ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study examines the readability of online medical information regarding cloacal exstrophy (CE). We hypothesize that inappropriate levels of comprehension are required in these resources, leading to poor understanding and confusion amongst caregivers. Methods: The Google and Bing search engines were used to search the terms "cloacal exstrophy" and "cloacal exstrophy treatment". The first 100 results for each were collected. Each webpage was analyzed for readability using four independent validated scoring systems: the Gunning-Fog index (GFI), SMOG grade (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook), Dale-Chall index (DCI), and the Flesch-Kincaid grade (FKG). Results: Forty-seven unique webpages fit the inclusion criteria. Mean readability scores across all websites were GFI, 14.6; SMOG score, 10.8; DCI, 9.3; and FKG, 11.8, correlating to adjusted grade levels of college sophomore, 11th grade, college, and 11th grade, respectively. There were significant differences across all readability formulas. Non-profit websites were significantly less readable than institutional and commercial webpages (GFI p = 0.012, SMOG p = 0.018, DCI p = 0.021, FKG p = 0.0093). Conclusion: Caregiver-directed health information regarding CE and its treatment available online is written at the 11th grade reading level or above. Online resources pertaining to CE must be simplified to be effective.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) is a malformation of the genitourinary system that occurs due to failure of abdominal wall closure. Unlike other malformations of similar incidence, prenatal diagnosis of CBE relies on suggested, rather than formal, diagnostic criteria. OBJECTIVE: This report describes prenatal diagnosis of CBE in the largest single-institutional cohort to date and delineates key sonographic findings and protocols for specialist referral. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institutional database was reviewed for CBE patients born since 2000. Data on screening ultrasound use, gestational age at ultrasound, and abnormal findings were extracted. Where possible, time of prenatal diagnosis (pre- or postnatal and gestational age), ultrasound findings and other imaging data, specialist referral, institution of birth and closure, and outcome of primary closure attempt were compared. RESULTS: Of 557 patients born with CBE between 2000 and 2022, 284 met inclusion criteria and complete data were available for 280 (229 born domestically and 51 born internationally) who were included for analysis. Abnormal sonography suggestive of CBE was present for 48% (n = 134) of patients, for whom absent bladder was the most common abnormal finding (76% [102/134]). Of domestic patients, 46% (n = 106) were diagnosed prenatally at a median gestational age of 22 weeks (inter-quartile range [IQR]: 20-24), and 14% (n = 32) underwent confirmatory fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Of domestic patients with abnormal prenatal findings, 75% (n = 80/106) consulted with maternal-fetal medicine and 58% (n = 62/106) consulted with pediatric urology. On univariate analysis, prenatal diagnosis was positively associated with primary repair at Association for the Bladder Exstrophy Community-recognized centers of excellence (54% vs. 38%, p = 0.02) and negatively associated with osteotomy at primary closure (41% vs 59%, p = 0.003) but not success of primary closure (74% vs. 82%, p = 0.07). DISCUSSION: Rates of prenatal diagnosis in this cohort were similar to previous reports of smaller cohorts. Diagnosis allows for comprehensive pre- and postnatal follow-up with a pediatric urologist, with implications on birth planning and decisions on termination of pregnancy. Because of the previously-reported association between exstrophy and in vitro fertilization, these pregnancies should undergo detailed sonography. Any nonvisualization of the fetal bladder should prompt a detailed exam, and any finding characteristic of bladder exstrophy warrants referral to pediatric urology. CONCLUSIONS: Although CBE is a rare disorder, it is underdiagnosed during pregnancy. Sonographers and obstetricians should be aware of characteristic findings and best practices following diagnosis. Early referral to pediatric urology and maternal-fetal medicine is important for counseling and postnatal planning.
Subject(s)
Bladder Exstrophy , Referral and Consultation , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Humans , Bladder Exstrophy/diagnostic imaging , Bladder Exstrophy/diagnosis , Female , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Infant, Newborn , Gestational Age , Male , Prenatal Diagnosis/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of stone formation amongst patients of the exstrophy-epispadias complex with augmentation cystoplasty. We hypothesize that bowel segment choice influences the rate of stone formation after bladder augmentation and the rate of complications from bladder stone surgery. METHODS: An IRB-approved institutional database of 1512 exstrophy-epispadias patients was reviewed retrospectively. Patients that had a history of bladder augmentation and were seen at our institution between 2003 and 2023 were included. RESULTS: Out of 259 patients, bladder stones developed in 21.6% (56), of which the bowel segment used was colon in 147 patients and ileum in 100. Stones formed in 19% of colon augments compared to 29% ileal augments, however, this was not statistically significant (P = .07). The most common primary stone component was dahllite, followed by struvite for all augments (Table 1). The median time to stone treatment after augmentation was 4.14 years (0.75-31). Seventy-four percentage of patients had a recurrence that required a second surgery. The median time from first to second surgery and second to third surgery was 1.4 years and 2.22 years, respectively. Bladder stone surgery complications occurred in 14% of patients, vesicocutaneous fistula being the most common, and complications did not differ by augment type. Median follow-up after first stone intervention was 6.07 years (0-19.5). CONCLUSION: The treatment of bladder stones in the exstrophy-epispadias complex remains challenging. Interventions to prevent recurrence are crucial as the majority of patients will require 2 or more stone surgeries in their lifetime.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The exstrophy-epispadias complex is a spectrum of ventral wall malformations including classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) and cloacal exstrophy (CE). Patients undergo multiple soft-tissues procedures to achieve urinary continence. If unsuccessful bladder neck closure (BNC) is performed, muscle flaps may be used to reinforce BNC or afterwards for fistula reconstruction. In this study, patients reconstructed using a rectus abdominis or gracilis muscle flap were reviewed. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of exstrophy-epispadias complex patients who underwent BNC and had a muscle fap was performed. Indication for flap use, surgical technique, risks for BNC failure including mucosal violations (MVs) were reviewed. MVs were prior bladder mucosa manipulation for exstrophy closure, repeat closure(s) and bladder neck reconstruction. Success was defined as BNC without fistula development. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients underwent reconstruction. Indications included during BNC (n=13), fistula closure after BNC (n=17), following BNC during open cystolithotomy (n=1) or fistula closure after open cystolithotomy (n=3). A vesicourethral fistula developed most frequently in CBE (88.9%) and vesicoperineal fistula in CE (87.5%). Thirty-three rectus flaps and 3 gracilis flap were used with success achieved in 97.1% and 66.7%, respectively. All 34 patients achieved success and 2 CE patients required a second flap. CONCLUSION: The rectus flap is preferred as it covers the antero-inferior bladder and pelvic floor to prevent urethral, cutaneous, and perineal fistula formation. The gracilis flap only reaches the pelvic floor to prevent urethral and perineal fistula development. Increased MVs, increase the risk of fistula formation and may influence the need for prophylactic flaps.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Appropriate perioperative management is crucial in patients undergoing classic bladder exstrophy closure (CBE). Therefore, the authors sought to review their intra and postoperative management of patients with CBE undergoing primary closure and examine the impact of this pathway on patient outcomes. METHOD: A prospectively maintained institutional approved exstrophy-epispadias complex database was reviewed for patients with CBE who had undergone primary closure between 2016 and 2022 and whose closure was performed within one year of age. Electronic medical records for eligible patients were retrospectively reviewed to examine patient demographics, use of pelvic osteotomy, immobilization status, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission and management, perioperative analgesia and sedation, nutritional support, drainage tubes, blood transfusions, antibiotic coverage, hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, and closure failure. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were identified, 22 with CBE and 3 with variant CBE. Closure was performed at a median age of 84 days with patients ranging in age from 9 to 351 days. All patients underwent osteotomy and immobilization with modified Buck's traction and external fixation for a median duration of 41 days. A suprapubic tube was placed in all patients for a median duration of 46.5 days. All patients underwent PICU admission following closure for a median duration of 8 days. Ventilator support was required in 68 % of patients for a median of 3 days. Epidural analgesia was used in all patients and catheters were maintained for a median duration of 19 days. All patients received a blood transfusion over the course of their admission. Patient-controlled analgesia was used in most patients as an adjunct for a median duration of 38.5 days. Other commonly used analgesic adjuncts included acetaminophen, diazepam, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine. TPN was used in 80 % of patients for a median of 7 days with a return of oral feeding thereafter. Overall, the closure success rate in this cohort of patients was 100 %. DISCUSSION: The outcome of primary bladder closure can have inauspicious consequences that can affect a child's continence for years. The incidence of failed bladder closure can be minimized with the implementation of a detailed plan for immobilization, analgesia, and nutrition guided by an experienced multi-disciplinary team. CONCLUSION: We have identified several guiding principles for perioperative success in exstrophy patients at our center including Buck's traction with external fixation, provision of adequate postoperative analgesia and sedation, aggressive nutritional support, renal and bladder drainage, and robust antibacterial support. Our high success rate in managing this complex pathology demonstrates its validity and use as a pathway to success.
Subject(s)
Bladder Exstrophy , Perioperative Care , Humans , Bladder Exstrophy/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Infant , Perioperative Care/methods , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Treatment Outcome , Infant, Newborn , Critical PathwaysABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for stenosis and compare management strategies for stenosis etiology and to examine the efficacy of each approach. Patients with classic bladder exstrophy (CBE), a rare genitourinary malformation, may require construction of a continent urinary stoma (CUS) if incontinence persists. Stomal stenosis is a challenging complication as it is common, progressive, and recurrent. METHODS: CBE patients who underwent CUS were retrospectively reviewed for risk factors for stenosis including stoma type, prior midline laparotomy number, and umbilicoplasty suture material. Stenosis etiology and management strategies were further reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 260 CBE patients underwent CUS creation. Stenosis developed in 65 patients (25.0%) at a median interval of 1.9 years. Etiology included scar contracture (n = 41), keloid (n = 17), and hypertrophic scar (n = 7). Multifilament suture was the only variable associated with an increased risk of stenosis compared to monofilament suture (P = .009). Almost all patients required surgical intervention. Most scar contractures underwent stomal incision with success in 100%. Hypertrophic scars and keloids responded best to excision with local tissue rearrangement (66.7%). At last follow-up, all patients achieved success. CONCLUSION: Stomal stenosis is common and challenging for the reconstructive surgeon. Strategies to prevent and effectively manage this are greatly desired. Use of multifilament suture for the umbilicoplasty increased stenosis perhaps from a greater inflammatory response and scarring, while monofilament suture may reduce its incidence. Stomal incision for treating scar contractures, and excision with local tissue rearrangement for hypertrophic scars and keloids may improve successful primary surgical intervention.