ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the staining quality between rapid hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and routine H&E staining of frozen breast tissue sections. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, 120 frozen breast tissue sections were randomly assigned to rapid or routine H&E staining (n = 60 per group). Rapid H&E staining used a 7:1 mixture of modified Gill's hematoxylin and alcohol-soluble 1% eosin Y. The staining quality of each section was evaluated and scored. A score of >7 was considered excellent, a score of 6 to 7 good, and a score of ≤5 poor. RESULTS: The staining time for rapid staining was approximately 3 minutes, whereas that of routine staining was approximately 12 minutes. There were no significant differences in the staining quality scores or proportions of sections in each grade between the two staining methods. The proportions of sections that were classified as excellent or good were 96.7% and 98.3% for rapid and routine staining, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In frozen breast tissue sections, rapid H&E staining may provide staining quality that is comparable to that of routine staining, while markedly reducing the staining time.
Subject(s)
Breast , Eosine Yellowish-(YS) , Frozen Sections , Hematoxylin , Staining and Labeling , Humans , Female , Staining and Labeling/methods , Frozen Sections/methods , Breast/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , AgedABSTRACT
The structure and properties of graphene/alumina composites are affected by the interface interaction. To demonstrate the influence of interface interaction on the structure of composite materials, a composite without graphene/matrix alumina interface was designed and prepared. We introduced a nano transition layer into the composite by pre-fabricating nano alumina coating on the surface of graphene, thus regulating the influence of interface interaction on the structure of the composite. According to the analysis of laser micro Raman spectroscopy, the structure of graphene was not seriously damaged during the modification process, and graphene was subjected to tensile or compressive stress along the 2D plane. The fracture behavior of the modified graphene/alumina composites is similar to that of pure alumina, but significantly different from that of pure graphene/alumina composites. The elastic modulus and hardness of composite material G/A/A are higher, while its microstructure has better density and uniformity. In situ HRSEM observation showed that there was a transition layer of alumina in the modified graphene/alumina composite. The transition layer blocks or buffers the interfacial stress interaction, therefore, the composite material exhibits a fracture behavior similar to that of pure alumina at this time. This work demonstrates that interface interactions have a significant impact on the structure and fracture behavior of graphene/alumina composites.