Predictors of Readmission and Reoperation Following Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Under 45 Years of Age.

BACKGROUND: The use of shoulder arthroplasty has increased among all age groups, albeit most prominently in older patients. While previous studies have investigated predictors of short-term readmission and reoperation in the general population, there is a paucity of literature available on these in patients under 45 years of age. This study aimed to identify the predictors of 30-day readmission and reoperation following shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 45 years of age. METHODS: A retrospective query in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2019 was used to identify patients who underwent primary reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of 30-day readmission and reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 530 patients were included. Multivariate regression revealed that Black race and Hispanic ethnicity were independent predictors of readmission. Functional dependence, hypertension requiring medication, and prolonged length of stay predicted reoperation. Finally, low hematocrit and prolonged length of stay predicted morbidity. DISCUSSION: Identifying and accounting for these risk factors for poor outcomes may help improve perioperative risk stratification. As a result, these findings have the potential to reduce healthcare costs associated with readmission and reoperation following shoulder arthroplasty in young patients. Our results also highlight the underlying disparities in healthcare outcomes among racial and ethnic groups that must be considered.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Outcomes and Perioperative Factors Associated with Posterior Cervical Fusion.

Introduction: While there is anecdotal evidence that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic altered perioperative decision-making in patients requiring posterior cervical fusion (PCF), a national-level analysis to examine the significance of this hypothesis has not yet been conducted. This study aimed to determine the potential differences in perioperative variables and surgical outcomes of PCF performed before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Adults who underwent PCF were identified in the 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 (intrapandemic) NSQIP datasets. Differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. On the other hand, differences in operative time and relative value units (RVUs) were estimated using quantile regression. Furthermore, the odds ratios (OR) for length of stay (LOS) were estimated using negative binomial regression. Secondary outcomes included rates of nonhome discharge and outpatient surgery. Results: A total of 3,444 patients were included in this study (50.7% from 2020). Readmission, reoperation, morbidity, operative time, and RVUs per minute were similar between cohorts (p>0.05). The LOS (OR 1.086, p<0.001) and RVUs-per-case (coefficient +0.360, p=0.037) were significantly greater in 2020 compared to 2019. Operation year 2020 was also associated with lower rates of nonhome discharge (22.3% vs. 25.8%, p=0.017) and higher rates of outpatient surgery (4.8% vs. 3.0%, p=0.006). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a 28% decreased odds of nonhome discharge following PCF and a 72% increased odds of PCF being performed in an outpatient setting were observed. The readmission, reoperation, and morbidity rates remained unchanged during this period. This is notable given that patients in the 2020 group were more frail. This suggests that patients were shifted to outpatient centers possibly to make up for potentially reduced case volume, highlighting the potential to evaluate rehabilitation-discharge criteria. Further research should evaluate these findings in more detail and on a regional basis.

Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Surgery on the Accuracy of Spine Pedicle Screw Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Spinal fusion is a common method by which surgeons decrease instability and deformity of the spinal segment targeted. Pedicle screws are vital tools in fusion surgeries and advancements in technology have introduced several modalities of screw placement. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in robot-assisted (RA) versus fluoroscopic-guided (FG) techniques. The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed from January 2007 through to August 8, 2022, to identify relevant studies. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was determined using the Gertzbein-Robbins (GR) classification system. Facet joint violation (FJV), total case radiation dosage, total case radiation time, total operating room (OR) time, and total case blood loss were collected. Twenty-one articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Successful screw accuracy (GR Grade A or B) was found to be 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 1.01 - 1.04) times more likely with the RA technique. In defining accuracy solely based on the GR Grade A criteria, screws placed with RA were 1.10 (95% confidence interval: 1.06 - 1.15) times more likely to be accurate. There was no significant difference between the two techniques with respect to blood loss (Hedges' g: 1.16, 95% confidence interval: -0.75 to 3.06) or case radiation time (Hedges' g: -0.34, 95% CI: -1.22 to 0.53). FG techniques were associated with shorter operating room times (Hedges' g: -1.03, 95% confidence interval: -1.76 to -0.31), and higher case radiation dosage (Hedges' g: 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 2.10). This review suggests that RA may slightly increase pedicle screw accuracy and decrease per-case radiation dosage compared to FG techniques. However, total operating times for RA cases are greater than those for FG cases.

Comparison of Relative Value Units and 30-Day Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the relative value units (RVUs) and 30-day outcomes between primary and revision pediatric spinal deformity (PSD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PSD surgery is frequently complicated by the need for reoperation. However, there is limited literature on physician reimbursement rates and short-term outcomes following primary versus revision spinal deformity surgery in the pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilizes data obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Pediatric database. Patients between 10 and 18 years of age who underwent posterior spinal deformity surgery between 2012 and 2018 were included. Univariate and multivariate regression were used to assess the independent impact of revision surgery on RVUs and postoperative outcomes, including 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and complications. RESULTS: The study cohort included a total of 15,055 patients, with 358 patients who underwent revision surgery. Patients in the revision group were more likely to be younger and male sex. Revision surgery more commonly required osteotomy (13.7% vs. 8.3%, P =0.002).Univariate analysis revealed higher total RVUs (71.09 vs. 60.51, P <0.001), RVUs per minute (0.27 vs. 0.23, P <0.001), readmission rate (6.7% vs. 4.0%, P =0.012), and reoperation rate (7.5% vs. 3.3%, P <0.001) for the revision surgery group. Morbidity rates were found to be statistically similar. In addition, deep surgical site infection, pulmonary embolism, and urinary tract infection were more common in the revision group. After controlling for baseline differences in multivariate regression, the differences in total RVUs, RVUs per minute, reoperation rate, and rate of pulmonary embolism between primary and revision surgery remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Revision PSD surgery was found to be assigned appropriately higher mean total RVUs and RVUs per minute corresponding to the higher operative complexity compared with primary surgery. Revision surgery was also associated with poorer 30-day outcomes, including higher frequencies of reoperation and pulmonary embolism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE: Navigation has been increasingly used to treat degenerative disease, with positive radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events and reoperations, despite increased operative time. However, short-term analysis on treating adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with navigation is limited, particularly using large nationally represented cohorts. This is the first large-scale database study to compare 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and value-per-operative time for navigated and conventional ASD surgery. METHODS: Adults were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Multivariate regression was used to compare outcomes between navigated and conventional surgery and to control for predictors and baseline differences. RESULTS: 3190 ASD patients were included. Navigated and conventional patients were similar. Navigated cases had greater operative time (405 vs 320 min) and mean RVUs per case (81.3 vs 69.7), and had more supplementary pelvic fixations (26.1 vs 13.4%) and osteotomies (50.3 vs 27.7%) (P <.001).In univariate analysis, navigation had greater reoperation (9.9 vs 5.2%, P = .011), morbidity (57.8 vs 46.8%, P = .007), and transfusion (52.2 vs 41.8%, P = .010) rates. Readmission was similar (11.9 vs 8.4%). In multivariate analysis, navigation predicted reoperation (OR = 1.792, P = .048), but no longer predicted morbidity or transfusion. Most reoperations were infectious and hardware-related. CONCLUSIONS: Despite controlling for patient-related and procedural factors, navigation independently predicted a 79% increased odds of reoperation but did not predict morbidity or transfusion. Readmission was similar between groups. This is explained, in part, by greater operative time and transfusion, which are risk factors for infection. Reoperation most frequently occurred for wound- and hardware-related reasons, suggesting navigation carries an increased risk of infectious-related events beyond increased operative time.

Navigated versus conventional pediatric spinal deformity surgery: Navigation independently predicts reoperation and infectious complications.

Context: Literature on treating pediatric spinal deformity with navigation is limited, particularly using large nationally represented cohorts. Further, the comparison of single-institution data to national-level database outcomes is also lacking. Aim: (1) To compare navigated versus conventional posterior pediatric deformity surgery based on 30-day outcomes and perioperative factors using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and (2) to compare the outcomes of the NSQIP navigated group to those of fluoroscopy-only and navigated cases from a single-institution. Settings and Design: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects and Methods: Pediatric patients who underwent posterior deformity surgery with and without navigation were included. Primary outcomes were 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and complications. The second part of this study included AIS patients < 18 years old at a single institution between 2015 and 2019. Operative time, length of stay, transfusion rate, and complication rate were compared between single-institution and NSQIP groups. Statistical Analysis Used: Univariate analyses with independent t-test and Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used. Multivariate analyses through the application of binary logistic regression models. Results: Part I of the study included 16,950 patients, with navigation utilized in 356 patients (2.1%). In multivariate analysis, navigation predicted reoperation, deep wound infection, and sepsis. After controlling for operative year, navigation no longer predicted reoperation. In Part II of the study, 288 single institution AIS patients were matched to 326 navigation patients from the NSQIP database. Operative time and transfusion rate were significantly higher for the NSQIP group. Conclusions: On a national scale, navigation predicted increased odds of reoperation and infectious-related events and yielded greater median relative value units (RVUs) per case but had longer operating room (OR) time and fewer RVUs-per-minute. After controlling for operative year, RVUs-per-minute and reoperation rates were similar between groups. The NSQIP navigated surgery group was associated with significantly higher operative time and transfusion rates compared to the single-institution groups.

Venous Thromboembolism Rates Have Not Decreased in Elective Lumbar Fusion Surgery from 2011 to 2020.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to (1) evaluate for any temporal trends in the rates of VTE, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and mortality from 2011 to 2020 and (2) identify the predictors of VTE following lumbar fusion surgery. METHODS: Annual incidences of 30-day VTE, DVT, PE, and mortality were calculated for each of the operation year groups from 2011 to 2020. Multivariable Poisson regression was utilized to test the association between operation year and primary outcomes, as well as to identify significant predictors of VTE. RESULTS: A total of 121,205 patients were included. There were no statistically significant differences in VTE, DVT, PE, or mortality rates among the operation year groups. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that compared to 2011, operation year 2019 was associated with significantly lower rates of DVT. Age, BMI, prolonged operation time, prolonged length of stay, non-home discharge, anterior fusion, smoking status, functional dependence, and chronic steroid use were identified as independent predictors of VTE following lumbar fusion. Female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, and outpatient surgery setting were identified as protective factors from VTE in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of VTE after lumbar fusion have remained mostly unchanged between 2011 and 2020. Older age, higher BMI, longer operation time, prolonged length of stay, non-home discharge, anterior fusion, smoking, functional dependence, and steroid use were independent predictors of VTE after lumbar fusion, while female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, and outpatient surgery were the protective factors.

Lumbar fusion during the COVID-19 pandemic: greater rates of morbidity and longer procedures.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered the standard of care for spine surgery in many ways. However, there is a lack of literature evaluating the potential changes in surgical outcomes and perioperative factors for spine procedures performed during the pandemic. In particular, no large database study evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on spine surgery outcomes has yet been published. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative factors and postoperative outcomes of lumbar fusion procedures. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database, which was queried for all adult patients who underwent primary lumbar fusion in 2019 and 2020. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on 2019 (pre-pandemic) or 2020 (intra-pandemic) operation year. Differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity rates were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Differences in total relative value units (RVUs), RVUs per minute, and total operation time were evaluated using quantile (median) regression. Odds ratios (OR) for length of stay were estimated via negative binomial regression. Results: A total of 27,446 patients were included in the analysis (12,473 cases in 2020). Unadjusted comparisons of outcomes revealed that lumbar fusions performed in 2020 were associated with higher rates of morbidity, pneumonia, bleeding transfusions, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and sepsis. 2020 operation year was also associated with longer length of hospital stay, less frequent non-home discharge, higher total RVUs, and higher RVUs per minute. After adjusting for baseline differences in regression analyses, the differences in bleeding transfusions, length of stay, and RVUs per minute were no longer statistically significant. However, operation year 2020 independently predicted morbidity, pneumonia, DVT, and sepsis. In terms of perioperative variables, operation year 2020 predicted greater operative time, non-home discharge, and total RVUs. Conclusions: Lumbar fusion procedures performed amidst the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with poorer outcomes, including higher rates of morbidity, pneumonia, DVT, and sepsis. In addition, surgeries performed in 2020 were associated with longer operative times and less frequent non-home discharge disposition.

Duration of Back Pain Symptoms and Its Relationship to Paralumbar Muscle Volume.

OBJECTIVE: Paralumbar muscle volume has been indicated as an important factor for patients reporting back pain. Our goal was to determine if there is a statistically significant relationship between the duration of patients' back pain symptoms (>12 weeks or ≤12 weeks) and paralumbar muscle volume. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, paralumbar muscles on axial T2-weighted lumbar magnetic resonance images were outlined using ImageJ to determine the paralumbar cross-sectional area (PL-CSA) and lumbar indentation value (LIV) at the center of disc spaces from L1 to L5. The Goutallier classification was determined by the primary author. Quantile regression was performed to compare the PL-CSA, PL-CSA normalized by body mass index, and LIV between the 2 cohorts. Cohort A consisted of patients reporting symptoms ≤12 weeks, and cohort B included patients with symptoms >12 weeks. Negative binomial regression was used to compare Goutallier class. RESULTS: A total of 551 patients operated on by a single surgeon with lumbar magnetic resonance imaging within the past 12 months and recorded duration of symptoms were included. Cohort A consisted of 229 patients (41.6%), and cohort B included 322 patients (58.4%). Statistical significance was not found at any lumbar level for PL-CSA, PL-CSA normalized by body mass index, Goutallier class, and LIV. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that duration of symptoms may not be an accurate indicator for lumbar muscle volume. These novel findings are clinically valuable because lumbar muscle volume has been shown to be a marker for recovery. With this information, patients previously believed to be inoperable because of long-standing symptoms can be reevaluated.

The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index Independently Predicts Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Instrumented Fusion following Extradural Tumor Removal.

Introduction: The management of spinal neoplasia consists of surgical, radiation, and systemic options. Little data exist to guide management based on overall health status, which is particularly challenging when patients who could benefit from surgery may be too frail for it. This study's objective was to evaluate the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) as a predictor of 30-day morbidity in patients undergoing instrumented resection for metastatic extradural spinal tumors. Methods: Adults undergoing extradural tumor resection from the 2011 to 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes 63275-63278 with an adjunct instrumentation code (22840-22843). Patients were classified into frailty levels 0, 1, or 2+ based on mFI-5 scores of 0, 1, or 2-5, respectively. The primary outcome was morbidity. Secondary outcomes were readmission and reoperation. Multivariate modeling was utilized to analyze mFI-5 as a predictor of outcomes. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to compare relative-model-fit based on frailty versus individual comorbidity variables to determine the optimal model. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to establish significance between individual complications and frailty. Results: There were 874 patients. Readmission, reoperation, and morbidity rates were 19.5%, 5.0%, 52.3%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, mFI-5=1 (OR: 1.45, SE: 0.31, p=0.036), mFI-5=2+ (OR: 1.41, SE: 0.40, p=0.036), operative time (OR: 1.18, SE: 0.03, p≤0.001), and chronic steroid use (OR: 1.56, SE: 0.42, p=0.037) independently predicted morbidity. Elective surgery (OR: 0.61) was protective. Frailty did not predict readmission or reoperation. Frailty was found to be significantly associated with respiratory complications, urinary tract infections, cardiac events, and sepsis/septic shock specifically. Conclusions: mFI-5=1 independently predicted 45% increased odds of morbidity. mFI-5=2+ independently predicted 41% increased odds of morbidity. Further, every 30 additional minutes of operative time predicted 18% increased odds of morbidity, suggesting an increased risk of site-related complication events. Taken together, the mFI-5 serves as a valid predictor of morbidity in patients with extradural tumor undergoing instrumented excision.

Association between history of lumbar spine surgery and paralumbar muscle health: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prior studies have suggested that muscle strength and quality may be associated with low back pain. Recently, a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based lumbar muscle health grade was shown to correlate with health-related quality of life scores after spine surgery. However, the potential association between history of lumbar spine surgery and paralumbar muscle health requires further investigation. PURPOSE: To compare MRI-based paralumbar muscle health parameters between patients with versus without a history of surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal disease. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive series of patients who presented to the spine surgery clinic of a single surgeon. OUTCOME MEASURES: MRI-based measurements of paralumbar cross-sectional area (PL-CSA), Goutallier grade, lumbar indentation value (LIV). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive series of patients of a single surgeon, and patients were included based on availability of lumbar MRI. Axial T2-weighted lumbar MRIs were analyzed for PL-CSA, Goutallier classification, and LIV. Measurements were performed at the center of disc spaces from L1 to L5. Patients with and without history of spine surgery were matched based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI) via propensity score matching. Normality of each muscle health variable was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Mann-Whitney U test or independent t-test performed to compare the matched cohorts, as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 615 patients were assessed. For final analysis, 89 patients with a history of previous spine surgery were matched with 89 patients without a history of spine surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, race, ethnicity, or BMI between the matched cohorts. History of spine surgery was generally associated with worse lumbar muscle health. At all 4 intervertebral levels between L1-L5, PL-CSA was significantly smaller among patients with history of spine surgery. At L4-L5, patients with prior spine surgery had significantly smaller PL-CSA/BMI. Patients with prior spine surgery were found to have greater fatty infiltration of the muscles, with higher average Goutallier grades at levels L1-L2, L2-L3, and L4-L5. In addition, history of spine surgery was associated with smaller LIV at L1-L2, L3-L4, and L4-L5. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates that history of lumbar spine surgery is associated with worse paralumbar muscle health based on quantitative and qualitative measurements on MRI. On average, patients with history of spine surgery were found to have smaller cross-sectional areas of the paralumbar muscles, greater amounts of fatty infiltration based on Goutallier classification, and smaller lumbar indentation values.

Adjunct pelvic fixation in short-to-medium segment degenerative fusion constructs independently predicts readmission and morbidity.

Context: Despite increasing utilization of fusion to treat degenerative pathology, few studies have evaluated outcomes with pelvic fixation (PF). This is the first large-scale database study to compare multilevel fusion with and without PF for degenerative lumbar disease. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the 30-day outcomes of multilevel lumbar fusion with and without PF. Settings and Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Subjects and Methods: Lumbar fusion patients were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Regression was utilized to analyze readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and specific complications and to evaluate for predictors thereof. Statistical Analysis Used: Student's t-test was used for continuous variables and Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. Variables significant in the univariate analyses (P < 0.05) and PF were then evaluated for significance as independent predictors and control variables in a series of multivariate logistic regression analyses of primary outcomes. Results: We identified 38,413 patients. PF predicted 30-day readmission and morbidity. PF was associated with greater reoperation in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analyses. PF predicted deep wound infections, organ-space infections, pulmonary complications, urinary tract infection, transfusion, deep venous thrombosis, and sepsis. PF was also associated with a longer hospital stay. Age, obesity, steroids, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥ 3 predicted readmission. Obesity, steroids, bleeding disorder, preoperative transfusion, ASA class ≥3, and levels fused predicted reoperation. Age, African American race, decreased hematocrit, obesity, hypertension, dyspnea, steroids, bleeding disorder, ASA class ≥3, levels fused, and interbody levels fused predicted morbidity. Male gender and inclusion of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) were protective of reoperation. Hispanic ethnicity, ALIF, and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) were protective of morbidity. Conclusions: Adjunctive PF was associated with a 1.5-times and 2.7-times increased odds of readmission and morbidity, respectively. ASA class and specific comorbidities predicted poorer outcomes, while ALIF and CAS were protective. These findings can guide surgical solutions given specific patient factors.

Discharge to Rehabilitation Predicts Increased Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare 30-day readmission and postdischarge morbidity for posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) in patients who were discharged to home versus rehabilitation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: An increasing number of patients are being discharged to postacute inpatient care facilities following spine surgery. However, little research has been performed to evaluate the effect of this trend on short-term outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent PCDF from 2011 to 2018 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvements Program (NSQIP)-database. Regression was utilized to compare primary outcomes between home and rehabilitation groups and to control for predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 8912 patients. Unadjusted analysis revealed that rehabilitation-discharge patients had greater readmission (10.4% vs. 8.0%, P=0.002) and postdischarge morbidity (7.1% vs. 4.0%, P<0.001) rates. After controlling for patient-related factors, rehabilitation-discharge independently predicted postdischarge morbidity (P<0.001, odds ratio=2.232). Readmission no longer differed between groups (P=0.071, odds ratio=1.311). Rates of discharge to rehabilitation increased from 23.5% in 2011 to 25.3% in 2018, while postdischarge morbidity rates remained stagnant.Patients discharged to rehabilitation were older (66.9 vs. 59.4 y); more likely to be African American (21.4% vs. 13.8%) and have diabetes (27.1% vs. 17.5%), steroid use (6.4% vs. 4.7%, P=0.002), and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA)-class ≥3 (80.2% vs. 57.7%); less likely to be male (53.9% vs. 57.4%, P=0.004) and smokers (20.3% vs. 26.6%); and had greater operative time (198 vs. 170 min) and length of hospital stay (5.9 vs. 3.3 d) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite controlling for significant factors, discharge to rehabilitation independently predicted a 2.2 times increased odds of postdischarge morbidity. Rates of discharge to rehabilitation increased overtime without an appreciable decrease in postdischarge morbidity, suggesting that greater resources are being utilized in the postacute care period without an obvious justification. Therefore, home-discharge should be prioritized after hospitalization for PCDF when feasible. These findings are notable in light of reform efforts aimed at reducing costs while improving quality of care.

Impact of Discharge to Rehabilitation on Postdischarge Morbidity Following Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare 30-day postdischarge morbidity for 3-or-more level (multilevel) posterior lumbar fusion in patients who were discharged to home versus rehabilitation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgery has been increasingly performed in the elderly population, with many of these patients being discharged to rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities. However, research evaluating the safety of nonhome discharge following spine surgery is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent multilevel posterior lumbar fusion from 2005 to 2018 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Regression was utilized to compare primary outcomes between discharge disposition and to evaluate for predictors thereof. RESULTS: We identified 5276 patients. Unadjusted analysis revealed that patients who were discharged to rehabilitation had greater postdischarge morbidity (5.6% vs. 2.6%). After adjusting for baseline differences, discharge to rehabilitation no longer predicted postdischarge morbidity [odds ratio (OR)=1.409, confidence interval: 0.918-2.161, P=0.117]. Multivariate analysis also revealed that age (P=0.026, OR=1.023), disseminated cancer (P=0.037, OR=6.699), and readmission (P<0.001, OR=28.889) independently predicted postdischarge morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty days morbidity was statistically similar between patients who were discharged to home and rehabilitation. With appropriate patient selection, discharge to rehabilitation can potentially minimize 30-day postdischarge morbidity for more medically frail patients undergoing multilevel posterior lumbar fusion. These results are particularly important given an aging population, with a great portion of elderly patients who may benefit from postacute care facility discharge following spine surgery.

Is academic department teaching status associated with adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy for degenerative spine diseases?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar laminectomy and discectomy surgeries are among the most common procedures performed in the United States, and often take place at academic teaching hospitals, involving the care of resident physicians. While academic institutions are critical for the maturation of the next generation of attending surgeons, concerns have been raised regarding the quality of resident-involved care. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of resident participation in teaching hospitals on spine surgery patient outcomes. As the volume of lumbar laminectomy and discectomy increases, it is imperative to determine how academic status impacts clinical and economic outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if lumbar laminectomy and discectomy surgeries for degenerative spine diseases performed at academic teaching centers is associated with more adverse clinical outcomes and increased cost compared to those performed at nonacademic centers. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This study is a multi-center retrospective cohort study using a New York Statewide database. PATIENT SAMPLE: We identified 36,866 patients who met the criteria through the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System who underwent an elective lumbar laminectomy and/or discectomy in New York State between January 1, 2009 and September 30, 2014. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary functional outcomes of interest included: length of stay, cost of the index admission; 30-day and 90-day readmission; 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year return to the operating room. METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision codes were utilized to define patients undergoing a laminectomy and/or discectomy who also had a diagnosis code for a lumbar spine degenerative condition. We excluded patients with a procedural code for lumbar fusion, as well as those with a diagnosis of scoliosis, neoplasm, inflammatory disorder, infection or trauma. Hospital academic status was determined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Unique encrypted patient identifiers allowed for longitudinal follow-up for readmission and re-operation analyses. We extracted charges billed for each admission and calculated costs through cost-to-charge ratios. Logistic regression models compared teaching and nonteaching hospitals after adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Compared to patients at nonteaching hospitals, patients at teaching hospitals were more likely to be younger, male, non-Caucasian, be privately insured and have fewer comorbidities (p<.001). Patients undergoing surgery at teaching hospitals had 10% shorter lengths of stay (2.7 vs. 3.0 days, p<.001), but 21.5% higher costs of admission ($13,693 vs. $11,601 p<.001). Academic institutions had a decreased risk of return to the operating room for revision procedures or irrigation and debridement at 30 days (OR:0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.82, p<.001), 90 days (OR:0.75, 95%CI: 0.66-0.86, p<.001), and 1 year (OR:0.84, 95%CI: 0.77-0.91, p<.001) post index procedure. There was no difference in 30- and 90-day all-cause readmission, or discharge disposition between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elective lumbar laminectomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar conditions at teaching hospitals is associated with higher costs, but decreased length of stay and no difference in readmission rates at 30- and 90-days postoperatively compared to nonteaching hospitals. Teaching hospitals had a decreased risk of return to the operating room at 30 days, 90 days and 1 year postoperatively. Our findings might serve as an impetus for other states or regions to compare outcomes at teaching and nonteaching sites.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Multilevel Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospective data. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the clinical, radiographic, and complication-related outcomes through ≥1-year of 27 patients who underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior instrumentation to treat ≥3 contiguous levels of degenerative lumbar scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Multilevel disease has traditionally been treated with open posterior fusion. Literature on multilevel LLIF is limited. We present our experience with utilizing LLIF to treat multilevel degenerative scoliosis. METHODS: Clinical outcomes were evaluated using VAS, SF-12, and ODI. Radiographic outcomes included pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, Cobb angle, and cage subsidence. Perioperative and long-term complications through the ≥1-year final-postoperative visit were reviewed; transient neurological disturbances were assessed independently. Demographic, comorbidity, operative, and recovery variables, including opioid use, were explored for association with primary outcomes. RESULTS: Mean time to final-postoperative visit was 22.5 months; levels treated with LLIF per patient, 3.7; age, 66 years; and lateral operative time, 203 minutes. EBL was ≤100 mL in 74% of cases. Clinical outcomes remained significantly improved at ≥1-year. Cobb angle was corrected from 21.1 to 7.9 degrees (P<0.001), lordosis from 47.3 to 52.6 degrees (P<0.001), and mismatch from 11.4 to 6.4 degrees (P=0.003). High-grade subsidence occurred in 3 patients. Subsidence did not significantly impact primary outcomes. In total, 11.1% returned to the operating room for complication-related intervention over nearly 2-years; 37% experienced complications. Experiencing a complication was associated with having an open-posterior portion (P=0.048), but not with number of LLIF levels treated, or with clinical or radiographic outcomes. No patients experienced protracted neurological deficits; psoas weakness was associated with increased lateral operative time (P=0.049) and decreased surgeon experience (P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent multilevel LLIF with adjunctive posterior surgery had significant clinical and radiographic improvements. Complication rates were similar compared to literature on single-level LLIF. LLIF is a viable treatment for multilevel degenerative scoliosis.