Role of Resmetirom, a Liver-Directed, Thyroid Hormone Receptor Beta-Selective Agonist, in Managing Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Resmetirom, a liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor beta-selective agonist, has recently been approved to treat nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the efficiency and safety of resmetirom in treating NASH. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of resmetirom vs placebo in patients with NASH. The primary outcomes were the changes from baseline in hepatic fat content, liver histology, including NASH resolution, and noninvasive markers of hepatic fibrosis. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials (n = 2231) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to placebo, resmetirom achieved greater reductions from baseline in hepatic fat content assessed by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (for resmetirom 80 mg: MD -27.76% [95%CI: -32.84, -22.69]; for resmetirom 100 mg: MD -36.01% [95%CI: -41.54, -30.48]; P < .00001 for both) and FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter (for resmetirom 80 mg: MD -21.45 dBm [95%CI: -29.37, -13.52]; for resmetirom 100 mg: MD -25.51 dBm [95%CI: -33.53, -17.49]; P < .00001 for both). Resmetirom 80 mg outperformed placebo in NASH resolution and ≥2-point nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score reduction. Moreover, resmetirom 80 mg and 100 mg were superior to placebo in cytokeratin-18 (M30) reduction. Greater reductions in liver enzymes, lipids, and reverse triiodothyronine were observed in the resmetirom arms with no impact on triiodothyronine. Nausea and diarrhea were more common with resmetirom than with placebo; other adverse events were comparable. CONCLUSION: Resmetirom improves hepatic fat content, liver enzymes, and fibrosis biomarkers in NASH patients. Resmetirom generally does not affect thyroid function and is well-tolerated.

Role of Teplizumab, a Humanized Anti-CD3 Monoclonal Antibody, in Managing Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Teplizumab has emerged as a potential disease-modifying drug in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This meta-analysis sought to summarize the therapeutic effect of teplizumab in newly diagnosed patients with T1D. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials involving patients with T1D receiving teplizumab in the intervention arm and placebo (or no active intervention) in the control arm were searched throughout the electronic databases. The primary outcome was the change in area under the curve of C-peptide levels from baseline. RESULTS: Seven reports from 6 studies involving 834 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Compared to teplizumab, greater reductions in area under the curve of C-peptide from the baseline values were observed in the control group after 6 months (mean difference [MD] 0.07 nmol/L [0.01, 0.13], P = .02), after 12 months (MD 0.07 nmol/L [0.04, 0.11], P = .0001), after 18 months (MD 0.10 nmol/L [0.06, 0.14], P < .00001), and after 24 months (MD 0.07 nmol/L [0.01, 0.14], P = .03) of interventions. Moreover, fewer patients treated with teplizumab had a decreased C-peptide response after 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 0.21), after 12 months (OR 0.17), after 18 months (OR 0.30), and after 24 months (OR 0.12) of treatment. The preservation of endogenous insulin production was supported by reduced use of exogenous insulin with maintenance of comparable glycemic control for up to 18 months post-treatment. Teplizumab imparted higher risks of grade 3 or higher adverse events, adverse events leading to study medication discontinuation, nausea, rash, and lymphopenia. CONCLUSION: The results of the meta-analysis support teplizumab as a promising disease-modifying therapy for newly diagnosed T1D.

Comparison of simplicity, convenience, safety, and cost-effectiveness between use of insulin pen devices and disposable plastic syringes by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study from Bangladesh.

INTRODUCTION: Insulin pen devices and disposable plastic insulin syringes are two common tools for insulin administration. This study aims to compare the simplicity, convenience, safety, and cost-effectiveness of insulin pens versus syringe devices in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at 14 diabetes clinics throughout Bangladesh from November 2021 to April 2022 among adults with T2DM injecting insulin by pen devices or disposable insulin syringes at least once a day for at least one year by purposive sampling. The simplicity, convenience, and safety of insulin devices were assessed using a structured questionnaire, and the study subjects were scored based on their answers; higher scores indicated a poorer response. Total scores for simplicity, convenience, and safety were obtained by adding the scores for relevant components. Their average monthly medical expense and cost of insulin therapy were recorded. The median values of the total scores and monthly expenses were compared between pen devices and disposable syringe users. RESULTS: 737 subjects were evaluated; 406 were pen users, and 331 were vial syringe users. The pen users had lower median scores for simplicity [6.0 (5.0-8.0) vs. 7.0 (5.0-9.0), p = 0.002], convenience [4.0 (3.0-6.0) vs. 5.0 (4.0-6.0), p < 0.001], and safety [7.0 (6.0-8.0) vs. 7.0 (6.0-9.0), p = 0.008] than vial syringe users. Pen devices were more expensive than vial syringes in terms of average medical expense per month [BDT 5000 (3500-7000) vs. 3000 (2000-5000), p < 0.001], the total cost of insulin therapy per month [BDT 2000 (1500-3000) vs. 1200 (800-1700), p < 0.001] and cost per unit of insulin used [BDT 2.08 (1.39-2.78) vs. 0.96 (0.64-1.39), p < 0.001]. Non-significant differences in favor of pens were observed in HbA1c levels [8.7 (7.8-10) vs. 8.9 (7.9-10)%, p = 0.607] and proportions of subjects having HbA1c < 7% (6.9 vs. 6.3%, p = 0.991). CONCLUSION: Insulin pens are simpler, more convenient, and safe but more expensive than vial syringes. Glycemic control is comparable between pen and syringe users. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to determine the clinical and economic impacts of such benefits of insulin pens.

Status of lipid control in Bangladeshi subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus on lipid-lowering drugs: a multicenter, facility-based, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Achievement of lipid targets is crucial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to mitigate the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Data on lipid-control status among patients with T2DM in Bangladesh are scarce. This study was conducted to determine the lipid-control status among patients with T2DM who were on lipid-lowering drugs in the country. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the diabetes outpatient departments of several tertiary hospitals in Bangladesh from January 2022 to December 2022. Adults of both sexes diagnosed with T2DM for at least one year and were on the lipid-lowering drug(s) for a minimum of 3 months were included in the study by consecutive sampling. Patients' data were collected by face-to-face interviews, and blood samples were collected for fasting lipid profile. The lipid target was set at < 200 mg/dL for total cholesterol (TC), < 150 mg/dL for triglyceride (TG), < 100 mg/dL for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), > 40 mg/dL for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and < 160 mg/dL for non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C). RESULT: Three thousand sixty patients (age 44.7 ± 13.3 years, female 57%) with T2DM were evaluated. Overall, almost 81% of the study subjects achieved the LDL-C target. Besides, TC, TG, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C targets were achieved by 40.8, 21.6, 66.3, and 44.1% of patients, respectively. However, all the lipid parameters were under control in only 8.8% of patients. Almost 77.6% of the patients with ischemic heart disease, 81.5% of patients with stroke, and 65% of patients with CKD had LDL levels < 70 mg/dL. Only 10.03% achieved the HbA1c target of < 7%. 7.4% of patients achieved both HbA1c < 7% and LDL < 100 mg/dL and 5% achieved both HbA1c < 7% and LDL < 70 mg/dL. Advanced age (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96, 0.98, p < 0.001), longstanding T2DM (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39, 0.72, p < 0.001), and non-statin therapy (aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.16, 0.37, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with lipid control (LDL < 100 mg/dL) while using oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.45, 2.77, p < 0.001) and having cardiovascular comorbidity (aOR 3.92, 95% CI 3.00, 5.12, p < 0.001) were positively associated with lipid control. CONCLUSION: Though most patients with T2DM achieved their target LDL level, the prevalence of both glycemic and overall lipid control was low in our study despite lipid-lowering therapy.

Prevalence and predictors of diabetes distress among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a facility-based cross-sectional study of Bangladesh.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes distress (DD) is common and has considerable impacts on diabetes management. Unfortunately, DD is less discussed and frequently underestimated. This study evaluated the prevalence and predictors of DD in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at several specialized endocrinology outpatient clinics in Bangladesh from July 2019 to June 2020; 259 adults with T2DM participated. Participants' DD and depression were measured using the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS-17) and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), respectively. DDS-17 scores ≥2 and PHQ-9 scores ≥10 were the cutoffs for DD and significant depression, respectively. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 50.36 (±12.7) years, with the majority (54.8%) being male; their median (IQR) duration of diabetes was 6 (3-11) years. Among the study participants, 52.5% had DD (29.7% moderate and 22.8% high DD). The prevalence of emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress was 68.7, 28.6, 66, and 37.7%, respectively. Depression was present in 40.5%; 28.6% of the participants had DD and depression. The total DDS-17 score was positively correlated with the PHQ-9 score (r = 0.325, p < 0.001). Rural residence (OR 1.94), presence of any diabetic complication (OR 3.125), insulin use (OR 2.687), and presence of major depression (OR 4.753) were positive predictors of DD. In contrast, age ≥ 40 years at diabetes diagnosis (OR 0.047) and diabetes duration of > 10 years (OR 0.240) were negative predictors of DD (p < 0.05 in all instances). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of DD in our setting is notably high; DD and depression frequently overlap. Screening for diabetes distress may be considered, especially in high-risk patients.

Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Obese Children and Adolescents: Experience from Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital, Bangladesh.

Obesity and hypothyroidism are interlinked. In this prospective study, 142 children and adolescents (mean age 140±34 months, girls 54.2%) either with obesity or overweight were included from the patients attending at the Endocrine out-patient clinic of Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital during a period from March, 2017 to February, 2020 and were assessed for thyroid function. Among them, 85 were obese (Body mass index, BMI >95th percentile), 29 were overweight (BMI between 85th to 95th percentile) and 28 had normal weight (BMI <85th percentile). Girls were more frequent in obese (57.6%) and overweight (51.7%) groups than boys. Mean TSH was not significantly different among the three groups (3.39 vs. 4.01 vs. 4.06mIU/L; p=0.248). Subclinical hypothyroidism was present in 22 cases (15.5%); the frequencies were 3.6% in Group 1, 17.2% in Group 2 and 18.8% in Group 3. Both overweight and obese groups had significantly (p<0.005) higher prevalence of SCH than the normal-weight group. Girls were more frequently affected than boys (72.7% vs. 27.3%, p=0.047). Among the 22 children who had SCH, 2(9.1%) had a mild goiter and higher serum levels of anti-TPO and anti-TG. Serum TSH had no correlations with age, body weight, height, BMI and serum FT4. The findings indicate that a substantial portion of over weight and obese children and adolescents have SCH and the causes other than thyroid autoimmunity are more prevalent in them.

Disorders of Sex Development: Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh.

In newborns, it is an emergency to decide the appropriate sex for rearing and eventual prevention associated metabolic disturbances. The birth of a baby with ambiguous genitalia inevitably precipitates a crisis for the baby and its family. This retrospective analysis of hospital data was designed to determine the chromosomal and etiological diagnosis of children presented with suspected disorders of sex development (DSD) according to the newer DSD consensus document. We retrospectively analyzed the available medical records of all patients admitted into the inpatient departments of Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2014 to December 2019, and all patients with the diagnosis of DSD in the hospital record were initially selected for the study. A total of 60 admitted cases with a disorder of sex development were classified according to the new DSD classification. 46XX DSD were 63.3% (n=38), 46XY DSD were 33.3% (n=20), sex chromosome DSD were 3.3% (n=2). Among 38 cases of 46XX DSD, the most common cause was congenital adrenal hyperplasia (97.0%, n=37), one was 46XX testicular DSD. However, among 46XY DSD cases, partial androgen insensitivity/5α-reductase deficiency (50.0%, n=10) was most common disorder. Other causes of 46XY DSD included congenital adrenal hyperplasia (20.0%, n=4), testosterone synthesis defect (20.0%, n=4), testicular regression syndrome (n=1) and persistent Mullerian duct syndrome (n=1). Sex chromosome disorders are mixed gonadal dysgenesis (n=1), chimeric ovotesticular DSD (n=1). In this study, 46XX DSD was the commonest of all, showing the predominance of congenital adrenal hyperplasia, especially salt-losing type. Early detection and prompt treatment may help reduce mortality and morbidity from these acute life-threatening conditions.

Penile Color Doppler Ultrasonography in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Presenting with Erectile Dysfunction: A Single-Center Experience from Bangladesh.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). ED is considered the earliest marker of widespread endothelial dysfunction. Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) of the penis is a valuable tool in identifying vasculogenic ED and may predict coronary vascular disease. In Bangladesh, no study has evaluated CDUS of the penis in such patients. This study assessed the penile CDUS characteristics of adult patients with T2DM having ED. This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to December 2021 at a specialized diabetes hospital in Cumilla, Bangladesh. The baseline velocities of the right and the left cavernosal arteries were measured at the penile base. Arterial insufficiency was defined as a peak systolic velocity (PSV) value <25 cm/s and venous insufficiency was described as an end-diastolic velocity (EDV) >5 cm/s at the end of the examination. Eighty-seven subjects were evaluated; the mean age was 44.2±9.2 years, mean duration of DM was 7.9±2.8 years; of them, 31.0% were smokers, 75.9% obese, 92.0% central obese, 69.0% hypertensive, 96.6% dyslipidemic and 51.7% with low testosterone. The mean HbA1c was 9.3±1.9%; DM was uncontrolled in 89.7% of the study subjects. Penile vasculopathy was found in 21.8% (17.2% had arterial insufficiency, 2.3% had a venous leak, and 2.3% had arterial insufficiency with a venous leak). There were no statistical differences between the two groups, with and without penile vasculopathy, except for diastolic blood pressure, which was higher in the vasculopathy group. CDUS may be incorporated into the tools for evaluating diabetic ED to direct specific management.

Role of anagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in managing type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: No comprehensive meta-analysis has examined and consolidated the effectiveness and safety of anagliptin in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). To bridge this knowledge gap, we undertook this meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials involving patients with T2D receiving anagliptin were sought after through electronic databases. The control arm consisted of either an active comparator (active control group [ACG]) or a placebo (passive control group [PCG]). The primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), with secondary outcomes including fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and lipid profiles and adverse events. RESULTS: From the 226 articles first examined, 10 randomized controlled trials with 970 participants were analyzed. Reductions in HbA1c (mean difference [MD]: -0.03%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.14 to 0.14, P = .51, I2 = 9%) and FPG (MD: 0.03 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.30 to 0.35, P = .87, I2 = 42%) were similar in the anagliptin group and ACG. Anagliptin reduced FPG better than placebo (MD: -1.25 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.87 to -0.64, P < .0001, I2 = 0%). Sufficient data were unavailable to analyze the HbA1c lowering with anagliptin versus placebo. Among the lipid parameters, changes in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B48, and apolipoprotein B100 were identical between the anagliptin and control groups (PCG and ACG). Anagliptin was better than ACG at lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol but not as good at lowering triglyceride. Adverse events were infrequent and similar in the anagliptin and control groups (PCG and ACG). CONCLUSION: Anagliptin positively affects glucose control and is safe for managing T2D. Its low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effect warrants further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of albiglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: No meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the therapeutic efficacy and safety of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This meta-analysis addresses this knowledge gap. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials involving patients with T2D receiving albiglutide in the intervention arm and either a placebo or an active comparator in the control arm were searched through electronic databases. The primary outcome was the change from baseline (CFB) in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); secondary outcomes included CFB in fasting plasma glucose, body weight, and adverse events (AE). RESULTS: From 443 initially screened articles, data from 12 randomized controlled trials involving 6423 subjects were analyzed. Albiglutide, at both doses, outperformed placebo in terms of HbA1c reductions (for albiglutide 30 mg: mean differences -1.04%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.37--0.72], P < .00001, I2 = 89%; and for albiglutide 50 mg: mean differences -1.10%, 95% CI [-1.45--0.75], P < .00001, I2 = 90%). Higher proportions of subjects achieved HbA1c < 7% in the albiglutide arm than in placebo (for albiglutide 30 mg: odds ratio 6.26, 95% CI [2.50-15.70], P < .0001, I2 = 82%; and for albiglutide 50 mg: odds ratio 5.57, 95% CI [2.25-13.80], P = .0002, I2 = 84%). Albiglutide had glycemic efficacy comparable to other glucose-lowering drugs. CFB in body weight was similar with albiglutide and placebo. AE profile, including gastrointestinal AE, was identical with albiglutide and placebo, except for higher drug-related AE and injection-site reaction with albiglutide. CONCLUSION: Albiglutide provides reassuring data on good glycemic efficacy, tolerability, and safety over an extended period of clinical use in patients with T2D. Albiglutide 30 mg has comparable efficacy and safety profiles to albiglutide 50 mg.

Orforglipron, a novel non-peptide oral daily glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist as an anti-obesity medicine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Orforglipron is a novel once-daily oral non-peptide glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist with several recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating its role in diabetes and obesity. No meta-analysis has analyzed the efficacy and safety of orforglipron; this meta-analysis aimed to address this knowledge gap. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases to identify RCTs that included individuals with obesity who were administered orforglipron and compared to either a placebo or an active comparator. The primary outcome of interest was the percent change in body weight. Results: From 12 initially screened articles, data from three RCTs involving 774 people were analyzed with a follow-up duration of up to 36 weeks. Compared to placebo, patients receiving orforglipron 12 mg/day (mean difference (MD), MD -5.48%, 95% CI [-7.64, -3.33], p < 0.01), 24 mg/day (MD -8.51%, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-9.88, -7.14], p < 0.01), 36 mg/day (MD -8.84%, 95% CI [-11.68, -6.00], p < 0.01) and 45 mg/day (MD -8.24%, 95% CI [-12.84, -3.63], p < 0.01) had a significantly greater percent reduction in body weight. The percentage of patients being able to achieve >15% weight loss from baseline was significantly higher with orforglipron 24 mg/day [Odds ratio (OR) 21.90 (95% CI [4.06, 118.15], p = 0.0003), 36 mg/day (OR 17.43, 95% CI [3.18, 95.66], p = 0.001) and 45 mg/day (OR 23.17, 95% CI [4.37, 123.03], p = 0.0002). Total but not severe adverse events were significantly higher with all the doses of orforglipron compared to placebo, with the hazard ratios being higher with higher doses. Gastrointestinal side-effects were predominant side effects, being dose-dependent, with nausea, vomiting, constipation, and gastroesophageal reflux being the predominant ones. Conclusion: Orforglipron at 24-45 mg/day doses is an effective weight loss medication. The efficacy versus side effect profile suggests that 24-36 mg/day is the most optimal dose for orforglipron as an anti-obesity medicine.

Efficacy and Safety of Omarigliptin, a Novel Once-Weekly Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGRUOUND: No recent meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the efficacy and safety of omarigliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We conducted a meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients with T2DM who received omarigliptin in the intervention arm. The control arm consisted of either a placebo (passive control group [PCG]) or an active comparator (active control group [ACG]). The primary outcome assessed was changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), while secondary outcomes included variations in glucose levels, achievement of glycemic targets, adverse events (AEs), and hypoglycemic events. RESULTS: From 332 initially screened articles, data from 16 RCTs involving 8,804 subjects were analyzed. Omarigliptin demonstrated superiority over placebo in reducing HbA1c levels (mean difference, -0.58%; 95% confidence interval, -0.75 to -0.40; P<0.00001; I2=91%). Additionally, omarigliptin outperformed placebo in lowering fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, and in the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c levels below 7.0% and 6.5%. The glycemic efficacy of omarigliptin was similar to that of the ACG across all measures. Although the omarigliptin group experienced a higher incidence of hypoglycemic events compared to the PCG, the overall AEs, serious AEs, hypoglycemia, and severe hypoglycemia were comparable between the omarigliptin and control groups (PCG and ACG). CONCLUSION: Omarigliptin has a favorable glycemic efficacy and safety profile for managing T2DM.

Acute hypothermia in a patient with COVID-19: a case report and summary of the evidence.

Introduction and importance: SARS-COV-2 has many presenting signs including a number of typical and atypical symptoms. However, having the enormous capacity of mutation, the virus is changing its genetic pattern continuously, giving rise to newer and rarer manifestations. Here, the authors report a case of adult COVID-19 along with features of hypothermia which is relatively rare and has future implications in clinical perspective. Case presentation: The patient presented with hypothermia and indicative symptoms of COVID-19 during admission. Comorbidities were assessed, potential differentials were ruled out thorough appropriate clinical examination and investigations. Insulation with a blanket and room heater was used to stabilize the normal body temperature (98.6°F) in the hospital setting, during this period vitals (Blood pressure, Pulse rate and oxygen saturation) were assessed regularly. On the sixth day of hospital admission, he was discharged from the hospital with advice. Clinical discussion: COVID-19 virus can enter into brain through olfactory tract and may cause dysfunction in the medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus containing warm sensitive neurons directly or via cytokine-induced release of prostaglandin E2 from endothelial cells, which acts through a paracrine mechanism that may provoke hypothermia in our case. Conclusions: This case highlights a rare presentation of COVID-19 infection that has not been thoroughly explored. The authors believe the case report holds particular importance especially in dealing with COVID-19 cases in both clinical and home settings.

First-trimester fasting plasma glucose as a predictor of subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse fetomaternal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The implication of intermediately elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in the first trimester of pregnancy is uncertain. PURPOSE: The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was to analyze if intermediately elevated first-trimester FPG could predict development of GDM at 24-28 weeks. The secondary outcomes were to determine if the commonly used FPG cut-offs 5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL), 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL), and 6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL) correlated with adverse pregnancy events. DATA SOURCES: Databases were searched for articles published from 2010 onwards for studies examining the relationship between first-trimester FPG and adverse fetomaternal outcomes. STUDY SELECTION: A total of sixteen studies involving 115,899 pregnancies satisfied the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS: Women who developed GDM had a significantly higher first-trimester FPG than those who did not [MD 0.29 mmoL/l (5 mg/dL); 95 % CI: 0.21-0.38; P < 0.00001]. First-trimester FPG ≥5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL) predicted the development of GDM at 24-28 weeks [RR 3.93 (95 % CI: 2.67-5.77); P < 0.0000], pre-eclampsia [RR 1.55 (95%CI:1.14-2.12); P = 0.006], gestational hypertension [RR1.47 (95%CI:1.20-1.79); P = 0.0001], large-for-gestational-age (LGA) [RR 1.32 (95%CI:1.13-1.54); P = 0.0004], and macrosomia [RR1.29 (95%CI:1.15-1.44); P < 0.001]. However, at the above threshold, the rates of preterm delivery, lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS), small-for gestational age (SGA), and neonatal hypoglycemia were not significantly higher. First-trimester FPG ≥5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) correlated with occurrence of macrosomia [RR1.47 (95 % CI:1.22-1.79); P < 0.0001], LGA [RR 1.43 (95%CI:1.24-1.65); P < 0.00001], and preterm delivery [RR1.51 (95%CI:1.15-1.98); P = 0.003], but not SGA and LSCS. LIMITATIONS: Only one study reported outcomes at first-trimester FPG of 6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL), and hence was not analyzed. CONCLUSION: The risk of development of GDM at 24-28 weeks increased linearly with higher first-trimester FPG. First trimester FPG cut-offs of 5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL) and 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) predicted several adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome Presented with Diabetes Mellitus and Primary Amenorrhea: A Case Report.

Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a rare congenital disorder that affects the female reproductive system and is characterized by an underdeveloped or absent uterus and vagina. A 17-year-old unmarried female was admitted into the Department of Endocrinology, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh in November 2023 for evaluation of primary amenorrhea and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. She was the 5th issue of non-consanguineous marriage delivered at term by normal vaginal delivery. Her growth pattern and developmental milestones were normal. She had no history of galactorrhea, chronic or cyclic pelvic pain, thyroid dysfunction, excessive exercise, psychiatric illness, or drug abuse. There was no history of such type of illness in her family. She was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus two years back without classic symptoms, and at that time, her blood glucose was 22 mmol/L. She was prescribed metformin and gliclazide. She had no history of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemic crises, or hospital admission. On examination, her body build and nutritional status were normal. Anemia, jaundice, edema, dehydration, lymphadenopathy, acne, hirsutism, acanthosis nigricans, abdominal striae and vitiligo were absent. Her blood pressure was 110/70 without the postural drop, thyroid gland was not enlarged, anthropometric measurements were normal and BMI was 18.4 kg/m2. Her tanner stage was P5 & B4. Genital examination revealed normal female external genitalia, and a blind vaginal pouch was found. Other systemic examinations revealed no abnormality. On laboratory reports, her blood glucose was uncontrolled (HbA1c-10.2%) with glycosuria. Thyroid function test and gonadal hormones were normal. Ultrasonogram of the abdomen revealed uterus, cervix, and upper part of the vagina are absent, and an ectopic left kidney.

Role of flibanserin in managing hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Flibanserin, approved for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in females, has demonstrated diverse therapeutic and adverse effect (AE) prospects in the extant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This meta-analysis aimed to characterize the outcomes of flibanserin use in these patients comprehensively. METHODS: RCTs involving women with HSDD receiving flibanserin in the intervention arm and placebo in the control arm were sought after throughout the electronic databases. The primary outcomes were the changes from baseline in satisfying sexual events (SSE) per month and sexual desire score per month measured using an electronic diary (eDiary). RESULTS: From 478 initially screened articles, data from 8 RCTs involving 7906 women with HSDD were analyzed. In premenopausal women, flibanserin 100 mg was superior to placebo in improving the number of SSE per month (mean difference, MD 0.69, 95% CI [0.39, 0.99]), eDiary sexual desire score (MD 1.71, 95% CI [0.43, 2.98]), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) desire domain (FSFI-d) score (MD 0.30, 95% CI [0.29, 0.31]), FSFI total score (MD 2.51, 95% CI [1.47, 3.55]), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) Item 13 score (MD -0.30, 95% CI [-0.31, -0.29]), and FSDS-R total score (MD -3.30, 95% CI [-3.37, -3.23]). Compared to placebo, a higher number of premenopausal women using flibanserin 100 mg achieved improvements in the Patient's Global Impression of Improvement score (OR 1.93, 95% CI [1.58, 2.36], P < .00001) and responded positively at Patient Benefit Evaluation (PBE) (odds ratio, OR 1.76, 95% CI [1.34, 2.31], P < .0001). Postmenopausal women receiving flibanserin 100 mg also benefited in terms of the number of SSE per month, FSFI-d and total scores, FSDS-R Item 13 and total scores, and PBE response. Although flibanserin use was associated with higher risks of dizziness, fatigue, nausea, somnolence, and insomnia, these adverse events were mild in nature; the serious AEs and severe AEs were comparable between the flibanserin and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: While flibanserin has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of HSDD in both pre- and postmenopausal women, its therapeutic advantages may be overshadowed by the higher likelihood of AEs.

Global Warming and Endocrinology: The Hyderabad Declaration of the South Asian Federation of Endocrine Societies.

Global warming and endocrine disorders are intertwined issues posing significant challenges. Greenhouse gases emanating from human activities drive global warming, leading to temperature rise and altered weather patterns. South Asia has experienced a noticeable temperature surge over the past century. The sizable population residing in the region heightens the susceptibility to the impact of global warming. In addition to affecting agriculture, water resources, and livelihood, environmental changes interfere with endocrine functioning. Resulting lifestyle changes increase the risk of metabolic and endocrine disorders. Individuals with diabetes face heightened vulnerability to extreme weather due to impaired thermoregulation. A high ambient temperature predisposes to heat-related illnesses, infertility, and nephropathy. Additionally, essential endocrine drugs and medical devices are susceptible to temperature fluctuations. The South Asian Federation of Endocrine Societies (SAFES) calls for collaboration among stakeholders to combat climate change and promote healthy living. Comprehensive approaches, including the establishment of sustainable food systems, promotion of physical activity, and raising awareness about environmental impacts, are imperative. SAFES recommends strategies such as prioritizing plant-based diets, reducing meat consumption, optimizing medical device usage, and enhancing accessibility to endocrine care. Raising awareness and educating caregivers and people living with diabetes on necessary precautions during extreme weather conditions are paramount. The heat sensitivity of insulin, blood glucose monitoring devices, and insulin pumps necessitates proper storage and consideration of environmental conditions for optimal efficacy. The inter-connectedness of global warming and endocrine disorders underscores the necessity of international collaboration guided by national endocrine societies. SAFES urges all stakeholders to actively implement sustainable practices to improve endocrine health in the face of climate change.

Prescription Pattern of Glucose-lowering Drugs in Patients with Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Attending Dhaka Medical College Hospital.

The increasing number of patients with diabetes mellitus imposes an enormous burden on both the healthcare authorities and healthcare providers. The study's objective was to explore the prescription pattern of glucose-lowering drugs for patients with controlled type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) attending a tertiary hospital in Bangladesh. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Endocrinology Outpatient Department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, for one year (February 2017 to January 2018). A total of 120 patients aged >12 years with T2DM were included in the study. Prescription analysis and demographic data were collected and recorded in the pre-designed case record form. Among the 120 prescriptions, the number of drugs prescribed per encounter ranged from 1 to 4. Oral drugs were prescribed most frequently (n=88, 73.3%), followed by different preparations of insulin; both (oral and insulin) were prescribed in 13.3% (n=16) of cases. Single drugs were used in 76.7% (n=92) of patients, whereas combined fixed-dose formulation and both types of formulation (single drug and combined fixed dose) were used in 17.5% and 5.8%, respectively. Of all, Metformin was the single most common (67.5%; n=81) drug prescribed by the physicians, followed by Gliclazide (n=19, 15.84%), Glibenclamide (n=14, 11.67%), and short-acting insulin (n=14, 11.67%). Besides, the overall drug use pattern in prescription showed most frequently used drugs were Metformin + Sulphonylureas (21.7%), Metformin (19.2%), Metformin + DPP-4 inhibitors (14.2%), Insulins (13.3%), DPP-4 inhibitors (9.2%) and Metformin + Insulin (9.2%) with a small share of other drugs. Moreover, short-acting insulin was used more commonly (n=14, 11.67%) than other formulations of insulin: long-acting insulin (n=13, 10.83%), premixed insulin (n=12, 10%), intermediate-acting insulin (n=5, 4.16%) and ultra short-acting insulin (n=2, 1.67%).