Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of a Large Series of Calcified Chondroid Mesenchymal Neoplasms Widening Their Morphologic Spectrum.

Recently, FN1 fusions to receptor tyrosine kinase genes have been identified in soft tissue tumors with calcified chondroid matrix named calcifying chondroid mesenchymal neoplasms (CCMNs). We collected 33 cases of CCMN from the French network for soft tissue and bone tumors. We performed whole-exome RNA sequencing, expression analysis, and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in 33, 30, and 20 cases of CCMN compared with a control group of tumors, including noncalcified tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT). Among them, 15 cases showed morphologic overlap with soft tissue chondroma, 8 cases with tophaceous pseudogout, and 10 cases with chondroid TGCT. RNA-sequencing revealed a fusion of FN1 in 76% of cases (25/33) with different 5' partners, including most frequently FGFR2 (14 cases), TEK or FGFR1. Among CCMN associated with FGFR1 fusions, 2 cases had overexpression of FGF23 without tumor-induced osteomalacia. Four CCMN had PDGFRA::USP8 fusions; 3 of which had histologic features of TGCT and were located in the hip, foot, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ). All cases with FN1::TEK fusion were located at TMJ and had histologic features of TGCT with or without chondroid matrix. They formed a distinct cluster on unsupervised clustering analyses based on whole transcriptome and genome-wide methylome data. Our study confirms the high prevalence of FN1 fusions in CCMN. In addition, through transcriptome and methylome analyses, we have identified a novel subgroup of tumors located at the TMJ, exhibiting TGCT-like features and FN1::TEK fusions.

Alveolar soft part sarcomas in young patients: The French national NETSARC+ network experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an ultra-rare chemo-resistant sarcoma in children, occurring preferentially in young adults. We aimed to describe and compare its clinical presentation and behaviour in children and young adults to determine whether the same therapeutic strategy should be addressed for both populations. METHODS: National retrospective multicentre study of children (0-18 years) vs. young adults (19-30 years) included in the "ConticaBase" sarcoma database, treated for ASPS between 2010 and 2019 with pathology reviewed via the NETSARC + network. RESULTS: Overall, 45 patients were identified, 19 children (42%) and 26 young adults (58%). All ASPS diagnoses were confirmed with TFE3 rearrangement by immunohistochemistry or FISH. All clinical characteristics were balanced between both populations with frequent metastases at diagnosis (8/19 vs. 10/26). The therapeutic strategy was based on surgery (17/19 vs. 21/26), radiotherapy (8/19 vs. 12/26) ± systemic treatment (8/19 vs. 9/26). In patients with initially localized disease, metastatic relapse occurred only in adults (8/16), whereas metastatic progression was present in both metastatic groups (5/8 vs. 8/10). After a median follow-up of 5.2 years (range, 0.2-12.2), 5-year EFS was 74% [95%CI, 56-96] vs. 47% [30-74] (p = 0.071) respectively, and 5-year OS was 95% [85-100] vs. 85% [70-100] (p = 0.84). For localized tumours, 5-year MFS was 100% [100-100] vs. 60% [39-91] (p = 0.005). The 5-year OS of all patients with metastasis at diagnosis was 80.2% (62.2%-100%). CONCLUSIONS: ASPS appears to have the overall same clinical characteristics, but a more aggressive behaviour in young adults than in children. However, despite frequent metastases at diagnosis, long-term survival is high in both groups. Overall, the same therapeutic strategies may be considered for both populations.

Improved Metastatic-Free Survival after Systematic Re-Excision Following Complete Macroscopic Unplanned Excision of Limb or Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Whether re-excision (RE) of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of limb or trunk should be systematized as adjuvant care and if it would improve metastatic free survival (MFS) are still debated. The impact of resection margins after unplanned macroscopically complete excision (UE) performed out of a NETSARC reference center or after second resection was further investigated. METHODS: This large nationwide series used data from patients having experienced UE outside of a reference center from 2010 to 2019, collected in a French nationwide exhaustive prospective cohort NETSARC. Patient characteristics and survival distributions in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) are reported. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was conducted to adjust for classical prognosis factors. Subgroup analysis were performed to identify which patients may benefit from RE. RESULTS: Out of 2371 patients with UE for STS performed outside NETSARC reference centers, 1692 patients were not reviewed by multidisciplinary board before treatment decision and had a second operation documented. Among them, 913 patients experienced re-excision, and 779 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, size, depth, grade and histotype in patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). In univariate analysis, final R0 margins are associated with a better MFS, patients with R1 margins documented at first surgery had a better MFS as compared to patients with first R0 resection. The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for MFS (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.53-0.93; p = 0.013). All subgroups except older patients (>70 years) and patients with large tumors (>10 cm) had superior MFS with RE. CONCLUSIONS: RE might be considered in patients with STS of limb or trunk, with UE with macroscopic complete resection performed out of a reference center, and also in originally defined R0 margin resections, to improve LRFS and MFS. Systematic RE should not be advocated for patients older than 70 years, or with tumors greater than 10 cm.