Break Wave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis: Results of the First-in-Human International Multi-Institutional Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: This study reports on a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, clinical trial utilizing the SonoMotion (San Mateo, California) Break Wave lithotripsy (BWL) device to fragment urinary stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a urinary stone underwent a single treatment of 30 minutes and peak negative pressure of 4.5 to 8 MPa. Subjects were contacted and outcomes assessed at 7, 14, and 35 days after treatment, with clinical follow-up and CT imaging 70 ± 14 days postprocedure. The primary objectives were to assess the safety (hematomas, complications, etc) and effectiveness of BWL (any fragmentation, residual fragments ≤4 mm or ≤2 mm, and completely stone-free rate) as assessed via noncontrast CT-kidneys, ureters, and bladder. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with a ureteral (43%) or renal (57%) stone were treated across 5 centers. Stone fragmentation occurred in 88% of cases; 70% had fragments ≤ 4 and 51% ≤ 2 mm, while 49% were completely stone free on CT; no serious adverse events were reported. Eighty-six percent of patients received either no analgesic medication at all (50%) or minor analgesia (36%). After determining optimal therapy settings, 36 patients were treated and the effectiveness improved exhibiting fragmentation in 92% (33/36), residual fragments ≤ 4 mm in 75% and 58% with fragments ≤ 2 mm with 58% completely stone free. Effectiveness was less in subjects with lower pole stones with 81% fragmentation, 71% having fragments ≤ 4 mm, 29% with fragments ≤ 2 mm, and 29% completely stone free; of distal ureteral stone patients, 89% were completely stone free. CONCLUSIONS: BWL offered safe and effective noninvasive stone therapy requiring little to no anesthesia and was carried out successfully in nonoperative environments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03811171.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasonic Propulsion-Facilitated Clearance of Residual Kidney Stone Fragments vs Observation.

PURPOSE: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigational procedure for awake patients. Our purpose was to evaluate whether ultrasonic propulsion to facilitate residual kidney stone fragment clearance reduced relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial used single block randomization (1:1) without masking. Adults with residual fragments (individually ≤5 mm) were enrolled. Primary outcome was relapse as measured by stone growth, a stone-related urgent medical visit, or surgery by 5 years or study end. Secondary outcomes were fragment passage within 3 weeks and adverse events within 90 days. Cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare the treatment (ultrasonic propulsion) and control (observation) groups. RESULTS: The trial was conducted from May 9, 2015, through April 6, 2024. Median follow-up (interquartile range) was 3.0 (1.8-3.2) years. The treatment group (n = 40) had longer time to relapse than the control group (n = 42; P < .003). The restricted mean time-to-relapse was 52% longer in the treatment group than in the control group (1530 ± 92 days vs 1009 ± 118 days), and the risk of relapse was lower (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.68) with 8 of 40 and 21 of 42 participants, respectively, experiencing relapse. Omitting 3 participants not asked about passage, 24 treatment (63%) and 2 control (5%) participants passed fragments within 3 weeks of treatment. adverse events were mild, transient, and self-resolving, and were reported in 25 treated participants (63%) and 17 controls (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic propulsion reduced relapse and added minimal risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO.: NCT02028559.

Development of an Automated Ultrasound Signal Indicator of Lung Interstitial Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The number and distribution of lung ultrasound (LUS) imaging artifacts termed B-lines correlate with the presence of acute lung disease such as infection, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and pulmonary edema. Detection and interpretation of B-lines require dedicated training and is machine and operator-dependent. The goal of this study was to identify radio frequency (RF) signal features associated with B-lines in a cohort of patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema. A quantitative signal indicator could then be used in a single-element, non-imaging, wearable, automated lung ultrasound sensor (LUSS) for continuous hands-free monitoring of lung fluid. METHODS: In this prospective study a 10-zone LUS exam was performed in 16 participants, including 12 patients admitted with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (mean age 60 ± 12 years) and 4 healthy controls (mean age 44 ± 21). Overall,160 individual LUS video clips were recorded. The LUS exams were performed with a phased array probe driven by an open-platform ultrasound system with simultaneous RF signal collection. RF data were analyzed offline for candidate B-line indicators based on signal amplitude, temporal variability, and frequency spectrum; blinded independent review of LUS images for the presence or absence of B-lines served as ground truth. Predictive performance of the signal indicators was determined with receiving operator characteristic (ROC) analysis with k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Two RF signal features-temporal variability of signal amplitude at large depths and at the pleural line-were strongly associated with B-line presence. The sensitivity and specificity of a combinatorial indicator were 93.2 and 58.5%, respectively, with cross-validated area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.91 (95% CI = 0.80-0.94). CONCLUSION: A combinatorial signal indicator for use with single-element non-imaging LUSS was developed to facilitate continuous monitoring of lung fluid in patients with respiratory illness.

First Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to test transcutaneous focused ultrasound in the form of ultrasonic propulsion and burst wave lithotripsy to reposition ureteral stones and facilitate passage in awake subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult subjects with a diagnosed proximal or distal ureteral stone were prospectively recruited. Ultrasonic propulsion alone or with burst wave lithotripsy was administered by a handheld transducer to awake, unanesthetized subjects. Efficacy outcomes included stone motion, stone passage, and pain relief. Safety outcome was the reporting of associated anticipated or adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects received either ultrasonic propulsion alone (n = 16) or with burst wave lithotripsy bursts (n = 13), and stone motion was observed in 19 (66%). The stone passed in 18 (86%) of the 21 distal ureteral stone cases with at least 2 weeks follow-up in an average of 3.9±4.9 days post-procedure. Fragmentation was observed in 7 of the burst wave lithotripsy cases. All subjects tolerated the procedure with average pain scores (0-10) dropping from 2.1±2.3 to 1.6±2.0 (P = .03). Anticipated events were limited to hematuria on initial urination post-procedure and mild pain. In total, 7 subjects had associated discomfort with only 2.2% (18 of 820) propulsion bursts. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the efficacy and safety of using ultrasonic propulsion and burst wave lithotripsy in awake subjects to reposition and break ureteral stones to relieve pain and facilitate passage.

Trends in Diagnostic Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Reimbursement for Medicare Beneficiaries Among the US Emergency Medicine Workforce, 2012 to 2016.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care ultrasonography allows rapid diagnosis in the emergency department. A previous study found that a low prevalence of emergency medicine clinicians received point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursement in 2012 (0.7%). We determine nationwide point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursement patterns for 4 subsequent years. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using 2012 to 2016 data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Fee-for-Service Provider Utilization and Payment Data Part B, defining point-of-care ultrasonographic examinations using Current Procedural Terminology codes. The emergency medicine workforce was defined by emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, critical care, and advanced practice providers who received emergency medicine-specific reimbursements. We compared patterns of point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursement among emergency physicians in 2012 versus 2016 through a 2-sample test of proportions. RESULTS: In 2012, 342 (0.7% of total) emergency medicine workforce clinicians were reimbursed for diagnostic point-of-care ultrasonography versus 801 (1.3%) in 2016. Emergency physicians represented an increasing proportion of the total workforce, increasing from 86.0% (95% confidence interval 82.3% to 89.6%) in 2012 (N=294) to 94.6% (95% confidence interval 93.1% to 96.2%) in 2016 (N=758). From 2012 to 2016, total point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursements increased from 13,697 to 31,717, with significant growth from echocardiograms (4,127 to 14,978), abdominal examinations (3,682 to 7,140), and thoracic examinations (801 to 5,278). CONCLUSION: The proportion of emergency medicine workforce clinicians receiving diagnostic point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursements, as well as the number of point-of-care ultrasonographic studies, more than doubled from 2012 to 2016. Efforts are needed to understand barriers to adoption of point-of-care ultrasonography because only a small proportion of the emergency medicine clinician workforce was reimbursed in any year.

Interleukin-6 improves infection identification when added to physician judgment during evaluation of potentially septic patients.

BACKGROUND: Identifying infection is critical in early sepsis screening. This study assessed whether biomarkers of endothelial activation and/or inflammation could improve identification of infection among Emergency Department (ED) patients with organ dysfunction. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study at two urban, academic EDs, between June 2016 and December 2017. We included admitted adults with 1) two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and organ dysfunction, 2) systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, or 3) lactate ≥4.0 mmol/L. We excluded patients with trauma, transferred for intracranial hemorrhage, or without available blood samples. Treating ED physicians reported presence of infection (yes/no) at inpatient admission. Assays for angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 were performed using ED blood samples. The primary outcome was infection, adjudicated by paired physician review. Using logistic regression, we compared the performance of physician judgment, biomarkers, and physician judgment-biomarkers combination to predict infection. Area under the curve (AUC) and AUC 95% confidence intervals were estimated by bootstrap procedure. RESULTS: Of 421 patients enrolled, 306 patients met final study criteria. Of these, 154(50.3%) patients had infectious etiologies. Physicians correctly discriminated infectious from non-infectious etiologies in 239 (78.1%). Physician judgment performed moderately when discriminating infection (AUC 0.78, 95% CI: 0.74-0.82) and outperformed the best biomarker model, interleukin-6 alone, (AUC 0.71, 0.66-0.76). Physician judgment improved when including interleukin-6 (AUC 0.84, 0.79-0.87), with modest AUC improvement: 0.06 (0.03-0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In ED patients with organ dysfunction, plasma interleukin-6 may improve infection discrimination when added to physician judgment.

Postdischarge Unplanned Care Events Among Commercially Insured Patients With an Observation Stay Versus Short Inpatient Admission.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Observation stays are composing an increasing proportion of unscheduled hospitalizations in the United States, with unclear consequences for the quality of care. This study used a nationally representative data set of commercially insured patients hospitalized from the emergency department (ED) to compare 30-day postdischarge unplanned care events after an observation stay versus a short inpatient admission. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of ED hospitalizations using the 2015 Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data set. Adult observation stays and short inpatient hospitalizations of 2 days or less were identified and followed for 30 days from hospital discharge to identify unplanned care events, defined as a subsequent inpatient admission, observation stay, or return ED visit. A propensity score analysis was used to compare rates of unplanned events after each type of index hospitalization. RESULTS: Among the propensity-weighted cohorts, patients with an index observation stay were 28% more likely to experience any unplanned care event within 30 days of discharge compared with those with a short inpatient admission (20.4% versus 15.9%; risk ratio 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21 to 1.34). Specifically, patients in the observation stay group had substantially higher rates of postdischarge observation stays (4.8% versus 1.9%; odds ratio 2.60; 95% CI 2.15 to 3.16) and ED revisits with discharge (11.1% versus 8.8%; odds ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.44) compared with those in the inpatient group, but were less likely to be readmitted as inpatients (6.4% versus 7.2%; odds ratio 0.90; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96). CONCLUSION: Commercially insured patients with an observation stay from the ED have a higher risk of postdischarge acute care events compared with similar patients with a short inpatient admission. Additional research is necessary to determine the extent to which quality of care, including care transitions, may differ between these 2 groups.

Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test.

Multiple pitfalls can occur with the conduct and analysis of a study of diagnostic tests, resulting in biased accuracy. Our conceptual model includes three stages: patient selection, interpretation of the index test and disease verification. In part 2, we focus on (1) Interpretation bias (or workup bias): where the classification of an indeterminate index test result can bias the accuracy of a test or how lack of blinding can bias a subjective test result, and (2) Disease verification bias: where the index test result is incorporated into the gold standard or when the gold standard is applied only to a select population as the gold standard is an invasive test. In an example with age-adjusted D-dimer for pulmonary embolism, differential verification bias was a limitation due to the use of two gold standards-CT for a high-risk population and follow-up for symptoms in a low-risk population. However, there are circumstances when certain choices in study design are unavoidable, and result in biased test characteristics. In this case, the informed reader will better judge the quality of a study by recognising the potential biases and limitations by being methodical in their approach to understanding the methods, and in turn, better apply studies of diagnostic tests into their clinical practice.

Recognising Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests Part 1: Patient Selection.

In this two-part series on sources of bias in studies of diagnostic test performance, we outline common errors and optimal conditions during three study phases: patient selection, interpretation of the index test and disease verification by a gold standard. Here in part 1, biases associated with suboptimal participant selection are discussed through the lens of partial verification bias and spectrum bias, both of which increase the proportion of participants who are the 'sickest of the sick' or the 'wellest of the well.' Especially through retrospective methodology, partial verification introduces bias by including patients who are test positive by a gold standard, since patients with a positive index test are more likely to go on to further gold standard testing. Spectrum bias is frequently introduced through case-control design, dropping of indeterminate results or convenience sampling. After reading part 1, the informed clinician should be better able to judge the quality of a diagnostic test study, its inherent limitations and whether its results could be generalisable to their practice. Part 2 will describe how interpretation of the index test and disease verification by a gold standard can contribute to diagnostic test bias.

State of the National Emergency Department Workforce: Who Provides Care Where?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe the current US emergency medicine workforce in terms of clinician type and examine rural and urban emergency medicine workforce differences. METHODS: Using the 2014 Medicare Public Use Files, we performed a cross-sectional study of all clinicians receiving reimbursement for evaluation and management (E/M) services (levels 1 to 5) to Medicare fee-for-service Part B beneficiaries in the emergency department. Providers were defined as emergency physicians, nonemergency physicians, or advanced practice providers, corresponding with the Medicare Public Use Files data set. The primary outcome was the number of clinicians providing greater than 10 E/M claims tabulated as a distinct encounter. Urbanicity data were obtained from the National Bureau of Economic Research. RESULTS: Of 58,641 unique emergency medicine clinicians, 35,856 (61.1%) were classified as emergency physicians, 8,397 (14.3%) as nonemergency physicians, and 14,360 (24.5%) as advanced practice providers. Among nonemergency physicians categorized as emergency medicine clinicians, family practice and internal medicine predominated (41.7% and 19.9%, respectively). Among advanced practice providers, physician assistants (68.4%) and nurse practitioners (31.5%) predominated. A total of 58,565 emergency medicine clinicians were mapped to 2,291 US counties or equivalents. Urban counties had a higher proportion of emergency physicians (63.9%) compared with rural counties (44.8%); 27.1% of counties had no emergency medicine clinicians and 41.4% of counties had no emergency physicians reimbursed by Medicare fee-for-service Part B. CONCLUSION: This work establishes a new baseline estimate of the emergency care workforce, encompassing nearly 60,000 emergency medicine clinicians, of whom fewer than 2 in 3 were emergency physicians. Notable differences exist in the type of clinician staffing of emergency care between urban and rural communities.

The cost of observation care for commercially insured patients visiting the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the use of ED observation stays among a national sample of patients with commercial insurance, and assess the patient cost-burden of an observation stay relative to an short inpatient hospitalization from the ED. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of ED observation stays and inpatient hospitalizations from 2008 to 2015 using the Truven MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters database. Index ED visits were identified from claims files and assessed for evidence of an observation or inpatient hospitalization. Total and out-of-pocket costs were calculated for the index hospitalization and a 30-day episode of care and standardized to 2015 $USD. Costs for ED patients with an observation stay were compared to a similar, propensity-matched cohort of ED patients hospitalized as inpatients. RESULTS: Over the 8 year period, observation stay admissions increased from 4.3% to 6.8% of total ED visits (60.5% relative increase) while inpatient admissions fell from 10.8% to 8.9% (16.6% relative decrease). In 2015, the mean total cost was $8162 for an observation stay and $22,865 for an inpatient hospitalization. Patient out-of-pocket costs were $962 and $1403, respectively. Among the propensity-matched cohorts, relative mean costs for the index hospitalization were 41% higher and patient out-of-pocket costs were 33% higher if the patient was admitted as an inpatient from the ED versus observation during their hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Observation hospitalizations are an increasingly common disposition for patients entering the hospital through the ED. Both total and patient out-of-pocket costs are lower, on average, for an observation stay compared with a similar inpatient admission for ED patients requiring hospitalization.

Derivation of decision rules to predict clinically important outcomes in acute flank pain patients.

