ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are considered pathogenic, whereas immunoglobulin M (IgM) autoantibodies may have protective effects. The aim of this study was to identify whether IgG/IgM autoantibody ratios differ between patients with incomplete systemic lupus erythematosus (iSLE), patients with SLE, and healthy controls (HCs), and whether IgG/IgM autoantibody ratios relate to progression from iSLE to SLE. METHOD: This prospective cohort study included 34 iSLE patients, 41 SLE patients, and 11 HCs. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA, anti-Ro52, and anti-Ro60 were measured by fluoro-enzyme immunoassay in serum samples obtained at baseline in all groups and in follow-up samples of up to 5 years for iSLE patients. Correlations between IgG/IgM autoantibody ratios, interferon signature, and clinical parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: At baseline, IgG anti-dsDNA, anti-Ro52, anti-Ro60, and IgM anti-dsDNA were elevated in iSLE and SLE patients. IgG/IgM anti-dsDNA and anti-Ro52 ratios were similar between groups, while IgG/IgM anti-Ro60 ratios were significantly elevated in iSLE and SLE patients compared to HCs. IgG/IgM autoantibody ratios were not correlated with interferon signature or clinical parameters. IgG/IgM ratios at baseline were similar and remained relatively stable during a median follow-up of 18 months in non-progressors and six iSLE patients who progressed to SLE. CONCLUSION: IgG anti-dsDNA, anti-Ro52, anti-Ro60, and IgM anti-dsDNA were elevated in iSLE and SLE patients, which was not apparent from the respective IgG/IgM ratios only. IgG/IgM autoantibody ratios remained relatively stable over up to 5 years in iSLE non-progressors and six patients who progressed to SLE.
Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Immunoglobulin M , Immunoglobulin G , Prospective Studies , InterferonsABSTRACT
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, usually drug-induced, acute pustular rash. Despite the lack of strong data supporting the effectiveness of topical or systemic corticosteroids in this drug reaction, they are widely used. More generally, there is no consensus on the diagnostic modalities and the management of patients with AGEP. We aimed to provide European expert recommendations for the diagnosis and management or patients with AGEP. Members of the ToxiTEN group of the European Reference Network (ERN)-skin, all dermatologists and/or allergologists with expertise in drug reactions, elaborated these recommendations based on their own experience and on a review of the literature. Recommendations were separated into the following categories: professionals involved, assessment of the diagnosis of AGEP, management of the patient and allergological work-up after the acute phase. Consensus was obtained among experts for the list of professionals involved for the diagnosis and management of AGEP, including the minimum diagnostic work-up, the setting of management, the treatments, the modalities and the timing of allergological work-up and follow-up. European experts in drug allergies propose herein consensus on the diagnosis and management of patients with AGEP. A multidisciplinary approach is warranted, including dermatologists, allergologists and pharmacovigilance services.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Research on the immune mechanism behind chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has revealed various new endotypes, leading to targeted therapies, especially for severe uncontrolled CRS. Biologics are novel therapeutic strategies providing targeted treatment for the difficult-to-treat recalcitrant CRSwNP patients. Dupilumab is a fully human-derived monoclonal antibody that binds to IL4Rα, inhibiting the signalling of both IL-4 and IL-13. In Hungary, it is approved for the treatment of uncontrolled CRSwNP according to criteria based on the EPOS2020 and the Hungarian guidelines. METHODOLOGY: This study aimed to collect and evaluate real-world therapeutic data of CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab. One hundred thirty-five patients from eight different referral centres have been enrolled in this study, who received dupilumab since 2020. All subjects were adult patients (over 18 years) with uncontrolled CRSwNP. Baseline data collection included demographics, medical history, previous surgeries, related comorbidities, total endoscopic nasal polyp score (NPS), SNOT22, nasal congestion parameters measured with visual analogue scale (VAS) and nasal obstruction evaluation scale (NOSE), loss of smell score (LSS) and eosinophil count. 300 mg dupilumab was administered subcutaneously every second week. Follow up visits were performed after 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: After 6 and 12 months of treatment significant improvement was detected in all clinical parameters. Safety was proved, no severe side effects occurred, and no rescue treatment was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-life findings show that continuous dupilumab treatment is effective and safe in daily clinical practice in CRSwNP and other type 2 comorbidities such as bronchial asthma and NERD.