. Publications from PubMed and Google were reviewed. A summary of regulatory approvals and current clinical data is also provided. EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY: Donanemab as a therapy for AD has more effective disease-modifying effects compared to lecanemab. Donanemab appears generally well-tolerated; however, it may have higher rates of severe side effects, such as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), that could lead to death. Guidelines for frequency of MRI monitoring for ARIA/safety are pending but will be integral to determining its use. Despite some limitations, donanemab is expected to receive FDA approval, giving clinicians access to another disease-modifying drug. Overall, more data is needed about donanemab, especially relating to safety, efficacy, cost, and integration with other treatments, but its development signifies progress in AD treatment.


Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a brain disorder that severely impacts memory, behavior, and thinking. The most common treatments manage symptoms but do not slow disease progression or improve function. Accumulation of proteins called amyloid-beta plaques in the brain are one of the main causes of the disease. Donanemab is an antibody that helps the body remove these plaques. This review summarizes what is currently known about the safety of donanemab, how it works, and the extent to which it can help people with AD.Results suggest that donanemab significantly decreases the amount of plaques in the brain, delays disease progression, and improves cognition. Treatment can prevent reaccumulation of plaques for an extended period of time. There are some side effects associated with treatment, but they are generally manageable and resolve when the drug is stopped. In rare cases, more serious side effects were reported. These require careful monitoring and an evaluation of potential risk compared to benefit. Overall, current information on donanemab is extensive and shows promise. However, to help caregivers and people with AD make informed decisions on using the drug, further research is needed to fully explore donanemab's safety, cost, and efficacy compared to other therapies in the same class.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Disease Progression , Plaque, Amyloid/drug therapy , Cognitive Dysfunction/drug therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Drug Development
19.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 24(6): 607-614, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785454

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cholinesterase inhibitors, along with memantine, are the mainstay of symptomatic treatment for AD (Alzheimer's disease); however, these medications are typically administered orally, which can be difficult for people with AD and their caregivers. AREAS COVERED: In this drug profile and narrative review, the authors trace the development of the new FDA-approved transdermal donepezil. The authors discuss the studies showing its bioequivalence with the oral formulation, including two double-blinded placebo controlled non-inferiority trials. The authors also compare the patch to the only other transdermal cholinesterase inhibitor on the market, rivastigmine, and highlight the potential advantages and disadvantages between these two treatments. EXPERT OPINION: While the patch is bio-equivalent, it is rather large and may not be affordable for some patients. In addition, there is no high dose (e.g. 23 mg) equivalent. Nevertheless, transdermal donepezil will be useful for people with AD and their caregivers, given its effectiveness and potential convenience.


Subject(s)
Administration, Cutaneous , Alzheimer Disease , Cholinesterase Inhibitors , Donepezil , Humans , Donepezil/administration & dosage , Donepezil/therapeutic use , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Transdermal Patch , Rivastigmine/administration & dosage , Rivastigmine/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index
20.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 21(6): 529-35, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23567411

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of Parkinson disease (PD) and Parkinson disease dementia (PDD) in community nursing homes. To estimate how many residents who meet criteria for PDD have been diagnosed with PDD and prescribed a Federal Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for PDD. SETTING: Three private Saint Louis metropolitan area nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five residents with a chart diagnosis of PD from a total of 714 residents were identified. Sixteen subjects or families did not give consent and two were excluded from the study because advanced stage of the illness impaired evaluation. Thirty-seven subjects with an established diagnosis of PD participated in the study. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: A chart review was used to identify the study sample: residents with an established diagnosis of PD. Consent was obtained from the nursing home administration, families or guardians, and the residents themselves (where applicable). Study data were obtained from review of residents' medical charts, family/caregiver interview, resident interview, resident cognitive testing (Mini-Mental State Examination, clock drawing test), and resident depression assessment (15-item Geriatric Depression Scale). Diagnosis of PDD was defined using existing literature and described below. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 15. RESULT: Of the 714 nursing home residents, 55 (7.7%) met criteria for PD. Of these, 37 participated in the study and 18 (48.6%) met criteria for PDD. None were diagnosed with PDD in the charts and 11.1% (2 of 18) were on FDA-approved treatment. CONCLUSION: In this sample of nursing home residents, the prevalence of PD was 7.7% and the overall prevalence of PDD was 3.7%. PDD remains an unrecognized entity in the nursing home setting. Close to half (48.65%) of nursing home residents with PD may have PDD at any given time and they remain undiagnosed and largely undertreated.


Subject(s)
Dementia/complications , Dementia/epidemiology , Nursing Homes , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognition Disorders/complications , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Dementia/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/complications , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Missouri/epidemiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL