Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 46
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Circulation ; 149(1): e157-e166, 2024 01 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37970724

ABSTRACT

This 2023 focused update to the neonatal resuscitation guidelines is based on 4 systematic reviews recently completed under the direction of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Neonatal Life Support Task Force. Systematic reviewers and content experts from this task force performed comprehensive reviews of the scientific literature on umbilical cord management in preterm, late preterm, and term newborn infants, and the optimal devices and interfaces used for administering positive-pressure ventilation during resuscitation of newborn infants. These recommendations provide new guidance on the use of intact umbilical cord milking, device selection for administering positive-pressure ventilation, and an additional primary interface for administering positive-pressure ventilation.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Medical Services , Infant , Child , Infant, Newborn , Humans , United States , Resuscitation , American Heart Association , Emergency Treatment
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 2022 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35045572

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The cesarean delivery rate in the United States is 31.9%. One of the leading indications for primary cesarean delivery is labor arrest. A modern understanding of the labor curve supports more time prior to the diagnosis of labor arrest. We conducted this study to examine the impact of adherence to the modern criteria for labor arrest and failed induction on rates of primary cesarean delivery and to identify predictors of meeting these criteria. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed rates of primary cesarean deliveries overall and primary cesarean deliveries occurring due to arrest of dilation, arrest of descent, and failed induction among the 17,877 live births at a large academic center from 2010 through 2013. Multiple logistic regression modeling identified predictors of meeting the new criteria for these indications based on guidelines published by the 2012 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. RESULTS: The primary cesarean delivery rate decreased from 23.5 to 21.1% (p = 0.026) from 2010 to 2013. Primary cesarean delivery rate for labor arrest and failed induction decreased from 8.5 to 6.7% (p = 0.005). The percentage of primary cesarean deliveries meeting the 2012 criteria for labor arrest increased from 18.8 to 34.9% (p = 0.002), and the rate of primary cesarean deliveries due to arrest of dilation decreased from 5.1 to 3.4% (p < 0.0005). The percentage of cases meeting the 2012 criteria for arrest of descent increased from 57.8 to 71.0% (p < 0.007), while primary cesarean delivery rate due to arrest of descent remained relatively unchanged, 3.1 to 2.6% (p = 0.330). CONCLUSION: A decrease in the primary cesarean rate was attributable to a decrease in cesarean for arrest of dilation in the setting of a significant increase in meeting the 2012 criteria for arrest of dilation. At the end of the study period, 65.2% of cesareans still did not meet the criteria for arrest of dilation. Greater rates of adherence to these guidelines may yield further reductions in the cesarean rate. KEY POINTS: · Primary cesarean delivery for labor arrest was decreased.. · Meeting criteria for labor arrest increased.. · A hospitalist provider increased odds of meeting criteria..

3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(1): 98.e1-98.e14, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30278176

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trial of labor after cesarean delivery is an effective and safe option for women without contraindications. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to examine hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after cesarean delivery and identify associated institutional characteristics and patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Using linked maternal and newborn hospital discharge records and birth certificate data in 2010-2012 from the state of California, we identified 146,185 term singleton mothers with 1 prior cesarean delivery and no congenital anomalies or clear contraindications for trial of labor at 249 hospitals. Risk-standardized utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery were estimated for each hospital after accounting for differences in patient case mix. Risk for severe maternal and newborn morbidities, as well as maternal and newborn length of stay, were compared between hospitals with high utilization and high success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery and other hospitals. Bivariate analysis was also conducted to examine the association of various institutional characteristics with hospitals' utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery. RESULTS: In the overall sample, 12.5% of women delivered vaginally. After adjusting for patient clinical risk factors, utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery varied considerably across hospitals, with a median of 35.2% (10th to 90th percentile range: 10.2-67.1%) and 40.5% (10th to 90th percentile range: 8.5-81.1%), respectively. Risk-standardized utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery demonstrated an inverted U-shaped relationship such that low or excessively high use of trial of labor after cesarean delivery was associated with lower success rate. Compared with other births, those delivered at hospitals with above-the-median utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery had a higher risk for uterine rupture (adjusted risk ratio, 2.74, P < .001), severe newborn respiratory complications (adjusted risk ratio, 1.46, P < .001), and severe newborn neurological complications/trauma (adjusted risk ratio, 2.48, P < .001), but they had a lower risk for severe newborn infection (adjusted risk ratio, 0.80, P = .003) and overall severe unexpected newborn complications (adjusted risk ratio, 0.86, P < .001) as well as shorter length of stays (adjusted mean ratio, 0.948 for mothers and 0.924 for newborns, P < .001 for both). Teaching status, system affiliation, larger volume, higher neonatal care capacity, anesthesia availability, higher proportion of midwife-attended births, and lower proportion of Medicaid or uninsured patients were positively associated with both utilization and success of trial of labor after cesarean delivery. However, rural location and higher local malpractice insurance premium were negatively associated with the utilization of trial of labor after cesarean delivery, whereas for-profit ownership was associated with lower success rate. CONCLUSION: Utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery varied considerably across hospitals. Strategies to promote vaginal birth should be tailored to hospital needs and characteristics (eg, increase availability of trial of labor after cesarean delivery at hospitals with low utilization rates while being more selective at hospitals with high utilization rates, and targeted support for lower capacity hospitals).


