Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Ann Surg ; 280(2): 212-221, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of early cold stored platelet transfusion compared with standard care resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock. BACKGROUND: Data demonstrating the safety and efficacy of early cold stored platelet transfusion are lacking following severe injury. METHODS: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open label, clinical trial was performed at 5 US trauma centers. Injured patients at risk of large volume blood transfusion and the need for hemorrhage control procedures were enrolled and randomized. The intervention was the early transfusion of a single apheresis cold stored platelet unit, stored for up to 14 days versus standard care resuscitation. The primary outcome was feasibility and the principal clinical outcome for efficacy and safety was 24-hour mortality. RESULTS: Mortality at 24 hours was 5.9% in patients who were randomized to early cold stored platelet transfusion compared with 10.2% in the standard care arm (difference, -4.3%; 95% CI, -12.8% to 3.5%; P =0.26). No significant differences were found for any of the prespecified ancillary outcomes. Rates of arterial and/or venous thromboembolism and adverse events did not differ across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In severely injured patients, early cold stored platelet transfusion is feasible, safe and did not result in a significant lower rate of 24-hour mortality. Early cold stored platelet transfusion did not result in a higher incidence of arterial and/or venous thrombotic complications or adverse events. The storage age of the cold stored platelet product was not associated with significant outcome differences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04667468.


Subject(s)
Blood Preservation , Platelet Transfusion , Shock, Hemorrhagic , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Shock, Hemorrhagic/etiology , Blood Preservation/methods , Feasibility Studies , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Treatment Outcome , Resuscitation/methods , Cold Temperature
3.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 145(12): 1499-1504, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33720316

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT.­: ABO mistransfusions are rare and potentially fatal events. Protocols are required by regulatory agencies to minimize this risk to patients, but how these are applied in the context of massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) is not specifically defined. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate the approaches used by transfusion services for switching from universally compatible to patient ABO type-specific blood components during massive hemorrhage. DESIGN.­: We added 1 supplemental multiple-choice question to address the study objective to the 2019 College of American Pathologists proficiency test J-survey (J-A 2019). We also reviewed the available literature regarding this topic. RESULTS.­: A total of 881 laboratories responded to the supplemental question. Approximately 80% (704 of 881) reported a policy for ABO-type switching during an MTP. Policies varied considerably between responding laboratories, but most (384 of 704, 55%) required 2 ABO types to match before switching from universal to recipient-specific blood components. Additional safety measures used in a minority of these protocols included reaction strength criteria (103 of 704, 15%), on-call medical director approval (41 0f 704, 5.8%), universal red cell unit number limits (12 of 704, 1.7%), or the presence of a mixed field (3 of 704, 0.4%). CONCLUSIONS.­: This survey reveals that significant heterogeneity exists regarding the available approaches for ABO-type switching during an MTP. Specific expert guidance regarding this issue is very limited, and best practices have not yet been established or rigorously investigated.


Subject(s)
Blood Grouping and Crossmatching , Blood Transfusion , Blood Component Transfusion , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 89(6): 1061-1067, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32890339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both groups A and AB plasma have been approved for emergency-release transfusion in acutely bleeding trauma patients before blood grouping being performed. The safety profile associated with this practice has not been well characterized, particularly in patients requiring massive transfusion. METHODS: This secondary analysis of the Pragmatic, Randomized, Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios trial examined whether exposure to group A emergency-release plasma (ERP) was noninferior to group AB ERP. We also examined patients whose blood groups were compatible with group A ERP versus patients whose blood groups were incompatible with group A ERP. Outcomes included 30-day mortality and complication rates including systemic inflammatory response syndrome, infection, renal injury, pulmonary dysfunction, and thromboembolism. RESULTS: Of the 680 patients predicted to receive a massive transfusion, 584 (85.9%) received at least 1 U of ERP. Of the 584 patients analyzed, 462 (79.1%) received group AB and 122 (20.9%) received group A ERP. Using a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.35 as the noninferiority margin, transfusion with group A versus group AB ERP was not associated with increased thromboembolic rates (HR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.90). Mortality (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.91-1.45) and nonfatal complication rates (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.87-1.77) were inconclusive. In the subgroup analysis, transfusion with incompatible ERP (group B or AB patients receiving group A ERP) was not associated with increased nonfatal complications (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.80-1.30). There were no reported hemolytic transfusion reactions. CONCLUSION: The use of ERP is common in patients requiring massive transfusion and facilitates the rapid balanced resuscitation of patients who have sustained blood loss. Group A ERP is an acceptable option for patients requiring massive transfusion, especially if group AB ERP is not readily available. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, level IV; Prognostic, level III.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion/methods , Blood Group Incompatibility , Hemorrhage/therapy , Plasma , Resuscitation/methods , Adult , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching , Emergencies , Female , Hemorrhage/mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Trauma Centers , Treatment Outcome , United States , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Young Adult
5.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 87(2): 420-429, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348403

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade, the shift toward damage control surgery for bleeding trauma patients has come with an increased emphasis on optimal resuscitation. Two lifesaving priorities predominate: to quickly stop the bleed and effectively resuscitate the hemorrhagic shock. Blood is separated into components for efficient storage and distribution; however, bleeding patients require all components in a balanced ratio. A variety of blood products are available to surgeons, and these products have evolved over time. This review article describes the current standards for resuscitation of bleeding patients, including characteristics of all available products. The relevant details of blood donation and collection, blood banking, blood components, and future therapies are discussed, with the goal of guiding surgeons in their emergency transfusion practice.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion , Emergency Medical Services , Hemorrhage/therapy , Hemostatic Techniques , Emergencies , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Humans , Resuscitation/methods
6.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 143(12): 1539-1544, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31173529

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT.­: The Kleihauer-Betke (KB) test is validated for estimating the dose of Rh immune globulin needed for Rh-negative pregnant females. However, some clinicians are also ordering the test for Rh-positive women. The degree to which this practice occurs is unknown. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate the number of laboratories that perform the KB test on Rh-positive pregnant women, and to establish current ordering practices for this indication. DESIGN.­: We added 9 supplemental questions regarding KB test use for fetomaternal hemorrhage to the 2016 College of American Pathologists proficiency test survey. We also reviewed the available literature regarding the diagnostic utility of the KB test for Rh-positive women. RESULTS.­: A total of 1578 surveys were evaluated and revealed that 52% (824) of respondents perform these tests for Rh-positive women, and more than 50% (440 of 819; 53.7%) of these laboratories report that the results for Rh-positive women are treated as important or very important. CONCLUSIONS.­: The KB test is commonly used for Rh-positive women, and the information obtained from the test is considered as urgent and important. However, the available literature in support of this practice is still nonconclusive.


Subject(s)
Fetal Hemoglobin/analysis , Fetomaternal Transfusion/diagnosis , Hematologic Tests/methods , Laboratories/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
World J Gastroenterol ; 19(7): 1135-9, 2013 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23467442

ABSTRACT

A 39-year-old male reported fevers, weight loss, watery loose stools, and decreased visual acuity in his right eye over the prior five years. He was pancytopenic, had an elevated American council on exercise level, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. Computed tomography revealed massive hepatosplenomegaly and emphysematous lung changes. Liver biopsy showed non caseating granulomas. The patient was diagnosed with extrapulmonary sarcoidosis and was treated with prednisone. The patient symptomatically improved but 5 mo later presented with abdominal pain caused by perforation of the cecum. He underwent a cecectomy and pathology revealed pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis. This represents the first reported association between pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis and sarcoidosis. The etiology of pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis in this case was likely multifactorial and involved both effects of the corticosteroids as well as the advanced nature of the gastrointestinal sarcoidosis. Furthermore this case has the unique features of emphysematous lung changes and pancytopenia which are uncommon with sarcoidosis.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Diseases/complications , Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis/etiology , Sarcoidosis/complications , Adult , Biopsy , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Intestinal Diseases/drug therapy , Male , Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis/diagnosis , Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis/therapy , Prednisone/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Sarcoidosis/diagnosis , Sarcoidosis/drug therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL