GADECCU 2022 Guideline for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Adaptation and updating of the GETECCU 2020 Guideline. / Guía GADECCU 2022 para el tratamiento de la colitis ulcerosa. Adaptación y actualización de la Guía GETECCU 2020.

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease that compromises the colon, affecting the quality of life of individuals of any age. In practice, there is a wide spectrum of clinical situations. The advances made in the physio pathogenesis of UC have allowed the development of new, more effective and safer therapeutic agents. OBJECTIVES: To update and expand the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of relevant treatments for remission induction and maintenance after a mild, moderate or severe flare of UC. RECIPIENTS: Gastroenterologists, coloproctologists, general practitioners, family physicians and others health professionals, interested in the treatment of UC. METHODOLOGY: GADECCU authorities obtained authorization from GETECCU to adapt and update the GETECCU 2020 Guide for the treatment of UC. Prepared with GRADE methodology. A team was formed that included authors, a panel of experts, a nurse and a patient, methodological experts, and external reviewers. GRADE methodology was used with the new information. RESULTS: A 118-page document was prepared with the 44 GADECCU 2022 recommendations, for different clinical situations and therapeutic options, according to levels of evidence. A section was added with the new molecules that are about to be available. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline has been made in order to facilitate decision-making regarding the treatment of UC, adapting and updating the guide prepared by GETECCU in the year 2020.

GETECCU 2020 guidelines for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Developed using the GRADE approach. / Guía GETECCU 2020 para el tratamiento de la colitis ulcerosa. Elaborada con metodología GRADE.

INTRODUCTION: Since the first edition of the Guidelines was published in 2013, much information has been generated around the treatment of ulcerative colitis, and new drugs and action protocols have been introduced. Clinical practice has changed substantially, warranting new approaches and a comprehensive review and update of the evidence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Once again, we used the GRADE approach, supported by an electronic tool (https://gradepro.org). The clinical scenarios are the same as in the previous version (induction and maintenance in severe and mild-moderate flare-ups), as are the variables and their evaluation. However, in the updated guidelines, three questions have been deleted, 14 added and 30 maintained, making a total of 44 clinical questions. After an exhaustive review of the evidence, the recommendations are now updated. RESULTS: Of the 44 questions analysed, no recommendation could be established in two due to the very low quality of the evidence, while in the other 42, based on different degrees of quality of evidence, recommendations were made according to the GRADE system. In 25 of these questions the final recommendation is strongly in favour, in six strongly against, in seven weakly in favour and in four weakly against. According to the scenarios and recommendations, six algorithms are proposed as a simple guide for practical decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The aim of this update of the 2013 guidelines is to provide answers, based on the GRADE approach, to the different questions we ask ourselves daily when deciding the most appropriate treatment for our patients with ulcerative colitis in the different clinical scenarios.

Recommendations of the Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Spanish Working Group (GETECCU) for the treatment of perianal fistulas of Crohn's disease. / Recomendaciones del Grupo Español de Trabajo de Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) para el tratamiento de las fístulas perianales de la enfermedad de Crohn.

Recommendations are advice that is given and considered to be beneficial; however, they are still suggestions and are therefore open to different interpretations. In this sense, the final objective of the review has been to try to homogenize, with the evidence available, the approach to the diagnosis and medical/surgical treatment of one of the most complex manifestations of Crohn's disease, such as simple and complex perianal fistulas.

Relationship between Serum Adalimumab Levels and Clinical Outcome in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab (ADA) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent that has been shown to be effective in inducing and maintaining remission in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The relationship between the ADA trough levels and clinical efficacy has been demonstrated, but there is variability in the definition of the most suitable range for its clinical applicability. SUMMARY: A review of published studies during the last 5 years on ADA serum levels and its relationship with the clinical outcome was performed. The studies selected included 7 observational studies, a systematic review, a meta-analysis and a post hoc analysis of a clinical trial. The reported ADA levels that discriminate patients in clinical remission from those with active disease range from 4.5 to 8 µg/mL. This therapeutic range varies when considering endoscopic remission (7.5 to >13.9 µg/mL). Although the sample of patients with ulcerative colitis is small, a tendency to reach higher levels of ADA is observed in both clinical and endoscopic remission. Key Messages: The optimal therapeutic cut-off point of serum ADA levels ranges from 4.5-5 to 12 µg/mL, where ADA levels are associated with an adequate clinical monitoring of the disease during maintenance therapy. These ranges vary according to the target, suggesting levels of 4.8 µg/mL as the cut-off for clinical remission and levels ≥7.5 µg/mL for mucosal healing/endoscopic response. Controlled prospective studies are required to determine the optimal therapeutic interval of ADA serum levels both as induction and as maintenance therapy.

Fecal Calprotectin Pretreatment and Induction Infliximab Levels for Prediction of Primary Nonresponse to Infliximab Therapy in Crohn's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: The association between infliximab (IFX) and fecal calprotectin (FC) levels on one hand, and the clinical and endoscopic response of patients with inflammatory bowel disease on the other, is well established. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To investigate the association between inflammatory biochemical parameters and serum concentrations of IFX during induction treatment with a primary nonresponse in a prospective cohort of Crohn's disease (CD) patients. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients included, 8 (22.8%) had primary nonresponse at the end of induction. Induction IFX levels were lower among primary nonresponders at weeks 6 and 14 (week 6: median IFX level 7.3 vs. 11.2 µg/mL, respectively, p = 0.090; week 14: median IFX level 1.5 vs. 4.7 µg/mL, respectively, p = 0.020). FC levels were higher in patients with primary nonresponse versus primary response at weeks 0, 6, and 14 (week 0: median FC level 1,830 vs. 410 µg/g, -respectively, p = 0.030; week 6: median FC level 1,150 vs. 230 µg/g, respectively, p = 0.074; week 14: median FC level 1,210 vs. 208 µg/g, respectively, p = 0.060). For the multivariate analysis, the median IFX level at week 14 and median FC level at week 0 were independently associated with primary nonresponse. A significant inverse correlation was determined between FC level at week 0 and IFX level at week 14 (Spearman's rho correlation, 0.440; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IFX levels (at week 14) and baseline FC levels could predict primary nonresponse after induction IFX therapy in patients with CD. A high baseline inflammatory load might modify the pharmacokinetic processes of anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. Drug level monitoring and measurement of baseline inflammatory parameters could improve the efficacy of IFX in the induction therapy of patients with active CD.

Validation of a population pharmacokinetic model of adalimumab in a cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: therapeutic monitoring of anti-TNF drugs and anti-drug antibody levels are useful for clinical decision-making, via the rationalization and optimization of the use of anti-TNF treatments. The objective of the present study was to validate the model of Ternant et al., in a cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). This model was originally established for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and was used in this study to optimize the adalimumab (ADA) dose and predict ADA trough levels (ATL). METHODS: this study used concentration data points from 30 IBD patients who received ADA treatment between 2014 and 2015. A goodness-of-fit of the model was determined by evaluating the relationship between the observed ATL values and population model-predicted values (PRED) or individual model-predicted values (IPRED). RESULTS: a total of 51 ADA concentration points were analyzed. The bias of the model was 2.39 (95% CI, 1.63-3.15) for PRED and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.23-1.03) for IPRED. The precision was 3.57 (95% CI, 2.90-4.13) and 1.53 (95% CI, 1.22-1.80), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: therapeutic drug monitoring involving ATL may allow the optimization of the treatment of IBD patients. The validation results of the phamacokinectic (PK) model for ADA in IBD patients are inadequate. However, additional studies will strengthen the bias and precision of the model.

Vedolizumab, an option in patients with inflammatory bowel disease intolerant to thiopurines and refractory to biological agents. / Vedolizumab, una opción en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal intolerantes a tiopurinas y refractarios a biológicos.

Vedolizumab (VDZ), a human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to α4ß7-integrin, and is approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), has demonstrated its efficacy in controlled clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To describe a population treated with VDZ and to evaluate its long-term efficacy and safety in clinical practice. METHODS: An observational and multicentre study was carried out on patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with VDZ for at least one year. An evaluation was performed on the activity indices, faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein levels, hospital admissions, surgeries, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were analysed (43 UC and 30 CD). More than one anti-TNF and more than one immunosuppressive was previously used by 74 and 23%, respectively, of UC patients, and 90 and 37%, respectively of CD patients. VDZ was stopped in 17 (23%) patients, 10 UC and 7 CD, due to a lack or loss of response before the first year, or due to adverse events. An intensification of the dose was required in 26 (63%) UC, and 16 (53%) CD patients. At 6 months, 70 and 42% of UC patients, and 80 and 43% of CD patients achieved a clinical response and remission, respectively. At one year, 58 and 35% of UC patients and 47 and 43% of CD patients, maintained the clinical response and remission, respectively. The C-reactive protein decreased significantly in both CD and UC patients. However, the decrease in faecal calprotectin was only achieved during follow-up in UC, but not in CD patients. Eight patients with CD that had been treated previously with ustekinumab avoided surgery at one year. A colectomy was performed on 8 (18.6%) UC patients, and 4 (13.3%) CD patients needed surgery. Six patients (8%) (5 UC and 1 CD) had adverse events. The concomitant use of corticosteroids or immunomodulators did not increase the efficacy. Those with a higher number of previous anti-TNF treatments showed less remissions in UC and responses in CD. CONCLUSIONS: After one year of VDZ, a clinical response and remission was induced in a considerable percentage of patients refractory to different biological or immunosuppressive therapies. VDZ can be considered as an alternative in those intolerant to immunosuppressives, with few adverse events.

Pharmaceutical costs for inflammatory bowel disease units - An issue for department heads? The GESTIONAEII survey.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) units have a relevant weight within gastroenterology departments. In order to gain insight into the managerial aspects of IBD diagnosis and treatment, SEPD submitted a survey (GESTIONAEII) to department heads, IBD specialists, and other gastroenterologists. In this letter, we discuss the results obtained from gastroenterology department heads.

How is inflammatory bowel disease managed in Spanish gastroenterology departments? The results of the GESTIONA-EII survey.

INTRODUCTION: Not all national health centers include specialized units or clinicians devoted to inflammatory bowel disease. The goal of the survey was to gain an insight into the management of this disease within Spanish gastroenterology departments via a survey among their members. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted in February and March 2015, among SEPD members (2017 clinician members), who were split into three categories: heads of department, general gastroenterologists, and experts in this disease. The results of the last two surveys are reported, including demography-related questions and specific questions on the strategies and resources available for the care of these patients. RESULTS: A total of 166 responses were received (response rate 8.19%), excluding those from heads of department (previously published). Sixty gastroenterologists considered themselves experts in inflammatory bowel disease, and 106 non-experts in it, the latter being either general gastroenterologists or specialists in other areas, mainly endoscopy. Twenty-eight percent of non-expert gastroenterologists said their hospitals had specific units, with a monographic clinic in 46%. However, 26% reported that they were treating affected patients themselves. Experts in inflammatory bowel disease reported that their institute had resources to support their work, but there was a lack of surgeons with expertise in this condition, particularly in county hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: At least, within SEPD members, 2 out of 3 experts in inflammatory bowel disease seem to have the resources available for their work (nurses, day unit, telephone line, database, referrals, joint sessions). Although there is room for improvement (email to contact patients, devoted surgeon, absence of referral protocols), and 2 out of 3 are concerned about pharmacy costs. Since a substantial number of patients remain treated by general practitioners, rapid referral programs might be helpful in this setting.

Information resources used by patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Satisfaction, expectations and information gaps.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Information received by IBD patients about their disease is of particular importance. The objective of the study was to determine the information resources these patients used, together with their perceived information gaps and expected preferences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study conducted on IBD patients attending 13 Spanish hospitals during 2008. Patients completed a semi-structured 52-question survey. RESULTS: Survey was adequately completed by 379 of 385 patients (98%), of whom 57% had Crohn's disease and 43% ulcerative colitis. Mean patient age was 37.9 years (range, 16-76 years). Gastroenterologists were the most commonly used resource (98%), followed by the Internet (60%), and general practitioners (50%). More than 90% reported good to excellent satisfaction with gastroenterologists, nurses, and patients' associations. Only 56% considered their information needs to be covered. The Internet was mostly used by young patients and those with a high education level. In the future, 85% of the patients would like to receive information from the gastroenterologists, and 92% by face-to-face interviews. Patients mainly want additional information on treatment (medical and surgical), clinical manifestations, cancer, and mortality risks. They also think that they are poorly informed about their social and work rights, risks of cancer and death, and research trials. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD use and prefer gastroenterologists as the main source of information, but only half of them consider their information needs to be covered.

Joint position statement by "Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva" (Spanish Society of Gastroenterology) and "Sociedad Española de Farmacología" (Spanish Society of Pharmacology) on biosimilar therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.

Biological drugs or biopharmaceutical products, manufactured with or from living organisms using biotechnology, have represented a therapeutic revolution for the control of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). At present, in this indication and in our country, only two biological are approved, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA), both of them monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor alpha. Effectiveness data are strong for both therapies, with maximum levels of scientific evidence.The upcoming expiry date for these biologicals´ patents has allowed the potential marketing of so-called biosimilar agents for the IBD indication. While biosimilars are conceptually for biological what generics are for chemical drugs, the structural complexity of biosimilars and their biological and manufacturing variability lead to consider validation processes for these two types in humans as highly differential. Thus, in our setting, under the coverage of "Agencia Española del Medicamento y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS)" (Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices), guidelines issued by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) are to be applied, which states that a number of stages or steps must be overcome in order to obtain approval for a biosimilar agent.However, despite the presence of these recommendations by EMA, which must be met by a biosimilar in order to be licensed in our marketplace, relevant uncertainties persist that only future decisions by EMA and AEMPS may clarify. The present stance by our task force is that biosimilar development should be undertaken according to established regulations, thus certifying their efficacy and safety. Similarly, this task force considers that results obtained from studies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should not be extrapolated to IBD since the biological variability of these complex structures will not ensure a lack of noticeable changes in efficacy and safety.

Therapeutic guidelines on ulcerative colitis: a GRADE methodology based effort of GETECCU.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evidence-based clinical guidelines on Ulcerative colitis (UC) have been developed through a consensus, while GRADE methodology is the current standard for guideline development. This is the first one based on GRADE methodology on UC. METHODS: Following GRADE methodology, the Spanish Group of Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's disease (GETECCU) have developed a guideline on UC treatment. After selection of relevant clinical scenarios, 32 clinical questions were chosen and recommendations were established. RESULTS: In 2 questions no recommendation was possible. Twenty-two actions were recommended for, 14 strongly and 8 weakly. However, in 8 questions a recommendation against doing something was obtained, weak in 5 and strong in 3. The majority of recommendations were based on moderate quality evidence, and only 5 on high-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: With GRADE methodology we find a clear recommendation on possible actions in most clinical decisions in UC treatment, but much more clinical high-quality research is needed.

[Peripheral arterial thromboembolism in Crohn's disease]. / Tromboembolia arterial periférica en enfermedad de Crohn.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) usually affects the gastrointestinal tract, although some patients can also develop extraintestinal manifestations, such as vascular symptoms both venous and arterial ones. The former being more frequent than the latter. CLINICAL REPORT: We report the case of a 62-year-old male, diagnosed of Crohns disease (CD) (A3,L1+L4,B3), admitted to hospital for treatment of a retroperitoneal abscess. He presented a peripheral arterial thromboembolism during his stay, which required urgent embolectomy. After anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), vascular magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large thrombus involving the descent aorta, which was solved with surgery and long-term anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Peripheral arterial thrombosis is a rare extraintestinal manifestation of IBD. Nevertheless it is always important to consider it in patients with IBD. Prophylactic treatment should be made with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and definitive treatment with a combination of LMWH and surgery.

Evaluation of AIF-1 (Allograft Inflammatory Factor-1) as a Biomarker of Crohn's Disease Severity.

Background: Recently, increased tissue levels of AIF-1 have been shown in experimental colitis, supporting its role in intestinal inflammation. Therefore, we studied the levels of AIF-1 in Crohn's disease (CD). Methods: This study included 33 patients with CD (14 men and 19 women) who participated in the PREDICROHN project, a prospective multicenter study of the Spanish Group of Inflammatory bowel disease (GETECCU). Results: This article demonstrates declines with respect to baseline levels of serum AIF-1 in Crohn's disease (CD) patients after 14 weeks of treatment with anti-TNFs. Furthermore, in patients with active CD (HB ≥ 5), serum AIF-1 levels were significantly higher than those in patients without activity (HB ≤ 4). The study of serum AIF-1 in the same cohort, revealed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of AUC = 0.66 (p = 0.014), while for the CRP (C-reactive protein), (AUC) value of 0.69 (p = 0.0066), indicating a similar ability to classify CD patients by their severity. However, the combination of data on serum levels of AIF-1 and CRP improves the predictive ability of these analyses for classifying CD patients as active (HB ≥ 5) or inactive (HB ≤ 4). When we used the odds ratio (OR) formula, we observed that patients with CRP > 5 mg/L or AIF-1 > 200 pg/mL or both conditions were 13 times more likely to show HB ≥ 5 (active CD) than were those with both markers below these thresholds. Conclusion: The development of an algorithm that includes serum levels of AIF-1 and CRP could be useful for assessing Crohn's disease severity.

Risk of Immunomediated Adverse Events and Loss of Response to Infliximab in Elderly Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cohort Study of the ENEIDA Registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Immunomediated adverse events [IAEs] are the most frequently reported infliximab [IFX]-related adverse events. Combination therapy may reduce their incidence, although this strategy is not recommended in elderly patients. We aimed to compare the rates of IFX-related IAEs and loss of response [LOR] in elderly and younger patients. METHODS: Adult patients in the ENEIDA registry who had received a first course of IFX therapy were identified and grouped into two cohorts regarding age at the beginning of treatment [over 60 years and between 18 and 50 years]. The rates of IAEs and LOR were compared. RESULTS: In total, 939 patients [12%] who started IFX over 60 years of age and 6844 [88%] below 50 years of age were included. Elderly patients presented a higher proportion of AEs related to IFX [23.2% vs 19%; p = 0.002], infections [7.1% vs 4.3%; p < 0.001] and neoplasms [2.2% vs 0.5%; p < 0.001]. In contrast, the rates of IAEs [14.8% vs 14.8%; p = 0.999], infusion reactions [8.1% vs 8.1%; p = 0.989], late hypersensitivity [1.3% vs 1.2%; p = 0.895], paradoxical psoriasis [1% vs 1.5%; p = 0.187] and drug-induced lupus erythematosus [0.6% vs 0.7%; p = 0.947] were similar in elderly and younger patients. LOR rates were also similar between the two groups [20.5% vs 19.3%; p = 0.438]. In the logistic regression analysis, IFX monotherapy, extraintestinal manifestations and female gender were the only risk factors for IAEs, whereas IFX monotherapy, extraintestinal manifestations and Crohn's disease were risk factors for LOR. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease have a similar risk of developing IFX-related IAEs and LOR to that of younger patients.

A new guidewire cannulation technique in ERCP: successful deep biliary access with triple-lumen sphincterotome and guidewire controlled by the endoscopist.

BACKGROUND: Current studies have addressed ways to improve the success of selective biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of deep bile duct access using a short-wire system with sphincterotome and guidewire controlled only by the endoscopist. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 70 patients with biliary diseases subjected to ERCP. Biliary cannulation was performed by the endoscopist without direct cooperation of the assistant in two centers with different experience in ERCP. The RX Biliary System™ was used in all patients. Efficacy (success rate and time to cannulation) of deep bile duct access and procedure-related complications were determined. RESULTS: Overall guidewire cannulation was successful in 65 of 70 patients (92.9%). Nonintentional pancreatic duct cannulation with the guidewire was performed in 22 patients (31.4%). Additional techniques were needed in 18 patients (25.7%): guidewire into the pancreatic duct in 11 patients (15.7%); contrast-medium was used in 13 patients (18.6%); and precut was performed in 3 patients (4.3%). Attempts at papilla cannulation numbered<10 in 48 patients (68.6%), and time to biliary cannulation was <10 min in 42 patients (60%). Minor complications occurred in five patients (7.1%). There were no significant differences between patients in both centers. CONCLUSIONS: The short-wire system allows the endoscopist to have access to the bile duct with a high success rate--early and safely--without the direct participation of the assistant.

Relationship between IGF-1 and body weight in inflammatory bowel diseases: Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), represented by ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, what leads to diarrhea, malnutrition, and weight loss. Depression of the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-1 axis (GH-IGF-1 axis) could be responsible of these symptoms. We demonstrate that long-term treatment (54 weeks) of adult CD patients with adalimumab (ADA) results in a decrease in serum IGF-1 without changes in serum IGF-1 binding protein (IGF1BP4). These results prompted us to conduct a preclinical study to test the efficiency of IGF-1 in the medication for experimental colitis. IGF-1 treatment of rats with DSS-induced colitis has a beneficial effect on the following circulating biochemical parameters: glucose, albumin, and total protein levels. In this experimental group we also observed healthy maintenance of colon size, body weight, and lean mass in comparison with the DSS-only group. Histological analysis revealed restoration of the mucosal barrier with the IGF-1 treatment, which was characterized by healthy quantities of mucin production, structural maintenance of adherers junctions (AJs), recuperation of E-cadherin and ß-catenin levels and decrease in infiltrating immune cells and in metalloproteinase-2 levels. The experimentally induced colitis caused activation of apoptosis markers, including cleaved caspase 3, caspase 8, and PARP and decreases cell-cycle checkpoint activators including phosphorylated Rb, cyclin E, and E2F1. The IGF-1 treatment inhibited cyclin E depletion and partially protects PARP levels. The beneficial effects of IGF-1 in experimental colitis could be explained by a re-sensitization of the IGF-1/IRS-1/AKT cascade to exogenous IGF-1. Given these results, we postulate that IGF-1 treatment of IBD patients could prove to be successful in reducing disease pathology.

Clinical outcome after anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy discontinuation in 1000 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: the EVODIS long-term study.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome of patients after antitumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) discontinuation is not well known. AIMS: To assess the risk of relapse in the long-term after anti-TNF discontinuation. METHODS: This was an extension of the evolution after anti-TNF discontinuation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (EVODIS) study (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis patients treated with anti-TNFs in whom these drugs were withdrawn after achieving clinical remission) based in the same cohort of patients whose outcome was updated. Clinical remission was defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw index ≤4 points in Crohn's disease, a partial Mayo score ≤2 in ulcerative colitis and the absence of fistula drainage despite gentle finger compression in perianal disease. RESULTS: This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study. A total of 1055 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 34 months. The incidence rate of relapse was 12% per patient-year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11-14). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 50% (95% CI = 47-53): 19% at one year, 31% at 2 years, 38% at 3 years, 44% at 4 years and 48% at 5 years of follow-up. Of the 60% patients retreated with the same anti-TNF after relapse, 73% regained remission. Of the 75 patients who did not respond, 48% achieved remission with other therapies. Of the 190 patients who started other therapies after relapse, 62% achieved remission with the new treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients who discontinued the anti-TNF remained in remission. In case of relapse, retreatment with the same anti-TNF was usually effective. Approximately half of the patients who did not respond after retreatment achieved remission with other therapies.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab in Ulcerative Colitis: Real-world Evidence from the ENEIDA Registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The development programm UNIFI has shown promising results of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis [UC] treatment which should be confirmed in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the durability, effectiveness, and safety of ustekinumab in UC in real life. METHODS: Patients included in the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry, who received at least one intravenous dose of ustekinumab due to active UC [Partial Mayo Score [PMS]>2], were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on PMS. Short-term response was assessed at Week 16. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included. At Week 16, 53% of patients had response [including 35% of patients in remission]. In the multivariate analysis, elevated serum C-reactive protein was the only variable significantly associated with lower likelihood of achieving remission. Remission was achieved in 39% and 33% of patients at Weeks 24 and 52, respectively; 36% of patients discontinued the treatment with ustekinumab during a median follow-up of 31 weeks. The probability of maintaining ustekinumab treatment was 87% at Week 16, 63% at Week 56, and 59% at Week 72; primary failure was the main reason for ustekinumab discontinuation. No variable was associated with risk of discontinuation. Three patients reported adverse events; one of them had a fatal severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab is effective in both the short and the long term in real life, even in a highly refractory cohort. Higher inflammatory burden at baseline correlated with lower probability of achieving remission. Safety was consistent with the known profile of ustekinumab.