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/methods , Pregnancy Outcome , Trial of Labor , Uterine Rupture/prevention & control , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean/statistics & numerical data , Adult , California , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Gestational Age , Hospitals, High-Volume/trends , Hospitals, Low-Volume/trends , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Age , Patient Safety , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean/methods
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(6): 582.e1-582.e11, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30742823

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of pregnancy-related death in the United States. Identification of short-term indicators of cardiovascular morbidity has the potential to alter the course of this devastating disease among women. It has been established that hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease 10-30 years after delivery; however, little is known about the association of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with cardiovascular morbidity during the delivery hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the immediate risk of cardiovascular morbidity during the delivery hospitalization among women who experienced a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of women, 15-55 years old with a singleton gestation between 2008 and 2012 in New York City, examined the risk of severe cardiovascular morbidity in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared with normotensive women during their delivery hospitalization. Women with a history of chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease were excluded. Mortality and severe cardiovascular morbidity (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, acute heart failure, heart failure or arrest during labor or procedure, cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation, or conversion of cardiac rhythm) during the delivery hospitalization were identified using birth certificates and discharge record coding. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed the association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and severe cardiovascular morbidity, adjusting for relevant sociodemographic and pregnancy-specific clinical risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 569,900 women met inclusion criteria. Of those women, 39,624 (6.9%) had a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy: 11,301 (1.9%) gestational hypertension; 16,117 (2.8%) preeclampsia without severe features; and 12,206 (2.1%) preeclampsia with severe features, of whom 319 (0.06%) had eclampsia. Among women with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, 431 experienced severe cardiovascular morbidity (10.9 per 1000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 9.9-11.9). Among normotensive women, 1780 women experienced severe cardiovascular morbidity (3.4 per 1000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-3.5). Compared with normotensive women, there was a progressively increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity with gestational hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.52), preeclampsia without severe features (adjusted odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-2.32), preeclampsia with severe features (adjusted odds ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.99-4.00), and eclampsia (adjusted odds ratio, 12.46; 95% confidence interval, 7.69-20.22). Of the 39,624 women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, there were 15 maternal deaths, 14 of which involved 1 or more cases of severe cardiovascular morbidity. CONCLUSION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, particularly preeclampsia with severe features and eclampsia, are significantly associated with cardiovascular morbidity during the delivery hospitalization. Increased vigilance, including diligent screening for cardiac pathology in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, may lead to decreased morbidity for mothers.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cardiomyopathies/epidemiology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Eclampsia/epidemiology , Educational Status , Electric Countershock , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Information Storage and Retrieval , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , New York City/epidemiology , Obesity, Maternal/epidemiology , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Ventricular Fibrillation/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
Birth ; 46(2): 289-299, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30251270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to examine hospital variation in both maternal and neonatal morbidities and identify institutional characteristics associated with hospital performance in a combined measure of maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Using the California Linked Birth File containing data from birth certificate and hospital discharge records, we identified 1 322 713 term births delivered at 248 hospitals during 2010-2012. For each hospital, a risk-standardized rate of severe maternal morbidities and a risk-standardized rate of severe newborn morbidities were calculated after adjusting for patient clinical risk factors. Hospitals were ranked based on combined information on their maternal and newborn morbidity rates. RESULTS: Risk-standardized severe maternal and severe newborn morbidity rates varied substantially across hospitals (10th to 90th percentile range = 67.5-148.2 and 141.8-508.0 per 10 000 term births, respectively), although there was no significant association between the two (P = 0.15). Government hospitals (non-Federal) were more likely than other hospitals to be in worse rank quartiles (P value for trend = 0.004), whereas larger volume was associated with better rank among hospitals in the first three quartiles (P = 0.004). The most prevalent morbidities that differed progressively across hospital rank quartiles were severe hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and heart failure during procedure/surgery for mothers, and severe infection, respiratory complication, and shock/resuscitation for neonates. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with low maternal morbidity rates may not have low neonatal morbidity rates and vice versa, highlighting the importance of assessing joint maternal-newborn outcomes in order to fully characterize a hospital's obstetrical performance. Hospitals with smaller volume and government ownership tend to have less desirable outcomes and warrant additional attention in future quality improvement efforts.


Subject(s)
Hospitals/standards , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications , Obstetrics/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Adult , Birth Certificates , California/epidemiology , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gestational Age , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Morbidity , Patient Discharge , Poisson Distribution , Pregnancy , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Young Adult
6.
Am J Perinatol ; 36(10): 1031-1038, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30500963

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Placenta accreta is a feared pathology, in part, because prenatal diagnosis is imperfect. It is not known whether clinical risk factors or sonographic features equally predict the entire graded pathological spectrum of placental overinvasion disease nor whether clinical outcomes differ along the spectrum. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a mixed methods retrospective study of a cohort of women screened sonographically for placenta accreta, cross-referenced against cases identified by pathological diagnosis (N = 416). Demographic, diagnostic, and outcome information were compared across the spectrum of invasive placentation: percreta, increta, accreta, and focal accreta not requiring hysterectomy. The t-test, chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis across groups. RESULTS: As the depth of invasion decreased, risk factors for placental overinvasion were less common, especially placenta previa and previous cesarean. There was also reduced anticipation by sonographic examination of the placenta. Rates of adverse outcomes were lower among women with focal accreta compared with those with deeper invasion. CONCLUSION: As the depth of invasion decreases, clinical risk factors and sonographic evaluation are less reliable in the antenatal prediction of placenta accreta. The potential for unanticipated morbidity underscores the need for improved diagnostic tools for placenta accreta spectrum.


Subject(s)
Placenta Accreta/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Maternal Age , Patient Acuity , Placenta/diagnostic imaging , Placenta/pathology , Placenta Accreta/pathology , Placenta Accreta/surgery , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 218(3): 326.e1-326.e7, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29223597

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of a safe and efficacious vaccine against human papillomavirus, uptake of the vaccine in the United States is low. Missed clinical opportunities to recommend and to administer human papillomavirus vaccine are considered one of the most important reasons for its low uptake in adolescents; however, little is known about the frequency or characteristics of missed opportunities in the young adult (18-26 years of age) population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess both the rates of and the factors associated with missed opportunities for human papillomavirus immunization among young adult women who attended an urban obstetrics and gynecology clinic. STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, medical records were reviewed for all women 18-26 years of age who were underimmunized (<3 doses) and who sought care from Feb. 1, 2013, to January 31, 2014, at an urban, hospital-based obstetrics and gynecology clinic. A missed opportunity for human papillomavirus immunization was defined as a clinic visit at which the patient was eligible to receive the vaccine and a dose was due but not administered. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test associations between sociodemographic variables and missed opportunities. RESULTS: There were 1670 vaccine-eligible visits by 1241 underimmunized women, with a mean of 1.3 missed opportunities/person. During the study period, 833 of the vaccine eligible women (67.1%) had at least 1 missed opportunity. Overall, the most common types of visits during which a missed opportunity occurred were postpartum visits (17%) or visits for either sexually transmitted disease screening (21%) or contraception (33%). Of the patients with a missed opportunity, 26.5% had a visit at which an injectable medication or a different vaccine was administered. Women who identified their race as black had higher adjusted odds of having a missed opportunity compared with white women (adjusted odds ratio, 1.61 [95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.41], P < .02). Women who reported a non-English- or non-Spanish-preferred language had lower adjusted odds of having a missed opportunity (adjusted odds ratio, 0.25 [95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.87], P = .03). No other patient characteristics assessed in this study were significantly associated with having a missed opportunity. CONCLUSION: A majority of young-adult women in this study had missed opportunities for human papillomavirus immunization, and significant racial disparity was observed. The greatest frequency of missed opportunities occurred with visits for either contraception or for sexually transmitted disease screening.


Subject(s)
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Contraception , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Gynecology/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Language , Obstetrics/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , United States , White People/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
8.
Med Teach ; 40(12): 1308-1309, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29375008

ABSTRACT

In this thoughtful article, medical educators in various stages of their careers (resident, mid-career clinician-educators, medical school deans) reflect upon increasing reports of harassment and mistreatment of trainees by patients. In addition to providing a general overview of the limited literature on this topic, the authors describe their own experience collecting information on trainee mistreatment by patients at their institution. They explore the universal difficulty that educators face regarding how to best address this mistreatment and support both faculty and trainees. Given the current sociopolitical climate, there has never been a more urgent need to critically examine this issue. The authors call on the greater medical education community to join them in these important conversations.


Subject(s)
Aggression , Attitude of Health Personnel , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Professional-Patient Relations , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Students, Medical
9.
J Perinat Med ; 45(9): 1055-1060, 2017 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27865094

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between planned home birth and neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). METHODS: This is a case-control study in which a database of neonates who underwent head cooling for HIE at our institution from 2007 to 2011 was linked to New York City (NYC) vital records. Four normal controls per case were then randomly selected from the birth certificate data after matching for year of birth, geographic location, and gestational age. Demographic and obstetric information was obtained from the vital records for both the cases and controls. Location of birth was analyzed as hospital or out of hospital birth. Details from the out of hospital deliveries were reviewed to determine if the delivery was a planned home birth. Maternal and pregnancy characteristics were examined as covariates and potential confounders. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds of HIE by intended location of delivery. RESULTS: Sixty-nine neonates who underwent head cooling for HIE had available vital record data on their births. The 69 cases were matched to 276 normal controls. After adjusting for pregnancy characteristics and mode of delivery, neonates with HIE had a 44.0-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-256.4] odds of having delivered out of hospital, whether unplanned or planned. Infants with HIE had a 21.0-fold (95% CI 1.7-256.4) increase in adjusted odds of having had a planned home birth compared to infants without HIE. CONCLUSION: Out of hospital birth, whether planned home birth or unplanned out of hospital birth, is associated with an increase in the odds of neonatal HIE.


Subject(s)
Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/epidemiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , New York City/epidemiology , Pregnancy
11.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 211(4): 319-25, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24925798

ABSTRACT

Begun in 2003, the Yale-New Haven Hospital comprehensive obstetric safety program consisted of measures to standardize care, improve teamwork and communication, and optimize oversight and quality review. Prior publications have demonstrated improvements in adverse outcomes and safety culture associated with this program. In this analysis, we aimed to assess the impact of this program on liability claims and payments at a single institution. We reviewed liability claims at a single, tertiary-care, teaching hospital for two 5-year periods (1998-2002 and 2003-2007), before and after implementing the safety program. Connecticut statute of limitations for professional malpractice is 36 months from injury. Claims/events were classified by event-year and payments were adjusted for inflation. We analyzed data for trends as well as differences between periods before and after implementation. Forty-four claims were filed during the 10-year study period. Annual cases per 1000 deliveries decreased significantly over the study period (P < .01). Claims (30 vs 14) and payments ($50.7 million vs $2.9 million) decreased in the 5-years after program inception. Compared with before program inception, median annual claims dropped from 1.31 to 0.64 (P = .02), and median annual payments per 1000 deliveries decreased from $1,141,638 to $63,470 (P < .01). Even estimating the monetary awards for the 2 remaining open cases using the median payments for the surrounding 5 years, a reduction in the median monetary amount per case resulting in payment to the claimant was also statistically significant ($632,262 vs $216,815, P = .046). In contrast, the Connecticut insurance market experienced a stable number of claims and markedly increased cost per claim during the same period. We conclude that an obstetric safety initiative can improve liability claims exposure and reduce liability payments.


Subject(s)
Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Teaching/standards , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Birth Injuries/economics , Birth Injuries/etiology , Connecticut , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Delivery, Obstetric/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Hospitals, Teaching/economics , Hospitals, Teaching/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Teaching/trends , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Malpractice/economics , Malpractice/statistics & numerical data , Malpractice/trends , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital/economics , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital/trends , Patient Safety/economics , Patient Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Program Evaluation , Quality Improvement/economics
12.
Pediatrics ; 153(2)2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37970665

ABSTRACT

This 2023 focused update to the neonatal resuscitation guidelines is based on 4 systematic reviews recently completed under the direction of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Neonatal Life Support Task Force. Systematic reviewers and content experts from this task force performed comprehensive reviews of the scientific literature on umbilical cord management in preterm, late preterm, and term newborn infants, and the optimal devices and interfaces used for administering positive-pressure ventilation during resuscitation of newborn infants. These recommendations provide new guidance on the use of intact umbilical cord milking, device selection for administering positive-pressure ventilation, and an additional primary interface for administering positive-pressure ventilation.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Medical Services , Infant , Child , Infant, Newborn , Humans , United States , Resuscitation , American Heart Association , Emergency Treatment , Positive-Pressure Respiration
13.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 27(1): 20-6, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23215706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The National Children's Study (NCS) was established as a national probability sample of births to prospectively study children's health starting from in utero to age 21. The primary sampling unit was 105 study locations (typically a county). The secondary sampling unit was the geographic unit (segment), but this was subsequently perceived to be an inefficient strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This paper proposes that second-stage sampling using prenatal care providers is an efficient and cost-effective method for deriving a national probability sample of births in the US. It offers a rationale for provider-based sampling and discusses a number of strategies for assembling a sampling frame of providers. Also presented are special challenges to provider-based sampling pregnancies, including optimising key sample parameters, retaining geographic diversity, determining the types of providers to include in the sample frame, recruiting women who do not receive prenatal care, and using community engagement to enrol women. There will also be substantial operational challenges to sampling provider groups. CONCLUSION: We argue that probability sampling is mandatory to capture the full variation in exposure and outcomes expected in a national cohort study, to provide valid and generalisable risk estimates, and to accurately estimate policy (such as screening) benefits from associations reported in the NCS.


Subject(s)
Epidemiologic Methods , Prenatal Care/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Maternal Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/standards , Sampling Studies , Selection Bias , United States , Young Adult
14.
Matern Child Health J ; 17(10): 1940-50, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23338127

ABSTRACT

This study estimates the effect of maternal infections during pregnancy on childhood asthma. One-thousand four-hundred and twenty-eight pregnant women were prospectively followed using structured interviews and chart review until their child's 6th year of life. Infections were identified from outpatient and hospital visits. Childhood asthma was defined as physician diagnosis with symptoms at age six. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated from multivariable logistic regression models. Six-hundred and thirty-five women experienced an infection during pregnancy. Among antepartum infections, maternal urinary tract infections were significantly associated with childhood asthma (aOR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.12-2.29). Chorioamnionitis and maternal group beta streptococcus colonization were not significantly associated with an increased risk in childhood asthma. This study found an increased risk of asthma in children of women diagnosed with urinary tract infections during pregnancy, while other maternal infections did not increase the risk.


Subject(s)
Asthma/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , Adult , Asthma/etiology , Child , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , New England/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
16.
F S Rep ; 3(2 Suppl): 46-54, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35937452

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate if knowledge and awareness of concepts and concerns pertaining to reproductive health and fertility vary by race/ethnicity among reproductive-aged women in the United States. Methods: A 2013 cross-sectional web-based survey assessed reproductive health-related knowledge, awareness, and perceptions of 1,000 women (18-40 years). Multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for age, education, income, marital status, employment, region, and pregnancy history, examined the association between race/ethnicity and subfertility-related risk factor awareness; knowledge of factors that may affect pregnancy susceptibility; and future fertility-related concerns. Results: Knowledge and awareness related to reproductive wellness and fertility differed by race/ethnicity in US women. Compared with Caucasians, Hispanic women were less likely to be aware of smoking-related harm to fertility (odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.86); African American women were more aware of the implications of sexually transmitted infections on fertility (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.15-3.94); and Asian women demonstrated greater awareness of a possible relationship between dysmenorrhea and subfertility (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.09-3.86). Asian women consider fertility socially taboo to talk about and a private affair that is difficult to discuss (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.32-5.29 and OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.05-3.75, respectively), were more concerned about their future fertility (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.24-4.52), and more likely to perceive a need for future fertility treatment (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.18-4.71). Conclusion: Among reproductive-aged women in the United States, knowledge, awareness, and perceptions relating to reproductive health vary by race/ethnicity. Our findings suggest race/ethnicity as potential modulators of population perceptions regarding reproductive health and infertility. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NIH ZIA# HD008985.

17.
Am J Perinatol ; 28(2): 97-102, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20640975

ABSTRACT

We investigated if clinicians were altering their care of group B streptococcus (GBS)-positive women in labor to achieve 4 hours of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis based on their interpretation of the 2002 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on prevention of perinatal GBS disease. We surveyed all clinicians with privileges on the labor floor at our institution about their interpretation and clinical application of the 2002 CDC guidelines. Seventy of 96 eligible clinicians (72.9%) completed our survey. In our survey, only 22.9% of clinicians reported not altering their management of labor in GBS-positive pregnancies that achieved less than 4 hours of prophylaxis. These alterations included "laboring down" or delaying pushing; turning off or decrease an oxytocin infusion; or delaying or avoiding artificial rupture of membranes. Clinicians are altering their management of labor to attempt to achieve 4 hours of intrapartum prophylaxis. The 2002 CDC guidelines do not specifically recommend prolonging labor and are being interpreted differently in the clinical setting than the authors may have intended. The effects and consequences of this interpretation are unknown.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Carrier State/microbiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/transmission , Streptococcus agalactiae , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/trends , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Labor, Obstetric , Male , Midwifery , Physicians , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy
18.
Midwifery ; 96: 102941, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33618318

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In recent decades, there has been a call to foster effective collaborative models of practice between midwives and obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) in the United States in order to improve clinician satisfaction and outcomes for childbearing women. Currently, there is no existing validated scale that measures the collaboration between obstetricians and midwives on labor and birth units. We sought to develop and validate a Midwifery- Obstetrics Collaboration (MOC) Scale that measures obstetricians' attitudes towards collaboration between obstetricians and midwives on labor and birth units. DESIGN: Validation study. The items in the questionnaire to be validated were developed de novo by the authors, based on their experiences and expertise in collaborative practice as well as by incorporating key principles of effective collaborative practice documented in the literature. The questionnaire was then piloted among 13 content experts. SETTING: Anonymous online survey conducted in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: We validated the questionnaire among 471 obstetricians in the United States from Sept 2019 to March 2020. The respondents included general obstetrician and gynecologists (OB/GYN) attendings, OB/GYN hospitalists, maternal fetal medicine (MFM) fellows and MFM attendings who practice on a labor and birth unit in the United States. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: We performed reliability analysis of the a priori items. We measured concurrent validity with an existing scale that measures inter-professional collaboration between nurses and physicians. We also correlated our scale with concerns for liability when working in a collaborative practice with midwives. Lastly, we measured discriminant validity with a single item burn out scale. The novel MOC Scale demonstrated construct and concurrent validity, and high inter-item reliability (a=0.93). The MOC Scale correlated with concerns about liability (r=0.63, p <0.001) but was not associated with burnout indicating the uniqueness of the new construct. KEY CONCLUSIONS: The MOC Scale is validated to assess collaboration between obstetricians and midwives on labor and birth units from an obstetrician's perspective IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The MOC Scale can be used as a tool in clinical practice, to assess and foster effective collaboration between obstetricians and midwives from an obstetricians' perspective especially when used in conjunction with other tools that take into the account the perspectives of midwives and childbearing women.


Subject(s)
Gynecology , Labor, Obstetric , Midwifery , Obstetrics , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Reproducibility of Results , United States
19.
J Perinatol ; 41(3): 468-477, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32801351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine interhospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and reasons for the variation. STUDY DESIGN: 2010-2012 linked birth certificate and hospital discharge data from 35 hospitals in California on live births at 35-42 weeks gestation and ≥1500 g birth weight were used. Hospital variation in NICU admission rates was assessed by coefficient of variation. Patient/hospital characteristics associated with NICU admissions were identified by multivariable regression. RESULTS: Among 276,489 newborns, 6.3% were admitted to NICU with 34.5% of them having mild diagnoses. There was high interhospital variation in overall risk-adjusted rate of NICU admission (coefficient of variation = 26.2) and NICU admission rates for mild diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 46.4-74.0), but lower variation for moderate/severe diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 8.8-14.1). Births at hospitals with more NICU beds had a higher likelihood of NICU admission. CONCLUSION: Interhospital variation in NICU admissions is mostly driven by admissions for mild diagnoses, suggesting potential overuse.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Birth Weight , Gestational Age , Hospitals , Humans , Infant, Newborn
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL