Association of indicators of extensive disease and rifampin-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Indicators of extensive disease-acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear positivity and lung cavitation-have been inconsistently associated with clinical rifampin-resistant/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB) outcomes. We evaluated the association of these indicators with end-of-treatment outcomes. METHODS: We did an individual participant data meta-analysis of people treated for RR/MDR-TB with longer regimens with documented AFB smear and chest radiography findings. We compared people AFB smear-negative without cavities to people: (1) smear-negative with lung cavities; (2) smear-positive without lung cavities and (3) AFB smear-positive with lung cavities. Using multivariable logistic regression accounting for demographic, treatment and clinical factors, we calculated adjusted ORs (aOR) for any unfavourable outcome (death, lost to follow-up, failure/recurrence), and mortality and treatment failure/recurrence alone. RESULTS: We included 5596 participants; included participants significantly differed from excluded participants. Overall, 774 (13.8%) were AFB smear-negative without cavities, 647 (11.6%) only had cavities, 1424 (25.4%) were AFB smear-positive alone and 2751 (49.2%) were AFB smear-positive with cavities. The median age was 37 years (IQR: 28-47), 3580 (64%) were male and 686 (12.5%) had HIV. Compared with participants AFB smear-negative without cavities, aOR (95% CI) for any unfavourable outcome was 1.0 (0.8 to 1.4) for participants smear-negative with lung cavities, 1.2 (0.9 to 1.5) if smear-positive without cavities and 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0) if AFB smear-positive with lung cavities. Odds were only significantly increased for mortality (1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.1) and failure/recurrence (2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.3) among participants AFB smear-positive with lung cavities. CONCLUSION: Only the combination of AFB smear-positivity and lung cavitation was associated with unfavourable outcomes, suggesting they may benefit from stronger regimens.

[Advances in antibiotic therapy for tuberculosis]. / Avancées dans l'antibiothérapie de la tuberculose.

ADVANCES IN ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY FOR TUBERCULOSIS. Treatment of tuberculosis is experiencing significant advancements. For the first time, a therapeutic regimen based on rifapentine and moxifloxacin allows for a reduction of treatment duration of drug-susceptible tuberculosis from 6 to 4 months. Regarding multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, combinations of new antituberculosis drugs (bedaquiline, linezolid, delamanid/pretomanid, moxifloxacin) have the potential to reduce the treatment duration from 20 to 6 months. Additionally, considering the extent of anatomical involvement and bacterial burden allows for strategies that involve variable treatment durations based on the severity of the disease. The new tuberculosis treatments thus appear to be shorter and more personalized.

AVANCÉES DANS L'ANTIBIOTHÉRAPIE DE LA TUBERCULOSE. Le traitement de la tuberculose connaît de grandes avancées. Pour la première fois, un protocole thérapeutique à base de rifapentine et moxifloxacine permet de réduire de six à quatre mois la durée du traitement des tuberculoses à bacilles sensibles. S'agissant des tuberculoses à bacilles multirésistants, des combinaisons de nouveaux antituberculeux (bédaquiline, linézolide, délamanide-prétomanide, moxifloxacine) permettent de réduire de vingt à six mois la durée du traitement. Enfin, la prise en compte de l'importance de l'atteinte anatomique et de la charge bacillaire permet d'envisager des stratégies incluant des durées de traitement variables selon l'importance de l'atteinte. Les nouveaux traitements de la tuberculose apparaissent donc plus courts et plus personnalisés.

Availability of drugs and resistance testing for bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaL(M)) regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Europe.

OBJECTIVES: Multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis is a major obstacle to successful tuberculosis control. The recommendation by the WHO to use bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaL(M)) for 6 months, based on results of two trials with high efficacy and low toxicity, has revolutionized treatment options. METHODS: In this study, representatives of the Tuberculosis Network European Trials group in 44 of 54 countries of the WHO Europe region documented the availability of the medicines and drug susceptibility testing (DST) of the BPaL(M) regimen through a structured questionnaire between September and November 2023. RESULTS: In total, 24 of 44 (54.5%), 42 of 44 (95.5%), 43 of 44 (97.7%), and 43 of 44 (97.7%) countries had access to pretomanid, bedaquiline, linezolid, and moxifloxacin, respectively. Overall, 23 of 44 (52.3%) countries had access to all the drugs composing the BPaL(M) regimen. In total, 21 of 44 (47.7%), 37 of 44 (84.1%), 40 of 44 (90.9%), and 41 of 44 (93.2%) countries had access to DST for pretomanid, bedaquiline, linezolid, and moxifloxacin, respectively. Overall, DST was available for all medicines composing the BPaL(M) regimen in 21 of 44 (47.7%) countries, including countries where pretomanid DST was available at specialized laboratories. The availability of DST for the drugs the countries had access to, varied from 87.5% to 95.3% (pretomanid 21 of 24 (87.5%), bedaquiline 37 of 42 (88.1%), linezolid 40 of 43 (93.1%) and moxifloxacin 41 of 43 (95.3%)). DISCUSSION: In only about half of the countries participating in the survey, clinicians had access to all the BPaL(M) regimen drugs. A complete DST for the BPaL(M) medicines was possible in less than half of the countries, because of the low accessibility of DST for pretomanid. Equal access to new regimens is urgently needed in Europe and a rapid scale up of DST, especially for pretomanid, is important to prevent unnoticed spread of drug resistance.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the real-world diagnostic infrastructure for tuberculosis-An ESGMYC collaborative study.

We determined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mycobacterial diagnostic services. 40 laboratories from 22 countries completed an online questionnaire covering the redeployment of the laboratory infrastructure and/or staff for SARS-CoV-2 testing, staff shortages and supply chain disruptions. 28 laboratories reported monthly numbers of samples processed for mycobacterial investigations and monthly numbers of M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC) PCRs performed between October 1st 2018 and October 31st 2020. More than half (23/40) of the participating TB laboratories reported having performed COVID-19 diagnostics in the early phase of the pandemic, in part with negative impact on the mycobacterial service activities. All participating laboratories reported shortages of consumables and laboratory equipment due to supply chain issues. Average monthly sample numbers decreased by 24% between January 2020 and October 2020 compared to pre-pandemic averages. At the end of the study period, most participating laboratories had not returned to pre-pandemic average MTBC PCR throughput.