Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(3): 258-62, 2016 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26940594

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital visitors' hand hygiene (HH) is an important aspect of preventing health care-associated infections, but little is known about visitors' use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (AHS). The study aim was to examine if use of AHS is influenced by visitor characteristics and the location of AHS within the lobby of a large hospital. METHODS: An observational study was conducted with AHS placed in 3 different locations. The data included visitor characteristics and if AHS were used. RESULTS: The results suggest that visitors are 5.28 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.68-7.82) more likely to use AHS when dispensers are located in the middle of the lobby with limited landmarks or barriers, 1.35 times more likely to use the AHS in the afternoon compared with the morning, or when they are younger visitors (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09-1.97). Individuals in a group are more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06-1.84) to use AHS. DISCUSSION: In addition to location, time of day, and age, there is a group effect that results in visitors being more likely to use AHS when in a group. The increased use related to groups may serve as a mechanism to encourage visitor HH. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest future research opportunities to investigate the effect of group dynamics and social pressure on visitor AHS use and to identify strategies for improving visitor HH.


Subject(s)
Alcohols/administration & dosage , Disinfectants/administration & dosage , Disinfection/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence , Hand Sanitizers , Visitors to Patients , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 59(1): 69-79, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16198220

ABSTRACT

While evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of many health education interventions, few of these evidence-based programs have been systematically or widely disseminated. This paper reports on the dissemination of one such intervention, the 6-week peer-led Chronic Disease Self-Management Program, throughout a large health-care system, Kaiser Permanente. We describe the dissemination process and, using qualitative analysis of interviews and surveys, discuss the factors that aided and hindered this process and make recommendations for similar dissemination projects. Six years after the beginning of the dissemination process, the program is integrated in most of the Kaiser Permanente regions and is being offered to several thousand people a year.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease , Process Assessment, Health Care , Self Care , Aged , Data Collection/methods , Diffusion of Innovation , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States
3.
Acad Med ; 84(6): 803-11, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19474564

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To test the effectiveness of a middle school, multimedia health sciences educational program called HEADS UP in non-Asian-minority (Hispanic and African American), inner-city students. The program designers hope to increase the number of these students entering the health sciences pipeline. The program includes video role-model stories featuring minority scientists and students, hands-on activities, and teacher resources. Collaborators from The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Spring Branch Independent School District, and the Health Museum developed the modules. METHOD: From 2004 to 2007, the authors used a quasi-experimental, two-group pretest/posttest design to assess program effects on students' performance and interest in science, their science self-efficacy, their fear of science, and their science-related careers self-efficacy. An independent third party matched the intervention school to a comparison school by test scores, school demographics, and student demographics and then matched pairs of sixth-grade students (N = 428) by fifth-grade science scores, gender, ethnicity, and participation in the free or reduced lunch program. The authors collected data on these students for three years. RESULTS: At eighth grade (2007), the intervention school students scored significantly higher (F = 12.38, P < .001) on the Stanford Achievement Test 10 in science and reported higher interest in science (F = 11.08, P < .001) than their matched, comparison-school pairs. Students in neither group reported an increase in their confidence to choose a science-related career, but students in one high-implementing teacher's class reported decreased fear of science. CONCLUSIONS: HEADS UP shows potential for improving inner-city, non-Asian-minority middle school students' performance and interest in science.


Subject(s)
Minority Groups/education , Multimedia/statistics & numerical data , Science/education , Teaching/methods , Adolescent , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Students , Urban Population
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL