ABSTRACT
Rare genetic disorders affect as many as 3%-5% of all babies born. Approximately 10,000 such disorders have been identified or hypothesized to exist. Treatment is supportive except in a limited number of instances where specific therapies exist. Development of new therapies has been hampered by at least two major factors: difficulty in diagnosing diseases early enough to enable treatment before irreversible damage occurs, and the high cost of developing new drugs and getting them approved by regulatory agencies. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) techniques have become exponentially less expensive and more rapid since the beginning of the human genome project, such that return of clinical data can now be achieved in days rather than years and at a cost that is comparable to other less expansive genetic testing. Thus, it is likely that WGS will ultimately become a mainstream, first-tier NBS technique at least for those disorders without appropriate high-throughput functional tests. However, there are likely to be several steps in the evolution to this end. The clinical implications of these advances are profound but highlight the bottlenecks in drug development that still limit transition to treatments. This article summarizes discussions arising from a recent National Institute of Health conference on nucleic acid therapy, with a focus on the impact of WGS in the identification of diagnosis and treatment of rare genetic disorders.
Subject(s)
Genetic Testing , Genetic Therapy , Humans , Genetic Testing/methods , Whole Genome Sequencing , Rare DiseasesABSTRACT
Mike, a memorable young patient with untreated phenylketonuria, as well as others affected by genetic disorders that could be treated if diagnosed in infancy, launched my six-decade career. This autobiographical article reflects on my childhood, early research, and professional experiences in pediatric genetics. My laboratory research focused on inborn errors of metabolism, including the glycogen storage diseases. My effort to organize newborn screening through the recommended uniform screening panel shaped and standardized newborn screening nationwide. Looking ahead, the expansion of whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing into newborn screening raises ethical and policy issues regarding informed consent procedures and the storage and use of residual blood spots.
Subject(s)
Genetics, Medical , Neonatal Screening/standards , Genetic Testing , Glycogen Storage Disease/diagnosis , Glycogen Storage Disease/genetics , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Muscular Dystrophies/diagnosis , Muscular Dystrophies/genetics , Neonatal Screening/ethics , Phenylketonurias/diagnosis , Phenylketonurias/genetics , Exome SequencingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The evidence review processes for adding new conditions to state newborn screening (NBS) panels rely on data from pilot studies aimed at assessing the potential benefits and harms of screening. However, the consideration of ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of screening within this research has been limited. This paper outlines important ELSI issues related to newborn screening policy and practices as a resource to help researchers integrate ELSI into NBS pilot studies. APPROACH: Members of the Bioethics and Legal Workgroup for the Newborn Screening Translational Research Network facilitated a series of professional and public discussions aimed at engaging NBS stakeholders to identify important existing and emerging ELSI challenges accompanying NBS. RESULTS: Through these engagement activities, we identified a set of key ELSI questions related to (1) the types of results parents may receive through newborn screening and (2) the initiation and implementation of NBS for a condition within the NBS system. CONCLUSION: Integrating ELSI questions into pilot studies will help NBS programs to better understand the potential impact of screening for a new condition on newborns and families, and make crucial policy decisions aimed at maximized benefits and mitigating the potential negative medical or social implications of screening.
Subject(s)
Neonatal Screening/ethics , Neonatal Screening/methods , Bioethics , Ethics, Research , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening/standards , Pilot Projects , Research PersonnelSubject(s)
Deafness/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening/methods , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , United StatesSubject(s)
Computational Biology/methods , Knowledge Bases , Neuromuscular Diseases/physiopathology , Database Management Systems/standards , Databases, Factual/standards , Humans , Muscular Dystrophies/genetics , Muscular Dystrophies/physiopathology , Neuromuscular Diseases/genetics , Registries , ResearchABSTRACT
New developments in the treatment and management of phenylketonuria (PKU) as well as advances in molecular testing have emerged since the National Institutes of Health 2000 PKU Consensus Statement was released. An NIH State-of-the-Science Conference was convened in 2012 to address new findings, particularly the use of the medication sapropterin to treat some individuals with PKU, and to develop a research agenda. Prior to the 2012 conference, five working groups of experts and public members met over a 1-year period. The working groups addressed the following: long-term outcomes and management across the lifespan; PKU and pregnancy; diet control and management; pharmacologic interventions; and molecular testing, new technologies, and epidemiologic considerations. In a parallel and independent activity, an Evidence-based Practice Center supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality conducted a systematic review of adjuvant treatments for PKU; its conclusions were presented at the conference. The conference included the findings of the working groups, panel discussions from industry and international perspectives, and presentations on topics such as emerging treatments for PKU, transitioning to adult care, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulatory perspective. Over 85 experts participated in the conference through information gathering and/or as presenters during the conference, and they reached several important conclusions. The most serious neurological impairments in PKU are preventable with current dietary treatment approaches. However, a variety of more subtle physical, cognitive, and behavioral consequences of even well-controlled PKU are now recognized. The best outcomes in maternal PKU occur when blood phenylalanine (Phe) concentrations are maintained between 120 and 360 µmol/L before and during pregnancy. The dietary management treatment goal for individuals with PKU is a blood Phe concentration between 120 and 360 µmol/L. The use of genotype information in the newborn period may yield valuable insights about the severity of the condition for infants diagnosed before maximal Phe levels are achieved. While emerging and established genotype-phenotype correlations may transform our understanding of PKU, establishing correlations with intellectual outcomes is more challenging. Regarding the use of sapropterin in PKU, there are significant gaps in predicting response to treatment; at least half of those with PKU will have either minimal or no response. A coordinated approach to PKU treatment improves long-term outcomes for those with PKU and facilitates the conduct of research to improve diagnosis and treatment. New drugs that are safe, efficacious, and impact a larger proportion of individuals with PKU are needed. However, it is imperative that treatment guidelines and the decision processes for determining access to treatments be tied to a solid evidence base with rigorous standards for robust and consistent data collection. The process that preceded the PKU State-of-the-Science Conference, the conference itself, and the identification of a research agenda have facilitated the development of clinical practice guidelines by professional organizations and serve as a model for other inborn errors of metabolism.
Subject(s)
Biopterins/analogs & derivatives , Diet Therapy , Phenylketonurias/blood , Phenylketonurias/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Biopterins/therapeutic use , Disease Management , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Phenylketonurias/diagnosis , Pregnancy , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Alpha-1 Foundation convened a workshop to consider the appropriateness of newborn screening for α-1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency. METHODS: A review of natural history and technical data was conducted. RESULTS: Homozygous ZZ AAT deficiency is a common genetic disease occurring in 1 in 2000 to 3500 births; however, it is underrecognized and most patients are undiagnosed. AAT deficiency can cause chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and liver failure in children and adults, and lung disease in adults. The clinical course is highly variable. Some neonates present with cholestatic hepatitis and some children require liver transplantation, but many patients remain well into adulthood. Some adults develop emphysema. There is no treatment for AAT liver disease, other than supportive care and liver transplant. There are no data on the effect of early diagnosis on liver disease. Avoidance of smoking is of proven benefit to reduce future lung disease, as is protein replacement therapy. Justifying newborn screening with the aim of reducing smoking and reducing adult lung disease-years in the future would be a significant paradigm shift for the screening field. Recent passage of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and the Affordable Care Act may have a major effect on reducing the psychosocial and financial risks of newborn screening because many asymptomatic children would be identified. Data on the risk-benefit ratio of screening in the new legal climate are lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Workshop participants recommended a series of pilot studies focused on generating new data on the risks and benefits of newborn screening.
Subject(s)
Emphysema/prevention & control , Health Promotion , Neonatal Screening , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/diagnosis , alpha 1-Antitrypsin/blood , Dietary Proteins/therapeutic use , Emphysema/blood , Emphysema/etiology , Health Promotion/economics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening/economics , Neonatal Screening/psychology , Smoking/adverse effects , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/bloodABSTRACT
A trans-National Institutes of Health initiative, Nutrition and Dietary Supplement Interventions for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (NDSI-IEM), was launched in 2010 to identify gaps in knowledge regarding the safety and utility of nutritional interventions for the management of inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) that need to be filled with evidence-based research. IEM include inherited biochemical disorders in which specific enzyme defects interfere with the normal metabolism of exogenous (dietary) or endogenous protein, carbohydrate, or fat. For some of these IEM, effective management depends primarily on nutritional interventions. Further research is needed to demonstrate the impact of nutritional interventions on individual health outcomes and on the psychosocial issues identified by patients and their families. A series of meetings and discussions were convened to explore the current United States' funding and regulatory infrastructure and the challenges to the conduct of research for nutritional interventions for the management of IEM. Although the research and regulatory infrastructure are well-established, a collaborative pathway that includes the professional and advocacy rare disease community and federal regulatory and research agencies will be needed to overcome current barriers.
Subject(s)
Diet , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/diet therapy , Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Dietary Supplements , Disease Management , Drug Administration Routes , Humans , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/genetics , Rare Diseases , United StatesABSTRACT
Progress in newborn screening (NBS) has been driven for 60 years by developments in science and technology, growing consumer advocacy, the actions of providers involved in the care of rare disease patients, and by federal and State government funding and policies. With the current explosion of clinical trials of treatments for rare diseases, the pressure for expansion has grown, and concerns about the capacity for improvement and growth are being expressed. Genome and exome sequencing (GS/ES) have now opened more opportunities for early identification and disease prevention at all points in the lifespan. The greatest challenge facing NBS stems from the conditions most amenable to screening, and new treatment development is that we are screening for rare genetic diseases. In addition, understanding the spectrum of severity requires vast amounts of population and genomic data. We propose recommendations on improving the NBS system and addressing specific demands to grow its capacity by: better defining the criteria by which screening targets are established; financing the NBS system's responsiveness to opportunities for expansion, including engagement and funding from stakeholders; creating a national quality assurance, data, IT, and communications infrastructure; and improving intra-governmental communications. While our recommendations may be specific to the United States, the underlying issues should be considered when working to improve NBS programs globally.
ABSTRACT
Newborn screening programs are state based with variable policies. Guidance regarding the retention, storage, and use of portions of newborn screening dried blood spots that remain after screening (residual specimens) was first published in 1996. Since then, newborn screening programs have paid increased attention to specimen storage and usage issues. Standard residual specimen uses include quality assurance and program evaluation, treatment efficacy, test refinement, and result verification. In all cases, privacy and security are primary concerns. In general, two distinct state practices regarding the storage and use of residual newborn screening specimens exist: (1) short-term storage (<3 years), primarily for standard program uses and (2) long-term storage (>18 years), for standard program uses and possible important public health research uses. Recently, there have been concerns in some consumer communities regarding both the potential uses of residual specimens and patient (newborn and family) privacy. To assist in policy improvements that can protect the individual's privacy and allow for important public health uses of residual newborn screening specimens, the Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children has developed recommendations (with requested action by the Secretary where applicable). This report presents the Committee's recommendations and reviews the pertinent associated issues.
Subject(s)
Blood Specimen Collection/standards , Child Health Services/standards , Neonatal Screening/standards , Advisory Committees , Blood Specimen Collection/methods , Child Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/blood , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/prevention & control , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening/methods , United States , United States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesABSTRACT
It would be difficult to overestimate the importance of persistent, thoughtful parents and their importance in the development of treatments for their children's rare disorders. Almost a century ago in Norway, observant parents led a brilliant young physician-scientist to his discovery of the underlying cause of their children's profound developmental delay-i.e., phenylketonuria, or PKU. Decades later, in a recovering war-ravaged Britain, an equally persistent mother pressed the scientists at Birmingham Children's Hospital to find a way to treat her seriously damaged daughter, Sheila, who suffered from PKU. Living on the financial edge, this mother insisted that Bickel and colleagues develop such a diet, and she volunteered Sheila to be the patient in the trial. The scientists concluded that the low phenylalanine diet helped but needed to be started very early-so, newborn screening was born to permit the implementation of this. Many steps brought us to where we are today, but these courageous parents made it all begin.
ABSTRACT
Primary health care providers will play an increasingly important role in delivering genetics-related services for women and children along the reproductive continuum. However, most primary health care providers have received little training in genetics or medical genomics to incorporate such services into routine care. A workshop was convened by the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Health Resources and Services Administration to identify practical strategies to educate primary care physicians involved in maternal and child health. These included developing a targeted curriculum for residency training programs, incorporating assessments of genetics and genomic medicine into the initial board certification process and the process for maintenance of certification, providing continuing medical education opportunities at national meetings, establishing an Internet-based repository of recommendations for primary care providers, and forming a learning collaborative to link primary care providers and specialists to evaluate strategies to improve care. Workgroup members underscored the importance of assessing the impact of these interventions on the process and outcomes of health care delivery. The recommendations from this workshop were presented to the United States Secretary for Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children Subcommittee on Education and Training. The Subcommittee reviewed the report and put forth recommendations to the Committee, which were adopted by the Committee in September 2009.
Subject(s)
Child Welfare , Education, Medical, Continuing/standards , Genetic Diseases, Inborn , Genetics, Medical/education , Maternal Welfare , Physicians, Family/education , Advisory Committees , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Child, Preschool , Female , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/therapy , Genetics, Medical/standards , Genomics , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Infant, Newborn , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Physicians, Family/standards , United StatesABSTRACT
The Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children is charged with evaluating conditions nominated for addition to the uniform screening panel and consequently making recommendations to the secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services. This report describes the framework by which the committee approaches its task. Key decision nodes include initial review of every nomination to determine whether conditions are amenable for systematic evidence review, review of systematic evidence reviews conducted by the committee's external review group, and deliberation and formal recommendation for addition or exclusion to the uniform panel. Data analyzed include the accuracy and specificity of screening and diagnostic tests for nominated disorders, the extent of predicted health benefits, harms impact on disease course, and cost from early diagnosis and treatment. The committee process is guided by approaches used by similar entities, but more flexible criteria are sometimes needed to accommodate data limitations stemming from the rarity of many of these conditions. Possible outcomes of committee review range from recommendation to add a nominated condition to the uniform panel; provide feedback on specific gaps in evidence that must be addressed before making a decision; or rejection of a nomination (e.g., because of identified harms). The committee's structured evidence-based assessment of nominated conditions supports a consistently rigorous, iterative and transparent approach to its making recommendations regarding broad population-based screening programs for rare conditions in infants and children.
Subject(s)
Neonatal Screening , Advisory Committees , Algorithms , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Health Planning Guidelines , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening/economics , Reproducibility of Results , United StatesABSTRACT
Spinal muscular atrophy is the most common fatal hereditary disease among newborns and infants. There is as yet no effective treatment. Although a carrier test is available, currently there is disagreement among professional medical societies who proffer standards of care as to whether or not carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy should be offered as part of routine reproductive care. This leaves health care providers without clear guidance. In fall 2009, a meeting was held by National Institutes of Health to examine the scientific basis for spinal muscular atrophy carrier screening and to consider the issues that accompany such screening. In this article, the meeting participants summarize the discussions and conclude that pan-ethnic carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy is technically feasible and that the specific study of implementing a spinal muscular atrophy carrier screening program raises broader issues about determining the scope and specifics of carrier screening in general.
Subject(s)
Genetic Carrier Screening , Genetic Testing , Muscular Atrophy, Spinal/diagnosis , Prenatal Diagnosis , Female , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heterozygote , Humans , Muscular Atrophy, Spinal/genetics , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Standard of Care/ethics , Standard of Care/legislation & jurisprudence , United StatesABSTRACT
The second conference of the Middle East and North Africa newborn screening initiative: partnerships for sustainable newborn screening infrastructure and research opportunities was held in Cairo, Arab Republic of Egypt on April 12 to 14, 2008. Policy makers, health ministry representatives, health care providers, and experts from the region, Europe, Asia, and North America participated. The primary outcome was development of country plans of action to implement or expand newborn screening programs. Country representatives were grouped by current levels of national newborn screening activities based on a Needs Assessment Survey for national newborn screening programs and assisted by international technical experts. The Needs Assessment Survey provided information on the level of newborn screening in each country, strengths and barriers to implementation of newborn screening programs, and identified areas for research. Newborn screening programs require an integrated system of laboratories, health care providers, and educators, thus, the infrastructure put in place to screen for one condition should support expansion to other conditions. Congenital hypothyroidism was selected for initiating newborn screening programs because of its high prevalence, availability of screening methods, and cost-effective intervention. To this end, the conference provided technical sessions on screening and treatment of congenital hypothyroidism, performance standards, quality assurance, follow-up interventions, and patient management. In addition, presentations highlighted the value of integrating research into newborn screening programs as they are established and in evaluating outcomes. Research opportunities were identified at a postconference workshop sponsored by the US Civilian Research Development Foundation.
Subject(s)
Genetic Testing , Africa, Northern , Congenital Hypothyroidism/diagnosis , Congenital Hypothyroidism/epidemiology , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Laboratories/organization & administration , Middle East , PrevalenceABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Newborn screening (NBS) identifies infants with specific congenital disorders for which earlier intervention cannot only prevent a lifetime of chronic disability but also, most importantly, save lives. In this article, we discuss complexities associated with NBS processes in the United States, with a focus on challenges in neuromuscular disorders. OBSERVATIONS: As new interventions for neuromuscular disorders become available, the clinical community must prepare to overcome the challenges of adding new diseases to screening panels and understand the rigorous evidence review at the federal level and the complex process of state-level implementation. In this regard, NBS programs for Pompe disease and spinal muscular atrophy can guide the path of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and other neuromuscular disorders as future candidates for NBS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The availability of advanced screening methods, the emergence of effective treatment, and the support of professional organizations may facilitate the expansion of NBS, such that an increasing number of infants can be identified in the newborn period who will benefit from life-saving interventions.
ABSTRACT
There are thousands of rare genetic diseases and many genetic and nongenetic contributors to common genetic diseases. The evidence base that is currently available about the great majority of these conditions is limited to case studies and relatively small observational study sets derived from one or several institutions. Hence, the statistical power in any one study is usually quite limited. Further, in the absence of organized registries and data collection on particular patient groups, the information available is weak and the patient resources that are available are limited. It is only through organized and coordinated clinical investigation systems that a sufficient number of patients with these diseases can be accumulated to provide the statistical power needed to inform about clinical history of treated and untreated forms, provide the resources needed for clinical trials of new tests and treatments, provide a sufficiently powered evidence base for public health decision-making and other uses. The meeting in which these issues were raised resulted in a set of proposed principles and associated recommendations as to how best to achieve the vision of creating an extensive and comprehensive collaboration of professional and lay communities to enable translational research to improve clinical care and therapies for persons with rare genetic diseases.
Subject(s)
Genetic Diseases, Inborn , Genetic Research , Rare Diseases , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/therapy , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Rare Diseases/diagnosis , Rare Diseases/genetics , Rare Diseases/therapy , United StatesABSTRACT
The US Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders and Genetic Diseases in Newborns and Children provides guidance to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with heritable disorders, with a special emphasis on those conditions detectable through newborn screening. Although long-term follow-up is necessary to maximize the benefit of diagnosis through newborn screening, such care is variable and inconsistent. To begin to improve long-term follow-up, the Advisory Committee has identified its key features, including the assurance and provision of quality chronic disease management, condition-specific treatment, and age-appropriate preventive care throughout the lifespan of affected individuals. There are four components central to achieving long-term follow-up: care coordination through a medical home, evidence-based treatment, continuous quality improvement, and new knowledge discovery.