APE1 and XRCC1 protein expression levels predict cancer-specific survival following radical radiotherapy in bladder cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy offers the potential of bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but only a proportion of tumors respond, and there are no accurate predictive methods. The ability of tumor cells to repair DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation influences radiosensitivity. We therefore investigated the prognostic value of the DNA repair proteins APE1 and XRCC1 in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated by radical radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The tumors of 90 patients with muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma and known clinical outcomes were immunostained with APE1 and XRCC1 antibodies. Levels of protein expression were assessed as a percentage of tumor cells with positive nuclear staining (1,000 cells per tumor). RESULTS: The median percentage of nuclear staining for APE1 was 98.7% (range, 42.2-100%) and for XRCC1 was 96.5% (range, 0.6-99.6%). High expression levels of APE1 or XRCC1 (> or = 95% positivity) were associated with improved patient cancer-specific survival (log-rank, P = 0.02 and 0.006, respectively). In a multivariate Cox regression model, APE1 and XRCC1 expression and hydronephrosis were the only independent predictors of patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Expression levels of both APE1 and XRCC1 proteins were strongly associated with patient outcome following radiotherapy, separating patients with good outcome from the 50% with poor outcome (82% and 44%, 3-year cause-specific survival, respectively). If prospectively validated, this simple test could be incorporated into clinical practice to select patients likely to respond to radiotherapy and consider alternative forms of therapy for those unlikely to respond.

The use of real-time reverse transcription-PCR for prostate-specific antigen mRNA to discriminate between blood samples from healthy volunteers and from patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: A clinical role for nonquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using prostate-specific antigen in blood samples from patients with prostate cancer remains undefined. Assay variation and detection of prostate-specific antigen mRNA illegitimate transcription may explain inconsistent results between studies. Defining levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA expression in blood samples from healthy volunteers and patients with prostate cancer would allow cutoffs to be established to distinguish the two groups. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Quantitative real-time RT-PCR for prostate-specific antigen mRNA was established and levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA measured in bloods samples from healthy volunteers (n=21) and patients with localized (n=27) and metastatic (n=40) prostate cancer. RESULTS: Levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA were significantly higher in blood samples from patients with metastatic prostate cancer than in blood samples from patients with localized prostate cancer (P <0.001) or in blood samples from healthy volunteers (P <0.01); levels between patients with localized prostate cancer and healthy volunteers were no different. Assay sensitivity to detect patients with metastatic prostate cancer was 68% with specificity of 95%. In patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer, monitoring response to hormonal therapy was possible with this assay. No correlation between levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA and serum prostate-specific antigen protein levels was found, suggesting that prostate-specific antigen mRNA and serum prostate-specific antigen protein levels reflect different features of prostate cancer, i.e., circulating tumor cells and total tumor bulk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative RT-PCR discriminates patients with metastatic prostate cancer from healthy volunteers and patients with localized prostate cancer but cannot discriminate patients with localized prostate cancer from healthy volunteers. A role for quantitative RT-PCR has been identified in the assessment and monitoring of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

MRE11 expression is predictive of cause-specific survival following radical radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Radical radiotherapy and surgery achieve similar cure rates in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but the choice of which treatment would be most beneficial cannot currently be predicted for individual patients. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether expression of any of a panel of DNA damage signaling proteins in tumor samples taken before irradiation could be used as a predictive marker of radiotherapy response, or rather was prognostic. Protein expression of MRE11, RAD50, NBS1, ATM, and H2AX was studied by immunohistochemistry in pretreatment tumor specimens from two cohorts of bladder cancer patients (validation cohort prospectively acquired) treated with radical radiotherapy and one cohort of cystectomy patients. In the radiotherapy test cohort (n = 86), low tumor MRE11 expression was associated with worse cancer-specific survival compared with high expression [43.1% versus 68.7% 3-year cause-specific survival (CSS), P = 0.012] by Kaplan-Meier analysis. This was confirmed in the radiotherapy validation cohort (n = 93; 43.0% versus 71.2%, P = 0.020). However, in the cystectomy cohort (n = 88), MRE11 expression was not associated with cancer-specific survival, commensurate with MRE11 being a predictive marker. High MRE11 expression in the combined radiotherapy cohort had a significantly better cancer-specific survival compared with the high-expression cystectomy cohort (69.9% versus 53.8% 3-year CSS, P = 0.021). In this validated immunohistochemistry study, MRE11 protein expression was shown and confirmed as a predictive factor associated with survival following bladder cancer radiotherapy, justifying its inclusion in subsequent trial designs. MRE11 expression may ultimately allow patient selection for radiotherapy or cystectomy, thus improving overall cure rates.