An Adaptor Hierarchy Regulates Proteolysis during a Bacterial Cell Cycle.

Regulated protein degradation is essential. The timed destruction of crucial proteins by the ClpXP protease drives cell-cycle progression in the bacterium Caulobacter crescentus. Although ClpXP is active alone, additional factors are inexplicably required for cell-cycle-dependent proteolysis. Here, we show that these factors constitute an adaptor hierarchy wherein different substrates are destroyed based on the degree of adaptor assembly. The hierarchy builds upon priming of ClpXP by the adaptor CpdR, which promotes degradation of one class of substrates and also recruits the adaptor RcdA to degrade a second class of substrates. Adding the PopA adaptor promotes destruction of a third class of substrates and inhibits degradation of the second class. We dissect RcdA to generate bespoke adaptors, identifying critical substrate elements needed for RcdA recognition and uncovering additional cell-cycle-dependent ClpXP substrates. Our work reveals how hierarchical adaptors and primed proteases orchestrate regulated proteolysis during bacterial cell-cycle progression.

Regulated Proteolysis in Bacteria: Caulobacter.

Protein degradation is essential for all living things. Bacteria use energy-dependent proteases to control protein destruction in a highly specific manner. Recognition of substrates is determined by the inherent specificity of the proteases and through adaptor proteins that alter the spectrum of substrates. In the α-proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus, regulated protein degradation is required for stress responses, developmental transitions, and cell cycle progression. In this review, we describe recent progress in our understanding of the regulated and stress-responsive protein degradation pathways in Caulobacter. We discuss how organization of highly specific adaptors into functional hierarchies drives destruction of proteins during the bacterial cell cycle. Because all cells must balance the need for degradation of many true substrates with the toxic consequences of nonspecific protein destruction, principles found in one system likely generalize to others.

Polar Localization Hub Protein PopZ Restrains Adaptor-Dependent ClpXP Proteolysis in Caulobacter crescentus.

In Caulobacter crescentus, timely degradation of several proteins by the ClpXP protease is critical for proper cell cycle progression. During the cell cycle, the ClpXP protease, the substrate CtrA, and many other proteins are localized to the stalked pole dependent on a polar interaction hub composed of PopZ protein oligomers. Prior work suggests that the localization of ClpXP, protease substrates, and cofactors is needed for recognition of substrates, such as CtrA, by ClpXP. Here, we formally test this hypothesis by examining the role of PopZ in ClpXP activity and find, surprisingly, that CtrA degradation is enhanced in cells lacking polar localization due to loss of PopZ. The ClpXP adaptor CpdR is required for this enhanced degradation of CtrA and other adaptor-dependent substrates, but adaptor-independent substrate degradation is not affected upon loss of PopZ. We find that overexpression of PopZ also leads to faster degradation of CtrA but is likely due to nonphysiologically relevant recognition of CtrA by ClpXP alone, as loss of CpdR does not affect this enhancement. Our main conclusion is that loss of PopZ, and therefore loss of polar localization, does not result in the loss of ClpXP-regulated proteolysis, as would be predicted from a model which requires polar localization of ClpXP for its activation. Rather, our data point to a model where PopZ normally restrains ClpXP proteolysis by promoting the inactivation of the CpdR adaptor, perhaps through the activity and localization of the CckA kinase.IMPORTANCE Regulated proteolysis is critical for the cell cycle progression of bacteria, such as Caulobacter crescentus According to one model, this regulated proteolysis requires localization of the ClpXP protease at the stalked pole for its subsequent degradation of substrates, such as CtrA. This study offers evidence that supports an alternative model to explain how localization might influence protein degradation. Using a delocalized in vivo system created by the deletion of a polar organizing protein, PopZ, we show that activation of the ClpXP protease is independent of its polar localization. The data point to a role for PopZ in restraining ClpXP activity, likely by controlling the activity of upstream regulators of protease activity, such as CckA, though changes in its localization.

Cargo engagement protects protease adaptors from degradation in a substrate-specific manner.

Protein degradation in bacteria is a highly controlled process involving proteolytic adaptors that regulate protein degradation during cell cycle progression or during stress responses. Many adaptors work as scaffolds that selectively bind cargo and tether substrates to their cognate proteases to promote substrate destruction, whereas others primarily activate the target protease. Because adaptors must bind their cognate protease, all adaptors run the risk of being recognized by the protease as substrates themselves, a process that could limit their effectiveness. Here we use purified proteins in a reconstituted system and in vivo studies to show that adaptors of the ClpXP protease are readily degraded but that cargo binding inhibits this degradation. We found that this principle extends across several adaptor systems, including the hierarchical adaptors that drive the Caulobacter bacterial cell cycle and the quality control adaptor SspB. We also found that the ability of a cargo to protect its adaptor is adaptor substrate-specific, as adaptors with artificial degradation tags were not protected even though cargo binding is unaffected. Our work points to an optimization of inherent adaptor degradation and cargo binding that ensures that robust adaptor activity is maintained when high amounts of substrate must be delivered and that adaptors can be eliminated when their tasks have been completed.

Elucidating heavy/light chain pairing preferences to facilitate the assembly of bispecific IgG in single cells.

Multiple strategies have been developed to facilitate the efficient production of bispecific IgG (BsIgG) in single host cells. For example, we previously demonstrated near quantitative (≥90%) formation of BsIgG of different species and isotypes by combining 'knob-into-hole' mutations for heavy chain heterodimerization with engineered antigen-binding fragments (Fabs) for preferential cognate heavy/light chain pairing. Surprisingly, in this study we found high yield (>65%) of BsIgG1without Fab engineering to be a common occurrence, i.e., observed for 33 of the 99 different antibody pairs evaluated. Installing charge mutations at both CH1/CL interfaces was sufficient for near quantitative yield (>90%) of BsIgG1 for most (9 of 11) antibody pairs tested with this inherent cognate chain pairing preference. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that a strong cognate pairing preference in one Fab arm can be sufficient for high BsIgG1 yield. These observed chain pairing preferences are apparently driven by variable domain sequences and can result from a few specific residues in the complementarity-determining region (CDR) L3 and H3. Transfer of these CDR residues into other antibodies increased BsIgG1 yield in most cases. Mutational analysis revealed that the disulfide bond between heavy and light chains did not affect the yield of BsIgG1. This study provides some mechanistic understanding of factors contributing to antibody heavy/light chain pairing preference and subsequently contributes to the efficient production of BsIgG in single host cells.