Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 82
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 59(6): 102921, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928663

ABSTRACT

The Hematology Department and its Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) program implemented several measures during COVID-19 outbreak in order to keep clinical activities with the maximum security for both donors and recipients. Nevertheless, there was a lack of evidence whether blood products and specifically bone marrow can cause transfusion-transmitted infection. Initially, there were many uncertainties and did not exist formal recommendations. Before official statements were available, we performed an allogeneic HCT in a 57-year-old male from a related matched donor in the incubation period of COVID-19 where the patient did not develop the disease. Actual epidemiology data suggest that transmission may occur early in the course of infection, even from asymptomatic patients in the incubation period. In our knowledge this is the first case report of an adult hematopoietic cell donor with COVID-19 in the incubation period where the transplant is successfully completed with no transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The low concentration of viral RNA in plasma of patients with COVID-19 could support the safety of blood products, including peripheral blood hematopoietic cells. In conclusion, blood products including hematopoietic stem cells are safe in the context of COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell , SARS-CoV-2 , Tissue Donors , Allografts , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/blood , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/therapy , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Haemophilia ; 24(5): 693-702, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29944195

ABSTRACT

Planning and undertaking elective surgery in people with haemophilia (PWH) is most effective with the involvement of a specialist and experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT) at a haemophilia treatment centre. However, despite extensive best practice guidelines for surgery in PWH, there may exist a gap between guidelines and practical application. For this consensus review, an expert multidisciplinary panel comprising surgeons, haematologists, nurses, physiotherapists and a dental expert was assembled to develop practical approaches to implement the principles of multidisciplinary management of elective surgery for PWH. Careful preoperative planning is paramount for successful elective surgery, including dental examinations, physical assessment and prehabilitation, laboratory testing and the development of haemostasis and pain management plans. A coordinator may be appointed from the MDT to ensure that critical tasks are performed and milestones met to enable surgery to proceed. At all stages, the patient and their parent/caregiver, where appropriate, should be consulted to ensure that their expectations and functional goals are realistic and can be achieved. The planning phase should ensure that surgery proceeds without incident, but the surgical team should be ready to handle unanticipated events. Similarly, the broader MDT must be made aware of events in surgery that may require postoperative plans to be changed. Postoperative rehabilitation should begin soon after surgery, with attention paid to management of haemostasis and pain. Surgery in patients with inhibitors requires even more careful preparation and should only be undertaken by an MDT experienced in this area, at a specialized haemophilia treatment centre with a comprehensive care model.


Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Hemophilia A/surgery , Hemophilia A/pathology , Humans
3.
Haemophilia ; 24(4): e187-e193, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29873151

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia is one of the most common inherited bleeding disorders in the Emergency Department (ED). The most dangerous site of bleeding is the central nervous system. AIMS: To describe the characteristics of haemophiliacs arrived to our ED following a head trauma and to analyse the incidence of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, analytical, observational study, conducted in a Paediatric ED. We included haemophilic patients aged from birth to 16 years who consulted after a head trauma over a 6-year period. Data collected included age, type of haemophilia and head trauma, symptoms, prophylaxis status, CT imaging, treatment and number of visits to the ED. RESULTS: About 46 males and 85 episodes were analysed. The median age was 2.38 years. Severe haemophilia A was the most frequent type of disease (50%). All head injuries were mild, and the most frequent mechanism was a collision with an object (38.8%). In 62 episodes (72.9%) the patients were asymptomatic. The rest 23 events had symptomatology, being the most common headache (26%), emesis (21.7%) and drowsiness (17.4%). Head CT was obtained in 31 episodes, founding altered results in 10 (6 of them corresponding to ICH). All the patients with ICH had symptomatology. About 37 episodes required admission. CONCLUSION: Intracranial haemorrhage is one of the most dangerous events in haemophiliacs and it may occur after a head trauma. Our study suggests that, in case of head trauma, CT must be obtained in symptomatic patients and in those with additional risk factors. Asymptomatic patients must have prolonged observation.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hemophilia A/complications , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnosis , Craniocerebral Trauma/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Tertiary Healthcare
4.
Haemophilia ; 23(6): 868-876, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28851065

ABSTRACT

Monitoring recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) treatment outcomes remains challenging. Thromboelastography (TEG) and the thrombin generation assay (TGA), measure coagulation dynamics over time and are being assessed as potential methods for evaluating and monitoring haemophilia treatment. Lack of standardized TEG/TGA methods makes it difficult to compare results and to establish a correlation with clinical outcomes. AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rFVIIa after 3×90 µg kg-1 doses vs a single dose (270 µg kg-1 ) in haemophilia patients and to evaluate TEG/TGA results postdosing to determine how these assays relate to PK findings. METHODS: Patients in this open-label, single-centre, randomized, crossover trial received one injection of 270 µg kg-1 rFVIIa crossed over with three injections of 90 µg kg-1 rFVIIa in a non-bleeding state. For TEG, kaolin and tissue factor were used as activators; TGA was performed on frozen platelet-rich and platelet-poor plasma, with and without corn trypsin inhibitor. FVIIa activity was evaluated using in vivo samples. RESULTS: TGA showed a dose-dependent effect of rFVIIa on thrombin generation; TEG revealed lower dose-dependent effects. Both showed some differences between single-/multiple-dose rFVIIa; both supported the PK findings. CONCLUSION: While TEG and TGA are not yet clinically predictive, both supported the PK results. Data suggest that, while a single dose of 270 µg kg-1 rFVIIa provides slightly higher haemostatic potential than the multiple-dose regimen of 3×90 µg kg-1 , the latter results in prolonged activity levels compared with a higher single dose.


Subject(s)
Factor VIIa/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia B/drug therapy , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Adult , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Factor VIIa/pharmacokinetics , Hemophilia A/blood , Hemophilia A/metabolism , Hemophilia B/blood , Hemophilia B/metabolism , Humans , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacokinetics , Thrombelastography , Thrombin/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Haemophilia ; 23 Suppl 1: 4-13, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27990784

ABSTRACT

The high incidence of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in patients with haemophilia A has encouraged debate as to whether product-type plays a role. There is debate in the literature as to whether rFVIII concentrates are associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors compared to pdFVIII products. The management of haemophilia in patients with inhibitors includes on-demand/prophylaxis treatment with bypassing agents, and/or immune tolerance induction (ITI). However, these options create an economic and emotional burden on patients, their families and healthcare practitioners. Although ITI eliminates inhibitors successfully in 60-80% of cases, it is costly. Despite high costs, preliminary data from a decision analytical model have indicated that ITI is economically advantageous compared with on-demand/prophylactic treatment with bypassing agents. In patients with persistent inhibitors and those who are not candidates for ITI or have failed ITI, bleeding-related mortality and morbidity increase and quality of life decreases, compared with non-inhibitor patients. This article provides an update on the risk of inhibitor development and discusses best management approaches for patients with high-risk factors for inhibitor development.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Factor VIII/antagonists & inhibitors , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors/pharmacology , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
6.
Haemophilia ; 22(6): 859-865, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27329267

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is a standard intervention to eradicate inhibitors in haemophilic patients. However, information on the long-term condition of patients who eradicated the inhibitor totally or partially after ITI is scarce. AIM: To perform a long-term follow-up to describe the status of patients reported as ITI success in the G-ITI study. METHODS: This was an international, multicentre, observational, retrospective study of the 57 haemophilic patients who were reported as ITI success in the G-ITI study. Demographics and post-ITI clinical data recorded until January 2015 were extracted from the medical records. A descriptive analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were evaluable. Post-ITI follow-up was 9.1 years in average. Thirty-seven target joints were affected in 21 patients; 38 patients presented bleeding with a mean of 1.0 ± 1.2 episodes year-1 , most of them (271/330) treated with Fanhdi® (Grifols). Around half of the patients underwent at least one surgical procedure. Most venous access complications were of expected nature, requiring hospital stay in practically all cases. Fanhdi was used in 42 patients as the regular haemophilia treatment after ITI, mainly prophylactically. Three patients (6.8%) who were being treated with Fanhdi (prophylaxis), Kogenate (prophylaxis) and Emoclot (on demand), respectively, showed inhibitor relapse (at 29, 53 and 13 months after ITI, with 0.9, 3.65 and 12.5 BU respectively). All of them were successfully tolerized after rescue ITI. CONCLUSION: After ITI success, all patients continued with regular successful FVIII treatment for haemophilia for more than 9 years. The few inhibitor relapses were successfully overcome after rescue ITI.


