Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 150, 2024 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528271

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Surveys generate valuable data in epidemiologic and qualitative clinical research. The quality of a survey depends on its design, the number of responses it receives, and the reporting of the results. In this study, we aimed to assess the quality of surveys in neurosurgery. METHODS: Neurosurgical surveys published between 2000 and 2020 (inclusive) were identified from PubMed. Various datapoints regarding the surveys were collated. The number of citations received by the papers was determined from Google Scholar. A 6-dimensional quality assessment tool was applied to the surveys. Parameters from this tool were combined with the number of responses received to create the survey quality score (SQS). RESULTS: A total of 618 surveys were included for analysis. The target sample size correlated with the number of responses received. The response rate correlated positively with the target sample size and the number of reminders sent and negatively with the number of questions in the survey. The median number of authors on neurosurgery survey papers was 6. The number of authors correlated with the SQS and the number of citations received by published survey papers. The median normalized SQS for neurosurgical surveys was 65%. The nSQS independently predicted the citations received per year by surveys. CONCLUSIONS: The modifiable factors that correlated with improvements in survey design were optimizing the number of questions, maximizing the target sample size, and incorporating reminders in the survey design. Increasing the number of contributing authors led to improvements in survey quality. The SQS was validated and correlated well with the citations received by surveys.


Subject(s)
Neurosurgery , Humans , Neurosurgical Procedures , Publications , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Res Sq ; 2024 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947068

ABSTRACT

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC) poses a significant challenge due to its poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Recently, Cancer/testis antigens (CTAs) have emerged as potential therapy targets due to their high expression in tumor cells and their immunogenic nature. We aimed to explore the expression and co-expression of CTAs in GEAC. We analyzed 63 GEAC patients initially and validated our findings in 329 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. CTA expression was measured after RNA sequencing, while clinical information, including survival outcomes and treatment details, was collected from an institutional database. Co-expression patterns among CTAs were determined using Pearson correlation analysis. The majority of the study cohort were male (87%), Caucasian (94%), and had stage IV disease (64%). CTAs were highly prevalent, ranging from 58-19%. The MAGE gene family showed the highest expression, consistent across both cohorts. The correlation matrix revealed a distinct cluster of significantly co-expressed genes, including MAGEA3, NY-ESO-1, and others (0.27 ≤ r ≤ 0.73). Survival analysis revealed that individual CTAs were associated with poorer survival outcomes in patients not receiving immunotherapy while showing potential for improved survival in those undergoing immunotherapy, although these findings lacked robust reliability. Our study provides a comprehensive characterization of CTA expression and co-expression in GEAC. The strong correlation among CTAs like MAGE, NY-ESO-1, and GAGE suggests a potential for therapies targeting multiple CTAs simultaneously. Further research, including prospective trials, is warranted to assess the prognostic value of CTAs and their suitability as therapeutic targets.

3.
Med Oncol ; 41(9): 227, 2024 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39143271

ABSTRACT

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC) poses a significant challenge due to its poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Recently, Cancer/testis antigens (CTAs) have emerged as potential therapy targets due to their high expression in tumor cells and their immunogenic nature. We aimed to explore the expression and co-expression of CTAs in GEAC. We analyzed 63 GEAC patients initially and validated our findings in 329 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. CTA expression was measured after RNA sequencing, while clinical information, including survival outcomes and treatment details, was collected from an institutional database. Co-expression patterns among CTAs were determined using Spearman correlation analysis. The majority of the study cohort were male (87%), Caucasian (94%), and had stage IV disease (64%). CTAs were highly prevalent, ranging from 58 to 19%. The MAGE gene family showed the highest expression, consistent across both cohorts. The correlation matrix revealed a distinct cluster of significantly co-expressed genes, including MAGEA3, NY-ESO-1, and others (0.27 ≤ r ≤ 0.73). Survival analysis revealed that individual CTAs were associated with poorer survival outcomes in patients not receiving immunotherapy while showing potential for improved survival in those undergoing immunotherapy, although these findings lacked robust reliability. Our study provides a comprehensive characterization of CTA expression and co-expression in GEAC. The strong correlation among CTAs like MAGE, NY-ESO-1, and GAGE suggests a potential for therapies targeting multiple CTAs simultaneously. Further research, including prospective trials, is warranted to assess the prognostic value of CTAs and their suitability as therapeutic targets.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Antigens, Neoplasm , Esophageal Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Antigens, Neoplasm/genetics , Antigens, Neoplasm/metabolism , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Prognosis , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/biosynthesis , Adult
4.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(7)2024 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610936

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malignant Central Airway Obstruction (MCAO) presents a significant challenge in lung cancer management, with notable morbidity and mortality implications. While bronchoscopy is the established diagnostic standard for confirming MCAO and assessing obstruction subtype (intrinsic, extrinsic, mixed) and severity, Computed Tomography (CT) serves as an initial screening tool. However, the extent of agreement between CT and bronchoscopy findings for MCAO remains unclear. METHODS: To assess the correlation between bronchoscopy and CT, we conducted a retrospective review of 108 patients at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, analyzing CT and bronchoscopy results to document MCAO presence, severity, and subtype. RESULTS: CT correctly identified MCAO in 99% of cases (107/108). Agreement regarding obstruction subtype (80.8%, Cohen's κ = 0.683, p < 0.001), and severity (65%, Quadratic κ = 0.657, p < 0.001) was moderate. CT tended to equally overestimate (7/19) and underestimate (7/19) the degree of obstruction. CT was also poor in identifying mucosal involvement in mixed MCAO. CONCLUSIONS: CT demonstrates reasonable agreement with bronchoscopy in detecting obstruction. Nevertheless, when CT indicates a positive finding for MCAO, it is advisable to conduct bronchoscopy. This is because CT lacks reliability in determining the severity of obstruction and identifying the mucosal component of mixed disease.

5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39019152

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer remains a major cause of mortality worldwide, necessitating further understanding of carcinogenesis and its driving factors, including those impacted by sex-dependent variables. We hypothesized that sex-specific lung immune composition may contribute to a greater risk of lung cancer in females. METHODS: Data from 1056 lung cancer screenings were examined for an association between sex and lung cancer risk using time-to-event analyses. Immune profiling by flow cytometry was performed on male and female lungs of three independent mouse models: non-tumor bearing, K-ras mutated, and urethane-exposed carcinogenic. A comparable analysis was performed on human bronchoalveolar lavage samples (n = 81) from lung cancer patients. RESULTS: Of the high-risk screening cohort examined, 60 patients (5.7%) developed lung cancer during median follow-up of 43.4 months. Multivariable stepwise modeling retained female sex (hazard ratio 1.56, P < 0.01) and age (P < 0.01) as prognostic indicators for lung cancer development. Female lung immune profiles in patients included T cell phenotypes consistent with exhaustion (e.g., higher proportions of PD-1+ Ki67-; P = 0.02), an expanded pool of regulatory T cells (P = 0.03), reduced effector T cell frequencies (P = 0.008), and enhancements in suppressive myeloid populations (P = 0.02) versus males, and this is recapitulated in mouse studies. CONCLUSIONS: Female smokers display higher risk for lung cancer. In murine models and humans, female sex is associated with robust immunosuppression within the lung. Further examination of this link will be important in developing immune-based approaches to lung cancer interception and their optimal application across the sexes.

6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of malignant central airway obstruction at diagnosis and its 5-year incidence are largely unknown, as are basic epidemiological data pertaining to this serious condition. To address these data limitations, we retrospectively collected data from the cohort of patients diagnosed with lung cancer at our institution in 2015 and followed cohort patients 5 years forward, until 2020. METHODS: We reviewed index PET/CT or CT scans at the time of lung cancer diagnosis to identify the presence, subtype, and severity of malignant central airway obstruction as well as progression/development over the next 5 years. RESULTS: The prevalence of malignant central airway obstruction affecting the airway lumen by 25% or greater was 17%, and its 5-year incidence of development was 8.2%. Notable associations from the multivariate analysis included a younger age and a stepwise increase in obstruction with increasing stage of disease. Squamous cell carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer were the 2 histologic subtypes with the strongest association with obstruction. The presence of malignant central airway obstruction either at time of diagnosis or on follow-up imaging was associated with significantly shortened survival (multivariate Cox proportional HR for MCAO=1.702, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides the first systematic characterization of fundamental epidemiological data on malignant central airway obstructions at a tertiary cancer center in the United States. This data is important to inform research directions and funding efforts of this serious complication. It also serves as a baseline value against which to compare for future studies.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Airway Obstruction/epidemiology , Airway Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Airway Obstruction/mortality , Male , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/complications , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnostic imaging , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/complications , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/epidemiology , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/mortality , Incidence , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged, 80 and over
7.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1286104, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38144524

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Survival rates for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain poor despite the decade-long established standard of surgical resection and systemic adjuvant therapy. Realizing this, researchers are exploring novel therapeutic targets and deploying neoadjuvant therapies to predict and improve clinical and pathological outcomes in lung cancer patients. Neoadjuvant therapy is also increasingly being used to downstage disease to allow for resection with a curative intent. In this review, we aim to summarize the current and developing landscape of using neoadjuvant therapy in the management of NSCLC. Methods: The PubMed.gov and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched on 15 January 2023, to identify published research studies and trials relevant to this review. One hundred and seven published articles and seventeen ongoing clinical trials were selected, and relevant findings and information was reviewed. Results & Discussion: Neoadjuvant therapy, proven through clinical trials and meta-analyses, exhibits safety and efficacy comparable to or sometimes surpassing adjuvant therapy. By attacking micro-metastases early and reducing tumor burden, it allows for effective downstaging of disease, allowing for curative surgical resection attempts. Research into neoadjuvant therapy has necessitated the development of surrogate endpoints such as major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) allowing for shorter duration clinical trials. Novel chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy agents are being tested at a furious rate, paving the way for a future of personalized systemic therapy in NSCLC. However, challenges remain that prevent further mainstream adoption of preoperative (Neoadjuvant) therapy. These include the risk of delaying curative surgical resection in scenarios of adverse events or treatment resistance. Also, the predictive value of surrogate markers of disease cure still needs robust verification. Finally, the body of published data is still limited compared to adjuvant therapy. Addressing these concerns with more large scale randomized controlled trials is needed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL