Occupational engagement, fatigue, and upper and lower extremity abilities in persons with melorheostosis.

INTRODUCTION: Melorheostosis is a rare bone disorder with limited literature that describes the effect of this disease on functional and motor abilities. As part of a natural history study, four outcome measures were administered to better understand the burden this disease has on a person's ability to engage in basic and instrumental activities of daily living. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between functional engagement, fatigue, and motor ability in patients with melorheostosis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional data gathered from a longitudinal natural history observational study. SETTING: Rehabilitation department within a single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven adult volunteers with melorheostosis were enrolled. Two participants were removed for failure to meet diagnosis eligibility. Thirty patients had lower extremity (LE) osteosclerotic bone lesions, 14 had upper extremity (UE) lesions, and one had lesions in both UEs and LEs. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Activity Card Sort, Second Edition (ACS); Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory; Lower Extremity Functional Scale; Upper Extremity Functional Index. RESULTS: On the ACS, high-demand leisure (HDL) activities were the least retained (p < .001). Of the activities rated most important, HDL activities were the most likely to have been given up (27%). General fatigue (µ = 11.8) and physical fatigue (µ = 11.0) were the two most limiting fatigue constructs. There were moderate negative correlations with HDL activities compared to physical fatigue (r = -0.524, p < .001) and reduced activity fatigue (r = -0.58, p = .001). LE lesions had a large effect on completing LE tasks (d = 0.95) and UE lesions had a medium effect on completing tasks involving the UE (d = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with melorheostosis experience fatigue and low engagement in HDL activities. The results of this study underscore the importance of acknowledging activity domain, fatigue constructs, and lesion location to support and provide targeted evidence-based rehabilitative therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02504879.

Simple and economical HandClench Relaxometer device for reliable and sensitive measurement of grip myotonia in myotonic dystrophy.

Grip myotonia and weakness are attractive treatment response biomarkers in clinical trials of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). There is a need to develop simple, patient-friendly and reproducible methods of quantifying grip myotonia in multisite trial settings. We designed a HandClench Relaxometer (HCR) that measures grip myotonia and strength. In contrast with the existing quantitative myometry (QMA) setup, the HCR is portable, economical, can be used with any laptop and generates automated command prompts. We demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of HCR device in twenty DM1 individuals and ten age-matched controls; patients returned for follow up within two months. The device showed excellent day to day reproducibility (ICC >0.80) in patients. The HCR device detected myotonia in milder muscle disease and measured longer myotonia duration than QMA indicating enhanced sensitivity for quantifying myotonia in DM1. The reaction time to the relax but not squeeze command was delayed and showed warm up similar to myotonia in DM1. HCR outcomes were correlated with key pinch strength, hand dexterity test, and fat replacement in the MRI of the long finger flexor muscles. Use of the HCR is warranted for grip myotonia and strength measurements in longitudinal observational and interventional studies of DM1.

A Brief Historical Perspective of Cancer Rehabilitation and Contributions From the National Institutes of Health.

People who have cancer diagnoses often need care throughout their lives through all stages of their illness. These stages include diagnosis, primary treatment, survivorship, and end of life. The management of people with cancer, now a common and chronic illness with long-term survival improving, is complex, challenging, and rapidly changing. Rehabilitation for people with cancer diagnoses is a new specialty and is charged with providing care throughout the trajectory of illness and wellness to maximize potential for function and mitigate disability. Rehabilitation interventions include the application of physical and occupational therapeutics, speech and language interventions, and physical medicine in order to help patients reach their individual goals and to promote life satisfaction. The Department of Rehabilitation in the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health has pioneered this field through research and clinical care models over the past 40 years. Staff of this department has supported clinical research investigators at the National Institutes of Health in their exploration of new treatments using chemotherapies, surgery, radiation, and psychosocial interventions. They have also engaged in research specific to rehabilitation to devise and improve functional outcome measures, design exercise interventions, devise orthotics, and prosthetic devices for adaptation to functional loss. Collectively, the staff has published widely in oncology textbooks and professional journals in order to share findings and improve the quality of cancer rehabilitation treatment across the continuum of care.

Upper extremity outcome measures for collagen VI-related myopathy and LAMA2-related muscular dystrophy.

Congenital muscular dystrophy (CMD) comprises a rare group of genetic muscle diseases that present at birth or early during infancy. Two common subtypes of CMD are collagen VI-related muscular dystrophy (COL6-RD) and laminin alpha 2-related dystrophy (LAMA2-RD). Traditional outcome measures in CMD include gross motor and mobility assessments, yet significant motor declines underscore the need for valid upper extremity motor assessments as a clinical endpoint. This study validated a battery of upper extremity measures in these two CMD subtypes for future clinical trials. For this cross-sectional study, 42 participants were assessed over the same 2-5 day period at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. All upper extremity measures were correlated with the Motor Function Measure 32 (MFM32). The battery of upper extremity assessments included the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test, Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), hand held dynamometry, goniometry, and MyoSet Tools. Spearman Rho was used for correlations to the MFM32. Pearson was performed to correlate the Jebsen, QUEST, hand-held dynamometry, goniometry and the MyoSet Tools. Correlations were considered significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Significant correlations were found between both the MFM32 and MFM Dimension 3 only (Distal Motor function) and the Jebsen, QUEST, MyoGrip and MyoPinch, elbow flexion/extension ROM and myometry. Additional correlations between the assessments are reported. The Jebsen, the Grasp and Dissociated Movements domains of the QUEST, the MyoGrip and the MyoPinch tools, as well as elbow ROM and myometry were determined to be valid and feasible in this population, provided variation in test items, and assessed a range of difficulty in CMD. To move forward, it will be of utmost importance to determine whether these upper extremity measures are reproducible and sensitive to change over time.