Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 263
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Allergy ; 79(5): 1291-1305, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38263750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: p-Phenylenediamine (PPD) is a potent contact allergen found in many hair colour products. However, not all individuals develop allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) although they are regularly exposed to PPD. It is unclear whether these asymptomatic individuals are true non-responders to PPD or whether they mount a response to PPD without showing any symptoms. METHODS: Skin biopsies were collected from 11 asymptomatic hairdressers regularly exposed to PPD and from 10 individuals with known ACD on day 4 after patch testing with 1% PPD in petrolatum and petrolatum exclusively as control. RNA sequencing and confocal microscopy were performed. RESULTS: T cell activation, inflammation and apoptosis pathways were up-regulated by PPD in both asymptomatic and allergic individuals. Compared to asymptomatic individuals with a negative patch test, individuals with a strong reaction to PPD strongly up-regulated both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines genes. Interestingly, PPD treatment induced significant up-regulation of several genes for chemokines, classical type 2 dendritic cell markers and regulatory T cell markers in both asymptomatic and allergic individuals. In addition, apoptosis signalling pathway was activated in both non-responders and allergic individuals. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that there are no true non-responders to PPD but that the immune response elicited by PPD differs between individuals and can lead to either tolerance, subclinical inflammation or allergy.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Phenylenediamines , Skin , Humans , Phenylenediamines/pharmacology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/genetics , Skin/immunology , Skin/pathology , Skin/metabolism , Male , Adult , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Immune Tolerance , Cytokines/metabolism , Allergens/immunology , Middle Aged , Hair Dyes/adverse effects , Young Adult , Patch Tests , Apoptosis
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(2): 116-125, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37735996

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rubber accelerators are used in the production of rubber gloves and may cause contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To estimate long-term trend and prevalence of contact allergy to rubber accelerators for a 30-year period in Denmark, high-risk occupations, and exposures. METHODS: Data from all patients with contact dermatitis consecutively patch tested at the department of Skin and Allergy Gentofte hospital with the rubber accelerators from the European baseline series (EBS) from 1990 to 2019, were analysed. Further, patients under suspicion of rubber accelerator contact allergy were additionally patch-tested with rubber accelerators from the specialised rubber series from 2005 to 2019 and these were additional extracted. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of contact allergy to one or more of the rubber accelerators from the EBS series was 2.7% with a significant decline in the first 12-years, followed by a stable frequency in the past 18-years. Associations with occupational contact dermatitis, hand dermatitis, and leg/foot dermatitis were found. Wet-work occupations were most often affected and gloves the most frequent exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Contact allergy to one or more of the rubber accelerators from the EBS is frequent and has been unchanged for several decades, which calls for prevention.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Latex Hypersensitivity , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Rubber/adverse effects , Patch Tests/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/complications , Latex Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Eczema/epidemiology , Eczema/complications , Denmark/epidemiology
3.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(2): 143-152, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37752672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) is a common occupational disease. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a known risk factor for OCD. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of previously diagnosed AD among young workers with recognized OCD and assess its impact on OCD prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study. A questionnaire was sent to 6251 workers with recognized OCD who were under 35 years at notification (response rate: 47%). Of the respondents, 2392 answered a question about previous doctor-diagnosed AD and were included in the study. Eczema severity, occupational consequences and quality of life were examined using statistical analyses comparing workers with and without previously diagnosed AD. RESULTS: The prevalence of previously diagnosed AD was 41.8% (95% CI: 39.8-43.8). Women had a higher AD prevalence, and workers with AD reported OCD at a younger age. Workers with AD reported more frequent and severe eczema symptoms and had a higher risk of OCD negatively affecting job and occupation choices. Health-related quality of life was more adversely affected in workers with AD. CONCLUSIONS: AD significantly impacts severity and has long-term consequences for young people with OCD. Targeted prevention strategies need to be developed.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Atopic , Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Eczema/complications
4.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(1): 1-10, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577784

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nickel is the leading cause of contact allergy in Europe, with 14.5% of the adult population being sensitized. Despite regulations limiting nickel release from consumer items, the incidence and prevalence of nickel allergy remain high. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical and subclinical immune response to low-dose nickel exposure on nickel pre-exposed skin to assess the adequacy of current regulatory limits. METHOD: Nickel-allergic and healthy controls were patch tested with nickel twice with a 3-4 weeks interval. The first exposure used the diagnostic concentration of 2000 µg/cm2 nickel sulphate, and the same skin areas were then re-exposed to 0.2, 0.5, 12.8 and 370 µg/cm2 nickel sulphate. After 48 h, the patch reactions were examined for clinical signs of eczema, and skin biopsies were collected. The transcriptomic immune profile was analysed with Nanostring nCounter and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Two nickel-allergic participants (15%) had clinical reactions to the regulatory limiting doses for nickel (0.2/0.5 µg/cm2) following re-exposure. There was immune activation in all skin areas following re-exposure to nickel, predominantly mediated by up-regulation of cytokines and chemokines. In all nickel re-exposed skin areas, 81 genes were up-regulated independent from the clinical response. In skin areas exposed to 0.2 µg/cm2, 101 immune-related genes were differentially expressed, even when no clinical response was observed. Healthy controls showed up-regulation of three genes in response to nickel re-exposures without any clinical reactions. CONCLUSION: Immune activation can be induced in skin with local memory to nickel upon challenge with nickel doses within the regulatory limits. Our findings suggest that the regulatory limits in the European nickel regulation may not provide sufficient protection for consumers against low-dose exposures.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Nickel , Patch Tests , Humans , Nickel/adverse effects , Nickel/immunology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cytokines/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Young Adult , Skin/drug effects , Skin/immunology
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(3): 280-290, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) is a prevalent, often chronic disease that poses a risk for job loss and decreased quality of life. In Germany, a multi-step prevention programme emphasising early detection and highly specialised multidisciplinary treatment has been implemented with great success. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of a Danish-adapted version of the German prevention effort on OCD severity, quality of life and occupational consequences at 3-month follow-up. METHODS: Randomised, controlled trial. Participants were recruited after the first referral from General Practitioner to Dermatologist with suspected OCD. The intervention group (IG) received a Danish-adapted, multidisciplinary intervention, while the control group (CG) navigated the Danish healthcare system without interference from the study. OCD severity, occupational consequences and quality of life were assessed at 3-month follow-up using self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease in the severity of eczema was found at 3-month follow-up in the IG compared to the CG. The IG were statistically significantly more likely to have seen a dermatologist at 3-month follow-up. Higher treatment level in the IG was indicated by the results but was not statistically significant. No significant difference was found in quality of life or occupational consequences. CONCLUSIONS: These initial findings suggest that early and specialised treatment of OCD improves OCD prognosis.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/prevention & control , Follow-Up Studies , Quality of Life , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Denmark/epidemiology
6.
Br J Dermatol ; 189(1): 114-124, 2023 07 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37052074

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a highly prevalent and disabling skin disease, it is currently unknown if CHE is associated with systemic inflammation. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the plasma inflammatory signature of CHE. METHODS: Using Proximity Extension Assay technology, we assessed 266 inflammatory and cardiovascular disease risk proteins in the plasma of 40 healthy controls, 57 patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) with active lesions, 11 with CHE and a history of AD (CHEPREVIOUS_AD), and 40 with CHE and no history of AD (CHENO_AD). Filaggrin gene mutation status was also assessed. Protein expression was compared between groups and according to disease severity. Correlation analyses for biomarkers, and clinical- and self-reported variables, were performed. RESULTS: Very severe CHENO_AD was associated with systemic inflammation when compared with controls. Levels of T helper (Th)2- and Th1-, general inflammation and eosinophil activation markers increased with severity of CHENO_AD, primarily being significantly increased in very severe disease. Significant, positive correlations were found between markers from these pathways and severity of CHENO_AD. Moderate-to-severe but not mild AD displayed systemic inflammation. The Th2 markers C-C motif chemokine (CCL)17 and CCL13 (also known as monocyte chemotactic protein 4) were the top differentially expressed proteins in both very severe CHENO_AD and moderate-to-severe AD, showing a higher fold change and significance in AD. CCL17 and CCL13 levels further correlated positively with disease severity in both CHENO_AD and AD. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic Th2-driven inflammation is shared between very severe CHE with no history of AD, and moderate-to-severe AD, suggesting that Th2 cell targeting could be effective in several CHE subtypes.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Eczema , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Inflammation , Biomarkers/metabolism , Patient Acuity , Proteins
7.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 23(5): 267-275, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37043158

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study aims to provide an overview on current knowledge on occupational allergic diseases in hairdressers and up-to-date perspectives of prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: Hand eczema (dermatitis) is common in hairdressers, often caused by contact allergy to one or multiple small molecules (haptens) used, e.g., for dyeing, bleaching, and waving/relaxing or by ancillary substances such as preservatives. Hairdressers, compared to other patch-tested patients, have an up to fivefold increased risk to be found sensitized, e.g., against p-phenylenediamine, ammonium persulfate, and glyceryl thioglycolate. Some of these small molecules may induce respiratory sensitization causing allergic rhinitis and/or asthma, notably persulfate salts. Occupational hazards in hairdressing are well described. This knowledge needs to be put into use for risk reduction, mainly by substitution of allergenic ingredients by less allergenic ones, education, and use of ventilation and suitable single-use gloves.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Hair Dyes , Hair Preparations , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Hair Dyes/adverse effects , Hair Preparations/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/prevention & control , Allergens/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control
8.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(1): 1-9, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36208426

ABSTRACT

Occupational hand eczema is frequent in metalworkers. The contribution of metal allergies is poorly elucidated even though such exposures are common at the workplace. To estimate the prevalence of metal allergy to cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni) in metalworkers and compare these to estimates from the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA). Two authors independently searched PubMed for studies reporting on the prevalence of metal allergy in metalworkers. Proportion meta-analyses were performed to calculate the pooled proportions of metal allergy in metalworkers. In total, 29 studies (22 from Europe) were included yielding 5691 subjects for quantitative analysis. The pooled proportion (95% confidence interval) of Co, Cr and Ni in European metalworkers with dermatitis referred to patch test clinics was 8.2% (5.3%-11.7%), 8.0% (5.1%-11.4%), and 11.0% (7.3%-15.4%), respectively. The corresponding estimates for unselected metalworkers from workplace studies were 4.9% (2.4%-8.1%), 5.2% (1.0%-12.6%), and 7.6% (3.8%-12.6%), respectively. In comparison, the prevalence of metal allergy in 13 382 consecutive European males with dermatitis was 3.9% (3.6%-4.2%), 4.4% (4.1%-4.8%) and 6.7% (6.3%-7.0%) for Co, Cr and Ni, respectively. Data on sex, age, body piercings and atopic dermatitis in metalworkers with metal allergy was mostly lacking. Metal allergy to all three metals was significantly more common in European metalworkers with dermatitis attending patch test clinics as compared to ESSCA data, indicating a relationship to occupational exposures, however, confounders could not be accounted for.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Male , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Patch Tests , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Metals/adverse effects , Nickel/adverse effects , Cobalt/adverse effects , Chromium/adverse effects , Prevalence
9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(4): 275-285, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36495303

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hairdressers are exposed to wet work and manifold allergens at work, rendering exposure complex and the aetiology of occupational hand eczema (OHE) often multifactorial in this occupational group. OBJECTIVES: To identify exposure patterns associated with increased risk of hand eczema in hairdressers. METHODS: All hairdressers graduating from 2004 to 2007 and 2015 to 2018 received a questionnaire in 2009 and 2020, respectively. Current exposures (with or without regular glove use) and OHE were self-reported, and their association examined. Patterns of exposure were identified by latent class analysis (LCA). RESULTS: A total response of 39.9% (668/1675) was obtained. Six exposure profiles (#1-6) were identified by LCA across 11 tasks performed with or without gloves as well as deep conditioning, that is, 23 task items. Compared to profile #1 with the lowest OHE risk (reference) an increased risk of current OHE were seen in profile #4 [adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-44.8 and #6 (aOR 39.4, 95%CI 6.1-362.8)] in logistic regression analysis. Profile #1 and #6 had performed the same tasks, but in profile #6 regular glove use was performed in 9.1% (1/ 11) of tasks compared to 72.7% (8/11) of tasks in profile #1 (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although occupational exposures in hairdressing are complex, meaningful patterns associated with a wide range of OHE risk can be identified by LCA. The increase of OHE risk seems predominantly to be due to poor compliance with protective gloves. LCA could be applied to further fields of complex (skin) exposures.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Eczema/etiology , Allergens , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(2): 93-108, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36254351

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The burden of occupational hand eczema in hairdressers is high, and (partly strong) allergens abound in the hair cosmetic products they use. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review published evidence concerning contact allergy to an indicative list of active ingredients of hair cosmetics, namely, p-phenylenediamine (PPD), toluene-2,5-diamine (PTD), persulfates, mostly ammonium persulfate (APS), glyceryl thioglycolate (GMTG), and ammonium thioglycolate (ATG), concerning the prevalence of sensitization, particularly in terms of a comparison (relative risk; RR) between hairdressers and non-hairdressers. METHODS: Following a PROSPERO-registered and published protocol, eligible literature published from 2000 to February 2021 was identified, yielding 322 publications, and extracted in standardized publication record forms, also considering risk of bias. RESULTS: Based on 141 publications, the contact allergy prevalence to PPD was 4.3% (95% CI: 3.8-4.9%) in consecutively patch tested patients. Other ingredients were mostly tested in an aimed fashion, yielding variable, and partly high contact allergy prevalences. Where possible, the RR was calculated, yielding an average increased sensitization risk in hairdressers of between 5.4 (PPD) and 3.4 (ATG). Additional evidence related to immediate-type hypersensitivity, experimental results, exposures, and information from case reports was qualitatively synthesized. CONCLUSIONS: An excess risk of contact allergy is clearly evident from the pooled published evidence from the last 20 years. This should prompt an improvement in working conditions and product safety.


Subject(s)
Beauty Culture , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Hair Preparations , Hand Dermatoses , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/complications , Hair Dyes/adverse effects , Hair Dyes/chemistry , Hair Preparations/adverse effects , Hair Preparations/chemistry , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/chemically induced , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Patch Tests , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/diagnosis , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Beauty Culture/statistics & numerical data
12.
Allergy ; 77(2): 513-524, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34169536

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is classically described as a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. However, patients often experience flare-ups characterized by itching erythema, edema, and often vesicles occurring within hours after re-exposure of previously sensitized skin to the specific contact allergen. Recent studies have indicated that skin-resident memory T (TRM ) cells play a central role in ACD. However, the pathogenic role of TRM cells in allergen-induced flare-ups is not known. METHODS: By the use of various mouse models and cell depletion protocols, we investigated the role of epidermal TRM cells in flare-up reactions to the experimental contact allergen 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene. The inflammatory response was measured by changes in ear thickness, and the cellular composition in epidermis was determined by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Finally, adaptive transfer and inhibitors were used to determine the role of TRM cells, neutrophils, and CXCL1/CXCL2 in the response. RESULTS: We show that CD8+ TRM cells initiate massive infiltration of neutrophils in the epidermis within 12 h after re-exposure to the contact allergen. Depletion of neutrophils before re-exposure to the allergen abrogated the flare-up reactions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that CD8+ TRM cells mediate neutrophil recruitment by inducing CXCL1 and CXCL2 production in the skin, and that blockage of the C-X-C chemokine receptor type 1 and 2 inhibits flare-up reactions and neutrophil infiltration. CONCLUSION: As the first, we show that epidermal CD8+ TRM cells cause ACD flare-ups by rapid recruitment of neutrophils to the epidermis.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Neutrophils , Allergens , Animals , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/pathology , Humans , Immunologic Memory , Memory T Cells , Mice
13.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 102: adv00818, 2022 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36317860

ABSTRACT

Artificial nail modelling systems (ANMS), encompassing artificial nails and long-lasting nail polish, are sources of acrylate exposure in beauticians and users of ANMS. Hairdressers' exposure to ANMS from self-use and occupational exposure is currently unknown. In 2020 a questionnaire was sent to all hairdressers graduating during 2008 to 2018 in Denmark (n = 4,830). Self-use of ANMS was reported by 87.6% of respondents (1,251/1,428), and application of ANMS to others was reported by 22.1% (316/1,428). Of these, application to others was performed in a salon by 37.1% (109/294), privately by 51.0% (150/294) and in both settings by 11.9% (35/294). Compliance with glove use was seen in 23.0% (67/291) among those applying ANMS to others. Among hairdressers exposed to ANMS, 4.3% (52/1,218) reported ANMS-related hand eczema. Being a trained beautician (adjusted odds ratio 3.26, 95% confidence interval 1.06-9.99) and having had a positive patch-test to acrylates (adjusted odds ratio 7.70, 95% confidence interval 1.44-41.13) were associated with ANMS-related hand dermatitis. In conclusion, hairdressers have a high prevalence of exposure to ANMS and ANMS-related hand dermatitis. Compliance with glove use when applying ANMS to others is poor. Patch-testing with acrylates is valuable in the diagnostic work-up of hand eczema in hairdressers.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Nails , Poland , Eczema/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Acrylates , Denmark/epidemiology
14.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 95(8): 1679-1702, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35316371

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on respiratory effects of persulfate salts (PS) or hair bleaches in hairdressers and animal models exploring mechanisms behind PS-induced asthma. METHODS: A systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed. Studies published from 2000 to July 2021 that fulfilled predefined eligibility criteria were retrieved. Data were not quantitatively synthesized due to the heterogeneity of study designs, outcomes and methods. RESULTS: Forty-two articles were included. PS are indicated as the main cause of occupational rhinitis and asthma in hairdressers, and one of the leading causes of occupational asthma in some European countries. Bleaching products are indicated as the most important factor for development of respiratory symptoms, lung function decline, and leaving the hairdressing profession. Risk estimates from a good quality prospective study showed up to 3.9 times higher risk for wheezing and breathlessness in hairdressers aged ≥ 40 years than in matched controls, and 20 times higher risk in hairdressers to develop respiratory symptoms from exposure to bleaching powder than controls. Pathophysiological mechanisms of the respiratory response to PS are not yet fully elucidated, but may include non-specific and specific immune responses. CONCLUSIONS: Hairdressing is associated with a wide spectrum of respiratory adverse effects, of which bleaching products were indicated as the most hazardous. Preventive measures for reducing inhalatory exposure to PS in hair salons should be re-evaluated, including adopting occupational exposure limits at EU level, and encouraging use of safer bleach formulations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021238118.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Asthma/etiology , Humans , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Powders/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Salts/adverse effects
15.
Contact Dermatitis ; 87(2): 142-153, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35246851

ABSTRACT

In Germany, a stepwise multidisciplinary approach has been established to prevent occupational skin diseases (OSDs), primarily occupational contact dermatitis. This review aims to perform a systematic evaluation of the short- and long-term effects of the German secondary and tertiary individual prevention programmes (SIP and TIP, respectively) for OSDs. Primary outcomes were continuation of employment, severity of hand dermatitis, and quality of life (QoL). The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the effects of the SIP and TIP. A total of 19 studies encompassing 5527 patients with OSDs were included: 11 studies evaluated the SIP and 8 evaluated the TIP. Following the SIP, approximately 70% to 90% and 60% to 70% of patients remained in their occupation after 1 and 5 years, respectively. At 3 years after the TIP, 82.7% of patients remained in their occupation and exhibited a significant decrease in hand dermatitis severity, as well as an increase in QoL. Most of these studies were uncontrolled and the interventions, outcomes, and measurement instruments used were heterogeneous. The SIP and TIP lead to decreased disease severity, improved QoL, and enabled most patients to continue working in their chosen professions. Implementing a similar multidisciplinary approach across Europe may be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational , Secondary Prevention , Tertiary Prevention , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Germany , Humans , Program Evaluation , Quality of Life , Secondary Prevention/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Tertiary Prevention/methods
16.
Contact Dermatitis ; 87(6): 511-520, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36017598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Compliance with glove use and safe work practices are important factors in primary prevention of occupational hand eczema (OHE) in hairdressers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk OHE and compliance with skin protective measures in hairdressers trained before and after implementation of a nationwide skin protection program in Danish hairdressing vocational schools in 2011. METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional study was performed. A questionnaire was sent in 2009 and 2020. The Danish Labour Market Supplementary Pension Scheme provided information on yearly payments from the hairdressing profession. RESULTS: A response rate of 66.6% (305/460) was obtained in the 2009 survey and of 29.9% (363/1215) in the 2020 survey. The career time prevalence of OHE decreased from 42.8% to 29.0% (adjusted odds ratio 0.55 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.77) and the incidence rate of OHE decreased from 57.5 (95%CI 48.4-68.4) to 42.0 (95%CI 34.6-50.9) per 1000 person years (incidence rate ratio 0.73 [95%CI 0.56-0.95] between the two surveys). A statistically significant (P < .05) increase in glove use when doing wet-work and when handling hair dyes, permanent wave solutions and bleaching products was observed in the 2020 compared to the 2009 survey. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that skin protection training during apprenticeship reduces the risk of OHE in hairdressers. The lack of primary prevention of OHE in hairdressing vocational schools may be a missed opportunity in the prevention of the disease.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/prevention & control , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Eczema/epidemiology , Eczema/prevention & control , Eczema/complications , Schools , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control
17.
Contact Dermatitis ; 86(1): 9-14, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34536036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Parents report that children with aluminium contact allergy and vaccination granulomas may react to aluminium-containing sunscreen following application. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether contact dermatitis develops following repeated application of aluminium-containing sunscreens in children with aluminium sensitization and vaccination granulomas. METHODS: Sixteen children aged 2-9 years (mean age 5 years) with vaccination granulomas and a positive patch test reaction to aluminium chloride hexahydrate 2%/10% petrolatum completed a blinded repeated open application test (ROAT) with two daily applications of two sunscreens for 14 days. One cream contained aluminium and the other did not. The children served as their own controls. RESULTS: Sixteen children completed the study. Only one child (6%) had a positive skin reaction during ROAT on day 2 to the sunscreen with aluminium. None reacted to the sunscreen without aluminium. CONCLUSIONS: Use of aluminium-containing sunscreens may on a case basis lead to allergic contact dermatitis in aluminium allergic children.


Subject(s)
Aluminum Chloride/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Patch Tests/methods , Sunscreening Agents/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Female , Humans , Male
18.
Contact Dermatitis ; 86(5): 404-416, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35050514

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies on the causes and consequences of occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) among young workers are non-existent. OBJECTIVES: Determine causes and consequences of OCD among workers younger than 35 years of age. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 6251 workers younger than 35 years at notification with recognized OCD (response rate 47%). RESULTS: The most prevalent occupations were health care workers, kitchen workers, nursery teachers, and hairdressers and beauticians. Seventy-six percent still had eczema, and 77% of these had eczema half to all the time over the last 3 months, with 61% evaluating their eczema as moderate to very severe. Fifty-three percent had changed their occupation since notification, and 42.5% had lost their job because of OCD. Allergic OCD increased the odds ratio (OR) for facial or foot eczema, job loss, change in work tasks, difficulties finding work, decrease in income, and sick leave. Age at notification of 25 years of age or younger increased the risk of job loss and feeling restricted in choice of job. Workers in the food industry had a higher OR for job loss, whereas hairdressers and beauticians had a higher risk of job loss and a decrease in income. CONCLUSIONS: The severe, long-term consequences of OCD notification signify the need for further preventive strategies among young workers.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Adolescent , Denmark/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/complications , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Eczema/complications , Eczema/etiology , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Contact Dermatitis ; 86(2): 71-79, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34812515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No biomarkers have been identified that can classify subtypes of hand eczema (HE). Although skin biopsies represent the gold standard for investigations of the skin, the invasive technique is not favorable when investigating skin from sensitive areas. Recent advances in the use of skin-tape strips for molecular investigations enable noninvasive investigations of HE. OBJECTIVE: By using whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS), the molecular profile of HE according to different localizations on the hands, etiologies, and clinical/morphological subtypes was investigated. METHODS: Thirty adult, Danish HE patients, 12 with and 18 without concurrent atopic dermatitis (AD), as well as 16 controls were included. Tape strip samples were collected from lesional, nonlesional, and healthy skin. Total RNA was extracted and WTS was performed. RESULTS: The largest molecular difference of HE patients with and without AD was found in nonlesional skin areas and included a downregulation of CXCL8 for HE patients without AD. Differences between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis included epidermal biomarkers such as EPHA1. CONCLUSION: Skin tape strip samples could be used to assess the gene expression profile of HE on different localizations of the hands. The skin tape strip method identified new molecular markers that showed promising result for the identification of HE subtypes.


Subject(s)
Hand Dermatoses/diagnosis , Hand Dermatoses/genetics , Specimen Handling/methods , Surgical Tape , Transcriptome , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/metabolism , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/genetics , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/genetics , Dermatitis, Irritant/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Irritant/genetics , Diagnosis, Differential , Down-Regulation , Female , Hand Dermatoses/immunology , Humans , Interleukin-8/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Receptor, EphA1/metabolism , Skin/immunology , Skin/metabolism , Exome Sequencing
20.
Contact Dermatitis ; 86(5): 333-343, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35088418

ABSTRACT

Hairdressers are at high risk of developing occupational hand eczema. Opinions on the health and safety concerns of nonfood consumer products, such as cosmetics and their ingredients, consider the exposure of a "common consumer," which may not account for occupational exposure of hairdressers. As a result, there is a parlous scenario in which serious safety concerns about occupational exposures are present. The purpose of this review is to compare the frequency of exposure to various types of hair cosmetic products among hairdressers and consumers. Database searches for this review yielded a total of 229 articles; 7 publications were ultimately included. The analysis showed that-dependent on the task-hairdressers were exposed 4 to 78 times more than consumers to a wide spectrum of hair cosmetic products used in their daily working life, ranging from shampoos, conditioners, oxidative and nonoxidative hair colors, to bleaching agents. The highest frequency was found for coloring hair with oxidative hair color. Consumer use frequency does not appear to be appropriate for representing hairdresser exposure. The current standards do not effectively address the occupational risks associated with hairdressers' use of cosmetics. The findings of this study should cause current risk-assessment procedures to be reconsidered.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Hair Dyes , Occupational Exposure , Beauty Culture , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Hair/chemistry , Hair Dyes/adverse effects , Hair Dyes/analysis , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL