Reteplase versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Alteplase is the standard agent used in early reperfusion therapy, but alternative thrombolytic agents are needed. The efficacy and safety of reteplase as compared with alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke are unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours after symptom onset in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous reteplase (a bolus of 18 mg followed 30 minutes later by a second bolus of 18 mg) or intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg per kilogram of body weight; maximum dose, 90 mg). The primary efficacy outcome was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no neurologic deficit, no symptoms, or completely recovered] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours after symptom onset. RESULTS: A total of 707 patients were assigned to receive reteplase, and 705 were assigned to receive alteplase. An excellent functional outcome occurred in 79.5% of the patients in the reteplase group and in 70.4% of those in the alteplase group (risk ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 1.21; P<0.001 for noninferiority and P = 0.002 for superiority). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours after disease onset was observed in 17 of 700 patients (2.4%) in the reteplase group and in 14 of 699 (2.0%) of those in the alteplase group (risk ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.54 to 2.75). The incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage at 90 days was higher with reteplase than with alteplase (7.7% vs. 4.9%; risk ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.51), as was the incidence of adverse events (91.6% vs. 82.4%; risk ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours after symptom onset, reteplase was more likely to result in an excellent functional outcome than alteplase. (Funded by China Resources Angde Biotech Pharma and others; RAISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05295173.).

Assessment of rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage in China: findings from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation improves functional recovery in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients, and assessing patients for rehabilitation is the first step in this process. However, little is known about clinical practice in China regarding the assessment and provision of rehabilitation for patients with SAH. METHODS: To identify patients hospitalized with SAH and to analyze rehabilitation assessment rates, we used data for 11,234 SAH patients admitted to 861 hospitals from the China Stroke Center Alliance from August 2015 to July 2019. We examined factors for rehabilitation assessment and analyzed the relationship between rehabilitation assessment and outcomes in these patients. RESULTS: Among 11,234 patients with SAH, 6,513 (58.0%) were assessed for rehabilitation. Assessed patients had an increased length of stay (mean ± SD days: 17.3 ± 12.5 versus 11.6 ± 10.5, P = 49.4), a higher Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission (mean ± SD GCS score: 12.3 ± 3.8 versus 11.8 ± 4.4, P = 12.2), and were more likely to be admitted to the stroke unit (19.6% versus 13.8%, P = 15.6). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with an increased likelihood of a rehabilitation assessment (p < 0.05) included a longer length of stay (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04 to 1.05) and care such as dysphagia screening (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.04), DVT prophylaxis (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.41 to 1.72) and vessel evaluation (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.63 to 1.98). For the multivariate analysis of outcomes, patients undergoing rehabilitation assessment had a longer length of stay (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.81 to 2.12), a higher modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.36 to 1.64), and higher rates of discharge to a rehabilitation center (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.81-5.75). CONCLUSION: More than two-fifths of SAH patients were not assessed for rehabilitation. Rates vary considerably among hospital grades, and there is a need to improve adherence to recommended care for SAH patients.

Short- and long-term outcomes of patients with minor stroke and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is a risk factor for stroke. This study was undertaken to determine the influence of NVAF on the mortality and recurrent stroke after a minor stroke event. METHODS: Data were derived from the Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III) which enrolled 15,166 subjects during August 2015 through March 2018 in China. Patients with minor stroke (NIHSS ≤ 5) within 24 h after onset were included. Clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, recurrent ischemic stroke, and recurrent hemorrhagic stroke were collected. The Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between NVAF and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 4,753 patients were included in our study. Of them, 222 patients had NVAF (4.7%) (mean age, 71.1 years) and 4,531 patients were without AF (95.3%) (mean age, 61.4 years). NVAF was associated with 12-month cardiovascular mortality in both univariate (hazards ratio [HR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84 to 9.31; P < 0.001) and multivariate analyses (HR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.79 to 12.15; P = 0.001). There was no difference in the in-hospital ischemic stroke recurrence rate between the two groups (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.19 to 1.05] P = 0.07 at discharge). However, patients with NVAF had a lower rate of recurrent ischemic stroke at medium- (3 months and 6 months) and long-term (12 months) follow-up (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.68] P = 0.003 at 3 months; 0.49 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.89] P = 0.02 at 6 months; 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.94] P = 0.03 at 12 months, respectively) compared with those without. There was no difference in all-cause mortality and hemorrhagic stroke between the two groups during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Minor stroke patients with NVAF were at higher risk of cardiovascular death but had a lower rate of recurrent ischemic stroke compared to those without during the subsequent year after stroke event. A more accurate stroke risk prediction model for NVAF is warranted for optimal patient care strategies.

Sex Differences in Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke in China.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in stroke outcomes are crucial to secondary prevention, but previous reports showed inconsistent results. We aimed to explore the sex differences in stroke outcomes in the Third China National Stroke Registry, a prospective multicenter registry study. METHODS: Among the 15 166 patients enrolled between 2015 and 2018, 9038 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) were included. The primary outcomes were stroke recurrence, mortality, and unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale > 2) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Cox regression model was used for stroke recurrence and mortality and logistic regression was used for the unfavorable functional outcome, and adjusted as follows: (1) Model 1: without adjustment; (2) Model 2: adjusted for potential risk factors, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at admission, prestroke modified Rankin Scale, tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment, TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) classification, and onset-to-door time; (3) Model 3: adjusted for covariates from model 2 in addition to blood pressure and blood serum covariates. Multiple imputation was used for missing values, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to describe sex differences by age groups. RESULTS: One-third (2802/9038) of the patients were women. Women were significantly older than men (64.78±10.84 versus 61.26±11.42, P<0.001). In the fully adjusted model, female patients were more likely to have unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months (odds ratio, 1.28 [1.09-1.50]), especially among patients aged 65 years or older (odds ratio, 1.39 [1.14-1.70]), but no difference was discovered in patients aged <65 years. There were no sex differences in stroke recurrence and mortality at 3, 6, or 12 months or unfavorable functional outcomes at 6 or 12 months after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with men, women with AIS were less likely to have favorable outcomes at 3 months in China, especially among those over 65 years of age. Experts should aim to tailor secondary prevention strategies for high-risk patients.

Sex differences in vascular risk factors, in-hospital management, and outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke in China.

BACKGROUND: Previous assessments of sex differences for patients with acute ischemic stroke were limited in a specific region or population, narrow scope, or small sample size. METHODS: Patients with acute ischemic stroke hospitalized in the China Stroke Center Alliance hospitals were analyzed. Absolute standardized differences (ASDs) were used to assess sex differences in vascular risk factors, guideline-recommended in-hospital management measures and outcomes, including stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale≥16), death/discharge against medical advice, major adverse cardiovascular events, pneumonia, and disability (modified Rankin Scale≥3). RESULTS: Of 838,229 patients analyzed, 524351 (62.6%) were men and 313,878 (37.4%) were women. Compared with men, women were older (68.6 vs. 64.7 years), had higher prevalence of hypertension (67.7% vs. 62.4%), diabetes (24.7% vs. 19.5%), and atrial fibrillation (7.1% vs. 4.3%), but lower prevalence of smoking (4.5% vs. 56.6%) and drinking (2.6% vs 35.8%) (ASDs >10%). No sex differences were seen in guideline-directed management measures, indicated by risk-adjusted individual measures and the all-or-null summary measure (34.5% vs 34.9%, ASD = 1.0%). Compared to men, women tended to have strokes that were more severe at presentation (6.5% vs. 4.5%, ASD = 8.8%) and more disabilities at discharge (34.9% vs 30.5%, ASD =9.4%). However, all sex-related differences in outcomes were attenuated to null after risk adjustments (ASDs<2%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to male patients, female patients had more vascular risk factors and received similar in-hospital care. They had strokes that were more severe at presentation and more disabilities at discharge, both of which may be explained by worse vascular risk profiles.

Machine learning is an effective method to predict the 90-day prognosis of patients with transient ischemic attack and minor stroke.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate factors related to the 90-day poor prognosis (mRS≥3) in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke, construct 90-day poor prognosis prediction models for patients with TIA or minor stroke, and compare the predictive performance of machine learning models and Logistic model. METHOD: We selected TIA and minor stroke patients from a prospective registry study (CNSR-III). Demographic characteristics,smoking history, drinking history(≥20g/day), physiological data, medical history,secondary prevention treatment, in-hospital evaluation and education,laboratory data, neurological severity, mRS score and TOAST classification of patients were assessed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed in the training set to identify predictors associated with poor outcome (mRS≥3). The predictors were used to establish machine learning models and the traditional Logistic model, which were randomly divided into the training set and test set according to the ratio of 70:30. The training set was used to construct the prediction model, and the test set was used to evaluate the effect of the model. The evaluation indicators of the model included the area under the curve (AUC) of the discrimination index and the Brier score (or calibration plot) of the calibration index. RESULT: A total of 10967 patients with TIA and minor stroke were enrolled in this study, with an average age of 61.77 ± 11.18 years, and women accounted for 30.68%. Factors associated with the poor prognosis in TIA and minor stroke patients included sex, age, stroke history, heart rate, D-dimer, creatinine, TOAST classification, admission mRS, discharge mRS, and discharge NIHSS score. All models, both those constructed by Logistic regression and those by machine learning, performed well in predicting the 90-day poor prognosis (AUC >0.800). The best performing AUC in the test set was the Catboost model (AUC=0.839), followed by the XGBoost, GBDT, random forest and Adaboost model (AUCs equal to 0.838, 0, 835, 0.832, 0.823, respectively). The performance of Catboost and XGBoost in predicting poor prognosis at 90-day was better than the Logistic model, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). All models, both those constructed by Logistic regression and those by machine learning had good calibration. CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms were not inferior to the Logistic regression model in predicting the poor prognosis of patients with TIA and minor stroke at 90-day. Among them, the Catboost model had the best predictive performance. All models provided good discrimination.

P2Y12 Inhibitors Plus Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone in Patients With Minor Stroke or High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet (DAPT) therapy with P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel/ticagrelor) and aspirin versus aspirin monotherapy in patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. METHODS: Following Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis standards for meta-analyses, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials that included patients with a diagnosis of an acute mild ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack, intervention of DAPT therapy with clopidogrel/ticagrelor and aspirin versus aspirin alone from January 2012 to July 2020. The outcomes included subsequent stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, hemorrhage (mild, moderate, or severe), and myocardial infarction. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used to estimate pooled risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% CI in R package meta. We assessed the heterogeneity of data across studies with use of the Cochran Q statistic and I2 test. RESULTS: Four eligible trials involving 21 493 participants were included in the meta-analysis. DAPT therapy started within 24 hours of symptom onset reduced the risk of stroke recurrence by 24% (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.68-0.83], I2=0%) but was not associated with a change in all-cause mortality (RR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.90-1.89], I2=0%), cardiovascular death (RR, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.56-3.17], I2=0%), mild bleeding (RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.37-4.29], I2=94%), or myocardial infarction (RR, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.62-3.39], I2=0%). However, DAPT was associated with an increased risk of severe or moderate bleeding (RR, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.16-4.08], I2=41%); further sensitivity tests found that the association was limited to trials with DAPT treatment duration over 21 days (RR, 2.86 [95% CI, 1.75-4.67], I2=0%) or ticagrelor (RR, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.16-4.08], I2=37%) but not within 21 days or clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with noncardioembolic mild stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack, DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel/ticagrelor is more effective than aspirin alone for recurrent stroke prevention with a small absolute increase in the risk of severe or moderate bleeding.

Feasibility of low-dose dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium after intracranial operations: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have shown that dexmedetomidine might decrease the occurrence of postoperative delirium after major surgery, but neurosurgical patients were excluded from these studies. We aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial of the effect of prophylactic low-dose dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in patients after elective intracranial operation for brain tumors. METHODS: In this single-center, parallel-arm pilot randomized controlled trial, adult patients who underwent an elective intracranial operation for brain tumors were recruited. Dexmedetomidine (0.1 µg/kg/hour) or placebo was continuously infused from intensive care unit (ICU) admission on the day of surgery until 08:00 AM on postoperative day one. Adverse events during the study-drug administration were recorded. The primary feasibility endpoint was the occurrence of study-drug interruption. Delirium was assessed twice daily with the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU during the first five postoperative days. The assessable rate of delirium evaluation was documented. RESULTS: Sixty participants were randomly assigned to receive either dexmedetomidine (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30). The study-drug was stopped in two patients (6.7%) in the placebo group due to desaturation after new-onset unconsciousness and an unplanned reoperation for hematoma evacuation and in one patient (3.3%) in the dexmedetomidine group due to unplanned discharge from the ICU. The absolute difference (95% confidence interval) of study-drug interruption between the two groups was 3.3% (- 18.6 to 12.0%), with a noninferiority P value of 0.009. During the study-drug infusion, no bradycardia occurred, and hypotension occurred in one patient (3.3%) in the dexmedetomidine group. Dexmedetomidine tended to decrease the incidence of tachycardia (10.0% vs. 23.3%) and hypertension (3.3% vs. 23.3%). Respiratory depression, desaturation, and unconsciousness occurred in the same patient with study-drug interruption in the placebo group (3.3%). Delirium was evaluated 600 times, of which 590 (98.3%) attempts were assessable except in one patient in the placebo group who remained in a coma after an unplanned reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of study-drug interruption and high assessable rate of delirium evaluation supported a fully powered trial to determine the effectiveness of low-dose dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in patients after intracranial operation for brain tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04494828) on 31/07/2020.

Incidence and risk factors of postoperative delirium in patients admitted to the ICU after elective intracranial surgery: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) has been confirmed as an important complication after major surgery. However, neurosurgical patients have usually been excluded in previous studies. To date, data on POD and risk factors in patients after intracranial surgery are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and risk factors of POD in patients after intracranial surgery. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A neurosurgical ICU of a university-affiliated hospital, Beijing, China. INTERVENTIONS: Adult patients admitted to the ICU after elective intracranial surgery under general anaesthesia were consecutively enrolled between 1 March 2017 and 2 February 2018. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. POD was diagnosed as Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU positive on either postoperative day 1 or day 3. Patients were classified into groups with or without POD. Data were collected for univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the risk factors for POD. RESULTS: A total of 800 patients were included. POD was diagnosed in 157 patients (19.6%, 95% confidence interval 16.9 to 22.4%). Independent risk factors for POD included age, nature of intracranial lesion, frontal approach craniotomy, duration of surgery, presence of an episode of low pulse oxygenation at ICU admission, presence of inadequate emergence and emergence delirium, postoperative pain and presence of immobilising events. POD was associated with adverse outcomes and high costs. CONCLUSION: POD is prevalent in patients after elective intracranial surgery. The identified risk factors for and the potential association of POD with adverse outcomes suggest that a comprehensive strategy involving screening for predisposing factors and early prevention of modifiable factors should be established in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03087838.

Use of Emergency Medical Services and Timely Treatment Among Ischemic Stroke.

Background and Purpose- Emergency medical services (EMSs) are critical for early treatment of patients with ischemic stroke, yet data on EMS utilization and its association with timely treatment in China are still limited. Methods- We examined data from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance for patients with ischemic stroke from June 2015 to June 2018. Absolute standardized difference was used for covariates' balance assessments. We used multivariable logistic models with the generalized estimating equations to account for intrahospital clustering in identifying demographic and clinical factors associated with EMS use as well as in evaluating the association of EMS use with timely treatment. Results- Of the 560 447 patients with ischemic stroke analyzed, only 69 841 (12.5%) were transported by EMS. Multivariable-adjusted results indicated that those with younger age, lower levels of education, less insurance coverage, lower income, lower stroke severity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease were less likely to use EMS. However, a history of cardiovascular diseases was associated with increased EMS usage. Compared with self-transport, EMS transport was associated with significantly shorter onset-to-door time, door-to-needle time (if prenotification was sent), earlier arrival (adjusted odds ratio [95% CIs] were 2.07 [1.95-2.20] for onset-to-door time ≤2 hours, 2.32 [2.18-2.47] for onset-to-door time ≤3.5 hours), and more rapid treatment (2.96 [2.88-3.05] for IV-tPA [intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator] in eligible patients, 1.70 [1.62-1.77] for treatment with IV-tPA by 3 hours if onset-to-door time ≤2 hours, and 1.76 [1.70-1.83] for treatment with IV-tPA by 4.5 hours if onset-to-door time ≤3.5 hours). Conclusions- Although EMS transportation is associated with substantial reductions in prehospital delay and improved likelihood of early arrival and timely treatment, rate of utilization is currently low among Chinese patients with ischemic stroke. Developing an efficient EMS system and promoting culture-adapted education efforts are necessary for improving EMS activation.

Atrial Fibrillation Known Before or Detected After Stroke Share Similar Risk of Ischemic Stroke Recurrence and Death.

Background and Purpose- We aim to compare the risk of 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence and death for atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS), atrial fibrillation known before stroke (KAF), and sinus rhythm (SR). Methods- From June 2012 to January 2013, 19 604 patients with acute ischemic stroke were admitted to 219 urban hospitals in the China National Stroke Registry II. Based on heart rhythm assessed during admission, we classified patients as AFDAS, KAF, or SR. We explored the relationship between heart rhythm groups and 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence or death by using Cox regression adjusted for multiple covariates. Considering that death is a competing risk for stroke recurrence, we used the competing risks analysis of Fine and Gray and subdistribution Cox proportional hazards to test the association between heart rhythm and 1-year outcomes. Results- Among 19 604 ischemic stroke patients, 17 727 had SR, 495 AFDAS, and 1382 KAF. At 1 year, 54 (10.9%) patients with AFDAS, 182 (13.2%) with KAF, and 1008 (5.7%) with SR had recurrent ischemic strokes ( P<0.0001). Mortality was 22.0% in patients with AFDAS, 22.1% in patients with KAF, and 7.0% in patients with SR ( P<0.0001). AFDAS-related ischemic stroke recurrence adjusted risk was higher than that of SR (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.29-2.01) but not different from that of KAF (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87-1.45]). The adjusted risk of 1-year death for AFDAS was also higher than that of SR (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.37-2.12) and not different from that of KAF (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86-1.41). Conclusions- This study showed that AFDAS had similar risk of 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence and mortality when compared with KAF and higher risk when compared with SR. The potential risk of AFDAS should be given more emphasis, and appropriate treatment is needed to achieve reduction in the incidence of stroke recurrence and mortality.

Regional Variations in Medication Usage for Cardiovascular Diseases at the Community Level in China (PURE-China Study).

We investigated the usage of secondary prevention drugs and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) products in individuals with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) at the community level in China. Among 2,407 participants with self-reported coronary heart disease (CHD) and 872 with stroke, nearly 80% of individuals with CHD and 73% of individuals with stroke were not taking any proven secondary prevention drug. However, 32.9% of them took TCM products. Patients with CVDs in rural areas used less secondary prevention treatment, but more TCM products than their counterparts in the urban regions. After adjusting for confounding factors, lower rates of secondary prevention treatment were evident in Western China compared with Eastern China, which was more developed. Systematic change is needed to promote the development of evidence-based medicine at the community level in China.

Reteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke within 4.5 hours (RAISE): rationale and design of a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reteplase is the third generation of alternative thrombolytic agent. We hypothesis that reteplase will be non-inferior to alteplase in achieving excellent functional outcome at 90 days among eligible patients with acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS AND DESIGN: Reteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke within 4.5 hours (RAISE) trial is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE), controlled phase 3 non-inferiority trial. A total of 1412 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either reteplase at a dose of 18 mg+ 18 mg or alteplase 0.9 mg/kg at a ratio of 1:1. An independent data monitoring committee will review the trail's progress and safety data. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome of this study is proportion of individuals attaining an excellent functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 at 90 days. The secondary efficacy outcomes encompass favourable functional outcome defined as mRS 0-2, major neurological improvement on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, ordinal distribution of mRS and Barthel Index score of at least 95 points at 90 days. The primary safety outcomes are symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at 36 hours within 90 days. DISCUSSION: The RAISE trial will provide crucial insights into the selection of thrombolytic agents for stroke thrombolysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05295173.

Rationale and design of Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke with Edaravone Dexborneol II (TASTE-2): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Edaravone dexborneol is believed to be a novel cytoprotective drug, demonstrating a synergistic combination of antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties in animal models. The Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke with Edaravone Dexborneol (TASTE) trial demonstrated its superior efficacy over edaravone alone for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients. However, its efficacy in individuals undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) remains uncertain. AIM: To clarify the rationale and design of the TASTE II (TASTE-2) trial. DESIGN: The TASTE-2 is a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of edaravone dexborneol in patients with AIS and large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. The eligible participants, presenting with a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score between 6 and 25 (range 0-42, with larger values suggesting severe neurological dysfunction) and an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score ranging from 6 to 10 (range 0-10, with smaller values suggesting larger infarction) within the initial 24 hours after symptom onset, will be randomly allocated to either the edaravone dexborneol group or the placebo group in equal proportions prior to thrombectomy. The treatment will be continuously administered for a duration of 10-14 days. A follow-up period of 90 days will be implemented for all participants. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome is defined as achieving favourable functional independence, measured by a modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days. The primary safety outcome focuses on the incidence of serious adverse events. DISCUSSION: The TASTE-2 trial will provide evidence to determine whether the administration of edaravone dexborneol in AIS patients undergoing EVT could yield significant improvements in neurological function.

Predictors of dysphagia screening and pneumonia among patients with intracerebral haemorrhage in China: a cross-sectional hospital-based retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate factors associated with undergoing dysphagia screening (DS) and developing pneumonia, as well as the relationship between DS and pneumonia in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). DESIGN: Our study was a cross-sectional hospital-based retrospective study. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: We derived data from the China Stroke Centre Alliance, a nationwide clinical registry of ICH from 1476 participating hospitals in mainland China. To identify predictors for pneumonia, multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify patient characteristics that were independently associated with DS and pneumonia. PARTICIPANTS: We included 31 546 patients in this study with patient characteristics, admission location, medical history, hospital characteristics and hospital grade from August 2015 to July 2019. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were DS and pneumonia during acute hospitalisation. RESULTS: In total, 25 749 (81.6%) and 7257 (23.0%) patients with ICH underwent DS and developed pneumonia. Compared with patients without pneumonia, those who developed pneumonia were older and had severe strokes (Glasgow Coma Scale 9-13: 52.7% vs 26.9%). Multivariable analyses revealed that a higher pneumonia risk was associated with dysphagia (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 4.02 to 4.68), heart failure (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.77) and smoking (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.12 to 0.20). DS was associated with lower odds of pneumonia (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: Our findings further confirm that dysphagia is an independent risk factor for pneumonia; one-fifth of patients with ICH did not undergo DS. However, comprehensive dysphagia evaluation and effective management are crucial. Nursing processes ensure the collection of complete and accurate information during evaluation of patients. There is a need to increase the rate of DS in patients with ICH, especially those with severe stroke or older. Further, randomised controlled trials are warranted to determine the effectiveness of DS on clinical outcomes.

RhPro-UK in acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of stroke onset trial-2(The PROST-2 study): Rationale and design of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human prourokinase (rhPro-UK) is a specific plasminogen activator, which has been approved to treat acute myocardial infarction in China. AIM: This phase III trial aimed to further demonstrate the efficacy and safety of rhPro-UK in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. METHODS AND DESIGN: RhPro-UK in AIS within 4.5 hours of stroke onset trial-2 (PROST-2) is a multicenter, prospective randomized, open-label, blinded end-point, non-inferiority, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA)-controlled, phase 3 trial. A total of 1,552 patients who are eligible for intravenous thrombolytic therapy from 72 clinical sites will be randomly assigned to receive either rhPro-UK 35 mg (15 mg bolus+ 20 mg infusion/30 minutes) or rt-PA 0.9 mg/kg (10% bolus +90% infusion/1 hour). STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days. Secondary efficacy outcomes include the proportion of patients with mRS score of 0-2, the distribution of mRS, self-care ability in daily life on the Barthel Index at 90 days, the proportion of subjects with ≥ 4 points decrease in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score or NIHSS score ≤ 1 from baseline at 24 hours and 7 days after treatment. Safety outcomes are symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and major systematic bleeding within 7 days as well as death from all causes within 90 days. DISCUSSION: The results from the PROST-2 trial will comprehensively elucidate the efficacy and safety profile of rhPro-UK as a potential alternative agent for stroke thrombolysis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT05700591.

The FAITHS2 Model Predicts Functional Disability in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

The present study aimed to develop a model to predict functional disability at 3 months in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (n = 5,406). The primary outcome was functional disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] >2) at 3 months. A prediction model including blood biomarkers was developed based on a multivariable logistic regression model, which was internally validated by the 100-time bootstrap method. A nomogram and a web-based calculator were developed for usage in clinical practice. At 3 months, 11% (638/5,406) of the patients had functional disability. Seven independent predictors of functional disability at 3 months were incorporated into the FAITHS2 model (fasting plasma glucose, age, interleukin-6, stroke history, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] at admission, sex, and systolic blood pressure). The Area Under Curves (AUCs) were 0.814 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.796-0.832) and 0.808 (95% CI 0.806-0.810), and the Brier scores were 0.088 ± 0.214 and 0.089 ± 0.003 for the derivation cohort and internal validation, respectively, showing optimal performance of the model. The FAITHS2 model has excellent potential to be a dependable application for individualized clinical decision making.