Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(3): E402-E410, 2021 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32588956

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the outcomes of urgent/emergent transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVr) and compare the clinical, echocardiographic, and procedural characteristics of survivors and nonsurvivors. BACKGROUND: TMVr is a treatment strategy for select patients with severe primary or secondary mitral regurgitation. However, knowledge regarding outcomes for urgent/emergent TMVr is limited. METHODS: All urgent or emergent TMVr procedures using MitraClip performed at the University of Washington Medical Center between January 2018 and March 2019 were identified and clinical, echocardiographic, hemodynamic, procedural, and outcomes data were obtained by chart review. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, hospital mortality, procedural success, periprocedural complications, and hospital readmission. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients who underwent urgent/emergent TMVr, eight were treated for cardiogenic shock (CS), four for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and eight for ADHF with failure of inpatient medical therapy. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was used in six patients; preceding TMVr in three patients and immediately post-TMVr in three patients. Overall, 30-day mortality and hospital readmission rates were 21 and 13%, respectively. Over a median 153 days (IQR 20-491) of follow-up, 10 patients (50%) died. Preprocedure CS, new or ongoing MCS post-TMVr, refractory respiratory failure post-TMVr, and acute kidney injury post-TMVr were associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In a single-center retrospective analysis, urgent/emergent TMVr in high-risk patients with ADHF or CS was associated with high short-term mortality and periprocedural complications. Prospective studies are warranted to inform patient selection and periprocedural management for urgent/emergent TMVr.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ; 35(3): 533-538, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32880803

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Low-dose rivaroxaban reduced major adverse cardiac and limb events among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD) in the COMPASS trial. The objective of our study was to evaluate the eligibility and budgetary impact of the COMPASS trial in a real-world population. METHODS: The VA administrative and clinical databases were utilized to conduct a cross-sectional study to identify patients eligible for low-dose rivaroxaban receiving care at all 141 facilities between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015. Proportion of patients with stable ASCVD eligible for low-dose rivaroxaban and prevalence of multiple risk enrichment criteria among eligible patients. Pharmaceutical budgetary impact using VA pharmacy pricing. Chi-squared and Student's t tests were used to compare patients eligible versus ineligible patients. RESULTS: From an initial cohort of 1,248,214 patients with ASCVD, 488,495 patients (39.1%) met trial eligibility criteria. Eligible patients were older (74.2 vs 64.5 years) with higher proportion of hypertension (84.1% vs 82.1%) and diabetes (46.2% vs 32.9) compared with ineligible patients (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). A median of 38.7% (IQR 4.6%) of total ASCVD patients per facility were rivaroxaban eligible. Estimated annual VA pharmacy budgetary impact would range from $0.47 billion to $1.88 billion for 25% to 100% treatment penetration. Annual facility level pharmaceutical budgetary impact would be a median of $12.3 million (IQR $8.0-$16.3 million) for treatment of all eligible patients. Among eligible patients, age greater than 65 years was the most common risk enrichment factor (86.9%). Prevalence of eligible patients with multiple enrichment factors varied from 34.2% (one factor) to 6.2% (four or more). CONCLUSION: Over one third of patients with stable ASCVD may qualify for low-dose rivaroxaban within the VA. Additional studies are needed to understand eligibility in other populations and a formal cost-effectiveness analysis is warranted.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Budgets/statistics & numerical data , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cigarette Smoking/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/economics , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Hemorrhage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Rivaroxaban/economics , United States
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 95(5): 893-894, 2020 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32294326

ABSTRACT

Stroke occurs infrequently following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with 30-day and 1-year cumulative incidence of 0.4 and 1.5%, respectively. Patient comorbidities, acute presentations, and complex coronary lesions are more prevalent among patients who sustain a stroke. The occurrence of stroke is associated with higher short-term and overall mortality compared with bleeding or myocardial infarction.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Stroke , Humans , Incidence , Registries , Treatment Outcome
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 95(1): 165-169, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31483078

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No previous reports have examined the impact of robotic-assisted (RA) chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI on procedural duration or safety compared to totally manual CTO PCI. METHODS: Among 95 patients who underwent successful PCI of a single CTO lesion at two centers, 49 (52%) were performed RA and were performed 46 (48%) totally manually. Cockpit time was the time the primary operator entered to robotic cockpit until the procedure was complete. "Theoretical" cockpit time in the control group was time the primary operator would have entered the cockpit after lesion crossing until the procedure was complete. Major adverse events (MAEs) were the composite of death, myocardial infarction, clinical perforation, significant vessel dissection, arrhythmia, acute thrombosis, and stroke. RESULTS: The lesion characteristics, procedural time, and contrast dose were similar. All procedures except for one (2%) selected for robotic completion after lesion crossing were completed successfully. The frequency of MAE was similar between groups and there were no in-hospital deaths. The cockpit time was 8 min longer in RA CTO PCI than the theoretical cockpit time in totally manual CTO PCI (40.6 ± 12.7 vs. 32.1 ± 17.8, p < .01). CONCLUSION: RA CTO PCI was not associated with excess adverse events compared with totally manual CTO PCI and resulted in an average 41 min cockpit time equaling to 48% of procedure time without radiation exposure or requirement for the primary operator to wear a lead apron. Understanding the relationship between cockpit time and reductions in radiation exposure and lead apron-related orthopedic complications for operators requires future study.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Occlusion/therapy , Robotics , Therapy, Computer-Assisted , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/mortality , Coronary Occlusion/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Occlusion/mortality , Coronary Occlusion/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Missouri , Patient Safety , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Robotics/instrumentation , Stents , Therapy, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Washington
5.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 21(11): 146, 2019 11 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31758275

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) complicating acute coronary syndromes (ACS) continues to carry a high rate of morbidity and mortality despite significant advances in EMS and interventional cardiology services. In this review, we discuss an evidence-based approach to the initial care and management of patients with OHCA complicating ACS from the pre-hospital response and initial resuscitation strategy, to advanced therapies such as coronary angiography, targeted-temperature management, neuro-prognostication, and care of the post-arrest patient. RECENT FINDINGS: Early recognition of cardiac arrest and prompt initiation of bystander CPR are the most important factors associated with improved survival. A comprehensive and coordinated approach to in-hospital management, including PCI, targeted temperature management, critical care, and hemodynamic support represents a significant critical link in the chain of survival. OHCA complicated by ACS continues to be one of the most challenging disease states facing healthcare practitioners and maintains a high mortality rate despite substantial advancements in healthcare delivery. A comprehensive approach to in-hospital management and further exploration of novel interventions, including ECMO, may yield opportunities to optimize care and improve outcomes for cardiac arrest patients.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Coronary Angiography , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
6.
Vasc Med ; 22(3): 197-203, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28145152

ABSTRACT

A high SAMe-TT2R2 score predicted poor warfarin control and adverse events among atrial fibrillation patients. However, the SAMe-TT2R2 score has not been well validated in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. A cohort of 1943 warfarin-treated patients with acute VTE was analyzed to correlate the SAMe-TT2R2 score with time in therapeutic range (TTR) and clinical adverse events. A TTR <60% was more frequent among patients with a high (>2) versus low (0-1) SAMe-TT2R2 score (63.4% vs 52.3%, p<0.0001). A high SAMe-TT2R2 score (>2) correlated with increased overall adverse events (7.9 vs 4.5 overall adverse events/100 patient years, p=0.002), driven primarily by increased recurrent VTE rates (4.2 vs 1.5 recurrent VTE/100 patient years, p=0.0003). The SAMe-TT2R2 score had a modest predictive ability for international normalized ratio (INR) quality and adverse clinical events among warfarin-treated VTE patients. The utility of the SAMe-TT2R2 score to guide clinical decision-making remains to be investigated.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Decision Support Techniques , Venous Thromboembolism/blood , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Drug Monitoring/methods , Female , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Racial Groups , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Smoking , Treatment Outcome , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Warfarin/adverse effects
7.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 17(8): e013670, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue (FTR) describes in-hospital mortality following a procedural complication and has been adopted as a quality metric in multiple specialties. However, FTR has not been studied for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing PCI from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry's CathPCI Registry between April 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021. PCI complications evaluated were significant coronary dissection, coronary artery perforation, vascular complication, significant bleeding within 48 hours, new cardiogenic shock, and tamponade. Secular trends for FTR were evaluated with descriptive analysis, and hospital-level variation and clinical predictors were analyzed with logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 2 196 661 patients undergoing PCI at 1483 hospitals, 3.5% had at least 1 PCI complication. In-hospital mortality occurred more frequently following a complication compared with cases without a complication (19.7% versus 1.3%). FTR increased during the study period from 17.1% to 20.1% (P<0.001). The median odds ratio for FTR was 1.48 (95% CI, 1.44-1.53) indicating significant hospital-level variation. Spearman rank correlation demonstrated the modest correlation between FTR and in-hospital mortality, 0.525 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Major procedural complications during PCI are infrequent, but FTR occurs in roughly 1 in 5 patients following a PCI procedural complication with significant hospital-level variation. Improved understanding of practices associated with low FTR could meaningfully improve patient outcomes following a PCI complication.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Registries , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Male , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Risk Assessment , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Failure to Rescue, Health Care , Treatment Outcome , Quality Indicators, Health Care
8.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 11(17): e025607, 2022 09 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36056726

ABSTRACT

Background It is unclear how to geographically distribute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) programs to optimize patient outcomes. The Washington State Certificate of Need program seeks to balance hospital volume and patient access through regulation of elective PCI. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective cohort study of all non-Veterans Affairs hospitals with PCI programs in Washington State from 2009 to 2018. Hospitals were classified as having (1) full PCI services and surgical backup (legacy hospitals, n=17); (2) full services without surgical backup (new certificate of need [CON] hospitals, n=9); or (3) only nonelective PCI without surgical backup (myocardial infarction [MI] access hospitals, n=9). Annual median hospital-level volumes were highest at legacy hospitals (605, interquartile range, 466-780), followed by new CON, (243, interquartile range, 146-287) and MI access, (61, interquartile range, 23-145). Compared with MI access hospitals, risk-adjusted mortality for nonelective patients was lower for legacy (odds ratio [OR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.48-0.72]) and new-CON hospitals (OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.45-0.65]). Legacy hospitals provided access within 60 minutes for 90% of the population; addition of new CON and MI access hospitals resulted in only an additional 1.5% of the population having access within 60 minutes. Conclusions Many PCI programs in Washington State do not meet minimum volume standards despite regulation designed to consolidate elective PCI procedures. This CON strategy has resulted in a tiered system that includes low-volume centers treating high-risk patients with poor outcomes, without significant increase in geographic access. CON policies should re-evaluate the number and distribution of PCI programs.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Government Regulation , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Washington/epidemiology
9.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 15(3): e007979, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35098732

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aspirin is recommended in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease for secondary prevention. In patients without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and not at high 10-year risk, there is no evidence aspirin reduces adverse cardiovascular events and it could increase bleeding. The 2019 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines on Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease state that aspirin may be considered for primary prevention (class IIb) in patients 40 to 70 years that are at higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and that routine use of aspirin should be avoided (class III:Harm) for patients >70 years. We examined the frequency of patients on aspirin for primary prevention that would have been considered unindicated or potentially harmful per the recent guideline where aspirin discontinuation may be beneficial. METHODS: To assess the potential impact, within the National Cardiovascular Disease Registry Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry, we assessed 855 366 patients from 400 practices with encounters between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019, that were receiving aspirin for primary prevention. We defined inappropriate use as the use of aspirin in patients <40 or >70 years and use without a recommended indication as use of aspirin in patients 40 to 70 years with low, borderline, or intermediate 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Frequency of inappropriate use and use without a recommended indication were calculated and practice-level variation was evaluated using the median rate ratio. RESULTS: Inappropriate use occurred in 27.6% (193 674/701 975) and use without a recommended indication in 26.0% (31 810/122 507) with significant practice-level variation in inappropriate use (predicted median practice-level rate 33.5%, interquartile range, 24.1% to 40.8%; median rate ratio, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.67-1.76]). CONCLUSIONS: Immediately before the 2019 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines on Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, over one-fourth of patients in this national registry were receiving aspirin for primary prevention inappropriately or without a recommended indication with significant practice-level variation. These findings help to determine the potential impact of guideline recommendations on contemporary use of aspirin for primary prevention.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Cardiology , Cardiovascular Diseases , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , American Heart Association , Aspirin/adverse effects , Atherosclerosis/diagnosis , Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Atherosclerosis/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Primary Prevention , Registries , United States/epidemiology
10.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(11): e015317, 2020 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32456522

ABSTRACT

Background Patient selection and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have changed over the past decade. However, there is limited information on outcomes for both revascularization strategies in the same population. The study evaluated temporal changes in risk profile, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes for PCI- and CABG-treated patients. Methods and Results We analyzed all PCI and isolated CABG between 2005 and 2017 in nonfederal hospitals in Washington State. Descriptive analysis was performed to evaluate temporal changes in risk profile and, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Over the study period, 178 474 PCI and 36 592 CABG procedures were performed. PCI and CABG volume decreased by 2.9% and 22.6%, respectively. Compared with 2005-2009, patients receiving either form of revascularization between 2014 and 2017 had a higher prevalence of comorbidities including diabetes mellitus and hypertension and dialysis. Presentation with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (17% versus 20%) and cardiogenic shock (2.4% versus 3.4%) increased for patients with PCI compared with CABG. Conversely, clinical acuity decreased for patients receiving CABG over the study period. From 2005 to 2017, mean National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI mortality score increased for patients treated with PCI (20.1 versus 22.4, P<0.0001) and decreased for patients treated with CABG (18.8 versus 17.8, P<0.0001). Adjusted observed/expected in-hospital mortality ratio increased for PCI (0.98 versus 1.19, P<0.0001) but decreased for CABG (1.21 versus 0.74, P<0.0001) over the study period. Conclusions Clinical acuity increased for patients treated with PCI rather than CABG. This resulted in an increase in adjusted observed/expected mortality ratio for patients undergoing PCI and a decrease for CABG. These shifts may reflect an increased use of PCI instead of CABG for patients considered to be at high surgical risk.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/trends , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/trends , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Washington
11.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 12(1): e004817, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30636483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing epidemic that has been linked to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guideline-directed medications for secondary prevention and risk factor control are recommended for patients with all forms of CVD. The association of body mass index (BMI) with use of medications for secondary prevention and risk factor control in patients with CVD are poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 1 122 567 patients with CVD receiving care in 130 Veterans Affairs facilities from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2014. Five groups were stratified by BMI-underweight (BMI, <18.5 kg/m2), normal (BMI, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m2), obese (BMI, 30-39.9 kg/m2), and extremely obese (BMI, ≥40 kg/m2). A composite of 4 measures-blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg, hemoglobin A1c ≤9% in diabetic patients, statin use, and antiplatelet use-termed optimal medial therapy (OMT) was compared among groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with normal BMI as the referent category. Underweight patients comprised 12 623 (1.1%), normal BMI 230 471 (20.5%), overweight 413 590 (36.8%), obese 404 105 (36%), and extremely obese 61 778 (5.5%) of the cohort. Only 43.7% of the entire cohort received OMT, and this was the highest in the overweight group. Adjusted odds ratios for receiving OMT were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85), 1.11 (95% CI, 1.10-1.13), 1.08 (95% CI, 1.06-1.09), and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.89), for patients who were underweight, overweight, obese, and extremely obese, respectively, compared with normal BMI. CONCLUSIONS: OMT was low in the entire cohort. There is an inverse U-shaped relationship between OMT and BMI with patients who are underweight and extremely obese less likely to receive OMT compared with patients with normal BMI.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Obesity/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention/methods , Thinness/drug therapy , Veterans Health , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Pressure , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/epidemiology , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Thinness/diagnosis , Thinness/epidemiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
12.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 46(1): 16-21, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29283294

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: While physicians are typically responsible for managing perioperative warfarin, clinic pharmacists may improve pre-procedural decision-making. We assessed the impact of pharmacist-driven care for chronic warfarin-treated patients undergoing outpatient right heart catheterization (RHC). METHODS: 200 warfarin patients who underwent RHC between January 2012 and September 2015 were analyzed. Pharmacist-care (n = 79) was compared to the usual care model (n = 121). The primary outcome was a composite of (1) documentation of anticoagulation plan, (2) holding warfarin at least 5 days prior to procedure, (3) guideline-congruent low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) bridging, and (4) correct LMWH dosing if bridging deemed necessary. Chi-squared test performed to assess the role of pharmacist. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to the composite endpoint, adjusted for the month of procedure. RESULTS: Compared to the usual care model, pharmacist-driven care (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.73-12.71, p = 0.002) and date of the procedure (OR 1.06/month, 95% CI 1.01-1.10, p = 0.011) were independently associated with the primary composite outcome. Of the individual outcome components, pharmacist-driven care was only associated with documentation (96.2% vs. 67.8%, OR 9.19, 95% CI 2.19-38.62, p = 0.002). Remaining components including hold warfarin for at least 5 days, appropriate bridging and correct LMWH dosing were not significantly associated with pharmacist-care. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist-care is associated with better guideline-based anticoagulation management, but this was primarily driven by improved documentation. The impact of pharmacist managed peri-procedural anticoagulation on clinical outcomes remains unknown.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Documentation , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Monitoring , Female , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Warfarin/therapeutic use
13.
J Thorac Dis ; 10(Suppl 30): S3629-S3636, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30505545

ABSTRACT

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive procedure to treat severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. While the TAVI procedure can be performed safely and provide excellent 5-year results, little is known about long-term durability. TAVI valves are composed of bioprosthetic leaflets are prone to deterioration, which are categorized as structural valve deterioration (SVD) and non-SVD. SVD refers to an intrinsic pathology of the leaflets or stent structure with mechanisms that include leaflet calcification, leaflet tear, stent fracture, or stent creep. Non-SVD processes include valve thrombosis, infective endocarditis and patient prosthesis mismatch. TAVI valves degenerate by similar mechanisms as bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves. Unique mechanisms that contribute to TAVI degeneration include valve crimpling, balloon expansion, stent under-expansion and valve thrombosis. The absence of a universally accepted definition of SVD poses a challenge in estimating valve durability. Traditional surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves have demonstrated excellent durability with clinically relevant SVD of 6.6% at 10-year follow up. Long-term durability of TAVI valves, however, remain poorly defined. From meta-analysis TAVI trials, SVD was estimated at 7% at 5 years. With iterative improvements in TAVI valve construction and deployment techniques, long-term durability may improve. Until long-term outcomes are better understood, TAVI should be used with caution in younger patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL