Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Surgeon ; 22(2): 125-129, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38071143

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transfer of all severe TBI patients to a neurosurgical unit (NSU) has been advocated irrespective of levels of complexity and prognostic factors. Previous publications have suggested that only 50% of severe TBI patients in Ireland were managed in NSUs. AIMS: This study aims to audit severe TBI referrals to the National Neurosurgical Centre, to evaluate reasons for nonacceptance, assess for differences in the transferred and not transferred cohorts and to analyse observed and expected mortality rates. METHODS: Data on all patients with TBI referred in 2021 were prospectively collected using an electronic referral system. Patients with severe TBI (GCS ≤ 8 and AIS ≥ 3) were included and dichotomised into transferred and not transferred cohorts. RESULTS: Of 118 patients referred with severe TBI, 45 patients (38.1%) were transferred to the neurosurgical centre. Patients in the transferred cohort were significantly younger (p < 0.001), had a higher GCS score (p < 0.001) and a lower proportion of bilaterally unreactive pupils (p < 0.001) compared to the not transferred cohort. 93% (68/73) of those not transferred were either >65 years old, or had bilaterally unreactive pupils, or both. Based on the IMPACT model, the observed to expected mortality ratios in the transferred and not transferred cohorts were 0.65 (95% CI 0.25-1.05) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.65-1.11) respectively. CONCLUSION: The observed mortality rate for severe TBI in Ireland was similar to or better than expected mortality rates when adjusted for important prognostic factors. 93% of severe TBI patients not transferred to a neurosurgical centre were either elderly or had bilaterally unreactive pupils or both. These patients have an extremely poor prognosis and recommendation for transfer cannot be made based on current available evidence.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Humans , Aged , Ireland/epidemiology , Glasgow Coma Scale , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/surgery , Prognosis , Referral and Consultation
2.
J Neurosurg Case Lessons ; 8(2)2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976918

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite years of research, the standard of care (SOC) treatment for grade 4 glioma has remained virtually unchanged for the last 2 decades. Autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination (DCVax-L), a novel immunotherapy, has demonstrated a significant survival benefit in a phase 3 trial. OBSERVATIONS: A 34-year-old male presented with episodes of lightheadedness and was subsequently diagnosed with a large fronto-insulo-temporal tumor, likely to be high grade. He underwent an asleep craniotomy for debulking, with a residual tumor noted in the frontal lobe and amygdala. Tumor histopathology was reported as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant methylated grade 4 astrocytoma. He received SOC treatment, alongside a course of DCVax-L. Surveillance imaging showed cystic transformation followed by a reduction in size of the residual tumor in the frontal lobe; the residual in the amygdala had regressed entirely. The patient remained clinically well and had returned to his preoperative functionality. LESSONS: The authors report a patient with grade 4 astrocytoma who received DCVax-L treatment in addition to SOC adjuvant therapy. The pattern and extent of tumor regression are highly unusual and atypical for what is seen or expected with adjuvant SOC treatment alone. The addition of DCVax-L to SOC opens new avenues in the management of this difficult disease. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24112.

3.
J Neurosurg ; : 1-15, 2024 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39366020

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Optimal management of the pituitary stalk during craniopharyngioma resection remains a controversial subject. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of pituitary stalk preservation on postoperative diabetes insipidus (DI), anterior pituitary function (PF), extent of resection, and recurrence. METHODS: Medline was searched via Ovid for relevant articles from inception to September 2, 2022. Studies reporting the rates of DI or anterior PF postoperatively or at last follow-up, extent of resection, or tumor recurrence at last follow-up were eligible for inclusion. The risk ratio (RR) for each outcome was calculated. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed with additional stratification by age. To assess for risk of bias across studies, funnel plots and the Egger's test were utilized. RESULTS: In total, 3488 abstracts and 150 full-text articles were reviewed, resulting in 33 studies with a total of 2366 patients for inclusion. In the comparative meta-analysis, pituitary stalk preservation significantly decreased the risk of DI postoperatively (17 studies, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.81, I2 = 75%), DI at last follow-up (6 studies, RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.72, I2 = 20%), and abnormal anterior PF postoperatively (15 studies, RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89, I2 = 49%) but not abnormal anterior PF at last follow-up (4 studies, RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.09-1.63, I2 = 64%). There were no significant differences in the rates of incomplete resection (12 studies, RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.77-3.28, I2 = 68%) or tumor recurrence (9 studies, RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.92-1.51, I2 = 0%) between the preservation and sacrifice groups. However, subgroup analysis of pediatric patients revealed a higher risk of incomplete resection (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.17-9.26, I2 = 70%) in the stalk preservation group. CONCLUSIONS: Pituitary stalk preservation was demonstrated to confer protective benefit on PF, although the benefit persisted on long-term follow-up for posterior PF only. Stalk preservation in pediatric patients should be given careful consideration, as it is associated with higher rates of incomplete resection. These results should be interpreted with caution due to inclusion of small studies and inadequate reporting of outcomes in the literature.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL