How often do healthy people cough?

Objective cough frequency has been reported in several respiratory conditions but the amount that healthy individuals cough daily is unclear. Seventy-nine healthy volunteers (38 males, median [IQR] age 41y [IQR 30-53]) completed 24-hour ambulatory cough monitoring (VitaloJAK™). The audio recording was filtered using a custom written algorithm to remove non-cough sounds and then all individual explosive cough sounds in the filtered file were tagged electronically by trained cough counters. Most coughing occurred during the day and cough numbers over 24 h were generally low (geometric mean of 4.6 coughs) but there was large variability; ranging from 0 to 136 coughs overall. Cough frequency was independent of participant characteristics apart from sex with males coughing significantly, 4-5 fold, more than females during the day and over 24 h (median [IQR] 16.1 [3.8-33.4] vs. 4.1 [1.0-15.0] total coughs; p = 0.015). This is the first report to describe cough frequency in a balanced group of healthy adults using an accurate cough monitoring system. The data reveal a further example of sexual dimorphism in cough, which warrants additional investigation.

Novel capsaicin cough endpoints effectively discriminate between healthy controls and patients with refractory chronic cough.

RATIONALE: Chronic cough is a common problem, substantially affecting quality of life. Effective treatments and diagnostic clinical tools for refractory chronic cough are lacking which remains a diagnosis of exclusion. OBJECTIVES: To investigate capsaicin evoked cough responses in healthy volunteers and refractory chronic cough patients and assess the discriminatory ability of novel endpoints. METHODS: Dose-response capsaicin cough challenges were performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves constructed to evaluate the discriminatory value of novel endpoints; Emax (maximum number of coughs evoked by any capsaicin concentration) and ED50 (capsaicin concentration evoking at least half of Emax). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-three healthy volunteers (median age 39yrs(IQR; 29-52), 47 females) and 51 refractory chronic cough patients (59yrs(53-67), 31 females) were studied. Emax was significantly higher in the patient group compared to healthy volunteers (p < 0.001) and ED50 was significantly lower (p = 0.001). Both parameters were influenced by gender; females had a higher Emax (p = 0.009) and more sensitive ED50 (p < 0.001) but there were no correlations with other patient demographics. There was a significant relationship between Emax and cough frequency in the patient group (p < 0.001). Emax effectively discriminated between the groups (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI; 0.75-0.90, p < 0.001) independently of ED50 which was less favourable (AUC = 0.66, 95% CI; 0.57-0.76, p = 0.002). Emax and ED50 were shown to be repeatable, and the dose-response method well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Novel capsaicin dose-response endpoints effectively discriminate between healthy controls and refractory chronic cough patients, which may better represent pathophysiological mechanisms and show promise for development as a tool to identify patients with cough hyper-excitability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.isrctn.com; ISRCTN23684347.

An open-label study of the tolerability and potential efficacy of memantine for treating refractory chronic cough.

Blocking NMDA receptors with memantine in refractory chronic cough patients is poorly tolerated and demonstrates no improvement in cough https://bit.ly/3kgx2g1.

Cough in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Longitudinal Observational Study of Characterization and Clinical Associations.

BACKGROUND: Cough is common in patients with lung cancer, and current antitussive treatments are suboptimal. There are little published data describing cough in patients with lung cancer or work assessing clinical associations. The aim of this study is to fill that gap. METHODS: This was a longitudinal prospective observational single-cohort study over 60 days. Patients were assessed through self-reported validated scales and, in a subsample, ambulatory cough monitoring at study entry (day 0), day 30, and day 60. RESULTS: At study entry, 177 patients were included and 153 provided data at day 60. The median duration of cough was 52 weeks (interquartile range, 8.5-260). Cough was described as severe enough to warrant treatment in 62% of the patients. Depending on the scale used, performance status was associated with both cough severity and cough impact (P < .001) at study entry, whereas higher cough severity at study entry was associated with female sex (P = .02), asthma (P = .035), and reflux disease (P < .001). Cough impact at study entry was additionally associated with experiencing nausea (P = .018). Cancer characteristics (ie, cancer stage, histology) were not associated with cough severity nor cough impact; neither was smoking or COPD. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe characteristics of cough in patients with lung cancer and to identify clinical associations that may be relevant for its treatment. Our data suggest that cough is a frequent and distressing symptom and an unmet clinical need. Its association with gastrointestinal symptoms in this study may improve our understanding of pathophysiology and therapeutic options for cough occurring in patients with lung cancer.