ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in patients with cirrhosis is associated with improved survival. Provision of HCC surveillance is low in the US, particularly in primary care settings. AIMS: To evaluate current hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HCC surveillance practices and physician attitudes regarding HCC risk-stratification among primary care and subspecialty providers. METHODS: Using the Tailored Design Method, we delivered a 34-item online survey to 7654 North Carolina-licensed internal/family medicine or gastroenterology/hepatology physicians and advanced practice providers in 2022. We included the domains of HCV treatment, cirrhosis diagnosis, HCC surveillance practices, barriers to surveillance, and interest in risk-stratification tools. We performed descriptive analyses to summarize responses. Tabulations were weighted based on sampling weights accounting for non-response and inter-specialty comparisons were made using chi-squared or t test statistics. RESULTS: After exclusions, 266 responses were included in the final sample (response rate 3.8%). Most respondents (78%) diagnosed cirrhosis using imaging and a minority used non-invasive tests that were blood-based (~ 15%) or transient elastography (31%). Compared to primary care providers, subspecialists were more likely to perform HCC surveillance every 6-months (vs annual) (98% vs 35%, p < 0.0001). Most respondents (80%) believed there were strong data to support HCC surveillance, but primary care providers did not know which liver disease patients needed surveillance. Most providers (> 70%) expressed interest in potential solutions to improve HCC risk-stratification. CONCLUSIONS: In this statewide survey, there were great knowledge gaps in HCC surveillance among PCPs and most respondents expressed interest in strategies to increase appropriate HCC surveillance.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Primary Health Care , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , North Carolina/epidemiology , Male , Female , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Gastroenterology/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Surveys and Questionnaires , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Health Care SurveysABSTRACT
Significant controversy exists regarding the evidence to support the clinical benefits and risks of weight loss interventions for individuals with obesity. United States Preventative Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines recommend weight loss for all individuals with obesity while weight-neutral models such as Health at Every Size promote weight inclusivity, focusing on body acceptance rather than weight loss. We discuss how lifestyle-based weight-centric paradigms, such as the USPSTF Guidelines, may increase weight stigma and weight cycling, and many of their purported clinical benefits are not supported by existing evidence. However, we also acknowledge the clear benefits of metabolic surgery in high-risk individuals, and the potential benefits for pharmacotherapy for obesity in selected patients. Herein we describe a weight-skeptical approach to the care of patients with obesity that aims to use available evidence to support patient-centered care.
Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents , Weight Prejudice , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Obesity/drug therapy , Weight Loss , Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Life StyleSubject(s)
Obesity , Shame , Weight Prejudice , Diet, Reducing , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Obesity/metabolism , Obesity/psychology , Obesity/therapySubject(s)
Outpatients , Potassium , Electronic Health Records , Electronics , Follow-Up Studies , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgical safety checklists, such as the perioperative time-out, have been shown to improve performance on a variety of patient safety measures. A variety of methods have been used to assess compliance with the perioperative time-out, but no standardized methodology with a reliable observer group currently exists. An observation-based methodology was used to assess time-out compliance at an academic medical center. METHODS: A single observer group made up of medical students and nurses recorded compliance with each of the 11 standardized items of the time-out. A total of 193 time-out procedures were observed, 48 by medical students and 145 by nurses. RESULTS: One item (procedure to be performed) achieved > 95% compliance. Three items (surgical site; availability of necessary blood products, implants, devices; and start of antibiotics) achieved 80%-95% compliance. Seven items achieved < 80% compliance (presence of required members of procedure team, presence of person who marked patient, patient identity, side marking, relevant images, allergies, and discussion of relevant special considerations). Compliance with the four core time-out items was 78.2%. Of the 11 items on the time-out being evaluated, there was a statistically significant difference between medical student and nursing observations for 10 items (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of observed time-outs, the compliance rate was low, calling into question time-out quality, and, more importantly, patient safety. Measures must be taken by large hospitals to regularly audit time-out compliance and create effective programming to improve performance. Although observational assessment is an effective method to assess compliance with surgical safety checklists, observer group bias has the potential to skew results.
Subject(s)
Checklist/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Checklist/standards , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Observer Variation , Patient Safety , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standardsABSTRACT
Despite a global obesity epidemic suggesting that human physiology is unable to prevent unhealthy gains in body weight, ample evidence indicates that weight can be tightly regulated. Food intake regulation is complex and in this article we will present a basic endocrine feedback loop model of energy homeostasis. Next, integration of long-term regulation with short-term, meal specific regulation and satiety will be discussed. Finally, the role of adiposity signals in modulation of food reward will be highlighted. A basic understanding of the structure-function of these systems will inform the challenges of clinical care for those with disorders of energy balance.
Subject(s)
Appetite Regulation , Neurosecretory Systems/physiology , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Poppy seeds contain morphine and other opioid alkaloids and are commercially available in the United States. Users of poppy seed tea (PST) can consume several hundred morphine milligram equivalents per day, and opioid dependence from PST use can develop. We report a case of a patient with chronic pain and PST use leading to opioid use disorder (OUD). This case represents the first published report of OUD from PST successfully treated with buprenorphine (BUP) in a primary care setting. The provider in this case used a unique model of care with an opioid prescribing support team to deliver safe and effective care. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old man with chronic pain and prescription opioid use presented to primary care to discuss a flare of shoulder pain, and revealed in subsequent conversation a long-standing use of PST to supplement pain control. Attempts at cessation resulted in severe withdrawal symptoms, leading to return to PST use. The primary care provider consulted the VA Puget Sound SUpporting Primary care Providers in Opioid Risk reduction and Treatment (SUPPORT) team to evaluate the patient for OUD. The patient discontinued all opioids, and initiated BUP under the supervision of the primary care provider. He remained on a stable dosage, without relapse, 24 months later. CONCLUSIONS: PST, which can be made through purchase of readily available poppy pods, carries risk for development of OUD and overdose. Herein we highlight the utility of a primary care opioid prescribing support team in empowering a primary care provider to prescribe BUP to treat a patient with complex OUD.
Subject(s)
Buprenorphine , Opioid-Related Disorders , Papaver , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Primary Health Care , Tea , United StatesABSTRACT
Introduction: Current approaches to teaching diagnostic reasoning minimally address the need for deliberate practice. We developed an educational conference for internal medicine residents to practice diagnostic reasoning and examine how biases affect their differential diagnoses through cognitive autopsies. Methods: We formatted the Virtual Interactive Case-Based Education (VICE) conference as a clinical problem-solving exercise, in which a facilitator presents a case to a single discussant selected from the audience. We delivered VICE on an internet-based conferencing platform with screen-sharing capability over approximately 30 minutes. To maximize learners' psychological safety, we employed an active facilitation model that normalized uncertainty and prioritized the diagnostic process over arriving at the correct diagnosis. Results: Resident attitudes toward VICE were assessed by utilizing a postconference survey and gathering descriptive data for 11 sessions. Ninety-seven percent of respondents (n = 35) felt that VICE was a novel and valuable addition to their curriculum. Qualitative data suggested that positive features of the conference included the opportunity to practice diagnostic reasoning, the single-discussant format, and the supportive learning environment. Discussants reported that holding the conference in person would have negatively impacted their experience. Discussion: Internal medicine residents universally valued the opportunity to engage in deliberate practice of case-based reasoning in a psychologically safe environment during the VICE conference. The virtual nature of the conference contributed significantly to discussants' positive experience. This resource includes all materials necessary to implement VICE, as well as an instructional video on facilitation.
Subject(s)
Simulation Training , Curriculum , Humans , Learning , Problem SolvingABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic challenged health care organizations to develop ways to provide patient care with rapidly changing guidelines and scarce resources. Clinical leaders and informatics specialists partnered to rapidly develop an electronic health record (EHR) template for primary care staff to screen Veterans at Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound. The template prompts categorization of patients by stability and suspicion for COVID-19, and provides just-in-time triaging advice for clinic staff. Each category is a discrete data element and this information was used by leadership to track screening and testing volumes. We found that a brief, practical EHR note template can be quickly adopted to inform guideline-based screening, direct patient care, and conserve resources.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Documentation , Electronic Health Records , Mass Screening/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humans , Leadership , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , United States Department of Veterans AffairsSubject(s)
Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Text Messaging/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Insulin signaling in the central nervous system (CNS) regulates energy balance and peripheral glucose homeostasis. Rictor is a key regulatory/structural subunit of the mTORC2 complex and is required for hydrophobic motif site phosphorylation of Akt at serine 473. To examine the contribution of neuronal Rictor/mTORC2 signaling to CNS regulation of energy and glucose homeostasis, we utilized Cre-LoxP technology to generate mice lacking Rictor in all neurons, or in either POMC or AgRP expressing neurons. Rictor deletion in all neurons led to increased fat mass and adiposity, glucose intolerance and behavioral leptin resistance. Disrupting Rictor in POMC neurons also caused obesity and hyperphagia, fasting hyperglycemia and pronounced glucose intolerance. AgRP neuron specific deletion did not impact energy balance but led to mild glucose intolerance. Collectively, we show that Rictor/mTORC2 signaling, especially in POMC-expressing neurons, is important for central regulation of energy and glucose homeostasis.