Can the new RCP R0/R1 classification predict the clinical outcome in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head?

PURPOSE: According to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), R1 is defined as the microscopic presence of tumor cells at the surface of the resection margin (RM). In contrast, the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) suggested to declare R1 already when tumor cells are found within 1 mm of the RM. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of the RM concerning the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: From 2007 to 2009, 62 patients underwent a curative operation for PDAC of the pancreatic head. The relevance of R status on cumulative overall survival (OS) was assessed on univariate and multivariate analysis for both the classic R classification (UICC) and the suggestion of the RCP. RESULTS: Following the UICC criteria, a positive RM was detected in 8 %. Along with grading and lymph node ratio, R status revealed a significant impact on OS on univariate and multivariate analysis. Applying the suggestion of the RCP, R1 rate rose to 26 % resulting in no significant impact on OS in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that the RCP suggestion for R status has no impact on the prognosis of PDAC. In contrast, our data confirmed the UICC R classification of RM as well as N category, grading, and lymph node ratio as significant prognostic factors.

[Amyloidosis of the small intestine following whipple operation is a rare cause of chronic ileus and has to be considered as differential diagnosis]. / Die Amyloidose des Dünndarms als seltene Differenzialdiagnose eines chronischen Ileus nach Whipple-Operation.

INTRODUCTION: When patients who underwent a Whipple operation because of a tumour of the pancreas develop symptoms of chronic ileus several months after surgery, the most common cause is a relapse of tumour growth or a peritoneal carcinomatosis. In this paper we report that secondary amyloidosis of the small intestine can produce similar symptoms and has to be evaluated as a rare differential diagnosis in chronic ileus. CASE REPORTS: Three patients (2 men: 82, 70 years old and 1 woman 70 years old) were admitted to our hospital with symptoms of chronic ileus. All of them had undergone a Whipple operation several months (4, 5, 13 months) before. In two patients surgery was performed due to carcinoma in situ and in one patient due to benign cystadenoma of the pancreas. Chronic ileus resulted in relaparotomy in all patients. Surprisingly, the intraoperative situs did not show any tumour growth. Instead severe adhesions of the small intestine were detected. The entire small intestine was covered with a substance that had a similar aspect to sugar icing. Thereby the motility of the small intestine was constricted. An extensive adhaesiolysis and a decompression of the bowel was carried out. By histopathology, amyloidosis was diagnosed using congo red staining. Diffuse amyloid deposits were found on the small intestine. In the postoperative course two patients could be discharged free of complaints after 7 to 9 days in the hospital. One man died four months later, after transfer to a geriatric hospital, because of intestinal atony and a serious senile depression. CONCLUSION: Secondary amyloidosis following the Whipple operation is a rare reason for the symptoms of chronic ileus. Surgeons have to keep in mind that amyloidosis is a possible differential diagnosis in addition to relapse of tumour growth and peritoneal carcinomatosis in these patients. Thus, in our opinion, relaparotomy should be undertaken as early as possible because this is the only chance to detect the cause of chronic ileus.