A Letter to Your Care Providers: Implementation and Analysis of a Letter-based Advance Care Planning Initiative for Gynecologic Oncology Patients.

To determine the impact of a letter-based advance care planning (ACP) healthcare improvement (HI) initiative on rates of ACP conversations and documentation among gynecologic oncology (GO) inpatients. An HI initiative was implemented from January to December 2020 to improve ACP documentation among GO inpatients. Patients admitted to the GO service were given ACP packets with a letter-based ACP worksheet. GO inpatients who were interested in learning more about ACP were visited by medical students trained to lead ACP conversations. ACP documentation rates in the EMR (electronic medical record) pre- and post-intervention were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Associations between sociodemographic characteristics and ACP documentation were analyzed using logistic regression. There were 172 patients admitted in 2019 (pre-implementation cohort). Of these, 45/172 patients (26%) had an advance directive (AD) documented in their electronic medical record (EMR). Following the implementation of the ACP HI in 2020, 55/168 patients (33%) had an AD documented in their EMR. This was a 7% absolute increase and 27% relative increase from pre-intervention AD documentation rates. Increasing age was associated with an increased likelihood of having an AD in the chart (p = 0.004). Married women were less likely to have an AD in their chart (p = 0.05). An HI utilizing a letter-based ACP packet given to GO inpatients improved AD documentation in the EMR. This HI offers a unique method for introducing ACP to patients. More work is needed to improve the occurrence and documentation of ACP conversations.

Serious Illness Treatment Preferences for Older Adults with Advanced CKD.

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care for older adults with CKD requires communication about patient's values, goals of care, and treatment preferences. Eliciting this information requires tools that patients understand and that enable effective communication about their care preferences. METHODS: Nephrology clinic patients age ≥60 years with stage 4 or 5 nondialysis-dependent CKD selected one of four responses to the question, "If you had a serious illness, what would be important to you?" Condensed versions of the options were, "Live as long as possible;" "Try treatments, but do not suffer;" "Focus on comfort;" or "Unsure." Patients also completed a validated health outcome prioritization tool and an instrument determining the acceptability of end-of-life scenarios. Patient responses to the three tools were compared. RESULTS: Of the 382 participants, 35% (n=134) selected "Try treatments, but do not suffer;" 33% (n=126) chose "Focus on comfort;" 20% (n=75) opted for "Live as long as possible;" and 12% (n=47) selected "Unsure." Answers were associated with patients' first health outcome priority and acceptability of end-of-life scenarios. One third of patients with a preference to "Focus on comfort" reported that a life on dialysis would not be worth living compared with 5% of those who chose "Live as long as possible" (P<0.001). About 90% of patients agreed to share their preferences with their providers. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with advanced CKD have diverse treatment preferences and want to share them. A single treatment preference question correlated well with longer, validated health preference tools and may provide a point of entry for discussions about patient's treatment goals.

Development and testing of a frailty-focused communication (FCOM) aid for older adults.

The concept of frailty as it pertains to aging, health and well-being is poorly understood by older adults and the public-at-large. We developed an aging and frailty education tool designed to improve layperson understanding of frailty and promote behavior change to prevent and/or delay frailty. We subsequently tested the education tool among adults who attended education sessions at 16 community sites. Specific aims were to: 1) determine acceptability (likeability, understandability) of content, and 2) assess the likelihood of behavior change after exposure to education tool content. Results: Over 90% of participants "liked" or "loved" the content and found it understandable. Eighty-five percent of participants indicated that the content triggered a desire to "probably" or "definitely" change behavior. The desire to change was particularly motivated by information about aging, frailty and energy production. Eight focus areas for proactive planning were rated as important or extremely important by over 90% of participants.

The earlier the better: the role of palliative care consultation on aggressive end of life care, hospice utilization, and advance care planning documentation among gynecologic oncology patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of specialty palliative care consultation (PCC) on end of life care outcomes among terminally ill gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of currently deceased gynecologic oncology patients seen at a single, academic institution between October 2006 and October 2016. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were examined using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients were eligible. Forty-one percent underwent at least one marker of aggressive care at the end of life. Most (53%) had a PCC prior to death, and of these most were inpatient (89%). Patients with a PCC had higher odds of hospice enrollment before death (OR 2.55, p = 0.016) and higher odds of advance care planning documentation before death (OR 6.79, p = < 0.001). Among patients with an inpatient PCC, 44% underwent a marker of aggressive medical care at the end of life and 82% enrolled in hospice before death. Among patients with an outpatient PCC, 25% underwent a marker of aggressive medical care at the end of life and 92% enrolled in hospice before death. Patients with outpatient PCC were engaged in palliative care longer than patients with inpatient PCC (median 106 days vs. 33 days prior to death). CONCLUSIONS: PCC increased hospice enrollment and advance care planning documentation. Patients with outpatient PCC had lower rates of aggressive medical care and higher rates of hospice enrollment when compared to inpatient PCC. Location of initial PCC plays an important role in end of life care outcomes.

Health Outcome Priorities of Older Adults with Advanced CKD and Concordance with Their Nephrology Providers' Perceptions.

BACKGROUND: Older adults with advanced CKD have significant pain, other symptoms, and disability. To help ensure that care is consistent with patients' values, nephrology providers should understand their patients' priorities when they make clinical recommendations. METHODS: Patients aged ≥60 years with advanced (stage 4 or 5) non-dialysis-dependent CKD receiving care at a CKD clinic completed a validated health outcome prioritization tool to ascertain their health outcome priorities. For each patient, the nephrology provider completed the same health outcome prioritization tool. Patients also answered questions to self-rate their health and completed an end-of-life scenarios instrument. We examined the associations between priorities and self-reported health status and between priorities and acceptance of common end-of-life scenarios, and also measured concordance between patients' priorities and providers' perceptions of priorities. RESULTS: Among 271 patients (median age 71 years), the top health outcome priority was maintaining independence (49%), followed by staying alive (35%), reducing pain (9%), and reducing other symptoms (6%). Nearly half of patients ranked staying alive as their third or fourth priority. There was no relationship between patients' self-rated health status and top priority, but acceptance of some end-of-life scenarios differed significantly between groups with different top priorities. Providers' perceptions about patients' top health outcome priorities were correct only 35% of the time. Patient-provider concordance for any individual health outcome ranking was similarly poor. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of older adults with advanced CKD ranked maintaining independence as their top heath outcome priority. Almost as many ranked being alive as their last or second-to-last priority. Nephrology providers demonstrated limited knowledge of their patients' priorities.

Heartland virus-associated death in tennessee.

BACKGROUND: Heartland virus (HRTV) is a tick-borne phlebovirus recently described in Missouri that is associated with fever, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. The virus has also been detected in Ambylomma americanum ticks. METHODS: Here we report the first fatal case of HRTV disease in an 80-year-old Tennessee resident. He was hospitalized with fever, confusion, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia and developed multiorgan failure and hemorrhage. A tick-borne illness was suspected and testing for ehrlichiosis was negative. He died on hospital day 15, and autopsy specimens were tested for various pathogens as part of an unexplained death evaluation. RESULTS: HRTV antigens were detected in postmortem spleen and lymph nodes by immunohistochemistry, and HRTV was detected in premortem blood by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and by isolation in cell culture. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates that HRTV infection can cause severe disease and death and expands the geographic range of HRTV within the United States.

Senior adult oncology, version 2.2014: clinical practice guidelines in oncology .

Cancer is the leading cause of death in older adults aged 60 to 79 years. The biology of certain cancers and responsiveness to therapy changes with the patient's age. Advanced age alone should not preclude the use of effective treatment that could improve quality of life or extend meaningful survival. The challenge of managing older patients with cancer is to assess whether the expected benefits of treatment are superior to the risk in a population with decreased life expectancy and decreased tolerance to stress. These guidelines provide an approach to decision-making in older cancer patients based on comprehensive geriatric assessment and also include disease specific issues related to age in the management of some cancer types in older adults.

Utilization and determinants of palliative care in the trauma intensive care unit: results of a national survey.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data evaluating utilization of palliative care in trauma intensive care units. AIM: We sought to determine current indications and determinants of palliative care consultation in the trauma intensive care units. DESIGN: Using a cross-sectional assessment, we surveyed trauma surgeons to understand indications, benefits, and barriers trauma surgeons perceive when consulting palliative care. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1232 surveys were emailed to all members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. RESULTS: A total of 362 providers responded (29% response rate). Majority of respondents were male (n = 287, 80.2%) and practiced in Level 1 (n = 278, 77.7%) trauma centers. Most common indicators for referral to palliative care were expected survival 1 week to 1 month, multisystem organ dysfunction >3 weeks, minimal neurologic responsiveness >1 week, and referral to hospice. In post hoc analysis, there was a significant difference in frequency of utilization of palliative care when respondents had access to board-certified palliative care physicians (χ(2) = 56.4, p < 0.001). Although half of the respondents (n = 199, 55.6%) reported palliative care consults beneficial all or most of the time, nearly still half (n = 174, 48.6%) felt palliative care was underutilized. Most frequent barriers to consultation included resistance from families (n = 144, 40.2%), concerns that physicians were "giving up" (n = 109, 30.4%), and miscommunication of prognosis (n = 98, 27.4%) or diagnosis (n = 58, 16.2%) by the palliative care physician. CONCLUSION: Although a plurality of trauma surgeons reported palliative care beneficial, those surveyed indicate that palliative care is underutilized. Barriers identified provide important opportunities to further appropriate utilization of palliative care services.

Connecting Families to Bereavement Resources: A Hospital-Based, Bereavement Follow-Up Pilot During First-Wave COVID-19.

Background: Hospitals often lack bereavement programs. Bereaved families often navigate grief support on their own. This problem was complicated by the early COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: Describe a cost neutral pilot to support next of kin (NOK) of deceased patients from our communicable disease response unit (CDRU) and palliative care unit (PCU). Design: Ad hoc pilot leveraging chaplains and a social worker (SW) to call NOK for grief support using a templated guide, referring interested NOK to bereavement support agencies. Setting/Subjects: NOK of patients who died in the CDRU and PCU at a metropolitan, quaternary care, hospital over five months. Results: One hundred eighty-six patients died. Eighty-one NOK were called, 51 calls were considered complete. Fourteen NOK accepted a referral for bereavement support. Conclusions: This cost neutral pilot successfully connected 81 NOK with either a pilot chaplain or SW for bereavement support. Fourteen NOK accepted referral for a community bereavement resource.

Patient Perceptions of Specialist Palliative Care Intervention in Surgical Oncology Care.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical oncology patients have a high symptom burden and increased risk of morbidity. The aim of palliative care is to evaluate and treat the patient in a holistic manner focusing on the unique attributes of each patient. This goal-concordant approach could help surgical patients cope with the stress and uncertainty that often accompany serious illness and surgery, improving overall outcomes. This qualitative analysis sought to explore whether unmet specialist palliative care or end-of-life needs exist in this population. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were completed with a subset of participants in a randomized, controlled trial of a specialist palliative care intervention for patients undergoing abdominal oncologic surgery. The interview guide sought to elicit respondents' perceptions of palliative care and end-of-life needs perioperatively and postoperatively. Recurring themes were identified by two independent coders. RESULTS: Analysis of 47 interview transcripts revealed few serious concerns about end-of-life issues, however appreciation for the supportive presence offered by palliative care was present. Among participants who received specialist palliative care, many found the intervention helpful, but few were able to articulate issues that the intervention improved. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest low levels of unmet palliative care needs among this population, which is consistent with the results of the parent trial. Targeting patients with a higher symptom burden perioperatively may allow for improved symptom management and better adherence to the treatment plan postoperatively, as well as be a more focused use of specialist palliative care clinicians' efforts.

Palliative care in colorectal and anal malignancies from diagnosis to death.

Colorectal (CRC) and anal (AC) cancer, both lower gastrointestinal (GI) cancers vary in their presentation and treatment. Overall, the incidence of CRC has decreased. However, the incidence of CRCs in younger adults has increased over the last 5 years. The incidence of ACs has increased, too. Women are disproportionally impacted by AC which is frequently associated with human papilloma virus (HPV). Patients diagnosed with both cancers often experience multiple symptoms including pain, constipation, nausea, and vomiting. Psychosocial distress including embarrassment and shame often results from both the cancers itself as well as surgical procedures such as creation of ostomy. Palliative care (PC) is an emerging specialty that focuses on maximizing the quality of life (QOL) for patients through expert symptom assessment and management, psychosocial support, and improved communication around illness. The evidence to support earlier integration of PC has steadily increased over the last ten years. The literature shows that early involvement of PC for these populations can result in improved QOL, improved symptom control and decreased intensity of care at the end of life. This article will review the palliative needs of patients diagnosed with CRC and discuss how PC as a specialty is well poised to support these needs.

Palliative Care Consultation Utilization Among Patient Undergoing Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: In patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis, we sought to: (1) describe patterns of palliative care consultation, (2) evaluate the factors that trigger palliative care consultation, and (3) determine the association of palliative care consultation on longer-term outcomes. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was conducted for patients undergoing spinal metastasis surgery from February 2010 to January 2021. The primary outcome was receiving a palliative care consultation, and the timing of consultation was divided into same hospital stay consultation, preoperative versus postoperative consultation, and early (

Effects of Specialist Palliative Care for Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery for Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Specialist palliative care benefits patients undergoing medical treatment of cancer; however, data are lacking on whether patients undergoing surgery for cancer similarly benefit from specialist palliative care. Objective: To determine the effect of a specialist palliative care intervention on patients undergoing surgery for cure or durable control of cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a single-center randomized clinical trial conducted from March 1, 2018, to October 28, 2021. Patients scheduled for specified intra-abdominal cancer operations were recruited from an academic urban referral center in the Southeastern US. Intervention: Preoperative consultation with palliative care specialists and postoperative inpatient and outpatient palliative care follow-up for 90 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary end point was physical and functional quality of life (QoL) at postoperative day (POD) 90, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Trial Outcome Index (TOI), which is scored on a range of 0 to 56 with higher scores representing higher physical and functional QoL. Prespecified secondary end points included overall QoL at POD 90 measured by FACT-G, days alive at home until POD 90, and 1-year overall survival. Multivariable proportional odds logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test the hypothesis that the intervention improved each of these end points relative to usual care in an intention-to-treat analysis. Results: A total of 235 eligible patients (median [IQR] age, 65.0 [56.8-71.1] years; 141 male [60.0%]) were randomly assigned to the intervention or usual care group in a 1:1 ratio. Specialist palliative care was received by 114 patients (97%) in the intervention group and 1 patient (1%) in the usual care group. Adjusted median scores on the FACT-G TOI measure of physical and functional QoL did not differ between groups (intervention score, 46.77; 95% CI, 44.18-49.04; usual care score, 46.23; 95% CI, 43.08-48.14; P = .46). Intervention vs usual care group odds ratio (OR) was 1.17 (95% CI, 0.77-1.80). Palliative care did not improve overall QoL measured by the FACT-G score (intervention vs usual care OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.75-1.58), days alive at home (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.69-1.11), or 1-year overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.50-1.88). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial showed no evidence that early specialist palliative care improves the QoL of patients undergoing nonpalliative cancer operations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03436290.

Advance Care Planning in Chronically Ill Patients With an Episodic Disease Trajectory in the Acute Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Project.

INTRODUCTION: Advance care planning (ACP) is a fluid discussion between patients and providers to define preferences for future medical care. In the acute care setting, ACP is limited due to lack of structured process for identifying persons who may benefit from ACP. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to increase the frequency of ACP discussions and documentation of preferences by targeting geriatric patients with an episodic disease trajectory for ACP. METHODS: This project used an intervention and comparison group design to target English-speaking, geriatric adults at a large academic medical center with a diagnosis of NYHA class III/IV HF and/or GOLD criteria III/IV COPD for ACP discussions. The intervention group was compared to a group with a range of diagnoses who were approached in a non-systematic way. RESULTS: Thirteen (n = 13) participants completed all aspects of the QI project. Results showed a non-significant increase in the number of patients with a diagnosis of HF and/or COPD who participated in an ACP discussion when compared to the comparison group (n = 20, p = 0.131), as well as a non-significant increase in the number of ACP tools documented in the HER (53.8% compared to 30%) (x = 1.877, p = 0.171). CONCLUSION: While this project demonstrated non-significant statistical results in the incidence and documentation of an ACP tool, this project increased the number of ACP discussions had, which is clinically significant.

Improving Medical and Nurse Practitioner Student Confidence and Clinical Skill in Advance Care Plan Development: A Multidisciplinary Mentorship Model.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is an integral aspect of patient-centered care, however medical (MD) and Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner (AGACNP) students receive minimal education on how to facilitate ACP discussions and ultimately feel uncomfortable having these discussions with patients.1-4 The aim of this project was to increase MD and AGACNP students' perceived ability and confidence in leading ACP conversations through an ACP educational program called the Letter Project Pilot (LPP). METHODS: The LPP consisted of faculty-supervised interactions in the inpatient setting during which students were able to lead ACP discussions with patients by guiding them through an advance directive worksheet that was structured in the format of a letter. Student participants were recruited from the MD and AGACNP programs associated with the academic medical center. Patients were recruited from inpatient medicine and geriatrics units at the academic medical center. At the end of the 3-month pilot, a voluntary, anonymous REDCap survey was used to evaluate 2 primary outcomes of interest:1) the association of the LPP pilot on perceived ACP skills, and 2) the perceived impact of the LPP pilot on ACP in future practice. RESULTS: Students perceived that their experiences positively enhanced their current ACP skills and their ability to have ACP conversations in their future practice. CONCLUSION: The results support that the LPP is a scalable, cost-effective project that increases students' perceived ability and confidence in leading ACP conversations.

A Retrospective Review of the Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients through an Integrated Palliative Care Model during the First Wave of the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic created surges of rapidly deteriorating patients straining health care necessitating the evaluation of novel models of palliative care (PC) integration to reduce patient suffering and hospital strain. Objective: To evaluate an integrated PC model's effect on code status change. Design: This is an observational retrospective study. Setting: Urban quaternary referral center in the southeastern United States from April 6th to August 20th, 2020. Patients: All patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit and stepdown unit were diagnosed with COVID-19. Measurements: Code status change, multivariate regression on patient characteristics. Results: In total, 79.7% (98/123) patients were full code at admission. After PC consultation, 33.3% (41/123) patients remained full code, 13.0% (16/123) were do not resuscitate (DNR), and 53.6% (66/123) changed to DNR/do not intubate (DNI). An ordinal logistic model determined that consultation location (odds ratio [OR] 3.35, p = 0.017) and patient age (OR 1.09, p < 0.001) were predictive of code status change to DNR/DNI. Conclusion: Within an integrated PC model, PC consultation was associated with code status change. The effect of an integrated PC model warrants further study in comparison with a traditional PC model in a similar patient cohort.

Palliative Care Exposure Relative to Predicted Risk of Six-Month Mortality in Hospitalized Adults.

CONTEXT: The optimal strategy for implementing mortality-predicting algorithms to facilitate clinical care, prognostic discussions, and palliative care interventions remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a real-time predictive model for 180 day mortality using routinely available clinical and laboratory admission data and determine if palliative care exposure varies with predicted mortality risk. METHODS: Adult admissions between October 1, 2013 and October.1, 2017 were included for the model derivation. A separate cohort was collected between January 1, 2018 and July 31, 2020 for validation. Patients were followed for 180 days from discharge, and logistic regression with selected variables was used to estimate patients' risk for mortality. RESULTS: In the model derivation cohort, 7963 events of 180 day mortality (4.5% event rate) were observed. Median age was 53.0 (IQR 24.0-66.0) with 92,734 females (52.5%). Variables with strongest association with 180 day mortality included: Braden Score (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.82-0.84); admission Do Not Resuscitate orders (OR 2.61; 95% CI 2.43-2.79); admission service and admission status. The model yielded excellent discriminatory ability in both the derivation (c-statistic 0.873; 95% CI 0.870-0.877; Brier score 0.04) and validation cohorts (c-statistic 0.844; 95% CI 0.840-0.847; Brier score 0.072). Inpatient palliative care consultations increased from 3% of minimal-risk encounters to 41% of high-risk encounters (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We developed and temporally validated a predictive mortality model for adults from a large retrospective cohort, which helps quantify the potential need for palliative care referrals based on risk strata. Machine learning algorithms for mortality require clinical interpretation, and additional studies are needed to design patient-centered and risk-specific interventions.

Statistical analysis plan for the Surgery for Cancer with Option of Palliative Care Expert (SCOPE) trial: a randomized controlled trial of a specialist palliative care intervention for patients undergoing surgery for cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of specialist palliative care intervention in patients undergoing surgery for cancer has not been studied extensively. The SCOPE randomized controlled trial will investigate the effect of specialist palliative care intervention in cancer patients undergoing surgery for selected abdominal malignancies. The study protocol of the SCOPE Trial was published in December 2019. METHODS AND DESIGN: The SCOPE Trial is a single-center, single-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial that will investigate specialist palliative care intervention for cancer patients undergoing surgery for selected abdominal malignancies. The study plans to enroll 236 patients that will be randomized to specialist palliative care (intervention arm) and usual care (control arm) in a 1:1 ratio. RESULTS: The primary outcome of the study is the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) at 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes of the study include the total FACT-G score at 90 days postoperatively, days alive at home without an emergency room visit within 90 days of operation, and all-cause mortality at 1 year after operation. Time frames for all outcomes will start on the day of surgery. CONCLUSION: This manuscript serves as the formal statistical analysis plan (version 1.0) for the SCOPE randomized controlled trial. The statistical analysis plan was completed on 6 April 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03436290 . Registered on 16 February 2018.