ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A previous study has shown an increased prevalence of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE CMR) detected unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) with increasing extent and severity of coronary artery disease. However, the coronary artery disease was evaluated on a patient level assuming normal coronary anatomy. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to investigate the prevalence of UMI identified by LGE CMR imaging in patients with stable angina pectoris and no known previous myocardial infarction; and to investigate whether presence of UMI is associated with stenotic lesions in the coronary artery supplying the segment of the myocardium in which the UMI is located, using coronary angiography to determine the individual coronary anatomy in each patient. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, we included patients with stable angina pectoris and without prior myocardial infarction, scheduled for coronary angiography. A LGE CMR examination was performed prior to the coronary angiography. The study cohort consisted of 235 patients (80 women, 155 men) with a mean age of 64.8 years. RESULTS: UMIs were found in 25% of patients. There was a strong association between stenotic lesions (≥70% stenosis) in a coronary artery and the presence of an UMI in the myocardial segments supplied by the stenotic artery; it was significantly more likely to have an UMI downstream a stenosis ≥ 70% as compared to < 70% (OR 5.1, CI 3.1-8.3, p < 0.0001). 56% of the UMIs were located in the inferior and infero-lateral myocardial segments, despite predominance for stenotic lesions in the left anterior descending artery. CONCLUSION: UMI is common in patients with stable angina and the results indicate that the majority of the UMIs are of ischemic origin due to severe coronary atherosclerosis. In contrast to what is seen in recognized myocardial infarctions, UMIs are predominately located in the inferior and infero-lateral myocardial segments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PUMI study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01257282).
Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris/pathology , Coronary Stenosis/pathology , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine , Myocardial Infarction/pathology , Aged , Angina Pectoris/diagnostic imaging , Angina Pectoris/epidemiology , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/epidemiology , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sweden/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Unrecognized myocardial infarctions (UMIs) are common. The study is an extension of a previous study, aiming to investigate the long-term (>5 year) prognostic implication of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) detected UMI in patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD) without previously diagnosed myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: In 235 patients with suspected stable CAD without previous MI, LGE-CMR imaging and coronary angiography were performed. LGE with a subendocardial component detectable in more than one imaging plane was required to indicate UMI. The stenosis grade of the coronary arteries was determined, including in the artery supplying an infarcted area. Stenosis ≥70% stenosis was considered significant. Patients were followed for 5.4 years in mean regarding a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, hospitalization due to heart failure, stable or unstable angina. RESULTS: UMI were present in 58 of 235 patients (25%). Thirty-nine of the UMIs were located downstream of a significant coronary stenosis. During the follow-up 40 patients (17.0%) reached the composite endpoint. Of patients with UMI, 34.5% (20/58) reached the primary endpoint compared to 11.3% (20/177) of patients with no UMI (HR 3.7, 95% CI 2.0-6.9, p<0.001). The association between UMI and outcome remained (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.4, p = 0.012) after adjustments for age, gender, extent of CAD and all other variables univariate associated with outcome. Sixteen (41%) of the patients with an UMI downstream of a significant stenosis reached the endpoint compared to four (21%) patients with UMI and no relation to a significant stenosis (HR 2.4, 95% CI 0.8-7.2, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: The presence of UMI was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events during long-term follow up.
Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Contrast Media , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/complications , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/epidemiology , Electrocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gadolinium , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Prevalence , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Both unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) and elevated levels of biomarkers are common in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The objective of this study was to determine the association between levels of cardiac biomarkers, UMI and extent of CAD in patients with stable CAD. METHODS: A total of 235 patients (median age: 65years; 34% women) with stable CAD without previously known myocardial infarction were examined with late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and coronary angiography. Blood samples were drawn at enrolment and high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (cTnI), NT-proBNP and Galectin-3 were analyzed. RESULTS: UMI was detected in 58 patients (25%). The median levels of cTnI, NT-proBNP and Galectin-3 were significantly higher in patients with UMI compared to those without, (p<0.001, p=0.006 and p=0.033, respectively). After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction and renal function, cTnI remained independently associated with the presence of UMI (p=0.031) and the extent of CAD (p=0.047). Neither NT-proBNP, nor Galectin-3, was independently associated with UMI or extent of CAD. CONCLUSIONS: The independent association between levels of cTnI and UMI indicates a common pathophysiological pathway for the cTnI elevation and development of UMI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01257282).
Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardium/metabolism , Troponin I/metabolism , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinically unrecognized myocardial infarctions (UMI) are not uncommon and may be associated with adverse outcome. The aims of this study were to determine the prognostic implication of UMI in patients with stable suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and to investigate the associations of UMI with the presence of CAD. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In total 235 patients late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging and coronary angiography were performed. For each patient with UMI, the stenosis grade of the coronary branch supplying the infarcted area was determined. UMIs were present in 25% of the patients and 67% of the UMIs were located in an area supplied by a coronary artery with a stenosis grade ≥70%. In an age- and gender-adjusted model, UMI independently predicted the primary endpoint (composite of death, myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris or heart failure within 2 years of follow-up) with an odds ratio of 2.9; 95% confidence interval 1.1-7.9. However, this association was abrogated after adjustment for age and presence of significant coronary disease. There was no difference in the primary endpoint rates between UMI patients with or without a significant stenosis in the corresponding coronary artery. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of UMI was associated with a threefold increased risk of adverse events during follow up. However, the difference was no longer statistically significant after adjustments for age and severity of CAD. Thus, the results do not support that patients with suspicion of CAD should be routinely investigated by LGE-CMR for UMI. However, coronary angiography should be considered in patients with UMI detected by LGE-CMR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NTC01257282.