Impact of an Opioid Prescribing Guideline in the Acute Care Setting.

BACKGROUND: Death from opioid abuse is a major public health issue. The death rate associated with opioid overdose nearly quadrupled from 1999 to 2008. Acute care settings are a major source of opioid prescriptions, often for minor conditions and chronic noncancer pain. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether a voluntary opioid prescribing guideline reduces the proportion of patients prescribed opioids for minor and chronic conditions. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on records of adult emergency department visits from January 2012 to July 2014 for dental, neck, back, or unspecified chronic pain, and the proportion of patients receiving opioid prescriptions at discharge was compared before and after the guideline. Attending emergency physicians were surveyed on their perceptions regarding the impact of the guideline on prescribing patterns, patient satisfaction, and physician-patient interactions. RESULTS: In our sample of 13,187 patient visits, there was a significant (p < 0.001) and sustained decrease in rates of opioid prescriptions for dental, neck, back, or unspecified chronic pain. The rate of opioid prescribing decreased from 52.7% before the guideline to 29.8% immediately after its introduction, and to 33.8% at an interval of 12 to 18 months later. The decrease in opioid prescriptions was observed in all of these diagnosis groups and in all age groups. All 31 eligible prescribing physicians completed a survey. The opioid prescribing guideline was supported by 100% of survey respondents. CONCLUSIONS: An opioid prescribing guideline significantly decreased the rates at which opioids were prescribed for minor and chronic complaints in an acute care setting.

Care of the Critically Ill Pregnant Patient and Perimortem Cesarean Delivery in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Maternal resuscitation in the emergency department requires planning and special consideration of the physiologic changes of pregnancy. Perimortem cesarean delivery (PMCD) is a rare but potentially life-saving procedure for both mother and fetus. Emergency physicians should be aware of the procedure's indications and steps because it needs to be performed rapidly for the best possible outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We sought to review the approach to the critically ill pregnant patient in light of new expert guidelines, including indications for PMCD and procedural techniques. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of maternal cardiac arrest and survival outcomes of PMCD in the emergency department setting are difficult to estimate. Advanced cardiovascular life support protocols should be followed in maternal arrest with special considerations made based on the physiologic changes of pregnancy. The latest recommendations for maternal resuscitation are reviewed, including advance planning, rapid determination of gestational age, emergent delivery, and postprocedure considerations for PMCD. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal resuscitation requires knowledge of physiologic changes and evidence-based recommendations. PMCD outcomes are best for both mother and fetus when the procedure is performed rapidly and efficiently in the appropriate setting. Emergency physicians should be familiar with this unique clinical scenario so they are adequately prepared to intervene in order to improve maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.

Implementation of a pilot novel objective peer comparison evaluation system in an emergency medicine residency program.

Objectives: Emergency medicine (EM) residents are currently evaluated via The Milestones, which have been shown to be imperfect and subjective. There is also a need for residents to achieve competency in patient safety and quality improvement processes, which can be accomplished through provision of peer comparison metrics. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the implementation of an objective peer comparison system for metrics that quantified aspects of quality and safety, efficiency and throughput, and utilization. Methods: This pilot study took place at an academic, tertiary care center with a 3-year residency and 14 residents per postgraduate year (PGY) class. Metrics were compared within each PGY class using Wilcoxon signed-rank and rank-order analyses. Results: Significant changes were seen in the majority of the metrics for all PGY classes. PGY3s accounted for the significant change in EKG and X-ray reads, while PGY1s and PGY2s accounted for the significant change in disposition to final note share. Physician evaluation to disposition decision was the only metric that did not reach significance in any class. Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that providing objective metrics is possible. Peer comparison metrics could provide an effective objective addition to the milestone evaluation system currently in use.

Gender differences in neurologic emergencies part I: a consensus summary and research agenda on cerebrovascular disease.

Cerebrovascular neurologic emergencies including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and migraine are leading causes of death and disability that are frequently diagnosed and treated in the emergency department (ED). Although sex and gender differences in neurologic emergencies are beginning to become clearer, there are many unanswered questions about how emergency physicians should incorporate sex and gender into their research initiatives, patient evaluations, and overall management plans for these conditions. After evaluating the existing gaps in the literature, a core group of ED researchers developed a draft of future research priorities. Participants in the 2014 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference neurologic emergencies working group then discussed and approved the recommended research agenda using a standardized nominal group technique. Recommendations for future research on the role of sex and gender in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes pertinent to ED providers are described for each of three diagnoses: stroke, SAH, and migraine. Recommended future research also includes investigation of the biologic and pathophysiologic differences between men and women with neurologic emergencies as they pertain to ED diagnoses and treatments.