Subject(s)
Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Immune Tolerance/genetics , von Willebrand Factor/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
7.
Haemophilia ; 22(1): 87-95, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26202305

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Development of neutralizing inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) is a major complication of haemophilia A treatment. AIM: The ongoing, international, open-label, uncontrolled, observational immune tolerance induction (ObsITI) study evaluates ITI, the standard of care in patients with inhibitors. PATIENTS/METHODS: Forty-eight prospective patients in this interim analysis received a single plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized, FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF) for ITI. According to recommended Bonn protocol, 'low responders' at ITI start (<5 BU) received 50-100 IU FVIII kg(-1) daily, or every other day; 'high responders' (≥5 BU) received 100 IU FVIII kg(-1) every 12 h. RESULTS: Forty of 48 patients (83.3%), had at least one risk factor for poor ITI-prognosis at ITI start (i.e. age ≥7 years, >2 years since inhibitor diagnosis, inhibitor titre ≥10 BU at the start of ITI, or prior ITI failure). Nonetheless, 34 patients (70.8%) achieved complete success, 3 (6.3%) partial success, 1 (2.1%) partial response; ITI failed in 10 patients (20.8%), all with poor prognosis factors. All six low responders achieved complete success. ITI outcome was significantly associated with inhibitor titre level at ITI start (P = 0.0068), number of poor prognosis factors for ITI success (P = 0.0187), monthly bleeding rate during ITI (P = 0.0005) and peak inhibitor titre during ITI (P = 0.0007). Twenty-two of 35 high responder patients (62.9%) with ≥1 poor prognosis factor achieved complete success. CONCLUSION: Treatment with a single pdFVIII/VWF concentrate, mainly according to the Bonn protocol, resulted in a high ITI success rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors and poor prognosis for ITI success.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Factor VIII/immunology , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia A/immunology , Immune Tolerance/drug effects , von Willebrand Factor/immunology , von Willebrand Factor/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Combinations , Factor VIII/adverse effects , Female , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemorrhage/complications , Humans , Infant , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Safety , Young Adult , von Willebrand Factor/adverse effects
9.
Haemophilia ; 21(4): 458-64, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25649244

ABSTRACT

Treatment adherence in adolescents with chronic diseases is around 50%, and failure is more common in preventive therapy. In haemophilia, contradictory results are reported by the published studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate adherence with factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis in Spanish patients with severe haemophilia A between age 6 and 20 years. Data were collected retrosp-ectively in the previous 2 years. The primary endpoint was the absolute adherence index (AAI), and the endpoints were related to clinical status, age, prophylaxis regimen, responsibility for factor administration and quality of life (QoL), assessed by the Haemo-QoL questionnaires. A total of 78 patients from 14 Spanish hospitals were recruited. Adherence ranged between -64.4 and 66.7 (mean -3.08). No differences were observed between children and adolescents (7.11 vs. 6.39; P = 0.809). A statistically significant association (P < 0.010) between infra adherent group and target joint was found, as was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.010) between the number of bleeding episodes experienced by the adherent group (mean 1.4) and by infra adherents (mean 4.5). There was no significant difference between AAI and prophylactic regimen (6.35 vs. 6.96, P = 0.848), neither between AAI and the person responsible for factor administration (5.57 vs. 8.79, P = 0.326). The Haemo-QoL scores (8-12 years) were related to adherence level (P < 0.05). Adherence was approximately ideal and patients perceived a high QoL. Because of the repercussions for compliance, it is essential to work during puberty on emotional and self-acceptance aspects of the disease, as well as coping, and the patient's family, school and health team relationships.


Subject(s)
Hemophilia A/psychology , Patient Compliance , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia A/pathology , Humans , Male , Parents/psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
10.
Haemophilia ; 20(1): 83-91, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24354480

ABSTRACT

Most studies on immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy in haemophilia A patients are focused on primary ITI in children. Here we report on the ITI outcome in a large retrospective cohort, including adults and patients with rescue ITI, treated with a pdFVIII/VWF concentrate. Retrospective data from haemophilic patients (FVIII< 2%) with inhibitors from 22 centres in Spain, Italy and Germany, who underwent primary or rescue ITI with pdFVIII/VWF concentrate, were collected. Complete success (CS), partial success (PS) and failure were defined based on the criteria of the consensus recommendations of the 2006 International ITI Workshop. A total of 41 cases of primary ITI (32 children and 9 adults) and 19 cases of rescue ITI (17 children and 2 adults) were evaluated. Success (CS+PS) rate of 87% was achieved in primary ITI and 74% in the higher risk profile of rescue ITI. Eight of nine (85%) patients with poorest prognosis (three or more of the known risk factors of poor response to ITI) achieved success (CS+PS). CS of 100% was observed in eight primary ITI patients with titre at start of ITI ≤2.5 BU and inhibitor peak ≤25 BU. The favourable response rates in primary and rescue ITI in children and in adult patients, even in the presence of poor prognostic factors, should be encouraged for broadening the indication of immune tolerance therapy in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Factor VIII/immunology , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia A/immunology , Immune Tolerance/drug effects , von Willebrand Factor/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Factor VIII/administration & dosage , Factor VIII/adverse effects , Germany , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Italy , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , von Willebrand Factor/administration & dosage , von Willebrand Factor/adverse effects
11.
Haemophilia ; 20 Suppl 5: 1-20, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24924596

ABSTRACT

The 4th Haemophilia Global Summit was held in Potsdam, Germany, in September 2013 and brought together an international faculty of haemophilia experts and delegates from multidisciplinary backgrounds. The programme was designed by an independent Scientific Steering Committee of haemophilia experts and explored global perspectives in haemophilia care, discussing practical approaches to the optimal management of haemophilia now and in the future. The topics outlined in this supplement were selected by the Scientific Steering Committee for their relevance and potential to influence haemophilia care globally. In this supplement from the meeting, Jan Astermark reviews current understanding of risk factors for the development of inhibitory antibodies and discusses whether this risk can be modulated and minimized. Factors key to the improvement of joint health in people with haemophilia are explored, with Carlo Martinoli and Víctor Jiménez-Yuste discussing the utility of ultrasound for the early detection of haemophilic arthropathy. Other aspects of care necessary for the prevention and management of joint disease in people with haemophilia are outlined by Thomas Hilberg and Sébastian Lobet, who highlight the therapeutic benefits of physiotherapy and sports therapy. Riitta Lassila and Carlo-Federico Perno describe current knowledge surrounding the risk of transmission of infectious agents via clotting factor concentrates. Finally, different types of extended half-life technology are evaluated by Mike Laffan, with a focus on the practicalities and challenges associated with these products.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Factor VIII , Hemophilia A , Factor VIII/immunology , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Germany , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemophilia A/immunology , Hemophilia A/therapy , Humans , Joint Diseases/etiology , Joint Diseases/prevention & control , Risk Factors
12.
Haemophilia ; 19(6): 841-6, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23758100

ABSTRACT

Several analyses have shown that recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is a cost-effective intervention compared with plasma-derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate (pd-aPCC) for the on-demand treatment of mild-to-moderate bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. The aim of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa vs. pd-aPCC in the treatment of bleeding episodes in severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors in Spain. A decision analytic model was designed to evaluate the costs and clinical outcomes of using rFVIIa or pd-aPCC to treat mild-to-moderate joint bleeds in children (≤14 years old) and adults with inhibitors. Data were obtained from a published meta-analysis and a panel of haemophilia experts. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Spanish National Healthcare System. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of model assumptions on study results. In the Treur meta-analysis, rFVIIa resulted in cumulative joint bleed resolution of 88% and 95% after 24 and 36 h, respectively, compared with 62% and 76%, respectively, with pd-aPCC (Treur et al. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 420-36). Here, the mean cost per bleed was estimated at €8473 and €15 579 in children and adults treated with rFVIIa, vs. €8627 and €15 677 in children and adults treated with pd-aPCC. rFVIIa treatment was found to be the dominating option (cheaper and more effective). The one-way sensitivity analysis also confirmed that rFVIIa was less costly than pd-aPCC. The model suggests that rFVIIa is a cost-effective option compared with pd-aPCC for the treatment of mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in a Spanish setting.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors/blood , Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use , Coagulants/therapeutic use , Factor VIIa/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Adult , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Spain
13.
Haemophilia ; 19(4): 481-6, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23387528

ABSTRACT

Prophylaxis is considered the optimal treatment regimen for patients with severe haemophilia, and may be especially important in the prevention of joint disease. Novel coagulation factor concentrates with prolonged half-lives promise to improve patient treatment by enabling prophylaxis with less frequent dosing. With the call to individualize therapy in haemophilia, there is growing awareness of the need to use pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments to tailor prophylaxis. However, for new factor concentrates, it is not yet known which PK values will be most informative for optimizing prophylaxis. This topic was explored at the Eighth Zurich Haemophilia Forum. On the basis of our clinical experience and a discussion of the literature, we report key issues relating to the PK assessment of new coagulation factors and include suggestions on the implementation of PK data to optimize therapy. As both inter- and intra-individual variability in factor half-life have been reported, we suggest that frequent PK assessments should be conducted. However, to diminish the burden of more frequent sampling, sparser sampling strategies and the use of population modelling should be considered. Guidelines on how to assay new factor concentrates, and which PK parameters should be measured, are needed. Concerns were raised regarding the possibility of breakthrough bleeding, and current thinking on how to prevent breakthrough bleeding may no longer be appropriate. Finally, as treatment adherence may be more important to ensure that a therapeutic level of a new coagulation factor concentrate is maintained, behavioural techniques could be implemented to help to improve treatment adherence.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Factors/pharmacokinetics , Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia A/prevention & control , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Patient Compliance , Precision Medicine
14.
Haemophilia ; 19 Suppl 3: 1-18, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23383607

ABSTRACT

The first meeting of international specialists in the field of von Willebrand disease (VWD) was held in the Åland islands in 1998 where Erik von Willebrand had first observed a bleeding disorder in some members of a family from Föglö and a summary of the meeting was published in 1999. The second meeting was held in 2010 and a report of the meeting was published in 2012. Topics covered included progress in understanding of VWD over the last 50 years; multimers; classification of VWD; pharmacokinetics and laboratory assays; genetics; treating the paediatric patient; prophylaxis; geriatrics; gene therapy and treatment guidelines. This third meeting held over 3 days covered the structure and function of von Willebrand factor (VWF); type 1 VWD, the most common form of the disease; a lifespan of pharmacokinetics in VWD; detecting inhibitors in VWD patients; and special challenges in understanding and treating the female VWD patient.


Subject(s)
von Willebrand Diseases/diagnosis , von Willebrand Diseases/therapy , Animals , Factor VIII/metabolism , Female , Humans , von Willebrand Diseases/genetics , von Willebrand Diseases/metabolism , von Willebrand Factor/metabolism
15.
Med Intensiva ; 37(4): 259-83, 2013 May.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23507335

ABSTRACT

Since allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) is not harmless, multiple alternatives to ABT (AABT) have emerged, though there is great variability in their indications and appropriate use. This variability results from the interaction of a number of factors, including the specialty of the physician, knowledge and preferences, the degree of anemia, transfusion policy, and AABT availability. Since AABTs are not harmless and may not meet cost-effectiveness criteria, such variability is unacceptable. The Spanish Societies of Anesthesiology (SEDAR), Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH), Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH), Critical Care Medicine (SEMICYUC), Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH) and Blood Transfusion (SETS) have developed a Consensus Document for the proper use of AABTs. A panel of experts convened by these 6 Societies have conducted a systematic review of the medical literature and have developed the 2013 Seville Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogeneic Blood Transfusion, which only considers those AABT aimed at decreasing the transfusion of packed red cells. AABTs are defined as any pharmacological or non-pharmacological measure aimed at decreasing the transfusion of red blood cell concentrates, while preserving patient safety. For each AABT, the main question formulated, positively or negatively, is: « Does this particular AABT reduce the transfusion rate or not?¼ All the recommendations on the use of AABTs were formulated according to the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/standards , Complementary Therapies , Humans , Patient Safety , Surgical Procedures, Operative
16.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 36(1): 1-25, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36322133

ABSTRACT

We do not know the precise figure for solid organ tumors diagnosed each year in Spain and it is therefore difficult to calculate whether there has been a decrease in cancer diagnoses as a consequence of the pandemic. Some indirect data suggest that the pandemic has worsened the stage at which some non-hematological neoplasms are diagnosed. Despite the lack of robust evidence, oncology patients seem more likely to have a poor outcome when they contract COVID-19. The antibody response to infection in cancer patients will be fundamentally conditioned by the type of neoplasia present, the treatment received and the time of its administration. In patients with hematological malignancies, the incidence of infection is probably similar or lower than in the general population, due to the better protective measures adopted by the patients and their environment. The severity and mortality of COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancies is clearly higher than the general population. Since the immune response to vaccination in hematologic patients is generally worse than in comparable populations, alternative methods of prevention must be established in these patients, as well as actions for earlier diagnosis and treatment. Campaigns for the early diagnosis of malignant neoplasms must be urgently resumed, post-COVID manifestations should be monitored, collaboration with patient associations is indisputable and it is urgent to draw the right conclusions to improve our preparedness to fight against possible future catastrophes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/diagnosis , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Spain/epidemiology , Vaccination , COVID-19 Testing
17.
Haemophilia ; 18(3): 431-6, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21999231

ABSTRACT

Recombinant factor VIIa is indicated for treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors; in FVII deficiency and in Glanzmann's thrombasthenia. The aim of the study reported here was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles between two formulations of rFVIIa that are produced in two different cell lines and media: Chinese hamster ovary cells cultured in a serum-free medium (CHO-rFVIIa) and baby hamster kidney cells cultured in a non-human serum-based medium (BHK-rFVIIa). Two clinical trials were performed; one in healthy subjects and the other in patients with congenital haemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors. Subjects were recruited into a two-way crossover trial and were randomized to receive a dose of CHO-rFVIIa and BHK-rFVIIa. Healthy subjects received one dose of 90 µg CHO-rFVIIa kg(-1) bodyweight (bw) in the newly developed room-temperature stable rFVIIa formulation and one dose of 90 µg BHK-rFVIIa kg(-1) bw, in the original rFVIIa formulation. Patients with haemophilia received one dose of 270 µg CHO-rFVIIa kg(-1) and one dose of 270 µg BHK-rFVIIa kg(-1), both in the room-temperature stable formulation. The trials showed higher FVII activity levels [higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)] following administration of CHO-rFVIIa than after BHK-rFVIIa. Therefore, bioequivalence could not be established. The difference in FVII activity levels is believed to be a result of different glycosylation patterns between the two products. Neither the use of CHO-rFVIIa nor the use of one single dose of 270 µg kg(-1) of the newly developed room-temperature stable rFVIIa raised any safety concerns.


Subject(s)
Coagulants/pharmacokinetics , Factor VIIa/pharmacokinetics , Hemophilia A/metabolism , Hemophilia B/metabolism , Adult , Area Under Curve , Cell Culture Techniques , Cells, Cultured , Cross-Over Studies , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia B/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacokinetics , Therapeutic Equivalency , Young Adult
18.
Haemophilia ; 18(5): 708-13, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22621702

ABSTRACT

We performed molecular analysis of the factor 8 gene (F8) in 272 unrelated Spanish patients with haemophilia A (HA) and detected a mutation by routine analysis in 267 of them (98.1%). No mutation was detected in the remaining five patients despite clinical and laboratory confirmation of HA. The aim is to describe the molecular alterations in F8 discovered by gene dosage methodologies in three of these patients. For methodology, F8 sequencing, intragenic marker analysis, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and quantitative real time-PCR were followed. One patient had Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY) and a large deletion spanning exons 1-12 masked by the other F8 allele; the second patient showed a large duplication spanning exons 2-10 and the third patient revealed a non-contiguous double duplication of exons 14 and 23-25. The remaining two patients had mild HA and dosage results were normal. The application of gene dosage methods is useful to define haemophilic patients in whom mutations are not detected using other routine methods. Nevertheless, in a small percentage of patients (<1%), no molecular pathology can be identified after testing several genetic methodologies.


Subject(s)
Factor VIII/genetics , Gene Dosage , Hemophilia A/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , DNA Mutational Analysis , Exons , Gene Duplication , Hemophilia A/complications , Humans , Klinefelter Syndrome/complications , Klinefelter Syndrome/genetics , Male , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Pedigree , Sequence Deletion , Spain
19.
Haemophilia ; 18 Suppl 2: 24-36, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22530576

ABSTRACT

Development of FVIII inhibitors is currently the most severe and challenging complication of haemophilia A treatment and represents a very large economic burden for a chronic disease. As a result, clinical research is making major efforts to optimize the therapeutic approaches for this condition. In this section we will review some important aspects of the management of haemophilia in adults, including an overview of bleeding in women with von Willebrand disease, an analysis of FVIII consumption in patients with severe haemophilia A, an update of the ongoing RES.I.ST study, long-term prophylaxis and experience from the Pro.Will study, current evidence relating to economic aspects of the treatment of haemophilic patients with inhibitors (based on the PROFIT study), and an overview of musculoskeletal complications in adults with severe bleeding disorders.


Subject(s)
Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , von Willebrand Diseases/drug therapy , von Willebrand Factor/therapeutic use , Adult , Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors/immunology , Female , Hemophilia A/immunology , Humans , Immune Tolerance/immunology , Male , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Pregnancy , von Willebrand Diseases/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL