Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Mult Scler ; 17(9): 1141-5, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21561956

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Memory impairment is prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS), but no drugs are approved to treat these memory problems. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the effect of l-amphetamine versus placebo on auditory/verbal memory and visual/spatial memory in MS patients with and without baseline memory impairment. METHODS: We conducted a re-analysis of a previously published clinical trial in which MS patients were randomly assigned to treatment (30 mg l-amphetamine, N = 99) or placebo (N = 37) in a four-week, double-blind, parallel-group, dose titration trial. Auditory/verbal memory (CVLT-II: Long Delay Free Recall) and visual/spatial memory (BVMT-R: Delayed Recall) were assessed at baseline and follow-up across subgroups of patients with intact baseline memory (mean = 50th percentile) or impaired baseline memory (mean = 2nd percentile). Primary analyses: 2 (l-amphetamine, placebo) × 2 (baseline, follow-up), × 2 (baseline memory intact, baseline memory impaired) ANOVAs performed separately for auditory/verbal and visual/spatial memory. RESULTS: For both auditory/verbal and visual/spatial memory, we observed significant 2 × 2 × 2 interactions whereby l-amphetamine improved memory more than placebo, and this effect was specific to patients with baseline memory impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Among memory-impaired patients, memory improved about 48.5% for those on l-amphetamine, but only 1.0% on placebo. Treatment with l-amphetamine produced large memory gains among memory-impaired MS patients.


Subject(s)
Amphetamine/therapeutic use , Memory Disorders/drug therapy , Memory/drug effects , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Adult , Amphetamine/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Memory Disorders/etiology , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Neuropsychological Tests , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Neurosurg ; 102(5): 856-63, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15926710

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: Females comprise an increasing percentage of the athlete population across all age groups, and analysis of recent literature reveals that they sustain more concussions in collegiate sports. Results of human and animal studies indicate that females may have poorer outcomes after traumatic brain injury; however, no return-to-play guideline takes sex or other individual differences into account. In the present study the authors evaluated the influence of patient sex on objective neurocognitive performance and subjective reporting of symptoms following sports-related concussion. METHODS: According to preseason baseline neurocognitive computerized testing in 2340 male and female high school and collegiate athletes, individuals who sustained sports-related concussions (155 persons) were reevaluated using an alternate form of the cognitive test. Sex differences in the magnitude of cognitive change from baseline levels and the subjective experience of symptoms were analyzed. To account for the possible protective effects of helmets, comparisons were performed among females, males with helmets, and males without helmets; none of the female athletes wore helmets. Female athletes had significantly greater declines in simple and complex reaction times relative to preseason baseline levels, and they reported more postconcussion symptoms compared with males. As a group, females were cognitively impaired approximately 1.7 times more frequently than males following concussions. Furthermore, females experienced more objective and subjective adverse effects from concussion even after adjusting for the use of helmets by some groups of male athletes (for example, in football). CONCLUSIONS: Return-to-play decisions and concussion management must be objective and made on an individual basis, including consideration of factors such as patient sex rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all guideline.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/complications , Athletic Injuries/physiopathology , Brain Concussion/complications , Brain Concussion/physiopathology , Cognition/physiology , Adolescent , Female , Head Protective Devices , Humans , Male , Sex Factors
3.
J Neurosurg ; 98(3): 477-84, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12650417

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: Current grading systems of concussion and return-to-play guidelines have little empirical support. The authors therefore examined the relationships of the characteristics and symptoms of concussion and the history of concussion to three indicators of concussion severity-number of immediate symptoms, number of symptoms at the initial follow-up examination, and duration of symptoms--to establish an empirical basis for grading concussions. METHODS: Forty-seven athletes who sustained concussions were administered alternate forms of an Internet-based neurocognitive test until their performances were within normal limits relative to baseline levels. Assessments of observer-reported and self-reported symptoms at the sideline of the playing field on the day of injury, and at follow-up examinations were also obtained as part of a comprehensive concussion management protocol. Although loss of consciousness (LOC) was a useful indicator of the initial severity of the injury, it did not correlate with other indices of concussion severity, including duration of symptoms. Athletes reporting memory problems at follow-up examinations had significantly more symptoms in general, longer durations of those symptoms, and significant decreases in scores on neurocognitive tests administered approximately 48 hours postinjury. This decline of scores on neurocognitive testing was significantly associated with an increased duration of symptoms. A history of concussion was unrelated to the number and duration of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This paper represents the first documentation of empirically derived indicators of the clinical course of postconcussion symptom resolution. Self-reported memory problems apparent 24 hours postconcussion were robust indicators of the severity of sports-related concussion and should be a primary consideration in determining an athlete's readiness to return to competition. A decline on neurocognitive testing was the only objective measure significantly related to the duration of symptoms. Neither a brief LOC nor a history of concussion was a useful predictor of the duration of postconcussion symptoms.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/physiopathology , Brain Concussion/psychology , Trauma Severity Indices , Adolescent , Adult , Amnesia/etiology , Athletic Injuries/complications , Brain Concussion/etiology , Cognition , Female , Humans , Internet , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Telemedicine , Time Factors , Unconsciousness/etiology
4.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol ; 18(3): 293-316, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14591461

ABSTRACT

The Concussion Resolution Index (CRI) is an online assessment tool designed to track resolution of symptoms following sports-related concussion. The CRI is composed of six subtests measuring reaction time, visual recognition, and speed of information processing. Three factors are derived from the subtests: Simple Reaction Time (SRT), Complex Reaction Time (CRT), and Processing Speed (PS). Multiple alternate forms within subtests afford simple, reliable, assessment of change, relative to a baseline test completed by an athlete. The test also assesses self-reported neurophysiological symptoms at the time of injury and tracks resolution of these symptoms. The data demonstrate the CRI is a valid and reliable measure of cognitive performance in a relatively heterogeneous group of athletes aged 13-35. Two methods of statistical analysis for assessing change from baseline were compared to establish a psychometric basis for return-to-play decision-making: the Reliable Change Index (RCI) and multiple regression. Multiple regression was more accurate than the RCI in determining a decline in performance relative to the baseline.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Brain Concussion/etiology , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Decision Making , Internet , Neuropsychological Tests , Sports/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Psychomotor Performance , Recovery of Function
5.
J Neurol Sci ; 340(1-2): 123-9, 2014 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24656433

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Determine reliability and basic psychometric properties of a composite cognitive endpoint, MS-COG, for monitoring change in cognitive function in MS drug trials. BACKGROUND: 50% of MS patients have cognitive impairment that impacts ability to work and quality of life. We selected neuropsychological tests based on sensitivity to MS cognitive impairment, availability of alternate forms, cross-cultural utility, and feasibility for multicenter trials, and assessed the reliability and validity of a composite endpoint, MS-COG. DESIGN/METHODS: Administered SRT, BVMT-R, PASAT, and SDMT to 60 MS patients at 4 US centers twice over 45days, along with symptom inventories by patients and informants. RESULTS: The MS-COG had test-retest reliability of 0.91. Processing Speed and Memory indices had reliabilities of 0.89 and 0.86, with modest practice effects. Reliability was high for the RR MS and SP MS subgroups as well, with correlations of .90 and .93, respectively for MS-COG. Overall, 42% of subjects obtained MS-COG scores in the impaired range, with SP MS subjects performing 0.8 SD below RR MS subjects. Impairment correlated well (r=0.37 to 0.40) with informant reports but was inconsistent with patient report, with the least reliable assessments by those with greater symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS: The MS-COG is a reliable, repeatable measure of MS cognitive functioning that is sensitive to cognitive impairment in SP MS and RR MS patients and feasible for multicenter clinical trials. Further development is warranted.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Memory , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/psychology , Neuropsychological Tests , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Space Perception , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Neurol ; 256(7): 1095-102, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19263186

ABSTRACT

Defects in processing speed and memory are common in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. In other populations, amphetamines have been shown to enhance cognition, but their use is limited by adverse behavioral effects. The L-isomer may have equivalent cognition enhancement with less adverse effects due to decreased potency in subcortical areas. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of L-amphetamine sulfate in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in MS. This was a 2:1 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, involving 33 MS clinics across the USA. One hundred and fifty-one clinically definite MS patients with documented cognitive dysfunction who were relapse free for >or=90 days, with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

Subject(s)
Amphetamine/pharmacology , Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Adult , Amphetamine/adverse effects , Amphetamine/therapeutic use , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Cognition/drug effects , Cognition/physiology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/physiopathology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Learning/drug effects , Learning/physiology , Male , Memory/drug effects , Memory/physiology , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Placebos , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function/drug effects , Recovery of Function/physiology , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 17(5): 458-76, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12802255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We acquired normative data for an Internet neurocognitive screening tool, the Cognitive Stability Index (CSI), and investigated its validity both for initial assessment and for detecting significant change. PARTICIPANTS: Normative data on a nationally representative sample of 284 individuals aged 18 to 89. Validity data was obtained for outpatient groups of mild-to-moderate TBI, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD), and Alzheimer's disease. RESULTS: The CSI subtests resolve to four factors: attention, processing speed, motor speed, and memory with acceptable psychometric properties. Patterns of scores obtained by three groups of patient-participants provided reasonable evidence of clinical validity for screening and monitoring change. CONCLUSIONS: An Internet-based system holds promise for applying complex statistical models for routine monitoring of cognitive function.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/complications , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Health Status , Internet , Mass Screening , Program Development , Telemetry , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL