Prevalence, diagnostic features, and medical outcomes of females with Turner syndrome with a trisomy X cell line (45,X/47,XXX): Results from the InsighTS Registry.

Turner syndrome (TS) is defined by partial or complete absence of a sex chromosome. Little is known about the phenotype of individuals with TS mosaic with trisomy X (45,X/47,XXX or 45,X/46,XX/47,XXX) (~3% of TS). We compared the diagnostic, perinatal, medical, and neurodevelopmental comorbidities of mosaic 45,X/47,XXX (n = 35, 9.4%) with nonmosaic 45,X (n = 142) and mosaic 45,X/46,XX (n = 66). Females with 45,X/47,XXX had fewer neonatal concerns and lower prevalence of several TS-related diagnoses compared with 45,X; however the prevalence of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric diagnoses were not different. Compared to females with 45,X/46,XX, the 45,X/47,XXX group was significantly more likely to have structural renal anomalies (18% vs. 3%; p = 0.03). They were twice as likely to have congenital heart disease (32% vs. 15%, p = 0.08) and less likely to experience spontaneous menarche (46% vs. 75% of those over age 10, p = 0.06), although not statistically significant. Congenital anomalies, hypertension, and hearing loss were primarily attributable to a higher proportion of 45,X cells, while preserved ovarian function was most associated with a higher proportion of 46,XX cells. In this large TS cohort, 45,X/47,XXX was more common than previously reported, individuals were phenotypically less affected than those with 45,X, but did have trends for several more TS-related diagnoses than individuals with 45,X/46,XX.

Discordant Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening vs. Diagnostic Results of Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies: Implications for Newborn Screening and Genetic Counseling.

Sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) collectively occur in 1 in 500 livebirths, and diagnoses in the neonatal period are increasing with advancements in prenatal and early genetic testing. Inevitably, SCA will be identified on either routine prenatal or newborn screening in the near future. Tetrasomy SCAs are rare, manifesting more significant phenotypes compared to trisomies. Prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening has been demonstrated to have relatively poor positive predictive values (PPV) in SCAs, directing genetic counseling discussions towards false-positive likelihood rather than thoroughly addressing all possible outcomes and phenotypes, respectively. The eXtraordinarY Babies study is a natural history study of children prenatally identified with SCAs, and it developed a longitudinal data resource and common data elements with the Newborn Screening Translational Research Network (NBSTRN). A review of cfDNA and diagnostic reports from participants identified a higher than anticipated rate of discordance. The aims of this project are to (1) compare our findings to outcomes from a regional clinical cytogenetic laboratory and (2) describe discordant outcomes from both samples. Twenty-one (10%), and seven (8.3%) cases were found to be discordant between cfDNA (result or indication reported to lab) and diagnosis for the Babies Study and regional laboratory, respectively. Discordant results represented six distinct discordance categories when comparing cfDNA to diagnostic results, with the largest groups being Trisomy cfDNA vs. Tetrasomy diagnosis (66.7% of discordance in eXtraordinarY Babies study) and Mosaicism (57.1% in regional laboratory). Traditional genetic counseling for SCA-related cfDNA results is inadequate given a high degree of discordance that jeopardizes the accuracy of the information discussed and informed decision making following prenatal genetic counseling.

Medical Findings in Infants Prenatally Identified with Sex Chromosome Trisomy in Year One of Life.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sex chromosome trisomies (SCT), including XXY, XYY, and XXX syndromes, have been historically underdiagnosed. Noninvasive prenatal cell-free DNA screening has significantly increased identification of these conditions, leading to a need for pediatric care for a growing population of newborns with SCT. Our goal was to analyze and compare perinatal features, medical diagnoses, and physical features in infants with prenatal identification of SCT conditions through the first year of life. METHODS: The eXtraordinarY Babies Study is an ongoing, prospective natural history study of prenatally identified children with SCT conducted by interdisciplinary teams in Colorado and Delaware. Participants were enrolled prior to 12 months of age and had pregnancy, birth, medical histories, and physical exams completed by board-certified pediatricians at 2, 6, and/or 12-month visits. Descriptive statistics were followed by comparisons between SCT groups using t-tests or ANOVA, Fisher exact, and correlations between medical features with alpha of 0.05. Relative risks were calculated compared to general population rates. RESULTS: 327 infants were included in the analysis (XXY=195, XXX=79, XYY=53). Major congenital anomalies were rare (1.7%). Relative risk compared to general population was elevated for breastfeeding difficulties (51.7%;RR 2.7), positional torticollis (28.2%;RR 7.2), eczema (48.0%;RR 3.5), food allergies (19.3%;RR 2.4), constipation requiring intervention (33.9%;RR 7.6), small cardiac septal defects (7.7%;RR 17.2), and structural renal abnormalities (4.4%;RR 9.7). Inpatient hospitalization was required for 12.4%, with 59.5% of hospitalizations attributable to respiratory infections. DISCUSSION: These findings of medical conditions with a higher prevalence can inform anticipatory guidance and medical management for pediatricians caring for infants with SCT. Article Summary: Medical findings in largest cohort of prenatally identified infants with XXY, Trisomy X, and XYY from birth to 12 months and implications for pediatric care.What's Known on This Subject: One in ∼500 individuals have an extra X or Y chromosome, or sex chromosome trisomy (SCT). Prenatal screening is now routinely identifying SCT, however there are few studies to guide perinatal and infant care for these individuals.What This Study Adds: This prospective observational study presents medical features for 327 infants with prenatally identified SCT from birth through the first year of life. Results identify where proactive screenings and/or interventions may be warranted for infants with SCT.

Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Roadmap for Dry Eye and MGD PCORI-Funded Research.

Introduction: Although affecting an estimated 35% of the population, Dry Eye is not well understood by patients and the medical community. As a result, both in research and clinical settings, diagnostic and treatment protocols tend to be non-specific, ad hoc, and inadequate, with a narrow industry-driven focus. The purpose of this convening was to propose a research roadmap that orients Dry Eye researchers toward a comprehensive patient-centered approach to diagnosing and treating Dry Eye, Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and related comorbidities with a goal of improving clinical outcomes for Dry Eye/MGD patients. Methods: Sixteen participants, including Dry Eye/MGD patients, caregivers, and patient advocates together with a group of experts in Dry Eye, MGD and other fields identified gaps in research on Dry Eye and MGD diagnostic and treatment approaches (age range 20-80; male to female ratio of 7:11; patients: 7). During a 2-day virtual convening, participants were assigned to topic-specific focus-group sessions to discuss and develop research questions pertaining to Dry Eye and MGD. The research questions were compiled into a proposed patient-centered roadmap for Dry Eye and MGD research. Two additional participants contributed to the proposed roadmap following the convening. Results: The focus groups identified over 80 patient-centered research questions important to patients and other stakeholders and compiled these into a proposed research roadmap. Conclusion: The convened stakeholders aim to establish a cohesive and comprehensive patient-centered approach to treating Dry Eye, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, and comorbidities. The research roadmap will serve as a reference for researchers, educational institutions, clinicians, and others evaluating diagnostic and treatment protocols in Dry Eye and MGD.