OBJECTIVE: Routine CT for patients with acute flank pain has not been shown to improve patient outcomes, and it may unnecessarily expose patients to radiation and increased costs. As preliminary steps toward the development of a guideline for selective CT, we sought to determine the prevalence of clinically important outcomes in patients with acute flank pain and derive preliminary decision rules. METHODS: We analyzed data from a randomized trial of CT vs. ultrasonography for patients with acute flank pain from 15 EDs between October 2011 and February 2013. Clinically important outcomes were defined as inpatient admission for ureteral stones and alternative diagnoses. Clinically important stones were defined as stones requiring urologic intervention. We sought to derive highly sensitive decision rules for both outcomes. RESULTS: Of 2759 participants, 236 (8.6%) had a clinically important outcome and 143 (5.2%) had a clinically important stone. A CDR including anemia (hemoglobin <13.2g/dl), WBC count >11000/µl, age>42years, and the absence of CVAT had a sensitivity of 97.9% (95% CI 94.8-99.2%) and specificity of 18.7% (95% 17.2-20.2%) for clinically important outcome. A CDR including hydronephrosis, prior history of stone, and WBC count <8300/µl had a sensitivity of 98.6% (95% CI 94.5-99.7%) and specificity of 26.0% (95% 24.2-27.7%) for clinically important stone. CONCLUSIONS: We determined the prevalence of clinically important outcomes in patients with acute flank pain, and derived preliminary high sensitivity CDRs that predict them. Validation of CDRs with similar test characteristics would require prospective enrollment of 2100 patients.

Impact of point-of-care ultrasonography on ED time to disposition for patients with nontraumatic shock.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Nontraumatic shock in the emergency department (ED) has multiple causes and carries in-hospital mortality approaching 20%, underscoring the need for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Diagnostic ultrasonography at the point of care is one method that may improve the ability of ED physicians to quickly diagnose and treat. This study assesses the effect of the use and timing of point-of-care (POC) ultrasonography on time to disposition request. METHODS: This retrospective study across 4 Connecticut EDs compared propensity score matched shock patients who did and did not receive POC ultrasonography. Two propensity score matches were performed: the first using covariates of time to disposition from previous literature and the second using 25 novel covariates identified from electronic health records using machine learning to reduce variable selection biases. RESULTS: A total of 3834 unique patients presented with shock during an 18-month period, and 703 (18.3%) patients received POC ultrasonography. Mean time to disposition for all patients was 255.4minutes (interquartile range, 163.8). After propensity score matching, patients had a mean reduction of 26.7minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-58.3) in time to disposition when POC ultrasonography was performed within 1hour of ED arrival and a lesser reduction of 16.7minutes (95% CI, -2.8 to 35.5) when POC ultrasonography was performed within 2hours. There was no evidence of reduction in time to disposition when ultrasonography was performed after 2hours (16.7minutes; 95% CI, -14.3 to 29.9). Propensity score models using machine learning-selected variables yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Performance of POC ultrasonography likely improves time to disposition when performed early on ED patients with shock.

Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department: Insights From the 2012 Medicare National Payment Data Set.

OBJECTIVES: Point-of-care ultrasound is a valuable tool with potential to expedite diagnoses and improve patient outcomes in the emergency department. However, little is known about national patterns of adoption. This study examined nationwide point-of-care ultrasound reimbursement among emergency medicine (EM) practitioners and examined regional and practitioner level variations. METHODS: Data from the 2012 Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Fee-for-Service Provider Utilization and Payment Data include all practitioners who received more than 10 Medicare Part B fee-for-service reimbursements for any Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code in 2012. Odds ratios (ORs) and descriptive statistics were calculated to assess relationships between ultrasound reimbursement and practice location, nearby presence of an EM residency, and time elapsed since practitioner graduation. RESULTS: Of 52,928 unique EM practitioners, 391 (0.7%) received limited ultrasound reimbursements for a total of 16,389 scans in 2012. Urban counties had an OR of 5.4 (95% confidence interval, 3.8-7.8) for receiving point-of-care ultrasound reimbursements compared to rural counties. Counties with an EM residency had an OR of 84.7 (95% confidence interval, 42.6-178.8) for reimbursement compared to counties without. The OR for receiving reimbursement was independent of medical school graduation year (P = .83); however, recent graduates performed more scans (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A small minority of EM practitioners received reimbursements for point-of-care ultrasound from Medicare beneficiaries. These practitioners were more likely to reside in urban and academic settings. Future efforts should assess the degree to which our findings reflect either low point-of-care ultrasound use or low rates of billing for ultrasound examinations that are performed.

EMS-STARS: Emergency Medical Services "Superuser" Transport Associations: An Adult Retrospective Study.

Abstract Objective. Emergency medical services (EMS) "superusers" -those who use EMS services at extremely high rates -have not been well characterized. Recent interest in the small group of individuals who account for a disproportionate share of health-care expenditures has led to research on frequent users of emergency departments and other health services, but little research has been done regarding those who use EMS services. To inform policy and intervention implementation, we undertook a descriptive analysis of EMS superusers in a large urban community. In this paper we compare EMS superusers to low, moderate, and high users to characterize factors contributing to EMS use. We also estimate the financial impact of EMS superusers. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study based on 1 year of data from an urban EMS system. Data for all EMS encounters with patients age ≥18 years were extracted from electronic records generated on scene by paramedics. We identified demographic and clinical variables associated with levels of EMS use. EMS users were characterized by the annual number of EMS encounters: low (1), moderate (2-4), high (5-14), and superusers (≥15). In addition, we performed a financial analysis using San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) 2009 charge and reimbursement data. Results. A total of 31,462 adults generated 43,559 EMS ambulance encounters, which resulted in 39,107 transports (a 90% transport rate). Encounters for general medical reasons were common among moderate and high users and less frequent among superusers and low users, while alcohol use was exponentially correlated with encounter frequency. Superusers were significantly younger than moderate EMS users, and more likely to be male. The superuser group created a significantly higher financial burden/person than any other group, comprising 0.3% of the study population, but over 6% of annual EMS charges and reimbursements. Conclusions. In this retrospective study, adult EMS "superusers" emerged as a distinct, predominantly male population and their EMS encounters were associated with alcohol use. Continued analysis of this unique, high-cost, and frequently transported population will likely illuminate specific intervention strategies.

Improving emergency physician performance using audit and feedback: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback can decrease variation and improve the quality of care in a variety of health care settings. There is a growing literature on audit and feedback in the emergency department (ED) setting. Because most studies have been small and not focused on a single clinical process, systematic assessment could determine the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in the ED and which specific characteristics improve the quality of emergency care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to assess the effect of audit and feedback on emergency physician performance and identify features critical to success. METHODS: We adhered to the PRISMA statement to conduct a systematic review of the literature from January 1994 to January 2014 related to audit and feedback of physicians in the ED. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases. We included studies that were conducted in the ED and reported quantitative outcomes with interventions using both audit and feedback. For included studies, 2 reviewers independently assessed methodological quality using the validated Downs and Black checklist for nonrandomized studies. Treatment effect and heterogeneity were to be reported via meta-analysis and the I2 inconsistency index. RESULTS: The search yielded 4332 articles, all of which underwent title review; 780 abstracts and 131 full-text articles were reviewed. Of these, 24 studies met inclusion criteria with an average Downs and Black score of 15.6 of 30 (range, 6-22). Improved performance was reported in 23 of the 24 studies. Six studies reported sufficient outcome data to conduct summary analysis. Pooled data from studies that included 41,124 patients yielded an average treatment effect among physicians of 36% (SD, 16%) with high heterogeneity (I2=83%). CONCLUSION: The literature on audit and feedback in the ED reports positive results for interventions across numerous clinical conditions but without standardized reporting sufficient for meta-analysis. Characteristics of audit and feedback interventions that were used in a majority of studies were feedback that targeted errors of omission and that was explicit with measurable instruction and a plan for change delivered in the clinical setting greater than 1 week after the audited performance using a combination of media and types at both the individual and group levels. Future work should use standardized reporting to identify the specific aspects of audit or feedback that drive effectiveness in the ED.

Bedside optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound for the evaluation of suspected pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and test characteristics of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by ocular ultrasound as a screening tool for ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) failure. METHODS: Prospective observational study using a convenience sample of children 6 months to 18 years of age, presenting to an academic pediatric emergency department for evaluation of possible VPS failure between September 2008 and March 2009. ONSD was measured by anterior transbulbar and lateral transbulbar techniques. Mean ONSD was compared between subjects with and without shunt failure, as determined by neurosurgical decision to operate. RESULTS: A total of 39 encounters were completed, including 20 VPS failures. The mean ONSD was 4.5 ± 0.9 and 5.0 ± 0.6 mm among encounters with and without shunt failure (p = 0.03), respectively. The mean ONSD was not statistically different when obtained by the anterior transbulbar vs. the lateral transbulbar approach (4.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.7 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.12). ONSD ultrasound had a sensitivity of 61.1 % (95 % CI 35.7-82.7) and specificity of 22.2 % (95 % CI 6.4-47.6 %) for detecting shunt failure in this sample. CONCLUSIONS: ONSD ultrasound does not appear to be a useful primary screening tool in emergency department evaluation of VPS failure. There was no difference between the anterior transbulbar approach and the lateral transbulbar approach. Children with VPS in our sample have larger ONSD measurements than in previously reported studies.

Impact of an Institutional Clinical Pathway on Emergency Physicians' Stated Preferences in Treating Patients with Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Evidence continues to accumulate that select patients with acute low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) can be safely discharged from the emergency department. Despite this, outpatient management continues to be uncommon. We report changes in emergency providers' stated preferences on low-risk acute PE management before and after the development and implementation of an institutional clinical pathway and decision tool. METHODS: We performed an observational analysis of attending emergency physicians' stated preferences towards the management of low-risk acute PE using survey results before and after the development and implementation of an electronic health record-embedded institutional low-risk acute PE pathway. RESULTS: Attending emergency medicine providers reported feeling more comfortable using PE risk stratification scores to identify dischargeable low-risk PE patients and also reported that they would be more likely to discharge a hypothetical patient with low-risk acute PE. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the implementation of an institutional clinical pathway with integration into the electronic health record was associated with a change in emergency physicians' stated preferences for managing patients with acute low-risk PE in the emergency department. Implementation of an evidence-based standard pathway was associated with increased comfort and familiarity with PE risk stratification, and an increased comfort with and preference for early outpatient management of low-risk PE.

Transfer Patient Imaging: Assessment of the Impact of Discrepancies Identified by Emergency Radiologists.

PURPOSE: Advanced imaging examinations of emergently transferred patients (ETPs) are overread to various degrees by receiving institutions. The practical clinical impact of these second opinions has not been studied in the past. The purpose of this study is to determine if emergency radiology overreads change emergency medicine decision making on ETPs in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: All CT and MRI examinations on patients transferred to a level I trauma center during calendar year 2018 were routinely overread by emergency radiologists and discrepancies with the outside report electronically flagged. All discrepant reports compared with the outside interpretations were reviewed by one of four emergency medicine physicians. Comparing the original and final reports, reviewers identified changes in patient management that could be attributed to the additional information contained in the final report. Changes in patient care were categorized as affecting ED management, disposition, follow-up, or consulting services. RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, 5,834 patients were accepted in transfer. Among 5,631 CT or MRI examinations with outside reports available, 669 examinations (12%) had at least one discrepancy in the corresponding outside report. In 219 examinations (33%), ED management was changed by discrepancies noted on the final report; patient disposition was affected in 84 (13%), outpatient follow-up in 54 (8%), and selection of consulting services in 411 (61%), and ED stay was extended in 544 (81%). Discrepant findings affected decision making in 613 of 669 of examinations (92%). CONCLUSION: Emergency radiology overreading of transferred patients' advanced imaging examinations provided actionable additional information to emergency medicine physicians in the care of 613 of 669 (92%) examinations with discrepant findings. This added value is worth the effort to design workflows to routinely overread CT and MRI examinations of ETPs.