Ethnic discordance in serum anti-Müllerian hormone in European and Indian healthy women and Indian infertile women.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) differ between healthy European and Indian women, and are potential ethnic differences modified by infertility diagnosis? DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of three prospectively recruited cohorts (n = 2758); healthy European women (n = 758), healthy community cohort from Kolhapur, India (n = 400) and infertility cohort from Kolhapur, India (n = 1600). AMH was determined by assay. Ethnicity, age and cause of infertility were modelled using additive quantile regression models. RESULTS: Healthy Indian women had lower AMH than their healthy European counterparts (population estimates 20.0% lower [95% CI 7.2-36.5]), with increasing discordance with increasing age; at 25 years AMH was 11.9% lower (95% CI 9.4-14.1), increasing to 40.0% lower (95% CI 0-64.6) by age 45. Comparison of healthy and infertile Indian women revealed differences that were related to cause of infertility. Women whose male partner had severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (n = 95) had similar AMH to controls; women with polycystic ovary syndrome (n = 220) had higher AMH, especially in those <30 years, and in women with a principal diagnosis of unexplained infertility (n = 757) AMH was lower (median difference 22.6% lower; 95% CI 9.1-37.7) than controls. CONCLUSIONS: AMH is substantially lower in healthy Indian women at all ages than their European counterparts. Infertile Indian women have variable differences in AMH from healthy Indian controls, with the extent and direction of differences primarily reflecting the underlying cause of infertility. Recognition of ethnic and cause-specific differences are critical to ensure accurate contextualizing of results and clinical outcomes for patients.

Association of AMH and AMHR2 gene polymorphisms with ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes in Indian women.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and AMH type II receptor (AMHR2) genes with ovarian response and clinical pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. METHODS: In this prospective study, we genotyped AMH polymorphisms (c. -649 T > C, c. 146 T > G, c. 252 G > A, and c. 303 G > A) in 365 women and AMHR2 polymorphisms (c. -482 A > G, c. 622-6 C > T, c. 4952 G > A, c. 10 A > G) in 80 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF. RESULTS: Higher doses of exogenous FSH and lower numbers of preovulatory follicles were noted in women having AMH c. -649 T > C and AMH c. -146 T > G polymorphisms, respectively. Overall, we found that the presence of a polymorphic genotype (homozygous or heterozygous) at positions c. -649 T > C, c. 146 T > G, c. 252 G > A, and c. 303 G > A in the AMH gene was associated with higher doses of FSH for ovulation induction (p < 0.001). Interestingly, a higher live birth rate was noted in women with a homozygous polymorphic genotype for all four AMH SNPs investigated while none of the women showing a homozygous polymorphic genotype at all AMHR2 SNPs investigated in this study had a live birth. CONCLUSION: Our results show that presence of AMHR2 SNPs (c. 482 A > G, c. 622-6 C > T, c. 4952 G > A, and c. 10 A > G) negatively correlate with live birth rate. However, these findings need to be validated by using larger sample size.

Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Fertility Treatment Decisions in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Literature Review.

Anti-Mullerian hormone is a robust marker of ovarian reserve and ovarian response in in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, its role extends beyond improving the safety of IVF by aiding in choosing appropriate protocols and dosing. This review looks at the value of pre-treatment anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) value in choosing the appropriate modality of treatment and its predictive ability for the outcomes of such treatment. It briefly addresses the factors that may modulate AMH levels and make clinical decision-making challenging.

Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective.

Controlled ovarian stimulation has been an integral part of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment cycles. Availability of different gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for prevention of premature rise of leutinising hormone during follicular phase offer an opportunity to utilise them for a successful outcome in women with different subsets of ovarian response. Further, use of GnRH agonist as an alternative for human chorionic gonadotropin improves safety of ovarian stimulation in hyper-responders. Mild ovarian stimulation protocols have emerged as an alternative to conventional protocols in the recent years. Individualisation plays an important role in improving safety of IVF in hyper-responders while efforts continue to improve efficacy in poor responders. Some of the follicular and peri-ovulatory phase interventions may be associated with negative impact on the luteal phase and segmentalisation of the treatment with frozen embryo transfer may be an effective strategy in such a clinical scenario. This narrative review looks at the available evidence on various aspects of ovarian stimulation strategies and their consequences. In addition, it provides a concise summary of the evidence that has emerged from India on various aspects of ovarian stimulation.

Resuming Assisted Reproduction Services during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Initial Indian Experience.

BACKGROUND: The pandemic of COVID-19 has affected many countries and medical services including assisted reproductive treatment (ART) have been hampered. AIM: The study was conducted to assess the preparedness of ART clinics and staff to resume services; patients' reasons to initiate treatment; and key performance indicators (KPIs) of ART laboratories during the pandemic. SETTING AND DESIGN: This was a semidescriptive, prospective study in two private in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics in Maharashtra, India, when COVID-19 testing for asymptomatic people was unavailable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Time required for replenishing consumables and clinic preparedness to function under "new norms" of pandemic was documented. Infection mitigation measures and triaging strategy were evaluated. KPIs following resumption were analyzed. The Student's t-test was performed for comparing parameters. RESULTS: Thirty percent of the patients consulted through telemedicine accepted or were eligible to initiate treatment on clinic resumption. Lack of safe transport and financial constraints prevented majority from undergoing IVF, and 9% delayed treatment due to fear of pandemic. With adequate training, staff compliance to meet new demands was achieved within a week, but procuring consumables and injections was time-consuming. Fifty-two cycles of IVF were performed including fresh and frozen embryo transfers with satisfactory KPIs even during pandemic. Conscious sedation and analgesia during oocyte retrieval were associated with reduced procedure time and no intervention for airway maintenance compared to general anesthesia. Self-reported pain scores by patients ranged from nil to mild on a graphic rating scale. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides practical insight for the resumption of IVF services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Poor ovarian reserve.

Poor ovarian reserve (POR) is an important limiting factor for the success of any treatment modality for infertility. It indicates a reduction in quantity and quality of oocytes in women of reproductive age group. It may be age related as seen in advanced years of reproductive life or may occur in young women due to diverse etiological factors. Evaluating ovarian reserve and individualizing the therapeutic strategies are very important for optimizing the success rate. Majority or women with POR need to undergo in vitro fertilization to achieve pregnancy. However, pregnancy rate remains low despite a plethora of interventions and is associated with high pregnancy loss. Early detection and active management are essential to minimize the need for egg donation in these women.